RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Traditional approaches to pediatric cardiac catheterization have relied on femoral venous access. Upper- extremity venous access may enable cardiac catheterization procedures to be performed safely for diagnostic and interventional catheterizations. The objective of this multicenter study was to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of upper-extremity venous access in a pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent cardiac catheterization via upper-extremity vascular access was performed. RESULTS: Eighty-two cardiac catheterizations were attempted via upper-extremity vein on 72 patients. Successful access was obtained in 75 catheterizations (91%) in 67 patients. Median age at catheterization was 18.79 years (interquartile range [IQR], 13.02-32.75 years; n = 75) with a median weight of 59.4 kg (IQR, 43.3-76.5 kg; n = 75). The youngest patient was 4.1 months old, weighing 4.3 kg. Local anesthesia or light sedation was utilized in 46 procedures (61%). Diagnostic right heart catheterization was the most common procedure (n = 65; 87%), with intervention performed via the upper extremity in 8 cases (11%). Median fluoroscopy time was 10.02 min (IQR, 2.87-36.26 min; n = 75), with dose area product/kg of 3.765 µGyâ¢m²/kg (IQR, 0.74-34.12 µGyâ¢m²/kg; n = 64). Median sheath duration time was 48 min (IQR, 19.5-147 min; n = 57) and median total procedure time was 116 min (IQR, 80.5-299 min; n = 65). Median length of stay for outpatient procedures was 5.37 hr (IQR, 4.25-6.92 hr; n = 27). There were no procedural complications. CONCLUSION: Upper-extremity venous access is a useful, feasible, and safe modality for cardiac catheterization in the pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Cateterismo Periférico , Extremidade Superior/irrigação sanguínea , Adolescente , Adulto , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Cateterismo Periférico/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Fluoroscopia/métodos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Duração da Cirurgia , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Doses de RadiaçãoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In a pilot study of chronic maternal hyperoxygenation (CMH) in left heart hypoplasia (LHH), we sought to determine effect estimates of CMH on head size, vascular resistance indices, and neurodevelopment compared to controls. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nine gravidae meeting the inclusion criteria (fetal LHH, ≥25.9 weeks' gestation, and ≥10% increase in percent aortic flow after acute hyperoxygenation) were prospectively enrolled. Controls were 9 contemporary gravidae with fetal LHH without CMH. Brain growth and Doppler-derived estimates of fetal cerebrovascular and placental resistance were blindly evaluated and compared using longitudinal regression. Postnatal anthropomorphic and neurodevelopmental assessments were compared. RESULTS: There was no difference in baseline fetal measures between groups. There was significantly slower biparietal diameter (BPD) growth in the CMH group (z-score change -0.03 ± 0.02 vs. +0.09 ± 0.05 units/week, p = 0.02). At 6 months postnatal age, the mean head circumference z-score in the CMH group was smaller than that of controls (-0.20 ± 0.58 vs. +0.85 ± 1.11, p = 0.048). There were no differences in neurodevelopmental testing at 6 and 12 months. DISCUSSION: In this pilot study, relatively diminished fetal BPD growth and smaller infant head circumference z-scores at 6 months were noted with in utero CMH exposure.
Assuntos
Circulação Cerebrovascular , Síndrome do Coração Esquerdo Hipoplásico/fisiopatologia , Oxigênio/uso terapêutico , Resistência Vascular , Encéfalo/irrigação sanguínea , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Encéfalo/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Feminino , Feto , Humanos , Troca Materno-Fetal , Projetos Piloto , Gravidez , Fluxo Pulsátil , Análise de Regressão , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal , Artérias Umbilicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Artérias Umbilicais/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
Background: Congenital heart diseases (CHDs) are the most common type of birth defects. Improvements in CHD care have led to approximately 1.4 million survivors reaching adulthood. Successful transition and transfer from pediatric to adult care is crucial. Unfortunately, less than 30% of adolescents with CHD successfully transition to adult care; this number is lower for minority and lower socioeconomic status populations. Few CHD programs exist to facilitate successful transition. Objective: The goal of our study was to describe the formative research used to develop a prototype mobile app to facilitate transition to adult care for adolescents with CHD. Methods: A literature search about best practices in transition medicine for CHD was conducted to inform app development. Formative research with a diverse group of CHD adolescents and their parents was conducted to determine gaps and needs for CHD transition to adult care. As part of the interview, surveys assessing transition readiness and CHD knowledge were completed. Two adolescent CHD expert panels were convened to inform educational content and app design. Results: The literature review revealed 113 articles, of which 38 were studies on transition programs and attitudes and 3 identified best practices in transition specific to CHD. A total of 402 adolescents aged 15 to 22 years (median 16 years) participated in semistructured interviews. The group was racially and ethnically diverse (12.6% [51/402] African American and 37.8% [152/402] Latino) and 42.0% (169/402) female; 36.3% (146/402) received public insurance. Most adolescents (313/402, 76.7%) had moderate or severe CHD complexity and reported minimal CHD understanding (79.0% [275/348] of those aged 15 to 17 years and 61.1% [33/54] of those aged 18 to 22 years). Average initial transition readiness score was 50.9/100, meaning that transition readiness training was recommended. When participants with moderate to severe CHD (313/402, 77.9%) were asked about technology use, 94.2% (295/313) reported having access to a mobile phone. Interviews with parents revealed limited interactions with the pediatric cardiologist about transition-related topics: 79.4% (331/417) reported no discussions regarding future family planning, and 55.2% (230/417) reported the adolescent had not been screened for mental health concerns (depression, anxiety). Further, 66.4% (277/417) reported not understanding how health care changes as adolescents become adults. Adolescents in the expert panels (2 groups of 3 adolescents each) expressed interest in a CHD-specific tailored app consisting of quick access to specific educational questions (eg, "Can I exercise?"), a CHD story-blog forum, a mentorship platform, a question and answer space, and a checklist to facilitate transition. They expressed interest in using the app to schedule CHD clinic appointments and receive medication reminders. Based on this data, a prototype mobile app was created to assist in adolescent CHD transition. Conclusions: Formative research revealed that most adolescents with CHD had access to mobile phones, were not prepared for transition to adult care, and were interested in an app to facilitate transition to adult CHD care. Understanding adolescent and parent needs, interests, and concerns helped in the development of a mobile app with a broader, tailored approach for adolescents with CHD.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The treatment of children with cardiac disease is one of the most prevalent and costly pediatric inpatient conditions. The design of inpatient medical services for children admitted to and discharged from noncritical cardiology care units, however, is undefined. North American Pediatric Cardiology Programs were surveyed to define noncritical cardiac care unit models in current practice. METHOD: An online survey that explored institutional and functional domains for noncritical cardiac care unit was crafted. All questions were multi-choice with comment boxes for further explanation. The survey was distributed by email four times over a 5-month period. RESULTS: Most programs (n = 45, 60%) exist in free-standing children's hospitals. Most programs cohort cardiac patients on noncritical cardiac care units that are restricted to cardiac patients in 39 (54%) programs or restricted to cardiac and other subspecialty patients in 23 (32%) programs. The most common frontline providers are categorical pediatric residents (n = 58, 81%) and nurse practitioners (n = 48, 67%). However, nurse practitioners are autonomous providers in only 21 (29%) programs. Only 33% of programs use a postoperative fast-track protocol. When transitioning care to referring physicians, most programs (n = 53, 72%) use facsimile to deliver pertinent patient information. Twenty-two programs (31%) use email to transition care, and eighteen (25%) programs use verbal communication. CONCLUSION: Most programs exist in free-standing children's hospitals in which the noncritical cardiac care units are in some form restricted to cardiac patients. While nurse practitioners are used on most noncritical cardiac care units, they rarely function as autonomous providers. The majority of programs in this survey do not incorporate any postoperative fast-track protocols in their practice. Given the current era of focused handoffs within hospital systems, relatively few programs utilize verbal handoffs to the referring pediatric cardiologist/pediatrician.