Does Geography Play a Role in the Receipt of End-of-Life Care for Advanced Cancer Patients? Evidence from an Australian Local Health District Population-Based Study.

Objectives: To assess the influence of geographic remoteness on health care utilization at end of life (EOL) by people with advanced cancer in a geographically diverse Australian local health district, using two objective measures of rurality and travel-time estimations to health care facilities. Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined the association between rurality (using the Modified Monash Model) and travel-time estimation, and demographic and clinical factors, with the receipt of >1 inpatient and outpatient health service in the last year of life in multivariate models. The study cohort comprised of 3546 patients with cancer, aged ≥18 years, who died in a public hospital between 2015 and 2019. Results: Compared with decedents from metropolitan areas, decedents from some rural areas had higher rates of emergency department visits (small rural towns: aRR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.07-1.57) and ICU admissions (large rural towns: aRR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.03-1.69), but lower rates of acute hospital admissions (large rural towns: aRR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76-0.90), inpatient palliative care (PC) (regional centers: aRR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75-0.97), and inpatient radiotherapy (lowest in small rural towns: aRR 0.07, 95% CI: 0.03-0.18). Decedents from rural and regional centers had lower rates of outpatient chemotherapy and radiotherapy use, yet higher rates of outpatient cancer service utilization (p < 0.05). Shorter travel times (10-<30 minutes) were associated with higher rates of inpatient specialist PC (aRR 1.48, 95% CI: 1.09-1.98). Conclusions: Reporting on a series of inpatient and outpatient services used in the last year of life, measures of rurality and travel-time estimates can be useful tools to estimate geographic variation in EOL cancer care provision, with significant gaps uncovered in inpatient PC and outpatient service utilization in rural areas. Policies aimed at redistributing EOL resources in rural and regional communities to reduce travel times to health care facilities could help to reduce regional disparities and ensure equitable access to EOL care services.

Challenges and strategies to improve the provision of end-of-life cancer care in rural and regional communities: Perspectives from Australian rural health professionals.

OBJECTIVE: To identify challenges and strategies to improve the provision of end-of-life (EOL) cancer care in an underserved rural and regional Australian local health district (LHD) from the perspective of general practitioners (GPs) and specialist clinicians while exploring the benefits of adopting a generalist health care approach to delivering EOL care in rural and regional communities. SETTING: Rural and regional Australia. PARTICIPANTS: General practitioners and palliative care and cancer care specialists (medical and nursing) involved in the provision of EOL care to people with advanced cancer in the rural and regional areas of an Australian LHD. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive study involving 22 participants in four face-to-face and online focus groups. Thematic analysis of the transcripts identified key issues affecting EOL care for people with advanced cancer in rural and regional areas of the LHD. RESULTS: Four themes including geographical remoteness, system structures, medical management and expertise and training emerged from the focus groups. Key barriers to effective EOL care included insufficient remuneration for GPs and other clinicians (especially home visits), resource limitations, limited community awareness of palliative care and lack of confidence and training of clinicians. Continuity of care was identified as an important facilitator to effective EOL care. Participants suggested greater Medicare rebates for palliative care and home visits, adequate equipment and resources, technology-enabled clinician training and greater rural-based training for specialist PC clinicians may improve the provision of EOL care in regional and rural communities. CONCLUSIONS: Rural-based clinicians delivering EOL cancer care appear to be disproportionately affected by geographical challenges including resource and funding limitations. A multi-pronged strategy aimed at greater interdisciplinary collaboration, community awareness and greater resourcing and funding could help to improve the provision of EOL care in underserved rural and remote communities of Australia.

End-of-Life Cancer Care Resource Utilisation in Rural Versus Urban Settings: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Despite the advances in End-of-life (EOL) cancer care, disparities remain in the accessibility and utilisation of EOL cancer care resources. Often explained by socio-demographic factors, geographic variation exists in the availability and provision of EOL cancer care services among EOL cancer decedents across urban versus rural settings. This systematic review aims to synthesise mortality follow-back studies on the patterns of EOL cancer care resource use for adults (>18 years) during end-of-life cancer care. METHODS: Five databases were searched and data analysed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria involved; a) original research; b) quantitative studies; c) English language; d) palliative care related service use in adults (>18 years) with any malignancy excluding non-melanoma skin cancers; e) exclusive end of life focus; f) urban-rural focus. Narrative reviews and discussions were excluded. RESULTS: 24 studies met the inclusion criteria. End-of-life cancer care service utilisation patterns varied by rurality and treatment intent. Rurality was strongly associated with higher rates of Emergency Department (ED) visits and hospitalisations and lower rates of hospice care. The largest inequities between urban and rural health service utilisation patterns were explained by individual level factors including age, gender, proximity to service and survival time from cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Rurality is an important predictor for poorer outcomes in end-of-life cancer care. Findings suggest that addressing the disparities in the urban-rural continuum is critical for efficient and equitable palliative cancer care. Further research is needed to understand barriers to service access and usage to achieve optimal EOL care for all cancer patient populations.