Switchable Coacervate Formation via Amino Acid Functionalization of Poly(dehydroalanine).

Our group recently developed a family of side-chain amino acid-functionalized poly(S-alkyl-l-homocysteines), Xaa-CH (Xaa = generic amino acid), which possess the ability to form environmentally responsive coacervates in water. In an effort to further study how the molecular structure affects polypeptide coacervate formation, we prepared side-chain amino acid-functionalized poly(S-alkyl-rac-cysteines), Xaa-rac-C, via post-polymerization modification of poly(dehydroalanine), ADH. The use of the ADH platform allowed straightforward synthesis of a diverse range of side-chain amino acid-functionalized polypeptides via direct reaction of unprotected l-amino acid 2-mercaptoethylamides with ADH. Despite their differences in the main-chain structure, we found that Xaa-rac-C can form coacervates with properties similar to those seen with Xaa-CH. These results suggest that the incorporation of side-chain amino acids onto polypeptides may be a way to generally favor coacervation. The incorporation of l-methionine in Met-rac-C allowed the preparation of coacervates with improved stability against high ionic strength media. Further, the presence of additional thioether groups in Met-rac-C resulted in an increased solubility change upon oxidation allowing facile reversible redox switching of coacervate formation in aqueous media.

Acute Decompensated Heart Failure in the Elderly: An Observational Study in a Regional Victorian Hospital.

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the frequency, triggers, clinical management, and outcomes of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) episodes in the elderly population of a regional Victorian town, along with analysing long-term outcomes, including rehospitalization rates, functional status, and mortality. Methods In this single-centre retrospective study, approved by the Research Governance Unit of Goulburn Valley Health, we analysed data from patients over 65 years of age discharged with a primary diagnosis of heart failure (HF) between July 2022 and June 2023. The study included 174 episodes from 148 patients, examining demographic and clinical profiles, investigations, outcome measures, and hospital admission risk program (HARP) involvement. Results The study highlighted a high prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), especially in patients over 85 years. No significant association between sex and ejection fraction categories was observed. The average length of stay was 5.9 days, with longer stays noted for females. Non-invasive ventilation emerged as a significant predictor of extended hospitalization. A 30-day readmission rate of 6.67% was noted, lower than some existing studies. Conclusion The findings underscore the complexity of ADHF management in the elderly, suggesting the need for region-specific, gender-focused strategies and indicating the potential benefits of enhanced HARP program engagement. These insights contribute to a nuanced understanding of HF management in elderly populations in regional settings.

Dynamic impact of liver allocation policy change on donor utilization.

Liver allocation policy was changed to reduce variance in median MELD scores at transplant (MMaT) in February 2020. "Acuity circles" replaced local allocation. Understanding the impact of policy change on donor utilization is important. Ideal (I), standard (S), and non-ideal (NI) donors were defined. NI donors include older, higher BMI donors with elevated transaminases or bilirubin, history of hepatitis B or C, and all DCD donors. Utilization of I, S, and NI donors was established before and after allocation change and compared between low MELD (LM) centers (MMaT ≤ 28 before allocation change) and high MELD (HM) centers (MMaT > 28). Following reallocation, transplant volume increased nationally (67 transplants/center/year pre, 74 post, p .0006) and increased for both HM and LM centers. LM centers significantly increased use of NI donors and HM centers significantly increased use of I and S donors. Centers further stratify based on donor utilization phenotype. A subset of centers increased transplant volume despite rising MMaT by broadening organ acceptance criteria, increasing use of all donor types including DCD donors (98% increase), increasing living donation, and transplanting more frequently for alcohol associated liver disease. Variance in donor utilization can undermine intended effects of allocation policy change.

Imprecision and Preferences in Interpretation of Verbal Probabilities in Health: a Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Many health providers and communicators who are concerned that patients will not understand numbers instead use verbal probabilities (e.g., terms such as "rare" or "common") to convey the gist of a health message. OBJECTIVE: To assess patient interpretation of and preferences for verbal probability information in health contexts. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of literature published through September 2020. Original studies conducted in English with samples representative of lay populations were included if they assessed health-related information and elicited either (a) numerical estimates of verbal probability terms or (b) preferences for verbal vs. quantitative risk information. RESULTS: We identified 33 original studies that referenced 145 verbal probability terms, 45 of which were included in at least two studies and 19 in three or more. Numerical interpretations of each verbal term were extremely variable. For example, average interpretations of the term "rare" ranged from 7 to 21%, and for "common," the range was 34 to 71%. In a subset of 9 studies, lay estimates of verbal probability terms were far higher than the standard interpretations established by the European Commission for drug labels. In 10 of 12 samples where preferences were elicited, most participants preferred numerical information, alone or in combination with verbal labels. CONCLUSION: Numerical interpretation of verbal probabilities is extremely variable and does not correspond well to the numerical probabilities established by expert panels. Most patients appear to prefer quantitative risk information, alone or in combination with verbal labels. Health professionals should be aware that avoiding numeric information to describe risks may not match patient preferences, and that patients interpret verbal risk terms in a highly variable way.