Comparison of acute outcomes from elective total hip replacements and after fragility femoral neck fractures in nonagenarians.

BACKGROUND: Hip hemiarthroplasty has traditionally been used to treat displaced femoral neck fractures in older, frailer patients whilst total hip replacements (THR) have been reserved for younger and fitter patients. However, not all elderly patients are frail, and some may be able to tolerate and benefit from an acute THR. Nonagenarians are a particularly heterogenous subpopulation of the elderly, with varying degrees of independence. Since THRs are performed electively as a routine treatment for osteoarthritis in the elderly, its safety is well established in the older patient. The aim of this study was to compare the safety of emergency THR to elective THR in nonagenarians. METHODS: A retrospective 10-year cohort study was conducted using data submitted to the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) across three hospitals in one large NHS Trust. Data was collected from 126 nonagenarians who underwent THRs between 1st January 2010 - 31st December 2020 and was categorised into emergency THR and elective THR groups. Mortality rates were compared between the two groups. Secondary outcomes were also compared including postoperative complications (dislocations, revision surgeries, and periprosthetic fracture), length of stay in hospital, and discharge destination. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in mortality between the two groups, with 1-year mortality rates of 11.4% and 12.1% reported for emergency and elective patients respectively (p = 0.848). There were no significant differences in postoperative complication rate and discharge destination. Patients who had emergency THR spent 5.56 days longer in hospital compared to elective patients (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: There is no increased risk of 1-year mortality in emergency THR compared to elective THR, in a nonagenarian population. Therefore, nonagenarians presenting with a hip fracture who would have been considered for a THR if presenting on an elective basis should not be precluded from an emergency THR on safety grounds. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not necessary as this was deemed not to be clinical research, and was considered to be a service evaluation.

Predicting 30-day mortality after hip fracture: the G4A calibrated prognostic tool.

INTRODUCTION: Proximal femoral fracture is common with a high mortality (7% mortality at 30 days). Accurate determination of mortality risk allows better consenting, clinical management and expectation management. Our study aim was to develop a prognostic tool to predict 30-day mortality after proximal femoral fracture, among patients treated within a dedicated hip fracture unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected data from our hospital concerning 2210 patients with 2287 proximal femoral fractures. The clinical parameters of 97 patients who died within 30 days of surgery were analysed. We used logistic regression to determine if the parameters' relationship with 30-day mortality was statistically significant or not. The statistically significant parameters were used to create a prognostic model for predicting 30-day mortality. RESULTS: The 5 independent predictors of 30-day mortality were gender, age, admission source, preoperative Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) and American Society of Anesthesiologists Score (ASA). The highest risk was for males >85 years, admitted from institutional care, with low preoperative mental test score and high ASA grade. Using these predictors, we formulated the G4A score. The Hosmer-Lemeshow 'goodness of fit' test showed good concordance between observed and predicted mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the use of the G4A score to predict 30-day mortality after surgery for proximal femoral fracture, particularly within dedicated hip fracture units. Further research is needed to establish whether the findings of this study are applicable on a national scale.

Medium-term mortality after hip fractures and COVID-19: A prospective multi-centre UK study.

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused 1.4 million deaths globally and is associated with a 3-4 times increase in 30-day mortality after a fragility hip fracture with concurrent COVID-19 infection. Typically, death from COVID-19 infection occurs between 15 and 22 days after the onset of symptoms, but this period can extend up to 8 weeks. This study aimed to assess the impact of concurrent COVID-19 infection on 120-day mortality after a fragility hip fracture. METHODS: A multi-centre prospective study across 10 hospitals treating 8% of the annual burden of hip fractures in England between 1st March and 30th April, 2020 was performed. Patients whose surgical treatment was payable through the National Health Service Best Practice Tariff mechanism for "fragility hip fractures" were included in the study. Patients' 120-day mortality was assessed relative to their peri-operative COVID-19 status. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 27. RESULTS: A total of 746 patients were included in this study, of which 87 (11.7%) were COVID-19 positive. Mortality rates at 30- and 120-day were significantly higher for COVID-19 positive patients relative to COVID-19 negative patients (p < 0.001). However, mortality rates between 31 and 120-day were not significantly different (p = 0.107), 16.1% and 9.4% respectively for COVID-19 positive and negative patients, odds ratio 1.855 (95% CI 0.865-3.978). CONCLUSION: Hip fracture patients with concurrent COVID-19 infection, provided that they are alive at day-31 after injury, have no significant difference in 120-day mortality. Despite the growing awareness and concern of "long-COVID" and its widespread prevalence, this does not appear to increase medium-term mortality rates after a hip fracture.

Systemic medical complications following total ankle arthroplasty: A review of the evidence.

BACKGROUND: Total Ankle Arthroplasty (TAA) is increasingly undertaken for the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. For each TAA procedure informed consent is required. The consent process should include discussion of the relevant complications, both systemic and regional. There is a lack of data regarding the systemic complications of TAA. This might cause problems in obtaining valid informed consent. METHODS: We reviewed and summarised the literature regarding the systemic complications and mortality rate of TAA. RESULTS: The average rate of systemic medical complications after TAA was 3% (range: 0-7%). The average mortality rate following TAA was 0.3% (range: 0-0.72%). The following were risk factors for systemic medical complications: obesity, diabetes, systemic co-morbidities, preoperative blood transfusion, revision procedures, and long anaesthetic duration. CONCLUSIONS: When obtaining informed consent for TAA a systemic complication rate of 3% and a mortality rate of 0.3% ought to be included and documented.

Thompson Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture Is Associated With Increased Risk of Dislocation.

BACKGROUND: This contemporaneous large multicenter retrospective study reflective of current practice, assesses the impact of patient factors, prosthesis selection, and implant features on the risk of dislocation after hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. METHODS: Radiographic records for 4116 consecutive patients who underwent a hip hemiarthroplasty between January 1, 2009 and September 30, 2017 at 3 acute hospitals (including a regional major trauma center) for a neck of femur fracture were reviewed in conjunction with United Kingdom National Hip Fracture Database records. RESULTS: In total, 4116 patients were eligible for inclusion in the study; 63 of 4116 (1.5%) dislocations were identified. Patient age, gender, preoperative abbreviated mental test score, postoperative abbreviated mental test score, and American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade were not found to be significant predictors of dislocation rates (P < .05). The Furlong prosthesis was the most commonly used implant (2280/4116, 55.4%) followed by the Exeter V40 + Unitrax head (1179/4116, 28.6%), other implants used during the study period were the monoblock Austin-Moore and Thompson implants. Hemiarthroplasty operations undertaken with the Thompson (24/273, 3.7%) were found to have significantly higher dislocation rates (P < .05). Cemented vs uncemented, variable vs fixed offset, and monoblock vs modular implant designs did not contribute to higher dislocation rates (P < .05). Surgeon seniority was also not a significant risk factor for subsequent dislocation (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Thompson hip hemiarthroplasties are associated with higher dislocation rates when compared to a contemporaneous cohort of implant choices and considerations for their use should be made in conjunction with this major risk factor for the need for subsequent operations.

Segmented Linear Regression Modelling of Time-Series of Binary Variables in Healthcare.

INTRODUCTION: In healthcare, change is usually detected by statistical techniques comparing outcomes before and after an intervention. A common problem faced by researchers is distinguishing change due to secular trends from change due to an intervention. Interrupted time-series analysis has been shown to be effective in describing trends in retrospective time-series and in detecting change, but methods are often biased towards the point of the intervention. Binary outcomes are typically modelled by logistic regression where the log-odds of the binary event is expressed as a function of covariates such as time, making model parameters difficult to interpret. The aim of this study was to present a technique that directly models the probability of binary events to describe change patterns using linear sections. METHODS: We describe a modelling method that fits progressively more complex linear sections to the time-series of binary variables. Model fitting uses maximum likelihood optimisation and models are compared for goodness of fit using Akaike's Information Criterion. The best model describes the most likely change scenario. We applied this modelling technique to evaluate hip fracture patient mortality rate for a total of 2777 patients over a 6-year period, before and after the introduction of a dedicated hip fracture unit (HFU) at a Level 1, Major Trauma Centre. RESULTS: The proposed modelling technique revealed time-dependent trends that explained how the implementation of the HFU influenced mortality rate in patients sustaining proximal femoral fragility fractures. The technique allowed modelling of the entire time-series without bias to the point of intervention. Modelling the binary variable of interest directly, as opposed to a transformed variable, improved the interpretability of the results. CONCLUSION: The proposed segmented linear regression modelling technique using maximum likelihood estimation can be employed to effectively detect trends in time-series of binary variables in retrospective studies.

Intraoperative Arthrographic Assessment of Ambiguous Neck of Femur Fractures in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.

The loss of bone mineral density caused by Chronic Kidney Disease can make the delineation of a patient's bony anatomy impossible during intra-operative fluoroscopy. This has the potential to increase the failure rate of implants used in the surgical treatment of neck of femur fractures due to sub-optimal placements. Intra-operative arthrograms add to the techniques available to a surgeon to achieve optimal implant placement without compromising the patient's renal function nor increasing the radiation dose exposure to the surgical team.

Plate versus intramedullary fixation of two-part and multifragmentary displaced midshaft clavicle fractures - a long-term analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures is predominantly achieved with intramedullary (IM) or plate fixation. Both techniques have potential pitfalls: plate fixation involves greater periosteal stripping and protuberance of the implant, whereas IM fixation may be associated with implant-related complications, such as migration or skin irritation, which may lead to further surgery for implant removal. The aim of this study was to compare these two methods in simple (Robinson 2b.1) and multifragmentary (Robinson 2b.2) displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. METHODS: A total of 133 consecutive patients who underwent surgical fixation for a displaced midshaft clavicle fracture with either IM fixation using a 2.5-mm Kirschner wire or plate fixation using an 8-hole Dynamic Compression Plate (DCP) were retrospectively reviewed. Follow-up was a minimum of 1 year. The patients were allocated into two injury groups: displaced simple 2-part fractures (64 IM vs. 16 DCP) and displaced multifragmentary fractures (27 IM vs. 26 DCP). The major observed outcome measures were: infection rate, non-union rate, reoperation rate and postoperative range of motion (ROM). RESULTS: Rates of non-union for displaced 2-part fractures were 2/64 (3.13%) with IM fixation and 0/16 (0.00%) with plate fixation (p = 0.477). For displaced multifragmentary fractures, rates of non-union were 2/27 (7.41%) with IM fixation and 0/26 (0.00%) with plate fixation (p = 0.161). No significant difference was observed between the two fixation modalities in patient-reported time to regain ROM on the injured side for displaced 2-part fractures (p = 0.129) and displaced multifragmentary fractures (p = 0.070). Deep infection rate was zero (p = 1.000) overall in the study, and reoperation rate for IM and plate fixation, respectively, was 3.13% and 6.25% in the Robinson 2b.1 group (p = 0.559) and 7.41% and 7.69% in the Robinson 2b.2 group (p = 0.969). CONCLUSION: IM fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (Robinson 2b.1) has an equivalent non-union rate to plate fixation and similarly low complication and reoperation rates. For displaced midshaft multifragmentary clavicle fractures (Robinson 2b.2), the higher non-union rates observed with IM fixation leads us to recommend consideration of plate fixation for Robinson 2b.2 fractures.

Safe intramedullary fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures with 2.5mm Kirschner wires - technique description and a two-part versus multifragmentary fracture fixation outcome comparison.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to present a modified Murray and Schwarz 2.5-mm Kirschner wire (K-wire) intramedullary (IM) technique for fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (DMCF), and to compare the differences in treatment outcome of two-part (Robinson 2B.1) and multifragmentary (Robinson 2B.2) DMCF. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 91 patients who underwent IM fixation with a 2.5-mm K-wire for DMCF and had a 1-year post-operative follow-up between 2000 and 2012 was performed. The patients were allocated into two groups: Robinson 2B.1 (n = 64) and Robinson 2B.2 (n = 27). Assessed outcomes were non-union, reoperation rate, wire migration and infection. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of non-union (2B.1,2B.2; 3.13%, 7.41%; p = 0.365), reoperation (2B.1, 2B.2; 3.13%, 7.41%; p = 0.365), K-wire migration (2B.1, 2B.2; 0.00%, 0.00%; p = 1.00) and clavicle shortening at 12-months (2B.1, 2B.2; 3.13%, 7.41%; p = 0.365). CONCLUSION: Intramedullary clavicle fixation with a 2.5-mm K-wire is a safe surgical technique. 2B.1 injuries treated with 2.5-mm IM K-wire fixation have relatively improved outcome compared with displaced 2B.2 fractures for both non-union and reoperation rates. There were no occurrences of implant migration with either 2B.1 or 2B.2 injuries, and a non-significant difference in implant irritation was documented with IM K-fixation. The non-union rate with K-wire IM fixation of 2B.1 injuries concords with the published results of other IM devices and thus this technique should be added to the surgeon's armamentarium when considering surgical treatment of such injuries.