Long-term response of different Botulinum toxins in refractory neurogenic detrusor overactivity due to spinal cord injury

ABSTRACT Purpose To assess the response in spinal cord injured patients alternatively treated with different types and dosages of Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) over 15 years. Material and methods Patients who underwent first BoNT/A from 1999-2001 and practiced intermittent catheterization were included. Baseline 3-day bladder diary (BD) and urodynamics were collected. BoNT/A failure was defined when patients asked for re-injection ≤ 3 months post-treatment. Criteria for re-injection was at least one daily episode of urinary incontinence at BD. Before re-injection, patients were asked if they had reached 6 months of dryness without antimuscarinics (YES response). Results Overall, 32/60 (53.4%) "No failure" (NF) group; 16 (26.6%) "occasional failure" (OF) and 12 (20%) "consecutive failure" (CF) were included. A total of 822 BoNT/A infiltrations were performed. The mean interval from previous injection to treatment re-scheduling was 8 months. No significant differences between treatments were found within the three groups (p>0.05). The percentage of YES responses increased from 19% (AboBoNT/A 500IU) to 29 % (OnaBoNT/A 300IU) in NF, and from 18% (AboBoNT/A 500IU) to 25% (OnaBoNT/A 300IU) for OF. Five NF cases (15.6%) maintained 6 months of dryness after each injection. Among the baseline variables, only low compliance (< 20mL/cmH2O) was found as predictor for failure (p=0.006). Conclusions Long term BoNT/A for NDO did not increase failures, independent of the types of treatments and switching. Definition of failure and other criteria for continuing repetitive BoNT/A treatment is mandatory. CF was predictable for no response in earlier follow-up.

Long-term response of different Botulinum toxins in refractory neurogenic detrusor overactivity due to spinal cord injury.

PURPOSE: To assess the response in spinal cord injured patients alternatively treated with different types and dosages of Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) over 15 years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who underwent first BoNT/A from 1999-2001 and practiced intermittent catheterization were included. Baseline 3-day bladder diary (BD) and urodynamics were collected. BoNT/A failure was defined when patients asked for re-injection ≤ 3 months post-treatment. Criteria for re-injection was at least one daily episode of urinary incontinence at BD. Before re-injection, patients were asked if they had reached 6 months of dryness without antimuscarinics (YES response). RESULTS: Overall, 32/60 (53.4%) "No failure" (NF) group; 16 (26.6%) "occasional failure" (OF) and 12 (20%) "consecutive failure" (CF) were included. A total of 822 BoNT/A infiltrations were performed. The mean interval from previous injection to treatment re-scheduling was 8 months. No significant differences between treatments were found within the three groups (p>0.05). The percentage of YES responses increased from 19% (AboBoNT/A 500IU) to 29 % (OnaBoNT/A 300IU) in NF, and from 18% (AboBoNT/A 500IU) to 25% (OnaBoNT/A 300IU) for OF. Five NF cases (15.6%) maintained 6 months of dryness after each injection. Among the baseline variables, only low compliance (< 20mL/cmH2O) was found as predictor for failure (p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Long term BoNT/A for NDO did not increase failures, independent of the types of treatments and switching. Definition of failure and other criteria for continuing repetitive BoNT/A treatment is mandatory. CF was predictable for no response in earlier follow-up.

Treating erectile dysfunction and central neurological diseases with oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors. Review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is reported in a high percentage of patients with central neurological disorders (CND). AIM: An up-to-date review on oral phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5): sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil for individuals with CND and ED. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Various questionnaires on ED, such as the International Index of Erectile Function composed of 15 questions. METHODS: Internationally published clinical studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of PDE5 on subjects with CND and ED were selected. RESULTS: Overall, 28 articles on PDE5 used to treat patients with CND and ED were included. With each of the three PDE5 compared to placebo or erectile baseline, literature reported significant statistical improvement (P < 0.01; P < 0.05) only in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). PDE5 efficacy was documented for SCI patients up to 10 years. The most frequent predicable factor for PDE5 success was the presence of upper motoneuron lesion. Each of the three clinical sildenafil studies documented statistically significant improvement on erectile function in Parkinson's patients (P < 0.01; P < 0.05). Two studies reported discordant results about sildenafil's effectiveness on multiple sclerosis (MS) patients; one on tadalafil showed significant statistical efficacy on erection versus baseline (P < 0.01; P < 0.05). The only spina bifida article determined that sildenafil remarkably improved erectile function. Overall, drawbacks were mostly slight-moderate, except in subjects with multiple system atrophy where sildenafil caused severe hypotension. CONCLUSIONS: PDE5 represent first line ED therapy only for SCI patients, though treatment results through meta-analysis were not possible. Encouraging results are reported for Parkinson's and MS patients. PDE5 use for other CND patients is limited for various reasons, such as ED and concomitant libido impairment caused by depression and/or sexual endocrinology dysfunctions, and because PDE5 may cause a worsening of neurological illness. Medical centers staffed by health professionals able to counsel patients on the possible use of PDE5 are needed.

Female sexual dysfunction and hormonal status in multiple sclerosis patients.

INTRODUCTION: Literature holds no information on a correlation between blood hormonal levels, in particular sex hormones and the sexual response of women with multiple sclerosis (MS). AIM: To investigate a possible correlation between hormonal status and the sexual response of females with MS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire was used to determine sexual dysfunctions (SDs). Methods for measuring blood hormones were chemiluminescence immunoassay, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, enzyme immunoassay, and radioimmunoassay. METHODS: During the screening phase, 55 women of reproductive age were recruited and completed the FSFI. In the first phase of the study females underwent a hematic hormonal evaluation on the third day of their menstrual cycle. Serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), prolactin (PRL), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEA-S), androstenedione, 17[alpha]-hydroxyprogesterone, total and free testosterone, 17 beta estradiol, inhibin and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), and thyroid hormones (fT3 and fT4) were checked. On the day 20-21 into their menstrual cycle the progesterone hematic value was noted. Patients with amenorrhea had all hormones tested once with a random blood drawing. After a 3-month period patients began phase 2, completing the FSFI again. The same blood hormones were investigated. RESULTS: Fifty-four females completed the study. Thirty-one continued to manifest at least one SD: desire (57.4%) was the most common. Overall, 36.4% showed abnormal hormonal alterations. The most frequent was 40% for 17 beta-estradiol. None of the FSFI domains, including the total score, revealed any statistically significant correlation to the hormones investigated. No statistically significant clinical predictive factors for blood hormone abnormalities were detected; comparing females with and without SD, P = 0.250 using chi-squared test was reached. CONCLUSIONS: Notable percentages of blood hormonal alterations and SD were documented, but no significant statistical correlations were detected between hormonal status and sexual function.

Vardenafil improves urodynamic parameters in men with spinal cord injury: results from a single dose, pilot study.

PURPOSE: We assessed urodynamic changes after vardenafil administration in spinal cord injured male patients on oxybutynin treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a single center, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial in 25 patients with spinal cord injury who had erectile dysfunction and micturition disorders. A baseline urodynamic test was performed as well as a second urodynamic test 1 to 3 hours after the administration of 20 mg vardenafil and placebo in 15 and 10 cases, respectively. In all patients standard oral oxybutynin administration was not discontinued. Statistical assessment included the 3 urodynamic parameters maximum detrusor pressure during voiding, maximum cystometric capacity and detrusor overactivity volume. RESULTS: Placebo administration did not affect urodynamic parameters. After vardenafil administration maximum detrusor pressure was significantly decreased (59.3 vs 52.1 cm H(2)O, p <0.001) and maximum cystometric capacity considerably improved (233.5 vs 272 ml, p <0.001). The most dramatic variations were observed for detrusor overactivity volume (174 vs 218 ml, p <0.0001). In 7 patients with American Spinal Injury Association classification A and spinal cord injury above T6 we observed the most significant improvement in the evaluated urodynamic items, including maximum detrusor pressure 57 vs 52 cm H(2)O (p = 0.039), maximum cystometric capacity 253 vs 296 ml (p = 0.004) and detrusor overactivity volume 177 vs 229 ml (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: This trial demonstrates that in spinal cord injured patients a single 20 mg vardenafil administration achieved a significant decrease in maximum detrusor pressure, an improvement in maximum cystometric capacity and a remarkable increase in detrusor overactivity volume value.