RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Asians and Asian Americans have the lowest rate of mental health service utilization (25%) in the US compared to other racial/ethnic groups (39 - 52%), despite high rates of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation. The lack of culturally-responsive mental health trainings hinders access to mental health services for these populations. We assessed the mental health priorities of Asian communities in Greater Boston and evaluated cultural responsiveness of the Mental Health First Aid (MHFA), a first-responder training teaching participants skills to recognize signs of mental health and substance use challenges, and how to appropriately respond. METHODS: This is community-based participatory research with the Boston Chinatown Neighborhood Center (BCNC), Asian Women For Health (AWFH), and the Addressing Disparities in Asian Populations through Translational Research (ADAPT) Coalition. We conducted focus groups with community-based organization staff and community members to assess mental health priorities of Asian populations in Boston, MA. We then evaluated the utility and cultural-responsiveness of the English-language MHFA for Asian populations through pre- and post-training questionnaires and focus groups with community participants. Paired t-tests were used to evaluate questionnaire responses. Thematic analysis was used to analyze interviews. RESULTS: In total, ten staff and eight community members participated in focus groups, and 24 community members completed the MHFA and pre- and post-training questionnaires. Common mental health challenges in the Asian communities reported by participants were loneliness, high stigma around mental illnesses, academic pressure, and acculturation stress. Compared to pre-training, MHFA participants demonstrated lower personal mental health stigma (p < 0.001) and higher mental health literacy (p = 0.04) post-training. Participants also noted the lack of data statistics and case studies relevant to Asian populations in the training, and desired the training be offered in languages spoken by Asian ethnic subgroups (e.g., Chinese, Vietnamese). CONCLUSION: Cultural-responsiveness of the MHFA for Asian populations could be improved with the inclusion of data and case studies that capture common mental health challenges in the Asian communities and with translation of the MHFA to non-English languages predominant in Asian communities. Increasing the cultural relevance and language accessibility of the MHFA could facilitate wider adoption of these trainings across communities and help to reduce mental health stigma and gaps in literacy and service utilization.
Assuntos
Asiático , Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade , Emigrantes e Imigrantes , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Boston , Feminino , Asiático/psicologia , Adulto , Masculino , Emigrantes e Imigrantes/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Primeiros Socorros/métodos , Transtornos Mentais/etnologia , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Competência Cultural , Saúde Mental/etnologia , Assistência à Saúde Culturalmente CompetenteRESUMO
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic and rise in anti-Asian racism have had adverse mental health impacts in Asian communities. The lack of culturally-responsive and linguistically-accessible mental health trainings hinders access to mental health services for Asian populations. In this study, we assessed the mental health needs of Asian communities in Greater Boston and evaluated cultural responsiveness of the Mental Health First Aid (MHFA), a first-responder training teaching participants skills to recognize signs of mental health and substance use challenges, and how to appropriately respond. Methods: This community-based participatory research with the Boston Chinatown Neighborhood Center (BCNC), Asian Women For Health (AWFH), and the Addressing Disparities in Asian Populations through Translational Research (ADAPT) Coalition employed two phases. In phase 1, we conducted focus groups with BCNC and AWFH staff and peer educators to assess mental health priorities of Asian populations in Boston. Findings informed phase 2, which evaluated cultural responsiveness of the MHFA through pre- and post-training questionnaires and focus groups with community participants. The pre-training questionnaire asked about mental health needs and barriers, help-seeking behaviors, and literacy; and personal and Asian community stigma. The post-training questionnaire and focus group with community participants asked about cultural competence of MHFA training for Asian populations. Paired t-tests were used to evaluate questionnaire responses. Thematic analysis was used to analyze interviews. Results: In total, 10 staff/educators and 8 community members participated in focus groups. They identified common mental health needs and workforce and culturally-responsive community strategies to support persons with mental health issues. Twenty-four community participants completed pre- and post-training questionnaires. They reported the MHFA training reduced mental health care stigma and increased mental health literacy. Recommendations to increase cultural-responsiveness of the MHFA were to include mental health case studies common in Asian populations and provide the training in other languages (e.g., Chinese, Vietnamese). Conclusion: Cultural responsiveness of the MHFA for Asian populations could be improved with the inclusion of case studies specific to the Asian communities and accessibility of the training in other languages. Increasing the cultural relevance and language accessibility of these trainings could help reduce mental health stigma and gaps in mental health awareness and service utilization among Asian populations.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Subjective cognitive impairment (SCI) among early psychosis is under-recognized and under-studied. However, SCI is as important as objective impairment to be understood, since it assesses cognitive difficulties in real-life situations from a personal perspective and is therefore an essence of individualized medicine. This study aims to explore the associations between the objective and subjective measures of cognitive impairments and to identify factors contributing to SCI among people with early psychosis. METHODS: Participants were 60 females (mean age 24.57 ± 8.28) who had a diagnosis of psychotic-spectrum disorder within 5 years. They completed a battery of neuropsychological tests assessing a range of cognitive functions including verbal learning, memory, attention, and executive functions. The Subjective Cognitive Impairment Scale (SCIS) was used to assess their perceived cognitive decline. Psychotic symptoms and depression were also assessed. RESULTS: SCIS was not correlated with any of the objective cognitive tests results. It was positively correlated with depression and positive symptoms. A hierarchical multiple regression model revealed that positive symptoms and depression together explained 31.9% of the total variance in SCIS and only depression significantly predicted SCI. Performances on the memory tests were correlated with, and predicted by negative symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: There was no correlation between SCI and objective cognitive performances in patients with early psychosis. Treatments should not only focus on symptomatic remission and performance of cognitive tests, but also place emphasis on improving moods and subjective cognitive functions of individuals with early psychosis.