The clinical status and survival in elderly dialysis: example of the oldest region of France.

BACKGROUND: The number of elderly (≥75 years) patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has increased markedly, including in the Limousin region, which has the oldest population in France. We retrospectively compared outcomes in elderly and non-elderly ESRD patients who started dialysis during two time periods. METHODS: Baseline clinical characteristics, care, and survival rates were assessed in 557 ESRD patients aged ≥75 and <75 years who started dialysis in 2002-2004 and 2005-2007. Survival curves and Cox proportional hazards model were used to assess survival and factors associated with survival. RESULTS: Of the 557 patients, 343 and 214 were <75 years and ≥75 years, respectively. Dialysis was started in 2002-2004 and 2005-2007 by 197 and 146 patients <75 years, respectively, and by 96 and 118 patients ≥75 years, respectively. Median age (73.4 years [interquartile range [IQR] 61.7-79.5 years] vs 69.5 years [IQR 57.4-77.4 years] p = 0.001) and the proportion aged ≥75 years (44.7% vs 32.8%, p = 0.004) were significantly higher in 2005-2007 than in 2002-2004. Improved initial status during 2005-2007 was observed only in patients ≥75 years, with a decrease in some co-morbidities, improved walking and better preparation for dialysis. Mortality rates were significantly lower in 2005-2007 than in 2002-2004 (hazard ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.95; p = 0.008), with the difference due to factors associated with clinical status and care. CONCLUSIONS: Improved initial clinical status and better preparation for dialysis, accompanied by increased survival, were observed for patients ≥75 years who started dialysis more recently, perhaps because of early referral to a nephrologist.

PAI-1 donor polymorphism influences long-term kidney graft survival.

BACKGROUND: The type 1 plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) is involved in the development of fibrosis, and its intrarenal expression is increased in interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA). Moreover, a 4G/5G polymorphism of the PAI-1 gene has been described associating 4G haplotype with higher PAI-1 plasma activity. We investigated the relationship between the donor and recipient PAI-1 polymorphism and kidney graft survival. METHODS: The PAI-1 genotype was determined for both the 304 donors and the 337 corresponding recipients. In recipients, PAI-1 antigen levels were also determined. We compared 4G/4G donors versus donors with other genotypes. RESULTS: Donor or recipient genotype did not influence the PAI-1 plasma level in recipients. Actuarial kidney graft survival was significantly reduced in the 4G/4G donor group (107 months versus 147.5 months, P = 0.013), while recipient PAI-1 genotype did not show any influence on graft survival. Moreover, graft loss due to IFTA proved significantly higher in the 4G/4G donor group (13% versus 6%, P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis showed that the significant independent variables associated with graft loss were the donor 4G/4G genotype, acute clinical rejection and donor age. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that donor PAI-1 polymorphism influences kidney graft survival and that the donor 4G/4G genotype is an independent risk factor for graft loss. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.