A nationwide real-world study for evaluation of effectiveness and safety of T-DM1 in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in Korea (KCSG BR19-15).

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate clinical practices and factors related to the outcomes of T-DM1 use in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Methods: We included patients with HER2-positive mBC who received T-DM1 as a palliative therapy between August 2017 and December 2018. The safety and outcomes of T-DM1, including overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), were evaluated. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) for mortality or progression to HER2-positive mBC. Results: In total, 824 patients were enrolled during the study period. The mean age of patients was 58 years, and 516 (62.6%) patients relapsed after curative treatment. Excluding a history of endocrine therapy, 341 (41.4%) patients previously received none or first-line chemotherapy, 179 (21.7%) received second-line therapy, and 303 (36.9%) received third-or later-line chemotherapy before T-DM1 therapy. During a median follow-up of 16.8 months, the ORR was 35%, the median PFS was 6.6 months, and the median OS was not reached. The clinical factors associated with the hazard of progression were age (<65 years), poor performance status (⩾2), advanced line of palliative chemotherapy (⩾2), prior pertuzumab use, and treatment duration of palliative trastuzumab (<10 months). Common grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (n = 107, 13.2%), neutropenia (n = 23, 2.8%), anemia (n = 21, 2.6%), and elevated liver enzyme (n = 20, 2.5%). Hypokalemia (⩽3.0 mmol/L) and any-grade bleeding events occurred in 25 (3.1%) and 94 (22.6%) patients, respectively. Conclusion: This is the first nationwide real-world study of T-DM1 use in patients with HER2-positive mBC in Korea. The effectiveness and toxicity profiles of T-DM1 in real-world practice were comparable to those in randomized trials. Moreover, patient factors and previous anti-HER2 therapy could predict the outcomes of T-DM1 therapy.

First-Line Ipatasertib, Atezolizumab, and Taxane Triplet for Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical and Biomarker Results.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a triplet regimen combining immune checkpoint blockade, AKT pathway inhibition, and (nab-) paclitaxel as first-line therapy for locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The single-arm CO40151 phase Ib study (NCT03800836), the single-arm signal-seeking cohort of IPATunity130 (NCT03337724), and the randomized phase III IPATunity170 trial (NCT04177108) enrolled patients with previously untreated mTNBC. Triplet therapy comprised intravenous atezolizumab 840 mg (days 1 and 15), oral ipatasertib 400 mg/day (days 1-21), and intravenous paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 (or nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2; days 1, 8, and 15) every 28 days. Exploratory translational research aimed to elucidate mechanisms and molecular markers of sensitivity and resistance. RESULTS: Among 317 patients treated with the triplet, efficacy ranged across studies as follows: median progression-free survival (PFS) 5.4 to 7.4 months, objective response rate 44% to 63%, median duration of response 5.6 to 11.1 months, and median overall survival 15.7 to 28.3 months. The safety profile was consistent with the known toxicities of each agent. Grade ≥3 adverse events were more frequent with the triplet than with doublets or single-agent paclitaxel. Patients with PFS >10 months were characterized by NF1, CCND3, and PIK3CA alterations and increased immune pathway activity. PFS <5 months was associated with CDKN2A/CDKN2B/MTAP alterations and lower predicted phosphorylated AKT-S473 levels. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mTNBC receiving an ipatasertib/atezolizumab/taxane triplet regimen, molecular characteristics may identify those with particularly favorable or unfavorable outcomes, potentially guiding future research efforts.

Comparative Study Between Radioisotope Uptake and Fluorescence Intensity of Indocyanine Green for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer.

Recently, several breast surgeons have reported a new method for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) by using indocyanine green (ICG) with infrared camera. This study aimed to determine whether the lymph nodes (LNs) with ICG uptake are true SLNs and to assess the reliability of using only ICG for SLNB. Data were prospectively collected between April and September 2021. All palpable LNs were fat-trimmed and ordered from high to low signal of the gamma detector. The degree of radioisotope uptake and brightness of ICG staining of the axillary LNs detected with a fluorescent camera were compared and associated factors were analyzed. Discordance was defined as sentinel LNs (SLNs) showing a single uptake of radioisotope or fluorescence of ICG only, or when the orders of uptake and intensity degree were different between the 2 materials. A total of 79 SLNBs were performed on 78 patients with breast cancer. The breast cancer was classified as cTis-2N0-1. The discordance rate was 14/79 (17.7%) overall and 45/270 (16.7%) of the total retrieved axillary LNs. The first SLNs showed the lowest discordance rate of 6.3%, whereas the second and third SLNs showed higher discordance rates of 27.6% and 60.0%, respectively. There were no associated clinicopathologic factors that affected the discordance between uptake of radioisotope and fluorescence intensity of ICG. The use of ICG alone for SLNB may be insufficient because of the high discordance rates between radioisotopes and ICG uptake. However, the first SLN could be cautiously regarded as a true SLN.

Safety and efficacy of everolimus (EVE) plus exemestane (EXE) in postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: final results from EVEREXES.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to collect clinical safety, tolerability, and efficacy data with the use of everolimus (EVE) combined with exemestane (EXE) in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). METHODS: The EVEREXES trial initiated in 2012, provided early access to the first dual blockade treatment with EVE + EXE in patients with HR+, HER2 - ABC in Asia and other emerging growth countries. Postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2 - ABC who had documented recurrence or progression, following a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy, were treated with EVE (10 mg/day) + EXE (25 mg/day) orally. RESULTS: A total of 235 patients received ≥ 1 dose of study medication. At the end of the study, all patients ceased the treatment. Disease progression (66.0%) was the primary reason of discontinuation. The most common AEs (≥ 20%) were stomatitis, decreased appetite, hyperglycemia, rash, aspartate aminotransferase increased, anemia, alanine aminotransferase increased, cough, and fatigue. No new safety concerns were identified in the current study. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in the Asian subset was similar to that of the overall population (9.3 months in both groups). Confirmed overall response rate (ORR) was achieved for 19.6% of the patients. Efficacy of EVE + EXE across subgroups (prior CT, line of treatment, and presence of visceral metastases) was maintained. CONCLUSION: The safety and efficacy results from EVEREXES trial are consistent to data previously reported in BOLERO-2. These results support that EVE + EXE could be a viable treatment option for the postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2 - ABC in Asian region.

Clinical significance of autoantibody expression in allogeneic stem-cell recipients.

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of autoantibodies has been reported in allogeneic stem-cell recipients, but the association of this occurrence with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) or survival remains uncertain. METHODS: A total of 121 consecutive patients who underwent allogeneic stem-cell transplantation from November 2001 to March 2008 and survived at least 3 months after transplantation were included in this study. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients (38.8%) expressed at least one of various autoantibodies after transplantation. Antinuclear antibody was positive in 22 patients (18.2%), antidouble stranded DNA in seven (5.8%), antismooth muscle antibody in six (5%), rheumatoid factor in 17 (14.0%), and a positive Coombs test recorded for 12 patients (9.9%). cGVHD was more commonly diagnosed in the patients with autoantibody expression (61.7% vs. 43.2%, P=0.048). The patients expressing autoantibodies had a better 5-year overall survival than those without any autoantibody expression: 70.2% and 47.9% for the autoantibody-positive and autoantibody-negative patients, respectively (P=0.002). The cumulative incidence of relapse was 21.5% and 39.3% for the autoantibody-positive and autoantibody-negative patients, respectively (P=0.023). In particular, the patients expressing autoantibodies without cGVHD had a better overall survival (100%) than the patients in the other groups: 63.1% for the autoantibody- and cGVHD-positive patients, 59.6% for the autoantibody-negative and cGVHD-positive patients, and 36.6% for the autoantibody- and cGVHD-negative patients. The multivariate analysis identified autoantibody expression as a good prognostic factor regarding survival (hazard ratio=0.378, 95% confidence interval=0.185-0.775, P=0.008). CONCLUSION: The occurrence of autoantibodies after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation was found to be related to cGVHD, and patients expressing autoantibodies had a better survival.

Prophylactic growth factor-primed donor lymphocyte infusion using cells reserved at the time of transplantation after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Standard allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) offers only a small chance of cure for most adult patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. The authors postulated that allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) followed by prophylactic growth factor-primed donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) with cells reserved at harvest would maximize the graft-versus-tumor effects in patients with hematologic malignancies who had a high risk of recurrence. METHODS: Seventeen patients with hematologic malignancies who had a high risk of recurrence were allocated on an intent-to-treat basis to allogeneic PBSCT from human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling donors followed by prophylactic growth factor-primed DLI of cells reserved at harvest for transplantation. RESULTS: The median age was 37 years (range, 19-56 years). All donors underwent two or more apheresis procedures. The median numbers of mononuclear cells (MNCs), CD34 positive (CD34+) cells, and CD3+ cells, respectively, that were collected for 17 donors were 9.0 x 10(8) MNCs/kg (range, 4.9-14.4 x 10(8) MNCs/kg), 13.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (range, 2.4-75.2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg), and 5.8 x 10(8) CD3+ cells/kg (range, 3.3-9.9 x 10(8) CD3+ cells/kg) for a mean number of 2.35 apheresis procedures (range, 2.0-4.0 procedures). The median numbers of MNCs and CD3+ cells that were cryopreserved were 2.1 x 10(8) MNCs/kg (range, 0.0-4.4 x 10(8) MNCs/kg) and 1.4 x 10(8) CD3+ cells/kg (range, 0.0-3.5 x 10(8) CD3+ cells/kg). Seven of 17 patients received additional PBSCs, with a median of 5.0 x 10(7) CD3+ cells/kg (range, 3.0-9.9 CD3+ cells/kg) between Day 41 and Day 120. The reasons for inability to administer additional PBSCs in 10 patients included early death (n = 4 patients), severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (n = 3 patients), disease recurrence (n = 2 patients), and harvest failure (n = 1 patient). Of seven patients, two patients died of recurrence, and one died of cytomegalovirus pneumonitis. The surviving four patients were free of disease when last assessed (median follow-up, 597 days) but were suffering from chronic GVHD (one patient had limited GVHD, and three patients had extensive GVHD). CONCLUSIONS: The authors suggest that allogeneic PBSCT with prophylactic growth factor-primed DLI may be a potentially curative strategy for the treatment of hematologic malignancies in patients with a high risk of recurrence. Their approach may offer the additional advantage of collecting enough cells at harvest for the potential use of DLI, which is easy, convenient for donors, and cost effective.