A Phase 2 Exploratory Study of a Novel Interleukin-1 Receptor Inhibitor (EBI-005) in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Allergic Conjunctivitis.

OBJECTIVES: Many allergic conjunctivitis (AC) patients are inadequately treated with conventional therapies or require steroids. EBI-005 was developed to address the late phase allergic response. This study's objectives were to evaluate two adapted clinical models for this indication and to assess safety and biological activity of EBI-005 in AC. METHODS: In this randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled study, 159 subjects with moderate-to-severe AC were randomized to topical EBI-005 (5 mg/mL) or vehicle control given 3 times per day and repeatedly challenged with allergen using an adaptation of 2 clinical models of AC. Subjects were assigned to repetitive aerosolized challenge in an allergy chamber (Environmental Exposure Chamber, EEC), or repetitive challenges with a direct conjunctival allergen challenge (Conjunctival Allergen Provocation Test, CAPT). RESULTS: In the EEC, the prespecified primary endpoint of ocular itching was not met. In the CAPT, EBI-005-treated subjects showed clinically meaningful, statistically significant improvements in ocular itching compared with vehicle control at the final 2 efficacy time points, visit 6 (P=0.033) and visit 7 (P=0.046). EBI-005-treated subjects showed statistically significant improvement compared with vehicle control for ocular tearing (P=0.027 and P=0.044) and nasal symptoms (P=0.004 and P=0.011) at visit 6 and visit 7. EBI-005 was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: These results support use of an adapted, multiple-challenge, direct conjunctival allergen model to assess efficacy of EBI-005 in late phase AC. In the CAPT, EBI-005 showed statistically significant improvements in clinically meaningful symptoms (ocular itching, tearing, and nasal symptoms) at multiple time points for moderate-to-severe AC subjects.

Bioanalytical method validation for macromolecules in support of pharmacokinetic studies.

The development and validation of ligand binding assays used in the support of pharmacokinetic studies has been the focus of various workshops and publications in recent years, all in an effort to establish a guidance document for standardization of these bioanalytical methods. This summary report of the workshop from 2003 focuses on the issues discussed in presentations and notes points of discussion and areas of consensus among the participants.

Recommendations for the bioanalytical method validation of ligand-binding assays to support pharmacokinetic assessments of macromolecules.

PURPOSE: With this publication a subcommittee of the AAPS Ligand Binding Assay Bioanalytical Focus Group (LBABFG) makes recommendations for the development, validation, and implementation of ligand binding assays (LBAs) that are intended to support pharmacokinetic and toxicokinetic assessments of macromolecules. METHODS: This subcommittee was comprised of 10 members representing Pharmaceutical, Biotechnology, and the contract research organization industries from the United States, Canada, and Europe. Each section of this consensus document addresses a specific analytical performance characteristic or aspect for validation of a LBA. Within each section the topics are organized by an assay's life cycle, the development phase, pre-study validation, and in-study validation. Because unique issues often accompany bioanalytical assays for macromolecules, this document should be viewed as a guide for designing and conducting the validation of ligand binding assays. RESULTS: Values of +/- 20% (25% at the lower limit of quantification [LLOQ]) are recommended as default acceptance criteria for accuracy (% relative error [RE], mean bias) and interbatch precision (%coefficient of variation [CV]). In addition, we propose as secondary criteria for method acceptance that the sum of the interbatch precision (%CV) and the absolute value of the mean bias (%RE) be less than or equal to 30%. This added criterion is recommended to help ensure that in-study runs of test samples will meet the proposed run acceptance criteria of 4-6-30. Exceptions to the proposed process and acceptance criteria are appropriate when accompanied by a sound scientific rationale. CONCLUSIONS: In this consensus document, we attempt to make recommendations that are based on bioanalytical best practices and statistical thinking for development and validation of LBAs.

Treatment with humanized monoclonal antibodies against CD80 and CD86 combined with sirolimus prolongs renal allograft survival in cynomolgus monkeys.

BACKGROUND: Co-stimulatory blockade has been shown to prolong allograft survival in different transplant models. We investigated the effect of combining humanized anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) with sirolimus in cynomolgus monkey renal transplant recipients. METHODS: After renal transplantation, groups of four animals were treated daily with sirolimus, sirolimus and nine weekly doses of mAb, two weekly doses of mAb, or sirolimus and two weekly doses of mAb. RESULTS: Survival was significantly better in monkeys treated with the combination of sirolimus and mAb when compared with treatment with either agent alone (P=0.0067 by log-rank analysis). When combined with sirolimus, nine weekly doses of mAb did not result in an additional survival benefit compared with only two mAb doses (P=0.74). None of the treatment regimens used in this study resulted in development of transplantation tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: Sirolimus can be successfully combined with humanized mAb against CD80 and CD86. Induction with a short course of mAb is effective in prolonging allograft survival in combination with sirolimus.

Antibody-based therapeutics in oncology.

The recent clinical and commercial success of anticancer antibodies, such as rituximab (Rituxan) and trastuzumab (Herceptin) has created great interest in antibody-based therapeutics for hematopoietic malignancies and solid tumors. Given the likely lower toxicity for antibodies versus small molecules, the potential increase in efficacy by conjugation to radioisotopes and other cellular toxins and the ability to characterize the target with clinical laboratory diagnostics to improve the drug's clinical performance, it is anticipated that current and future antibody therapeutics will find substantial roles alone and in combination therapy strategies for the treatment of patients with cancer. It is also likely that conjugation strategies will add new radiolabeled and toxin-linked products to the market to complement the recent approvals of ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) and gemtuzumab ozogamycin (Mylotarg). However, although there are a large number of agents in both early and later stages of clinical development, only a handful will make it through regulatory approval and become successful products. This review considers the structure of anticancer therapeutic antibodies, the techniques used to reduce their antigenicity, factors that influence efficacy and toxicity, conjugation with isotopes and toxins and antibody target validation.

Combination induction therapy with monoclonal antibodies specific for CD80, CD86, and CD154 in nonhuman primate renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Antibodies and fusion proteins specific for CD80, CD86, and CD154 have shown promise as agents capable of inducing donor-specific tolerance in rodents. These agents have also been shown to be synergistic with one another in many settings of counter-adaptive immunity. In the nonhuman primate, monoclonal antibodies specific for CD80 and CD86 have prolonged the time to rejection of renal allografts but have not resulted in tolerance. A monoclonal antibody specific for CD154 has resulted in markedly prolonged survival of kidney, islet, cardiac, and skin allografts, but again most animals have eventually developed rejection after prolonged periods of rejection-free survival off therapy. METHODS: A combination of monoclonal antibodies specific for CD80, CD86, and CD154 were used in a mismatched nonhuman primate renal-allograft model. Doses used were based on optimized treatment protocols for each agent individually. RESULTS: Treatment of four rhesus macaques with this combination yielded a mean rejection-free survival of 565 days (311-911 days), significantly greater than untreated controls (mean survival=7.0 days, P=0.001) and animals treated with only a combination of anti-CD80 and CD86 (mean survival=191 days, P=0.01). The survival of animals treated with this combination of monoclonal antibodies was not significantly greater than those treated with anti-CD154 alone, but the production of alloantibody was delayed compared with monotherapy anti-CD154. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that a synergy exists between these agents, particularly with regard to T-dependent B-cell responses, but that they fail to induce durable tolerance in nonhuman primates.

Measurement of human interleukin 11.

This unit describes an ELISA and a cell proliferation assay that can be used, respectively, to measure the protein level or biologic activity of human and murine interleukin 11 (IL-11). The bioassay is based on the ability of IL-11 to support growth of the B9-11 cell line, a subline of B9 that has traditionally been used to measure levels of IL-6. B9-11 is substantially more responsive to IL-11 than the T10 line used in older protocols. This new bioassay therefore provides improved sensitivity, with a detection limit of 20 pg/ml. An alternate procedure is provided that employs neutralizing antibodies in the cell proliferation bioassay to use to ensure that the activity of the desired molecule (IL-11) is being measured in samples containing multiple cytokines. A describes maintenance of B9-11 cells.