Paraesophageal hiatal hernia. Open vs. laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: paraesophageal hiatal hernia represents 5-10% of hiatal hernias. Its importance is based on the severe complications it may have, including gastric volvulus, and surgical treatment is recommended when a diagnosis is established. MATERIAL AND METHODS: a retrospective study of all patients who underwent surgery for paresophageal hernia between 1985 and 2007. RESULTS: we studied 90 cases, 68 females and 22 males with a median age of 67.6 years (37-96). Forty-five patients reported pyrosis, 34 epigastric postprandial pain, and 15 dysphagia; eight patients were diagnosed with gastric volvulus. Eighty-one patients underwent elective surgery and 9 emergency surgery. Forty-seven cases underwent an open procedure and 43 a laparoscopic one; 5 (11.6%) of them required conversion. The techniques performed were D Or fundoplication in 35 cases, Nissen in 35, Toupet in 14, simple hiatal closure in 2, Narbona in 1, and Lortat-Jakob in 1; in 10 patients a mesh was placed. The complication rate for open procedure was 10.6 and 9.5% for the laparoscopic one (p > 0.05). Median hospital stay was 9.1 days for the open procedure and 3.4 for the laparoscopic one (p < 0.05). As follow-up, we analyzed 84 patients. After a median follow-up of 12 years (1-19), 15 patients were still symptomatic (17.8%), with recurrence in 8 cases (5 required reoperation). The satisfaction rate was 95.5%. CONCLUSION: equivalent results were observed after laparoscopic and open surgery and a significant shorter hospital stay in the laparoscopic one. Therefore, we think that laparoscopic surgery should be considered as the election procedure for paraesophageal hiatal hernia.

Hernia de hiato paraesofágica: cirugía laparoscópica vs. cirugía abierta / Paraesophageal hiatal hernia. Open vs. laparoscopic surgery

Introducción: la hernia hiatal paraesofágica representa el 5-10% de las hernias hiatales. Su importancia radica en las gravescomplicaciones que pueden presentar, como el vólvulo gástrico, yse recomienda el tratamiento quirúrgico una vez establecido eldiagnóstico.Material y métodos: estudio retrospectivo de los pacientesintervenidos en nuestro centro de hernia hiatal paraesofágica entre1985 y 2007.Resultados: estudiamos 90 casos, 68 mujeres y 22 varones,con edad media de 67,6 años (37-96). Cuarenta y cinco pacientespresentaban pirosis, 34 dolor epigástrico postprandial y 15 disfagia;ocho pacientes fueron diagnosticados como vólvulo gástrico.Se realizaron 81 intervenciones programadas y 9 urgentes. En 47casos el abordaje fue abierto y en 43 laparoscópico, de los cuales5 se convirtieron a cirugía abierta. Se realizó funduplicatura D´Oren 35 casos, Nissen en 35, Toupet en 14, cierre simple de pilaresen 2, Narbona en 1 y Lortat-Jakob en 1; en 10 pacientes se colocaronmallas. La tasa de complicaciones en cirugía abierta fue10,6% y en laparoscópica 9,5% (p > 0,05). La estancia media fue9,1 días en cirugía abierta y 3,4 en laparoscópica (p < 0,05). Enel seguimiento, analizamos 84 pacientes, con una mediana de 12años (1-19): 15 continuaban sintomáticos, objetivándose recidivaen 8 (5 fueron reintervenidos). El 95,5% de los pacientes estabansatisfechos con los resultados.Conclusión: se obtuvieron resultados equivalentes tras cirugíalaparoscópica y abierta, con estancia hospitalaria significativamentemenor en los primeros. Por ello creemos que se debe considerarla cirugía laparoscópica como abordaje de elección paratratar la hernia hiatal paraesofágica(AU)

Background: paraesophageal hiatal hernia represents 5-10%of hiatal hernias. Its importance is based on the severe complicationsit may have, including gastric volvulus, and surgical treatmentis recommended when a diagnosis is established.Material and methods: a retrospective study of all patientswho underwent surgery for paresophageal hernia between 1985and 2007.Results: we studied 90 cases, 68 females and 22 males with amedian age of 67.6 years (37-96). Forty-five patients reported pyrosis,34 epigastric postprandial pain, and 15 dysphagia; eightpatients were diagnosed with gastric volvulus. Eighty-one patientsunderwent elective surgery and 9 emergency surgery. Forty-sevencases underwent an open procedure and 43 a laparoscopicone; 5 (11.6%) of them required conversion. The techniques performedwere D´Or fundoplication in 35 cases, Nissen in 35,Toupet in 14, simple hiatal closure in 2, Narbona in 1, and Lortat-Jakob in 1; in 10 patients a mesh was placed. The complicationrate for open procedure was 10.6 and 9.5% for the laparoscopicone (p > 0.05). Median hospital stay was 9.1 days for theopen procedure and 3.4 for the laparoscopic one (p < 0.05). Asfollow-up, we analyzed 84 patients. After a median follow-up of12 years (1-19), 15 patients were still symptomatic (17.8%), withrecurrence in 8 cases (5 required reoperation). The satisfactionrate was 95.5%Conclusion: equivalent results were observed after laparoscopicand open surgery and a significant shorter hospital stay inthe laparoscopic one. Therefore, we think that laparoscopicsurgery should be considered as the election procedure for paraesophagealhiatal hernia(AU)