A Prospective Audit of Airway Code Activations and Adverse Events in Two Tertiary Hospitals

INTRODUCTION@#Airway management outside the operating room can be challenging, with an increased risk of difficult intubation, failed intubation and complications. We aim to examine airway practices, incidence of difficult airway and complications associated with airway code (AC) activation.@*METHODS@#We conducted a prospective audit of AC activations and adverse events in two tertiary hospitals in Singapore. We included all adult patients outside the operating room who underwent emergency intubation by the AC team after AC activation. Adult patients who underwent emergency intubation without AC activation or before the arrival of the AC team were excluded. Data were collected and documented by the attending anaesthetists in a standardised survey form shortly after their responsibilities were completed.@*RESULTS@#The audit was conducted over a 20-month period from July 2016 to March 2018, during which a total of 224 airway activations occurred. Intubation was successful in 218 of 224 AC activations, giving a success rate of 97.3%. Overall, 48 patients (21.4%) suffered an adverse event. Thirteen patients (5.8%) had complications when intubation was carried out by the AC team compared with 35 (21.5%) by the non-AC team.@*CONCLUSION@#Dedicated AC team offers better success rate for emergency tracheal intubation. Non-AC team attempted intubation in the majority of the cases before the arrival of the AC team. Increased intubation attempts are associated with increased incidence of adverse events. Equipment and patient factors also contributed to the adverse events. A multidisciplinary programme including the use of supraglottic devices may be helpful to improve the rate of success and minimise complications.

Treatment preferences for decompression illness amongst Singapore dive physicians.

INTRODUCTION: Owing to the scarcity of randomized controlled trials to guide treatment for decompression illness (DCI), there are many unanswered questions about its management. Apart from reviews and expert opinion, surveys that report practice patterns provide information about useful management strategies. Hence, this study aimed to identify current treatment preferences for DCI amongst diving physicians in Singapore. METHODS: An anonymous web-based questionnaire was sent to known diving physicians in Singapore. The demographics of the respondents were captured. Respondents were asked about their preferred management for five different DCI scenarios. RESULTS: The response rate was 74% (17 of 23 responses). All respondents chose to recompress patients described in the five scenarios. Regarding the number of recompression sessions, "one additional session after no further improvement in signs and symptoms" was the most common end point of treatment across all the scenarios (47 of 85 responses). Analgesics would be used by five physicians, three would use lidocaine and two steroids as adjuvant therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Apart from the general agreement that recompression is indicated for DCI, there was no strong consensus regarding other aspects of management. This survey reinforces the need for robust RCTs to validate the existing recommendations for DCI treatment.

Discrepancies in end-of-life decisions between elderly patients and their named surrogates

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>This study aims to determine the attitudes of Asian elderly patients towards invasive life support measures, the degree of patient-surrogate concordance in end-of-life decision making, the extent to which patients desire autonomy over end-of-life medical decisions, the reasons behind patients' and surrogates' decisions, and the main factors influencing patients' and surrogates' decision-making processes. We hypothesize that there is significant patient-surrogate discordance in end-of-life decision making in our community.</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>The patient and surrogate were presented with a hypothetical scenario in which the patient experienced gradual functional decline in the community before being admitted for life-threatening pneumonia. It was explained that the outcome was likely to be poor even with intensive care and each patient-surrogate pair was subsequently interviewed separately on their opinions of extraordinary life support using a standardised questionnaire. Both parties were blinded to each other's replies.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>In total, 30 patients and their surrogate decision-makers were interviewed. Twenty-eight (93.3%) patients and 20 (66.7%) surrogates rejected intensive care. Patient-surrogate concurrence was found in 20 pairs (66.7%). Twenty-four (80.0%) patients desired autonomy over their decision. The patients' and surrogates' top reasons for rejecting intensive treatment were treatment-related discomfort, poor prognosis and financial cost. Surrogates' top reasons for selecting intensive treatment were the hope of recovery, the need to complete final tasks and the sanctity of life.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The majority of patients desire autonomy over critical care issues. Relying on the surrogates' decisions to initiate treatment may result in treatment against patients' wishes in up to one-third of critically ill elderly patients.</p>