Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J West Afr Coll Surg ; 13(4): 26-33, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38449542

RESUMO

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is the third most commonly reported nosocomial infection, accounting for 10%-40% of all nosocomial infections and is a major cause of postoperative morbidity. Knowledge of factors related to SSI can help in reducing its incidence and related morbidity, which in many studies is shown to account for 38% of all infections in surgical patients. Lack of extending nosocomial infection surveillance programme and prevention measures in countries like India is viewed as a major challenge for the future. Objectives: The aims of this work were (1) to study the SSI rate in patients undergoing both elective and emergency abdominal surgery and SSI with CDC, and NNIS risk index; and (2) to assess SSI along with body mass index (BMI), glycaemic status, smoking and duration of pre-operative hospital stay of patients. Materials and Methods: In total, 300 patients who underwent elective and emergency abdominal surgery were enrolled in the study as per inclusion and exclusion criteria. SSI with CDC's NNIS risk index were analysed considering BMI, glycaemic status, smoking and duration of pre-operative hospital stay of patients. Results: In total, 300 cases of abdominal surgeries (elective and emergency) were analysed, out of which 60 cases were diagnosed to have SSI as per the criteria. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that there is a significant increase in SSI with increasing NNIS score that is, the greater the NNIS score, the greater the risk of SSI. With an increase in age, BMI, glycaemic index and preoperative hospital stay, the risk of SSI increases. Smoking and associated comorbidities also increase the risk of SSI.

2.
J West Afr Coll Surg ; 12(4): 56-63, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36590783

RESUMO

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the procedure of choice for the management of symptomatic gallstone disease. In LC, the surgeons encountered difficulties with acutely inflamed or gangrenous gallbladder (GB), dense adhesions at Calot's triangle, fibrotic and contracted GB, and cholecystoenteric fistula. Depending on the difficulty faced during the surgery, the outcome of LC may vary from abandoning the procedure or partial cholecystectomy to conversion into open cholecystectomy. Complications related to biliary tract or adjoining structures or vessels may also occur. Our aim was to assess the different preoperative factors in patients of cholelithiasis and ascertain the validity of the scoring system devised by Randhawa and Pujahari in preoperatively predicting the difficult LC in our hospital scenario. Materials and Methods: This hospital-based observational study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery for a period of 2 years. All diagnosed cases of cholelithiasis admitted for elective LC during the study period in our hospital were included in the study. Results: In total, 154 patients, aged≥50 years, history of hospitalization for acute cholecystitis (AC), body mass index of 25 kg/m2 and more, abdominal scar, palpable GB, GB wall thickness ≥4 mm, pericholecystic collection, impacted stone found to be significant factors to predict difficult LC preoperatively. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and pancreatitis were found as independent risk factor for difficult LC. Conclusion: We recommend that the scoring system should be regularly used as a protocol for predicting difficulty levels preoperatively in LC. It can help to decide the surgical approach, counsel the patients, and reduce the complication rate, rate of conversion, and overall medical cost. The scoring system proposed by Randhawa and Pujahari is effective but has some lacunae.

3.
Indian J Urol ; 30(4): 387-91, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25378819

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Stone disease is a significant and world-wide health problem. Recently, certain drugs have been used as a supplement to observation alone in an effort to improve spontaneous stone expulsion. We evaluated the efficacy of nifedipine and alfuzosin in the medical treatment of symptomatic, uncomplicated distal ureteral stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized controlled prospective study to determine the efficacy of alfuzosin and nifedipine as an adjunctive medical therapy, to increases the stone-expulsion rates in distal ureteric calculus of size ≤10 mm. Investigators and patients were blinded to the randomization scheme. Patients were randomly divided into three equal groups of 35 patients each. Patients in Group I received tablet nifedipine 30 mg/day, Group II received alfuzosin 10 mg/day and Group III was the control group received tablet diclofenac sodium. The patient blood pressure, stone position on imaging, number of pain attacks, time of stone-expulsion, hospital re-admission and any adverse events were assessed. Patients were followed-up weekly and continued until the patient was rendered stone free or up to 28 days. Statistical analysis was performed and P < 0.05 was considered to be significant. RESULTS: Stone-expulsion was observed in 60%, 85.7% and 20% patients in Group I, II and III respectively. A statistically significant difference was noted in between Groups I versus III, Groups II versus III and Groups I versus II (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, and P < 0.0315 respectively). The mean number of pain attacks was 2.91 ± 1.01 for Group I, 1.8 ± 0.83 for Group II, and 2.82 ± 1.12 for Group III, which is statistical significant in Groups II versus III, and Groups I versus II (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). Hospital re-admission rate was less in treatment groups when compare to control group (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The use of alfuzosin and nifedipine as a medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteric stones proved to be safe and effective in term of increased stone-expulsion rate, reduced pain attacks and decrease hospital re-admissions.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA