RESUMO
Rotavirus (RV) infection causes acute rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) in infants. Safe and effective RV vaccines are available, of which Mexico has included one in its national immunization program (NIP) since 2007. Health outcome gains, expressed in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and cost improvements are important additional factors for the selection of a NIP vaccine. These two factors were analyzed here for Mexico over one year implementing three RV vaccines: 2-dose Rotarix (HRV), versus 3-dose RotaTeq (HBRV), and 3-dose Rotasiil (BRV-PV), presented in a 1-dose or 2-dose vial). HRV would annually result in discounted QALY gains of 263 extra years compared with the other vaccines by averting an extra 24,022 homecare cases, 10,779 medical visits, 392 hospitalizations, and 12 deaths. From a payer's perspective and compared with HRV, BRV-PV 2-dose vial and BRV-PV 1-dose vial would annually result in $13,548,179 and $4,633,957 net savings, respectively, while HBRV would result in $3,403,309 extra costs. The societal perspective may also show savings compared with HRV for BRV-PV 2-dose vial of $4,875,860, while BRV-PV 1-dose vial and HBRV may show extra costs of $4,038,363 and $12,075,629 respectively. HRV and HBRV were both approved in Mexico, with HRV requiring less investment than HBRV with higher QALY gains and cost savings. The HRV vaccine produced those higher health gains due to its earlier protection and greater coverage achieved after its schedule completion with two doses only, providing full protection at four months of age instead of longer periods for the other vaccines.
Rotavirus (RV) infection causes acute diarrhea in infants and can be life-threatening. Several safe and effective vaccines against RV and its complications exist. For many governments choosing vaccines for national immunization programs, total costs or savings and health gains are important factors in the selection process. We compared the costs and health benefits of three RV vaccines for Mexico: HRV, HBRV, and BRV-PV, that have different dosing schedules: two doses for HRV and three doses for HBRV and BRV-PV. HRV is currently part of the national immunization program in Mexico. HRV would result in more health benefits as it incurs fewer RV-related cases, medical visits, hospitalizations, and infant deaths than the other vaccines due to its early protection achieved after only two doses to complete its schedule. However, from a payer's perspective, the least expensive vaccine was BRV-PV, while HRV was less expensive than HBRV. From a societal perspective, also accounting for families' costs and loss in income due to an infant's RV disease, and the families' costs and loss in income when accompanying the infant to the vaccination center, the HRV vaccine was less expensive than HBRV and BRV-PV presented in a 1-dose vial, while more expensive than BRV-PV presented in a 2-dose vial. HRV and HBRV are both approved in Mexico, although HBRV requires a greater investment at lower health benefits than HRV, from both a payer's and a societal perspective. A 2-dose vaccination scheme is an important asset for the economic value of this vaccination program.
Assuntos
Gastroenterite , Infecções por Rotavirus , Vacinas contra Rotavirus , Rotavirus , Lactente , Humanos , Análise de Custo-Efetividade , México , Análise Custo-Benefício , Infecções por Rotavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Atenuadas , Programas de ImunizaçãoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The risk of herpes zoster (HZ) increases with age. In countries with an ageing population such as Mexico, a rise in the risk of HZ and complications is expected. The goal of this study was to provide an updated estimate of the potential burden of HZ and associated complications in Mexico. METHODS: A retrospective database study was performed using data from the national surveillance database of the Ministry of Health (Secretaría de Salubridad y Asistencia/Dirección General de Información en Salud). HZ cases and associated complications were identified via the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes. Emergency room (ER) visits, hospitalizations, and deaths were extracted and analyzed by age group and year. The observation period was between 2011 and 2020 for ER visits and hospitalizations and between 2011 and 2019 for deaths. Cumulative incidence per 1000 people and case fatality rate were estimated. RESULTS: During the observation period, 53,030 ER visits, 4172 hospitalizations, and 263 deaths due to HZ were reported nationwide. The cumulative incidence of HZ based on ER visits was 1.04 per 1000 people aged ≥ 50 years but increased in older age groups (1.47 per 1000 people aged ≥ 65 years). The most common complications were neuralgia (10.9%), ocular disease (7.0%), meningoencephalitis (2.9%), and disseminated disease (3.1%). Patients ≥ 65 years accounted for 37% of hospitalizations and 81% of deaths. CONCLUSION: In Mexico, HZ and its complications impose a considerable burden on the population and the healthcare system. Prospective surveillance studies are required to obtain an accurate picture of the current epidemiology of HZ in Mexico and to estimate the benefits of future vaccination strategies against HZ.
Herpes zoster (HZ), also called shingles, is a disease typically characterized by a painful skin rash. It affects mostly older adults and immunocompromised populations. Approximately 30% of patients have complications such as prolonged, severe pain; eye disease; or disease affecting parts of the body other than the skin. In this study, we analyzed national passive surveillance data for HZ disease and related complications in Mexico. Over the last 10 years (20112020), more than 50,000 cases and 4000 hospitalizations have been observed. In those, 263 people died, and most of the deaths (81%) occurred in people aged 65 years or older. Since the proportion of older people in the Mexican population will increase over the next decades, herpes zoster will probably become more frequent and complicated. Vaccination against HZ could help protect the older population against this serious disease.
RESUMO
Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is an uncommon but serious and potentially fatal condition mainly affecting children and adolescents. Active surveillance between 2005 and 2016 at Tijuana General Hospital, Mexico, indicated that the incidence of IMD in Tijuana was higher than previously thought, at 2.69 per 100,000 population aged <16 years. The objective of this study was to estimate the economic burden associated with 51 IMD cases in children aged <16 years identified over the 11 years of active surveillance at Tijuana General Hospital, Mexico. Healthcare resource usage for the IMD cases was obtained from the hospital database and combined with unit costs from the hospital purchasing department or national databases to estimate total healthcare costs over a follow-up period of 3 months. Societal costs were represented by the value of lost wages for parents or guardians. All costs were expressed in US$. Over the 11-year study period there were 51 IMD cases, of which 13 (25%) were fatal. The total cost for all 51 cases over the 11-year study period was US$1,054,499 (average per case US$20,676), of which direct healthcare costs comprised US$1,029,948 (average per case US$20,195) and societal costs US$24,551 (average per case US$481). Extrapolated to the population of Tijuana region aged <16 years, the estimated annual economic burden of IMD was US$268,794. The major cost driver was the cost of hospitalization. These data illustrate the significant economic burden associated with IMD in Tijuana, and will be useful in assessing optimal vaccination programs against meningococcal disease in Mexico.
Assuntos
Infecções Meningocócicas , Vacinas Meningocócicas , Criança , Adolescente , Humanos , Infecções Meningocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Vacinação , Hospitalização , Incidência , Vacinas Meningocócicas/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection is a leading cause of viral hepatitis in children, yet the HAV vaccine is not included in the national immunization program (NIP) in Mexico. This study addresses an identified evidence gap of the burden of hepatitis A disease, complications, and associated costs in Mexico by analyzing surveillance and healthcare data. Data review included disease morbidity (incidence and hospitalization), mortality, and healthcare resource utilization costs. METHODS: In this observational, retrospective database study, we conducted a systematic screening, extraction, and analysis of outcome data from the national surveillance system in Mexico from January 2000 to December 2019. RESULTS: During the analysis period (2000-2019), the average incidence rate/year of HAV cases was 14.7 (5.4-21.5) per 100,000 inhabitants. Children 1-9 years of age (YoA) had the highest average incidence rate/year with 47.8 (14.7-74.5). The average hospitalization rate/year due to HAV infection was 5.8% (2.9-9.6%). Although the highest burden of HAV continued to be in children (1-9 YoA), an increase in incidence and hospitalizations (with complications) in older age groups (≥ 10-64 YoA) was observed. The annual average fatality rate was estimated to be 0.44% (0.26-0.83%) of which 28.8% of deaths were concentrated in adults ≥ 65 YoA. The total direct costs of medical attention due to HAV and related complications were estimated at $382 million Mexican pesos. CONCLUSION: The overall results suggest an uptrend in HAV infections in adolescents/adults compared to children in Mexico. Therefore, as the overall incidence risk of HAV infection decreases, the mean age of infection increases. This consequently increases the risk of severity and complications in older age groups, thus increasing the demand for healthcare resources. Our findings provide evidence for including the inactivated HAV vaccine in the Mexican NIP.
Assuntos
Vírus da Hepatite A , Hepatite A , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Hepatite A/complicações , Hepatite A/epidemiologia , Vacinas contra Hepatite A , Humanos , México/epidemiologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
A systematic review was conducted in Mexico to consolidate and evaluate evidence after 15 years of rotavirus vaccination, according to the National Immunization Program. Five databases were screened to identify published articles (January 2000-February 2020) with evidence on all clinical and epidemiological endpoints (e.g. immunogenicity, safety, efficacy, impact/effectiveness) of rotavirus vaccination in Mexico. Twenty-two articles were identified (observational studies including health-economic models: 17; randomized controlled trials: 5). Fourteen studies evaluated a human attenuated vaccine (HRV), four studies evaluated both vaccines, and only two evaluated a bovine-human reassortant vaccine, with local efficacy data only for HRV. Local evidence shows vaccines are safe, immunogenic, efficacious, and provide an acceptable risk-benefit profile. The benefits of both vaccines in alleviating the burden of all-cause diarrhea mortality and morbidity are documented in several local post-licensure studies. Findings signify overall benefits of rotavirus vaccination and support the continued use of rotavirus vaccine in Mexico.
Assuntos
Infecções por Rotavirus , Vacinas contra Rotavirus , Rotavirus , Animais , Bovinos , Humanos , Lactente , México/epidemiologia , Infecções por Rotavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Rotavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinação , Vacinas AtenuadasRESUMO
Background: We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of 2 + 1 infant regimens initiated with the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) and completed with the pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D-conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV). Methods: This partially blinded study randomized 6-12-week-old infants to receive two-dose priming and a booster (at ages 2, 4, 12-15 months) with: PCV13 at priming and PHiD-CV at boosting (PPS); PCV13 then PHiD-CV at priming and PHiD-CV at boosting (PSS); or PHiD-CV at priming and boosting (SSS control). All analyses were descriptive, i.e., no statistical significance tests were done. Results: The total vaccinated cohort at priming comprised 294 infants. Grade 3 adverse events were reported after 8.7% (PPS), 11.4% (PSS), and 16.9% (SSS) of primary doses (primary objective). No serious adverse events were considered vaccination-related. For most PHiD-CV serotypes, observed percentages of children reaching antibody concentrations ≥0.2 µg/mL and opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) titers above cutoffs were similar across groups 1 month post-priming and post-booster. Observed geometric mean antibody concentrations and OPA titers were lower for some PHiD-CV serotypes with the mixed regimens than with PHiD-CV only, especially for PSS. However, no tests of statistical significance were performed. Conclusions: Immunogenicity of the two mixed PCV13/PHiD-CV regimens seemed mostly similar to that of a PHiD-CV-only series, although observed antibody GMCs and OPA GMTs for some PHiD-CV serotypes were lower. No safety concerns were raised. The clinical relevance of the observed differences is unknown. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01641133.
Focus on the patientWhat is the context? Infant immunization programs worldwide include the pneumococcal conjugate vaccines Synflorix and Prevnar 13 to help combat pneumococcal diseases. Countries or regions choose whether to use Synflorix or Prevnar 13 and may decide to switch from one vaccine to the other. This can result in infants receiving a mixed vaccination regimen. Limited information is available about such mixed regimens. What is new? We assessed the immunogenicity of three infant vaccination regimens: 1) priming with two doses of Prevnar 13 and boosting with Synflorix; 2) priming with one dose of Prevnar 13 followed by one dose of Synflorix and boosting with Synflorix; 3) priming and boosting with Synflorix. The study showed that: Switching from Prevnar 13 to Synflorix at any time during the vaccination regimen did not seem to affect safety. When switching from Prevnar 13 to Synflorix at the time of boosting, immunogenicity was mostly similar to that of the Synflorix- only regimen. Switching vaccines during priming resulted in a trend toward lower immune responses for some vaccine components. What is the impact? This piece of evidence can be considered by doctors and health authorities when evaluating the possibility of switching pneumococcal vaccines in an immunization program or individual immunization regimen. Further effectiveness studies from countries or regions switching from Prevnar 13 to Synflorix (or vice versa) may shed more light on the feasibility of switching between these vaccines.
Assuntos
Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinação/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Imunização Secundária , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Lactente , Masculino , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/efeitos adversos , SorogrupoRESUMO
Worldwide, rotavirus infection has been a leading cause of severe diarrhea morbidity and mortality. Two rotavirus vaccines have been used in the National Immunization Program (NIP) in Mexico; two-dose Rotarix from 2006 to 2011 and three-dose RotaTeq since 2011. This study assessed coverage (receiving at least one dose or full dose series) in eligible infants, compliance (% completing dose series and % completing series on schedule) in eligible infants vaccinated with Rotarix (2010) versus RotaTeq (2012), using Mexican Social Security Institute data nationwide and by regions. In 2010, 80.7% received at least one dose of Rotarix, 75.6% received both doses and 57.0% received both doses on schedule. In 2012, 85.7% received at least one dose of RotaTeq, 61.0% received all three doses and 43.2% received all three doses on schedule. More eligible infants received all doses with Rotarix versus RotaTeq (p < 0.001). Among infants vaccinated with Rotarix versus RotaTeq, 93.7% versus 71.1% completed full series (p < 0.001), and 75.5% versus 70.9% completed full series on schedule (p = 0.105), respectively. The full series coverage and compliance decreased in all regions with RotaTeq compared with Rotarix. In conclusion, rotavirus vaccination has successfully reduced morbidity and mortality in children under 5 years in Mexico. This study found significant differences in full series coverage and compliance among infants and a higher proportion of completed scheduled at an earlier age in Mexico when comparing a two-dose vaccine in 2010 with a three-dose vaccine in 2012. Such differences might need to be taken into consideration to maximize NIP benefits, including early protection of the rotavirus vaccination program.
Assuntos
Programas de Imunização , Esquemas de Imunização , Infecções por Rotavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/administração & dosagem , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , México , Cooperação do Paciente , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/imunologia , Vacinas Atenuadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Atenuadas/imunologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To estimate hepatitis B virus (HBV) seroprevalence from natural infection or vaccination in 10-25-year-olds in Mexico, using the 2012 National Health and Nutrition Survey (ENSANUT). METHODS: Randomly selected serum samples (1,581) from adolescents and young adults, representative of 38,924,584 Mexicans, were analyzed to detect hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) and hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc). Weighted HBV seroprevalence in the Mexican population and association with sociodemographic variables were calculated. RESULTS: Overall weighted seroprevalence from natural infection (positive for anti-HBs and anti-HBc) was 0.23% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.10-0.52). No HBsAg was detected, indicating no acute or chronic infection. Vaccine-derived immunity (positive ≥ 10.0 mIU/ml for anti-HBs and negative to anti-HBc) was 44.7% (95% CI: 40.2-49.4) overall; lower in persons aged 20-25 years (40.83%) than in persons aged 10-19 years (47.7%). Among the population analyzed, 54.2% (95% CI: 49.6-58.8) were seronegative to HBV (negative for all three markers) and no sociodemographic risk factors were identified. CONCLUSIONS: HBV seroprevalence from natural infection was low. Vaccination-induced immunity was higher among Mexican adolescents than young adults, possibly due to vaccination policies since 1999.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite B/sangue , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/uso terapêutico , Hepatite B/epidemiologia , Hepatite B/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangue , Criança , Feminino , Vírus da Hepatite B/imunologia , Humanos , Masculino , México/epidemiologia , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
To describe hepatitis A virus (HAV) seroprevalence and associated factors in adolescents (10-19â¯years) and young adults (20-25â¯years) in different Mexican regions, using 2012 National Health and Nutrition Survey data. A random selection of 1581 serum samples was analyzed. Weighted HAV seroprevalence with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) and its association with sociodemographic factors were estimated. Mean weighted HAV seroprevalence was 69.3% (95%CI: 64.8-73.4) overall, with 58.8% (95%CI: 53.4-64.1) in adolescents and 83.0% (95%CI: 75.3-88.7) in young adults. By age of 10, 46.7% (95%CI: 33.9-60.0) were seropositive and by age of 15, 52.8% (95%CI: 36.5-68.5), corresponding to intermediate endemicity nationally. Factors associated with HAV seropositivity (adjusted odds ratio, aOR) included: lower socioeconomic status (SES) (aORâ¯=â¯4.09 for low and aORâ¯=â¯2.31 for medium versus high SES), older age (aORâ¯=â¯0.29 for adolescents versus young adults), living in the South (aORâ¯=â¯2.12 versus Central Mexico) or in rural areas (aORâ¯=â¯2.25 versus urban areas). Regional differences and increased seroprevalence of HAV in marginalized populations present an important public health issue, as a relatively large proportion of young adults are susceptible to infection. The burden of symptomatic disease must be addressed further to support specific programs of continued sanitation and education improvement, and the possibility of vaccination in more susceptible regions.
Assuntos
Hepatite A/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite A/sangue , Vírus da Hepatite A , Humanos , Masculino , México/epidemiologia , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Razão de Chances , Análise de Componente Principal , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Classe Social , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Despite vaccination programs, influenza still represents a significant disease burden in Mexico. We conducted an observational, retrospective analysis to better understand the epidemiological situation of the influenza virus in Mexico. Analysis of the seasonal patterns of influenza A and B were based on the Directorate General of Epidemiology dataset of influenza-like illness(ILI), and severe acute respiratory infection(SARI) that were recorded between January 2010 and December 2013. Our objectives were 1) to describe influenza A and B activity, by age group, and subtype and, 2) to analyze the number of laboratory-confirmed cases presenting with ILI by influenza type, the regional distribution of influenza, and its clinical features. Three periods of influenza activity were captured: August 2010-January 2011, December 2011-March 2012, and October 2012-March 2013. Cases were reported throughout Mexico, with 50.3% (n = 10,320) of cases found in 18-49 year olds. Over the entire capture period, a total of 76,085 ILI/SARI episodes had swab samples analyzed for influenza, 27% were positive. During the same period, influenza A cases were higher in the 18-49 years old, and influenza B cases in both 5-17 and 18-49 age groups. Peak activity occurred in January 2012 (n = 4,159) and December 2012 (n = 348) for influenza A and B respectively. This analysis confirms that influenza is an important respiratory pathogen for children and adults in Mexico despite vaccination recommendations. School-age children and adolescents were more prone to influenza B infection; while younger adults were susceptible to both influenza A and B viruses. Over the seasons, influenza A and B co-circulated.
Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Vírus da Influenza A/isolamento & purificação , Vírus da Influenza B/isolamento & purificação , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Doença Aguda/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Conjuntos de Dados como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Vírus da Influenza A/patogenicidade , Vírus da Influenza B/patogenicidade , Influenza Humana/diagnóstico , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Influenza Humana/virologia , Masculino , México/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Infecções Respiratórias/virologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estações do Ano , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Reduced-antigen-content diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (dTpa) vaccine, Boostrix™, is indicated for booster vaccination of children, adolescents and adults. The original prefilled disposable dTpa syringe presentation was recently replaced by another prefilled-syringe presentation with latex-free tip-caps and plunger-stoppers. 671 healthy adolescents aged 10-15 years who had previously received 5 or 6 previous DT(P)/dT(pa) vaccine doses, were randomized (1:1) to receive dTpa booster, injected using the new (dTpa-new) or previous syringe (dTpa-previous) presentations. Immunogenicity was assessed before and 1-month post-booster vaccination; safety/reactogenicity were assessed during 31-days post-vaccination. Non-inferiority of dTpa-new versus dTpa-previous was demonstrated for all antigens (ULs 95% CIs for GMC ratios ranged between 1.03-1.13). 1-month post-booster, immune responses were in similar ranges for all antigens with both syringe presentations. dTpa delivered using either syringe presentation was well-tolerated. These clinical results complement the technical data and support the use of the new syringe presentation to deliver the dTpa vaccine.