Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for Safer Conception Among Serodifferent Couples: Findings from Healthcare Providers Serving Patients with HIV in Seven US Cities.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) can reduce the risk of HIV transmission among serodifferent couples trying to conceive, yet provider knowledge, attitudes, and experience utilizing PrEP for this purpose are largely unexamined. Trained interviewers conducted phone interviews with healthcare providers treating patients with HIV in seven cities (Atlanta, Baltimore, Houston, Kansas City, Newark, Philadelphia, and San Francisco, N = 85 total). Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed to describe experience, concerns, and perceived barriers to prescribing PrEP for safer conception. Providers (67.1% female, 43 mean years of age, 70.4% white, 10 mean years treating HIV+ patients, 56% in academic vs. community facilities, 62.2% MD) discussed both benefits and concerns of PrEP for safer conception among serodifferent couples. Only 18.8% of providers reported experience prescribing PrEP, 74.2% were willing to prescribe it under ideal circumstances, and 7.0% were not comfortable prescribing PrEP. Benefits included added protection and a greater sense of control for the HIV-negative partner. Concerns were categorized as clinical, system-level, cost, or behavioral. Significant differences in provider characteristics existed across sites, but experience with PrEP for safer conception did not, p = 0.14. Despite limited experience, most providers were open to recommending PrEP for safer conception as long as patients understood the range of concerns and could make informed decisions. Strategies to identify and link serodifferent couples to PrEP services and clinical guidance specific to PrEP for safer conception are needed.

Brief Behavioral Intervention to Improve Adolescent Sexual Health: A Feasibility Study in the Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVE: Although emergency department (ED) visits offer an opportunity to deliver brief behavioral interventions to improve health, provision of ED-based interventions targeting adolescent sexual health is uncommon. The objectives for this study were to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effects of a novel sexual health service intervention for adolescents. METHODS: In this cross-sectional feasibility study, sexually active patients aged 14 to 19 years presenting to a Midwestern pediatric ED were recruited to receive an intervention to improve sexual health. The intervention, based on motivational interviewing (MI), included agenda setting, exploration of behaviors, a decisional balance exercise, tailored feedback, and provision of personalized health services (including condoms, prescription for emergency contraception, urine testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrheae, and referral to the hospital-affiliated adolescent clinic). Data were collected before and after intervention administration and at a 3-month follow-up telephone interview. Surveys assessed sexual risk behaviors, satisfaction with the intervention, health care use, and demographics. Feasibility criteria were (1) subject-rated interventionist fidelity to MI principles (Likert scale 1 [strongly agree] to 4 [strongly disagree]), (2) subject satisfaction (Likert scale 1 [not at all] to 5 [very]), and (3) session duration (minutes, recorded by the interventionist). A secondary outcome was the proportion of subjects who completed at least 1 health service. Services provided at the adolescent clinic were determined by an electronic medical record review. Comparisons of responses between sex subgroups were analyzed using Χ test. RESULTS: From August to November 2012, 69 adolescents were approached, 66 (96%) completed the screening survey, and 24 (37%) reported previous sexual activity. Of those, 20 (83%) agreed to participate. The mean (SD) age was 16.2 (1.4) years; 60% were female. Most (78%) reported that the interventionist maintained high fidelity to MI principles and most (80%) were very satisfied with the intervention. Mean (SD) intervention length was 15.7 (2.2) minutes. Most subjects (65%) accepted 1 or more health services, including 42% who completed clinic follow-up. In the ED or the referral clinic, the following services were provided to the subjects: condoms (n = 11), emergency contraception prescription (n = 5), C. trachomatis/N. gonorrheae testing (n = 4), hormonal birth control provision (n = 2), and human immunodeficiency virus testing (n = 3). Fifteen subjects (75%) were reached for the 3-month follow-up, and condom use was maintained by 67% of those reporting sexual activity. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the feasibility and potential utility of an MI-based service navigation intervention to connect youth with point-of-care services as well as resources for ongoing sexual health needs.

A qualitative assessment of provider perspectives on smoking cessation counselling.

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Few studies have examined doctors' views about counselling unmotivated smokers. This study explored doctors' perceptions of useful strategies to motivate patients to quit, how receptive they felt patients were to these strategies, and the benefits and drawbacks of discussing smoking cessation with patients. METHODS: Fourteen semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with doctors and resident doctors. RESULTS: Strategies reported by providers included: educating about the health risks of smoking, using 'scare tactics' to highlight the harmful effects and providing advice about how to quit. Providers believed that most patients were receptive to their strategies, but noted that they lacked feedback to know for sure. Providers saw the possibility of improving patients' health and decreasing overall health care costs as potential benefits, but cited the potential to damage rapport, competing priorities during already rushed visits and uncertainty about the effectiveness of their efforts as drawbacks that reduced their motivation to raise the issue with patients. CONCLUSIONS: Doctors believe in the potential benefits of smoking cessation counselling but predominantly report focusing on enhancing patient's risk perceptions. They did not report attempting to use the wider array of recommended and empirically supported methods to counsel their patients. Providing doctors with increased training in motivational counselling and feedback about the efficacy their efforts or supplementing doctor care with behaviour change specialists would likely increase the benefits of counselling to patients.

Physician smoking cessation counseling and adherence to a clinical practice guideline.

OBJECTIVE: The U.S. Public Health Service Clinical Practice Guideline recommends that physicians provide tobacco cessation interventions to their patients at every visit. While many studies have examined the extent to which physicians implement the guideline's "5 A's", few studies have examined the extent to which physicians implement the guideline's "5 R's" which are to be used in a Motivational Interviewing (MI) consistent style with smokers not ready to quit. This study examined the extent to which physicians in usual practice and without specific training administered the 5 R's including the use of an MI style. METHODS: Thirty-eight physicians were audio recorded during their routine clinical practice conversations with smokers.Recordings were coded by independent raters on the implementation of each of the 5 A's, 5 R's and MI counseling style. RESULTS: Results revealed that for patients not ready to quit smoking, physicians most frequently discussed the patient's personal relevance for quitting and the risks of smoking. Roadblocks and rewards were discussed relatively infrequently. MI skill code analyses revealed that physicians, on average, had moderate scores for acceptance and autonomy support, a low to moderate score for collaboration and low scores for empathy and evocation. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that for the Clinical Guideline to be implemented appropriately physicians will need specialized training or will need to be able to refer patients to counselors with the necessary expertise. Counseling efforts could increase providers' willingness to implement guideline recommendations and therefore to enhance the person-centeredness of clinical care.