Study Design and Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of a Triple Combination of Ezetimibe, Fenofibrate, and Moderate- Intensity Statin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors (ENSEMBLE).

Background: Atherogenic dyslipidemia, which is frequently associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and insulin resistance, contributes to the development of vascular complications. Statin therapy is the primary approach to dyslipidemia management in T2D, however, the role of non-statin therapy remains unclear. Ezetimibe reduces cholesterol burden by inhibiting intestinal cholesterol absorption. Fibrates lower triglyceride levels and increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels via peroxisome proliferator- activated receptor alpha agonism. Therefore, when combined, these drugs effectively lower non-HDL-C levels. Despite this, few clinical trials have specifically targeted non-HDL-C, and the efficacy of triple combination therapies, including statins, ezetimibe, and fibrates, has yet to be determined. Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, active-comparator controlled trial involving 3,958 eligible participants with T2D, cardiovascular risk factors, and elevated non-HDL-C (≥100 mg/dL). Participants, already on moderate-intensity statins, will be randomly assigned to either Ezefeno (ezetimibe/fenofibrate) addition or statin dose-escalation. The primary end point is the development of a composite of major adverse cardiovascular and diabetic microvascular events over 48 months. Conclusion: This trial aims to assess whether combining statins, ezetimibe, and fenofibrate is as effective as, or possibly superior to, statin monotherapy intensification in lowering cardiovascular and microvascular disease risk for patients with T2D. This could propose a novel therapeutic approach for managing dyslipidemia in T2D.

Pioglitazone as Add-on THERAPY in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled with Dapagliflozin and Metformin: Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Background: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of triple therapy with pioglitazone 15 mg add-on versus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled with metformin and dapagliflozin. Methods: In this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, phase 3 study, patients with T2DM with an inadequate response to treatment with metformin (≥1,000 mg/day) plus dapagliflozin (10 mg/day) were randomized to receive additional pioglitazone 15 mg/day (n=125) or placebo (n=125) for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels from baseline to week 24 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05101135). Results: At week 24, the adjusted mean change from baseline in HbA1c level compared with placebo was significantly greater with pioglitazone treatment (-0.47%; 95% confidence interval, -0.61 to -0.33; P<0.0001). A greater proportion of patients achieved HbA1c <7% or <6.5% at week 24 with pioglitazone compared to placebo as add-on to 10 mg dapagliflozin and metformin (56.8% vs. 28% for HbA1c <7%, and 23.2% vs. 9.6% for HbA1c <6.5%; P<0.0001 for all). The addition of pioglitazone also significantly improved triglyceride, highdensity lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance levels, while placebo did not. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between the groups, and the incidence of fluid retention-related side effects by pioglitazone was low (1.5%). Conclusion: Triple therapy with the addition of 15 mg/day of pioglitazone to dapagliflozin plus metformin was well tolerated and produced significant improvements in HbA1c in patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with dapagliflozin plus metformin.

Mortality in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: A nationwide population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: A new fatty liver disease nomenclature, steatotic liver disease (SLD) has been proposed; however, there are no data on clinical outcomes. We investigated the impact of SLD with metabolic dysfunction (MD; SLD-MD) on all-cause mortality. METHODS: We evaluated nationally representative participants aged ≥19 years using data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2015 and their linked death data through 2019. The presence of fatty liver disease was assessed by liver fat score, fatty liver index and significant liver fibrosis was evaluated by the Fibrosis-4 Index, and fibrosis score. SLD-MD was categorized into three groups: metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD); metabolic alcoholic liver disease (MetALD); and SLD with other combination etiologies. RESULTS: Among 26734 individuals (11561 men and 15173 women, mean age 48.8 years), 1833 (6.9 %) died during a mean follow-up period of 110.6 ± 33.9 months. Mortality risk was significantly higher in individuals with SLD-MD (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.35) than in those without (P < 0.001). Among the three groups, MASLD (HR = 1.32) and SLD with other combination etiologies (HR = 2.06) independently increased mortality risk (all P < 0.001). When individuals with SLD-MD had significant liver fibrosis or diabetes, mortality risk increased further (HR = 1.68 and 1.85, respectively; all P < 0.001). SLD-MD with both significant liver fibrosis and diabetes showed the highest mortality risk (HR = 2.29, P < 0.001). When applied fatty liver index and fibrosis score, similar results were observed. CONCLUSIONS: SLD-MD is associated with a higher mortality risk. When SLD-MD was combined with significant liver fibrosis or diabetes, the mortality risk became much higher. Treatment strategies to reduce fibrotic burden and improve glycemic control in individuals with MASLD are needed.

Intact ketogenesis predicted reduced risk of moderate-severe metabolic-associated fatty liver disease assessed by liver transient elastography in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

Aim: Hepatic ketogenesis is a key metabolic pathway that regulates energy homeostasis. Some related controversies exist regarding the pathogenesis of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). We aimed to investigate whether intact ketogenic capacity could reduce the risk of MAFLD based on transient electrography (TE) in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: A total of 361 subjects with newly diagnosed T2D were recruited and classified into two groups based on the median serum ß-hydroxybutyrate (ßHB) level, referred to as the intact and impaired ketogenesis groups. The glucometabolic relevance of ketogenic capacity and associations of the baseline serum ß-HB and MAFLD assessed with TE were investigated. Results: Compared to the impaired ketogenesis group, the intact ketogenesis group showed better insulin sensitivity, lower serum triglyceride levels, and higher glycated hemoglobin levels. The controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) was lower in the intact ketogenesis group without statistical significance (289.7 ± 52.1 vs. 294.5 ± 43.6; p=0.342) but the prevalence of moderate-severe steatosis defined by CAP ≥260 dB/m was significantly lower in the intact group. Moreover, intact ketogenesis was significantly associated with a lower risk of moderate-severe MAFLD after adjusting for potential confounders (adjusted odds ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.98; p=0.044). Conclusion: In drug-naïve, newly diagnosed T2D patients, intact ketogenesis predicted a lower risk of moderate-severe MAFLD assessed by TE.