Internet search by the patients undergoing hernia surgery about the disease and surgeon selection.

AIM: To find out the current status of the internet use of patients who undergo surgery for repair of their hernias. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients who were diagnosed with abdominal wall hernia and scheduled for elective hernia repair were requested to answer a questionnaire. The questions were directed face-to-face by the surgeons themselves. The age, gender, education status, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, place of living, health insurance, access to the Internet, surgical method, the person who did the search, previous hernia surgery, recurrence of previous hernia surgery, surgery other than hernia, and the hernia type were the recorded parameters at the first stage. Then, the answers for three main questions were taken: "Did you make a search about your hernia?", "Did you make a search about your surgeon?", "Would you prefer another surgeon if you could?" RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were included in the study (146 male/54 female). 55.5% of the patients made an Internet search about their hernias. 58.5% of the patients made a search to find a proper surgeon. 12.5% of the patients stated that they would like to go to another surgeon for the hernia repair if it was possible. Internet search rate was significantly higher in younger patients in comparison with older patients. The higher the education level of the patients, the higher the rate of making Internet searches about the hernias and surgeons. Patients who live in the cities more frequently made Internet searches in comparison with those living in towns or villages. Internet searches about the hernias were similar in patients who had a history of hernia surgery (n = 23, 52%), and were even operated for recurrence of the same hernia (n = 30, 60%), compared to other patients (p = 0.569). Similarly, the rates of conducting surgeon research of the patients in these two groups (66.7%, 56.5%, respectively) were statistically similar (p = 0.450). The effect of ASA classification of patients on the Internet researches conducted about the disease and about the surgeons was not statistically significant (p = 0.799, p = 0.388, respectively). It was found that the rates of researching about the disease and about the surgeon on the Internet were significantly higher in patients who had undergone a minimally invasive surgery (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Less than two-thirds of the hernia patients make Internet search about their disease. Higher education level, younger age, patient's preference for minimally invasive surgery and living in a city positively affect Internet search rates.

Return to outdoor walking, car driving, and sexual activity following elective inguinal hernia repair: surgeons' perspective versus patients' reality.

PURPOSE: To determine the time to resumption of outdoor walking, car driving, sports, and sexual activity following elective inguinal hernia repair, and to reveal if there are differences between surgeons' recommendations and patients' real return times. METHODS: A questionnaire including questions about recommendations to hernia patients for times to resume outdoor walking ability without assistance, driving and sexual intercourse after an elective inguinal hernia repair was sent to surgeons. Also, a short questionnaire was sent to patients who had undergone elective inguinal hernia repair to search the exact times for resuming these physical activities. RESULTS: Surgeons' thoughts and recommendations to their patients varied significantly. The range of recommendations were same day to 20 days for outdoor walking, and same day to 3 months both for driving and sexual intercourse. Patients' actual resumption of postoperative activities were 1-14 days for outdoor walking, 1 day to 3 months for driving, and 1 day to 2 months for sexual intercourse. When the answers from the two questionnaires were compared, it was observed that the mean times for resumption of outdoor walking and sexual intercourse were significantly longer in the patients' lives than recommended by the surgeons. Patients ≥ 60 years were able to walk outside, drive, and participate in sexual activity earlier than the younger patients. Bilateral and recurrent hernia repairs caused slower resumption of different activities in comparison to primary hernias. CONCLUSIONS: Patients reported that times for resumption of outdoor walking, driving, and sexual activity were significantly longer than those recommended by surgeons. Age, BMI, bilateral repair, and recurrent hernias were found to be factors affecting return time to different activities.

Individual mesh size for open anterior inguinal hernia repair: an anthropometric study in Turkish male patients.

PURPOSE: To conduct a study to determine the measurements of the inguinal region in male patients with inguinal hernias to reveal the proper mesh size for each patient. METHODS: In this prospective study, the anthropometric measurements were obtained from 100 consecutive adult male patients with unilateral primary inguinal hernias. First, the distance between the pubic tubercle and the medial border of the deep inguinal ring was measured (x). Second, the distance between the inner edge of the inguinal ligament and the uppermost level of the internal oblique aponeurosis at the midpoint of the inguinal ligament corresponding to the Hesselbach triangle was measured (y). Individual mesh sizes were calculated according to the original recommendations for mesh overlap. RESULTS: The mean x value was 41.6 mm (22-55 mm), the mean y value was 45.2 mm (30-68 mm). The mean dimensions of the mesh were 126.6 mm × 65.2 mm. The largest mesh was 140 mm × 88 mm, and the smallest one was 107 mm × 62 mm. The mean mesh area was 8320 mm2. It was larger than the index mesh area recommended by the Lichtenstein Hernia Institute in 45 patients and smaller in 55 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The intraoperative measurements for ideal mesh size in Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernias may present somewhat different mesh dimensions in many patients. Individualization of mesh size may be of importance in surgical outcomes.

Quality of life measures in Islamic rectal carcinoma patients receiving counselling.

AIM: This prospective study was conducted to compare changes in the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and religious practices of patients who underwent surgery for rectal cancer. METHOD: We prospectively followed 93 Muslim patients after surgery for colorectal carcinoma: abdominoperineal excision (APE, n = 50), sphincter-saving resection (LAR, n = 22) or anterior resection including sigmoid colectomy (AR, n = 1). The HRQoL was measured pre- and postoperatively at 15-18 months with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) and a modified version of the American Society of Colorectal Surgeons (ASCRS) Fecal Incontinence questionnaire. Life standards, including religious practice, were measured using the Ankara University Life Standard Questionnaire. RESULTS: No difference was detected in any SF-36 Health Survey HRQoL domain among the groups, although there were differences within groups before and after surgery. The ASCRS Fecal Incontinence questionnaire scales of lifestyle, coping/behaviour and depression/self-perception were similar in the APE and AR groups and were significantly worse than in the AR group (P ≤ 0.004). The embarrassment scale was worse in the APE than in the LAR and AR groups (P < 0.001). Religious worship (praying alone, praying in mosques, fasting during Ramadan and purifying alms) was not significantly different among the groups. CONCLUSION: HRQoL measured by the SF-36 questionnaire and religious practices were not significantly different after APE compared with AR. Ostomy support and pre- and postoperative health-related and religious counselling may have had beneficial effects.