Performance of antenatal imaging to predict placenta accreta spectrum degree of severity.

INTRODUCTION: In cases of placenta accreta spectrum, a precise antenatal diagnosis of the suspected degree of invasion is essential for the planning of individual management strategies at delivery. The aim of this work was to evaluate the respective performances of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the antenatal assessment of the severity of placenta accreta spectrum disorders included in the database. The secondary objective was to identify descriptors related to the severity of placenta accreta spectrum disorders. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All the cases included in the database for which antenatal imaging data were available were analyzed. The rates of occurrence of each ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging descriptor were reported and compared between the Group "Accreta-Increta" (FIGO grades 1 & 2) and the Group "Percreta" (FIGO grade 3). RESULTS: Antenatal imaging data were available for 347 women (347/442, 78.5%), of which 105 were included in the Group "Accreta - Increta" (105/347, 30.2%) and 213 (213/347, 61.4%) in the Group "Percreta". Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in addition to ultrasound in 135 women (135/347, 38.9%). After adjustment for all ultrasound descriptors in multivariate analysis, only the presence of a bladder wall interruption was associated with a significant higher risk of percreta (Odds ratio 3.23, Confidence interval 1.33-7.79). No magnetic resonance imaging sign was significantly correlated with the degree of severity. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging to discriminate mild from severe placenta accreta spectrum disorders is very poor. To date, the benefit of additional magnetic resonance imaging has not been demonstrated.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes in planned versus emergency cesarean delivery for placenta accreta spectrum: A multinational database study.

INTRODUCTION: Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is a condition often resulting in severe maternal morbidity. Scheduled delivery by an experienced team has been shown to improve maternal outcomes; however, the benefits must be weighed against the risk of iatrogenic prematurity. The aim of this study is to investigate the rates of emergency delivery seen for antenatally suspected PAS and compare the resulting outcomes in the 15 referral centers of the International Society for PAS (IS-PAS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifteen centers provided cases between 2008 and 2019. The women included were divided into two groups according to whether they had a planned or an emergency cesarean delivery. Delivery was defined as "planned" when performed at a time and date to suit the team. All the remaining cases were classified as "emergency". Maternal characteristics and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups according to gestation at delivery. RESULTS: In all, 356 women were included. Of these, 239 (67%) underwent a planned delivery and 117 (33%) an emergency delivery. Vaginal bleeding was the indication for emergency delivery in 41 of the 117 women (41%). There were no significant differences in terms of blood loss, transfusion rates or major maternal morbidity between planned and emergency deliveries. However, the rate of maternal intensive therapy unit admission was increased with emergency delivery (45% vs 33%, P = .02). Antepartum hemorrhage was the only independent predictor of emergency delivery (aOR: 4.3, 95% confidence interval 2.4-7.7). Emergency delivery due to vaginal bleeding was more frequent with false-positive cases (antenatally suspected but not confirmed as PAS at delivery) and the milder grades of PAS (accreta/increta). The rate of infants experiencing any major neonatal morbidity was 25% at 34+1 to 36+0  weeks and 19% at >36+0  weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency delivery in centers of excellence did not increase blood loss, transfusion rates or maternal morbidity. The single greatest risk factor for emergency delivery was antenatal hemorrhage. When adequate expertise and resources are available, to defer delivery in women with no significant antenatal bleeding and no risk factors for pre-term birth until >36+0  weeks can be considered to improve fetal outcomes. Further studies are needed to investigate this fully.

Intrauterine Fetal Growth Delay During Late Pregnancy After Maternal Gastric Bypass Surgery.

PURPOSE: To investigate intrauterine fetal growth development and birth anthropometry of fetuses conceived after maternal gastric bypass surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Longitudinal cohort study describing longitudinal growth estimated by ultrasound on 43 singleton pregnancies after gastric bypass compared to 43 BMI-matched controls. RESULTS: In fetuses after maternal gastric bypass surgery, growth percentiles decreased markedly from the beginning of the second trimester until the end of the third trimester (decrease of 3.1 fetal abdomen circumference percentiles (95 %CI 0.9-5.3, p = 0.007) per four gestational weeks). While in the second trimester, fetal anthropometric measures did not differ between the groups, the mean abdomen circumference percentiles appeared significantly smaller during the third trimester in offspring of mothers after gastric bypass (mean difference 25.1 percentiles, p < 0.001). Similar tendencies have been observed in estimated fetal weight resulting in significantly more SGA offspring at delivery in the gastric bypass group. In children born after maternal gastric bypass surgery, weight percentiles (32.12th vs. 55.86th percentile, p < 0.001) as well as placental weight (525.2 g vs. 635.7 g, p < 0.001) were significantly reduced compared to controls. CONCLUSION: In fetuses conceived after maternal gastric bypass, intrauterine fetal growth distinctively declined in the second and third trimester, most prominently observed in fetal abdomen circumferences. Birth weight and placental weight at birth was significantly lower compared to BMI-matched controls, possibly due to altered maternal metabolic factors and comparable to mothers experiencing chronic hunger episodes.

Risk-adapted management for vasa praevia: a retrospective study about individualized timing of caesarean section.

PURPOSE: Vasa praevia is a rare condition with high foetal mortality if not detected prenatally. There is limited evidence available to determine the ideal timing of delivery and management recommendations. The aim of this study was to critically review our experience with vasa praevia, with a focus on diagnosis and management. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, all cases of vasa praevia identified in our department from January 2003 to December 2017 were included. All cases were diagnosed antenatally during sonographic inspection of the placenta, and individualized management for each patient was performed based on individual risk factors. 19 cases of vasa praevia were identified (15 singletons, four twins). 13 patients (79%) presented placental anomalies. In patients at high risk for preterm birth, caesarean delivery was performed between 34-35 weeks after early hospitalization and administration of corticosteroids, whereas in patients at low risk for preterm birth, caesarean section could be delayed to 35-37 weeks of gestation. Administration of corticosteroids was not obligatory in the latter cases. RESULTS: There were two acute caesarean sections, due to premature abruption of the placenta and vaginal bleeding. There was no maternal or foetal/neonatal death. None of the neonates required blood transfusion. There is limited evidence available with which to determine the ideal timing of delivery. CONCLUSION: However, our individualized, risk-adapted management, which attempts to delay the timing of caesarean section up to two weeks beyond the standard recommendation, seems feasible, with just two emergency caesarean sections and no case of foetal or maternal death.

Intra- versus retroplacental hematomas: a retrospective case-control study on pregnancy outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Intrauterine hematomas are a common pregnancy complication. The literature lacks studies about outcomes based on hematoma localization. Thus, we aimed to compare pregnancies complicated by an intraplacental hematoma to cases with a retroplacental hematoma and to a control group. METHODS: In a retrospective case-control study, 32 women with an intraplacental hematoma, 199 women with a retroplacental hematoma, and a control group consisting of 113 age-matched women with no signs of placental abnormalities were included. Main outcome measures were pregnancy complications. RESULTS: Second-trimester miscarriage was most common in the intraplacental hematoma group (9.4%), followed by women with a retroplacental hematoma (4.2%), and controls (0%; p = 0.007). The intraplacental hematoma group revealed the highest rates for placental insufficiency, intrauterine growth retardation, premature preterm rupture of membranes, preterm labor, preterm delivery <37 weeks, and early preterm delivery <34 weeks (p < 0.05), followed by the retroplacental hematoma group. When tested in multivariate models, intraplacental hematomas were independent predictors for placental insufficiency (ß = 4.19, p < 0.001) and intrauterine growth restriction (ß = 1.44, p = 0.035). Intrauterine fetal deaths occurred only in women with a retroplacental hematoma (p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Intra- and retroplacental hematomas have different risk profiles for the affected pregnancy and act as independent risk factors.

Ten-Year Experience with the Conservative Management of Abnormally Invasive, Residual Trophoblastic Disease. A Retrospective Case Series.

Conservative management of abnormally invasive, residual trophoblastic disease (AIRTD) is underreported. We aimed at critically reviewing our experience with such conservative management. We conducted a retrospective cohort study that included 24 women. The median completed week of gestation at delivery (20/24, 83.3%)/2nd trimester miscarriage (4/24, 16.7%) was 35 (range 17-41). Two women initially chose a surgical treatment (dilatation and curettage), but AIRTD remained sonographically visible afterward. Five patients developed a fever >38.0°C for ≥2 days (5/24, 20.8%). Due to heavy vaginal bleeding, 2 patients then underwent dilatation, diagnostic hysteroscopy, and curettage (2/24, 8.3%). One of these women also had to undergo hysterectomy (1/24, 4.2%). The 23 patients without hysterectomy underwent regular sonographic follow-up examinations. Regression of AIRTD was found after a median of 74 days (range 36-323). In conclusion, our data suggest that a conservative, observational treatment is feasible in AIRTD, with low rates of secondary surgical interventions. The long time intervals until regression require perseverance by these patients.