To what extent do people living with HIV, people on pre-exposure prophylaxis, doctors and pharmacists endorse 90-day dispensing of antiretroviral therapy in France?

JUSTIFICATION: The WHO 95-95-95 targets for 2030 do not imply that people living with HIV (PLHIV) achieve a good quality of life. The current 30-day dispensing interval for antiretroviral (ART) burdens the healthcare system. Lengthening dispensing intervals could alleviate this burden as well as enhance patient well-being. OBJECTIVES: To capture perceptions on 90-day dispensing interval (90D) for ART from the perspective of PLHIV, people on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), doctors, and pharmacists. METHODS: Multi-centre observational survey led in France from 16 to 20 October 2020, among doctors agreeing to participate via regional coordinated care organisations for HIV, all PLHIV or people on PrEP consulting these outpatient-clinic doctors, and pharmacists doing ART dispensing. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 220 doctors who saw 1087 people (999 PLHIV; 88 on PrEP) and 176 pharmacists from 55 centres. Among the PLHIV, 855 (85.6%, 95% CI: 83.2%-87.7%) and among the patients on PrEP, 70 (79.5%, 95% CI: 69.6%-87.4%) stated they would be interested in 90D. All in all, patients who were more likely to endorse 90D are those who opt exclusively for hospital dispensing (OR 3.22 [1.57-6.58]) and who rotate between hospital and community pharmacy dispensing (OR 3.29 [1.15-9.32]). Patients who were less likely to endorse 90-D were those who consult in a city located outside the 3 French high HIV prevalence regions (OR 0.66 [0.44-0.99]), receive 2 vs 1 pill QD regimens (OR 0.53 [0.31-0.91]), and anticipate at least one vs no limitation to 90D (OR 0.27 [0.17-0.42]). 90D was perceived as possible by 152 pharmacists (86.4%), including 8 (5%) without restriction, and 219 doctors (99.6%), including 42 (19.2%) regardless of PLHIV's immunovirologic status or social conditions (health insurance coverage, access to housing or accommodation, access to rights, resources). Comparison of the benefits and limitations of a 90-day ART dispensing interval as perceived by PLHIV and people on PrEP, doctors and pharmacists shows that doctors anticipate a higher number of benefits than people on ART and/or pharmacists, chiefly that 90D would be more convenient and create less risk of drug shortages and that patients would gain autonomy and a better quality of life. Pharmacists were found to clearly perceive the economic benefits (90D would be less expensive) but anticipate more drawbacks than doctors and the people on ART themselves: more administrative burdens, more non-dispensing if doses get lost, harder to track adherence and more drug-drug interaction issues, and more work as they shall have to warn the patient of potential risks of shortages due to the cost of the stock. CONCLUSION: A clear majority of PLHIV, people on PrEP, doctors, and pharmacists endorsed 90D of ART. Most patients thought that 90D would be a good option, whereas most pharmacists and doctors thought that eligibility for 90D dispensing should depend on immunovirologic factors and social condition criteria. Moreover, pharmacists thought it would be necessary to commit regulatory resources and a better follow-up on adherence and drug-drug interactions.

Pharmacist's role in HIV care in France. Implication for clinical improvement of people living with HIV worldwide.

In France, antiretroviral (ARV) treatment can be dispensed by hospital and/or community pharmacies. Since January 2016, an online patient medication file can be used to optimize dispensing, but medication interviews have not yet been incorporated into this system. To understand both people living with HIV (PLHIV) and their pharmacists' habits and expectations of patient medication file and interviews, two consecutive national surveys were organized. The first one, carried out in October 2016 in care centers, was an anonymous questionnaire for PLHIV. The second one was an online survey for community and hospital pharmacies conducted in February 2017. A total of 1137 PLHIV (68% men, of mean age 50.2 ± 11.5 years, CD4 count 671 ± 354, 90% with undetectable HIV viral load (VL) and 64.2% reporting comorbidities) and 246 pharmacies responded. While the existence of the online medication file is known by 58% of PLHIV, only 40% of pharmacists declare it to be systematically offered. It was offered to 120/694 (17%) PLHIV and 96 (80%) accepted it. Currently, 78 (7%) PLHIV feel well taken care of because they are offered medication interviews, 343/1078 (32%) would like to take advantage of this program, mainly those with a shorter ARV duration (OR ARV duration 0.97 [0.95-0.99]), a VL less often undetectable (OR undetectable VL 0.55 [0.31-0.98]), and those who feel anxious more often (OR anxious 2.38 [1.48-3.84]). These results suggest that better implementation of medication files and interviews will strengthen current clinical pathways.

Dispensation des antirétroviraux pour une durée de plus d'un mois : retour sur une recherche exploratoire qualitative.

This article presents the results of a qualitative research on practices of dispensing antiretroviral medication concerning requests for greater than one month, for departure abroad. In spite of a strict regulation, a cartography shows a heterogeneity of its application leading to a great diversity of dispensing practices. This qualitative research with 22 pharmacies across the territory reveals relational and regulatory logics that contribute to this non-uniformity of practices. The concepts of embarrassment, professional commitment, regulatory concerns and personal relationships with patients largely explain the accommodations and crafts observed in this type of ARV dispensing request.

Formation et conditions facilitant l'intégration de patients dans la coanimation de séances collectives d'éducation thérapeutique.

PURPOSE OF RESEARCH: The purpose of this research was to promote the involvement and intervention of patient-partners (PPs) in collective sessions of therapeutic patient education (TPE), including training and support for the implementation of these sessions, in co-facilitation with a health professional (HP). Therefore, the matter was to co-construct a training model, to experiment with its implementation and to define favorable conditions for this collaboration. METHODS: Collaborative research oriented by the design, led by a steering committee representative of different categories of stakeholders, which has been spread over 2 years, in Paris area and Montpellier, in 4 phases: 1/ exploration (bibliographic review and investigation); 2/ recruitment of PPs affected by different pathologies; 3/ implementation and evaluation of PPs training in inter-pathology; 4/ implementation and evaluation of co-facilitated group sessions. RESULTS: 35 patients solicited, 24 (69%) included. Of these, 22 (92%) completed the training entirely; 17 sessions were conducted in co-facilitation (15 planned) for 151 patients (150 expected). Satisfaction rates for PPs, HPs and patient beneficiaries were very high. CONCLUSIONS: This research validated a training model for patient-partners in therapeutic education and identified some conditions that could facilitate their integration into TPE programs.

[Training and conditions improving the integration of patients in the co-facilitation of collective sessions of therapeutic education]. / Formation et conditions facilitant l'intégration de patients dans la coanimation de séances collectives d'éducation thérapeutique.

Purpose of research: The purpose of this research was to promote the involvement and intervention of patient-partners (PPs) in collective sessions of therapeutic patient education (TPE), including training and support for the implementation of these sessions, in co-facilitation with a health professional (HP). Therefore, the matter was to co-construct a training model, to experiment with its implementation and to define favorable conditions for this collaboration. METHODS: Collaborative research oriented by the design, led by a steering committee representative of different categories of stakeholders, which has been spread over 2 years, in Paris area and Montpellier, in 4 phases: 1/ exploration (bibliographic review and investigation); 2/ recruitment of PPs affected by different pathologies; 3/ implementation and evaluation of PPs training in inter-pathology; 4/ implementation and evaluation of co-facilitated group sessions. RESULTS: 35 patients solicited, 24 (69%) included. Of these, 22 (92%) completed the training entirely; 17 sessions were conducted in co-facilitation (15 planned) for 151 patients (150 expected). Satisfaction rates for PPs, HPs and patient beneficiaries were very high. CONCLUSIONS: This research validated a training model for patient-partners in therapeutic education and identified some conditions that could facilitate their integration into TPE programs.

Budget impact of antiretroviral therapy in a French clinic cohort.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we first assessed costs associated with the use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in an infectious diseases University Hospital Clinic; second, we evaluated characteristics associated with these costs and finally simulated the impact on the overall ART budget of switching first-line and second-line regimens to less-costly regimens (as effective and well tolerated). DESIGN: Cohort analysis including persons living with HIV (PLHIV) aged at least 18 years on ART to estimate ART costs during 2014. METHODS: The current study was conducted in the Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital Clinic in Paris, France, where 4501 PLHIV consulted in 2014. We used the medical database Nadis to describe patients' ART, characteristics and estimated costs. When assessing the budgetary impact of potential switches, we considered patients' history of failure, CD4 cell count, plasma viral load, resistance mutations, hepatitis B surface antigen or HLAB5701 profile. RESULTS: A total of 4238 of 4501 patients were on ART (94%). The total annual cost of ART prescribed was estimated at &OV0556;48 280 200 in 2014; first/second (simplification)-line regimens represented 25% (1076/4238) of the treated PLHIV and 23% (&OV0556;11 209 000) of the annual cost. For these PLHIV, we considered switches from the most common ART regimens (protease inhibitor boosted by ritonavir or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor + two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors) to less-expensive regimens. We found savings ranging from &OV0556;36 100 to 1472 600/year. Savings were the highest when we considered switching to generic-based regimens or from protease inhibitor-based triple therapy to protease inhibitor monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Costs associated with ART prescriptions are very high. Switches to generic-based regimens are associated with large savings. However, those targeting protease inhibitor regimens are also associated with substantial savings and should be considered.

[Galenic forms for oral medication]. / Respect des formes galéniques pour la voie orale et vigilances.

Galenic science is interested in the art and the way of formulating an active principle with an excipient in order for it to be administered to the patient. The pharmaceutical forms envisage different administration routes, including by mouth. Nurses need to handle and sometimes modify the pharmaceutical form of a drug to make it easier for the patient to take. This requires vigilance.

Phase II study of cetuximab as first-line single-drug therapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), as a first-line monotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (SCCS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients received cetuximab (initial dose of 400 mg/m(2) followed by subsequent weekly doses of 250 mg/m(2)) for at least 6 weeks with a 48-week follow-up. The primary end point was the disease control rate (DCR) at 6 weeks (according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] criteria). Secondary end points included best response rate, overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity assessment. Association of treatment efficacy with RAS mutations or FcγR genotypes was investigated. RESULTS: Median age of the study population was 79 years. DCR at 6 weeks was obtained in 25 of 36 patients (69%; 95% CI, 52% to 84%) of the intention-to-treat population. The best responses were eight partial responses and two complete responses. There were no cetuximab-related deaths. There were three related serious adverse events: two grade 4 infusion reactions and one grade 3 interstitial pneumopathy. Grade 1 to 2 acne-like rash occurred in 78% of patients and was associated with prolonged PFS. One HRAS mutation was identified. Combined FcγRIIa-131H/H and/or FcγRIIIa-158V/V polymorphisms were not associated with the clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: As a first-line treatment in patients with unresectable SCCS, cetuximab achieved 69% DCR. A randomized phase III trial is warranted to confirm that cetuximab may be considered as a therapeutic option especially in elderly patients. The low frequency of RAS mutations in SCCS makes SCCS tumors attractive for EGFR inhibition.

[Adherence intervention for HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral treatment. Implementation and initial assessment]. / Consultation d'observance pour des malades infectés par le VIH et traités par antirétroviraux dans un service de maladies infectieuses et tropicales. Mise en place et première évaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the implementation and initial results of a specific educational and counseling intervention to examine and improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ARV) in HIV-infected patients. METHOD: Four patient profiles were defined: 1) discontinuation and 2) failure: patients with virological failure (defined as two consecutive viral loads>200 copies/mL) at ARV discontinuation or under treatment, both seen after the fact; 3) preparation: naive patients seen before starting treatment, and 4) reinforcement: patients in treatment seen for counseling to prevent virological failure. A clinical psychologist, nurse and hospital pharmacist jointly conducted the session. Data collected include standardized information about the characteristics of HIV infection and ARV regimens, and demographic, behavioral, social and cultural indicators. CD4 cell counts and HIV viral loads were recorded at D0, M1, M3, M9 and M12. The effectiveness of the adherence intervention was defined separately for each patient profile based on some combination of taking or restarting an ARV regimen, virological response, and M12 follow-up. RESULTS: The study included 139 patients between November 1998 and April 2000. The intervention was defined as effective in 50% and 40% of the discontinuation (n=26) and failure (n=61) patients respectively, 84% of those with preparation profile (n=37) and 93% (14/15) of reinforcement patients. Only undetectable HIV viral load at M3 was significantly associated with the effectiveness of the adherence intervention for all 4 profiles. The preventive interventions (preparation and reinforcement) were less effective in patients from outside Europe (p=0.013). CONCLUSION: The adherence intervention was more effective in preventing virological failure than in restoring ARV effectiveness among patients who had already experienced virological failure. It should therefore be proposed primarily before starting ARV, to prevent failure in treatment-naive patients, especially those from outside Europe.

Lamivudine and indinavir/ritonavir maintenance therapy in highly pretreated HIV-infected patients (Vista ANRS 109).

OBJECTIVE: In patients with extensive HIV resistance, one option is to delay salvage therapy until new drugs become available. We hypothesized that this delay period could be based on a simplified treatment, which would reduce drug toxicity, stabilize resistance, and prevent resurgence of wild-type virus. METHODS: A prospective 24-week treatment simplification study in HIV-1-infected patients having failed several lines of antiretroviral therapy, with CD4+ T-cell counts > or = 100 cells/ml, plasma HIV RNA (viral load [VL]) > or = 4 log10 copies/ml and a resistance genotype predicting less than two active drugs. Treatment associated ritonavir-boosted low-dose indinavir (200 mg twice daily) and lamivudine (150 mg twice daily). The primary endpoint was a decrease in CD4+ T-cell counts > or = 25% or increase in VL > or = 0.7 log copies/ml relative to baseline. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were included. Baseline median VL was 4.5 log10 copies/ml and median CD4+ T-cell count was 290 cells/ml. During the study, 10/26 patients (38%, 95% confidence interval = 20.2-59.4) reached the primary endpoint. No patient had an AIDS-defining event. At week 24, the median change in plasma VL was +0.2 log10 copies/ml (interquartile range (IQR): 0-0.5; P = 0.003). The median change in CD4+ T-cell counts was -49 cells/ml (IQR: -14 to -93, P < 0.001), with a median decline slope of 10 cells/ml/month, which was not different from that measured under full highly active antiretroviral therapy during the 6 months preceding inclusion. There were no significant changes in HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase genotypes during the study. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced resistance, treatment simplification prevented resurgence of wild-type HIV, reduced drug burden, but failed to stabilize progression of the immune deficiency.

Nevirapine or lamivudine plus stavudine and indinavir: examples of 2-class versus 3-class regimens for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.

We compared use of a 3-class regimen (nevirapine [Nvp], stavudine [d4T], and indinavir [Idv; 1000 mg 3 times daily]) with use of a 2-class regimen (lamivudine [3TC], d4T, and Idv [800 mg 3 times daily]) for 145 patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). At week 72, the plasma HIV-1 RNA level was undetectable in 52% of Nvp recipients versus 79% of 3TC recipients (P<.001). Idv trough levels were 81 ng/mL in the Nvp group and 99 ng/mL in the 3TC group (P=.012). In the Nvp group, 42.5% of patients discontinued the study regimen; in the 3TC group, 22.5% of patients discontinued therapy (P=.013). The rate of resistance to nonnucleoside analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitors among patients in the Nvp group with virological failure was not different from the rate of resistance to 3TC among patients in the 3TC group with virological failure. These results do not support the use of a 3-class regimen that includes Nvp for patients with no or limited exposure to nucleoside analogues.

Efficacy of zidovudine compared to stavudine, both in combination with lamivudine and indinavir, in human immunodeficiency virus-infected nucleoside-experienced patients with no prior exposure to lamivudine, stavudine, or protease inhibitors (novavir trial).

We compared the efficacy and the toxicity of zidovudine (AZT) versus stavudine (d4T), in combination with lamivudine (3TC) and indinavir, in AZT-, dideoxyinosine (ddI)-, and/or dideoxycytosine (ddC)-experienced patients in a randomized comparative multicenter trial. One hundred seventy human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients, who had received AZT, ddI, and/or ddC for at least 6 months but were naive for d4T, 3TC, and protease inhibitors, were randomized to AZT at 250 to 300 mg twice daily, 3TC at 150 mg twice daily, and indinavir at 800 mg every 8 h or to d4T at 40 mg twice daily, 3TC at 150 mg twice daily, and indinavir at 800 mg every 8 h. The primary endpoint was time to virological failure, defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA levels of >5,000 copies/ml after at least 8 weeks of antiretroviral therapy. Additional endpoints were change from baseline in CD4 cell counts, AIDS-defining events and adverse events, and proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels of <500 copies/ml and HIV-1 RNA levels of <50 copies/ml. At week 80, 15 patients in the AZT arm and 14 patients in the d4T arm had reached the primary endpoint, and time to virological failure did not differ between the two arms (P = 0.98). In the d4T and in the AZT arms, 67 and 73% of patients, respectively, had HIV-1 RNA levels of <500 copies/ml (P = 0.50). The median change from baseline in CD4 cell count was 195 x 10(6) and 175 x 10(6)/liter for the d4T- and AZT-containing arms, respectively. The proportions of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels of <50 copies/ml at weeks 8, 16, and 24 were similar in the two arms. The occurrence of serious adverse events was not significantly different between arms. In conclusion, in these patients heavily pretreated with AZT, switching from AZT to d4T when initiating indinavir and 3TC did not bring any additional benefit compared to maintaining AZT.