Efficacy of concentrated growth factor versus collagen membrane in reconstructive surgical therapy of peri-implantitis: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the 3-year clinical and radiographic outcomes of two different reconstructive surgical management of peri-implantitis using a bone substitute in combination with either concentrated growth factor (CGF) or collagen membrane (CM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients who had at least one implant presenting peri-implantitis with an intrabony defect were filled with a xenogenic bone grafting material and covered either CGF or CM. Clinical and radiographic assessments were carried out at baseline and postoperative years 1 and 3. Three different composite outcomes were defined to evaluate treatment success at a 3-year follow-up. The effects of possible prognostic indicators on treatment success were identified by using multilevel regression analysis. RESULTS: The changes in probing depth (PD) and radiographic vertical defect depth (VDD) between baseline and year 1 and baseline and year 3 presented significantly greater decreases for the CM group in comparison with the CGF group (p < 0.05). No significant differences between the two treatment modalities were demonstrated regarding treatment success outcomes. History of periodontitis, VDD at baseline, and the number of intrabony defect walls revealed significant impacts on treatment success (p = 0.033; OR = 3.50, p = 0.039; OR = 0.975, and p = 0.024; OR = 7.0 and p = 0.019;OR = 6.0, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CM in combination with a bone substitute seems to have slightly better outcomes compared to the CGF membranes in reconstructive surgical therapy of peri-implantitis. The history of periodontitis, baseline VDD, and peri-implant bone defect configuration could be possible predictors influencing treatment success. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04769609. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: For the reconstruction of peri-implant bone defects, using a bone substitute in combination with a collagen membrane may show more favorable outcomes.

Regenerative surgical treatment of peri-implantitis using either a collagen membrane or concentrated growth factor: A 12-month randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Platelet concentration based membranes, as well as collagen membranes in combination with bone substitutes, have demonstrated successful outcomes in regeneration of peri-implant bone defects (PBD). PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of regenerative surgical treatment (RST) of peri-implantitis using a bone substitute combined with two different bioresorbable barrier membranes, either collagen membrane (CM) or concentrated growth factor (CGF), during 12-month follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty two patients, who had at least one peri-implantitis lesion was treated by using a bone substitute in combination with CGF or CM. After surgical procedures, implants were allowed for submerged healing. Clinical assessments were conducted at baseline, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, while radiographic evaluation was performed at baseline and 12 months. RESULTS: Significant reductions were obtained in the mean gingival index (GI), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL) and mucosal recession (MR) values at both 6 and 12 months postoperatively compared to baseline for both treatment procedures (P < 0.05). At 6 months, no statistically significant difference was observed for all clinical parameters between the groups, whereas the mean PD, CAL and vertical defect depth (VDD) values were statistically significant in favor of the CM group at 12 months (P < 0.05). The mean defect fill (DF) in the CM group (1.99 ±0.76) was not statistically significantly different from that observed in the CCF group (1.63 ±1.00) (P = 0.154). CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of the present study suggest that both regenerative approaches yielded significant improvements in both clinical and radiographic assessments. The procedure using a collagen membrane in combination with a bone substitute showed better results at 12 months in RST of peri-implantitis.