Lasmiditan inhibits calcitonin gene-related peptide release in the rodent trigeminovascular system.

Migraine headache pathophysiology involves trigeminovascular system activation, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) release, and dysfunctional nociceptive transmission. Triptans are 5-HT1B/1D/(1F) receptor agonists that prejunctionally inhibit trigeminal CGRP release, but their vasoconstrictor properties limit their use in migraine patients with cardiovascular disease. By contrast, lasmiditan is a novel antimigraine and selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist devoid of vasoconstrictor properties. On this basis, this study has investigated the modulation of trigeminal CGRP release by lasmiditan. For this purpose, we have comparatively analysed the inhibition of several components of the trigeminovascular system induced by lasmiditan and sumatriptan through: ex vivo KCl-induced CGRP release from isolated dura mater, trigeminal ganglion, and trigeminal nucleus caudalis of mice; and in vivo dural vasodilation in the rat closed-cranial window model induced by endogenous (electrical stimulation and capsaicin) and exogenous CGRP. The ex vivo release of CGRP was similarly inhibited by sumatriptan and lasmiditan in all trigeminovascular system components. In vivo, intravenous (i.v.) lasmiditan or higher doses of sumatriptan significantly attenuated the vasodilatory responses to endogenous CGRP release, but not exogenous CGRP effects. These data suggest that lasmiditan prejunctionally inhibits CGRP release in peripheral and central trigeminal nerve terminals. Because lasmiditan is a lipophilic drug that crosses the blood-brain barrier, additional central sites of action remain to be determined.

Trigeminovascular calcitonin gene-related peptide function in Cacna1a R192Q-mutated knock-in mice.

Familial hemiplegic migraine type 1 (FHM1) is a rare migraine subtype. Whereas transgenic knock-in mice with the human pathogenic FHM1 R192Q missense mutation in the Cacna1a gene reveal overall neuronal hyperexcitability, the effects on the trigeminovascular system and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor are largely unknown. This gains relevance as blockade of CGRP and its receptor are therapeutic targets under development. Hence, we set out to test these effects in FHM1 mice. We characterized the trigeminovascular system of wild-type and FHM1 mice through: (i) in vivo capsaicin- and CGRP-induced dural vasodilation in a closed-cranial window; (ii) ex vivo KCl-induced CGRP release from isolated dura mater, trigeminal ganglion and trigeminal nucleus caudalis; and (iii) peripheral vascular function in vitro . In mutant mice, dural vasodilatory responses were significantly decreased compared to controls. The ex vivo release of CGRP was not different in the components of the trigeminovascular system between genotypes; however, sumatriptan diminished the release in the trigeminal ganglion, trigeminal nucleus caudalis and dura mater but only in wild-type mice. Peripheral vascular function was similar between genotypes. These data suggest that the R192Q mutation might be associated with trigeminovascular CGRP receptor desensitization. Novel antimigraine drugs should be able to revert this complex phenomenon.

Characterization of the trigeminovascular actions of several adenosine A2A receptor antagonists in an in vivo rat model of migraine.

BACKGROUND: Migraine is considered a neurovascular disorder, but its pathophysiological mechanisms are not yet fully understood. Adenosine has been shown to increase in plasma during migraine attacks and to induce vasodilation in several blood vessels; however, it remains unknown whether adenosine can interact with the trigeminovascular system. Moreover, caffeine, a non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist, is included in many over the counter anti-headache/migraine treatments. METHODS: This study used the rat closed cranial window method to investigate in vivo the effects of the adenosine A2A receptor antagonists with varying selectivity over A1 receptors; JNJ-39928122, JNJ-40529749, JNJ-41942914, JNJ-40064440 or JNJ-41501798 (0.3-10 mg/kg) on the vasodilation of the middle meningeal artery produced by either CGS21680 (an adenosine A2A receptor agonist) or endogenous CGRP (released by periarterial electrical stimulation). RESULTS: Regarding the dural meningeal vasodilation produced neurogenically or pharmacologically, all JNJ antagonists: (i) did not affect neurogenic vasodilation but (ii) blocked the vasodilation produced by CGS21680, with a blocking potency directly related to their additional affinity for the adenosine A1 receptor. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that vascular adenosine A2A (and, to a certain extent, also A1) receptors mediate the CGS21680-induced meningeal vasodilation. These receptors do not appear to modulate prejunctionally the sensory release of CGRP. Prevention of meningeal arterial dilation might be predictive for anti-migraine drugs, and since none of these JNJ antagonists modified per se blood pressure, selective A2A receptor antagonism may offer a novel approach to antimigraine therapy which remains to be investigated in clinical trials.

Dihydroergotamine and sumatriptan in isolated human coronary artery, middle meningeal artery and saphenous vein.

BACKGROUND: Dihydroergotamine (DHE) and sumatriptan are contraindicated in patients with cardiovascular disease because of their vasoconstricting properties, which have originally been explored in proximal coronary arteries. Our aim was to investigate DHE and sumatriptan in the proximal and distal coronary artery, middle meningeal artery and saphenous vein. METHODS: Blood vessel segments were mounted in organ baths and concentration response curves for DHE and sumatriptan were constructed. RESULTS: In the proximal coronary artery, meningeal artery and saphenous vein, maximal contractions to DHE (proximal: 8 ± 4%; meningeal: 32 ± 7%; saphenous: 52 ± 11%) and sumatriptan (proximal: 17 ± 7%; meningeal: 61 ± 18%, saphenous: 37 ± 8%) were not significantly different. In the distal coronary artery, contractions to DHE (5 ± 2%) were significantly smaller than those to sumatriptan (17 ± 9%). At clinically relevant concentrations, mean contractions to DHE and sumatriptan were below 3% in proximal coronary arteries and below 6% in distal coronary arteries. Contractions in the meningeal artery and saphenous vein were higher (7%-38%). CONCLUSIONS: Contractions to DHE in distal coronary arteries are smaller than those to sumatriptan, while at clinical concentrations they both induce only slight contractions. In meningeal arteries contractions to DHE and sumatriptan are significantly larger, showing their cranioselectivity. Contractions to DHE in the saphenous vein are higher than those in the arteries, confirming its venous contractile properties.

Cranioselectivity of sumatriptan revisited: pronounced contractions to sumatriptan in small human isolated coronary artery.

BACKGROUND: Initial concerns about the coronary side-effect potential of the anti-migraine drug sumatriptan and second-generation triptans initiated cranioselectivity studies using proximal human coronary arteries. However, myocardial ischaemia may originate from both large and small human coronary arteries. METHODS: We investigated the contractions to sumatriptan in proximal (internal diameter 2-3 mm), distal (internal diameter 1,000-1,500 µm) and small (internal diameter 500-1,000 µm) human epicardial coronary arteries and compared these with contractions in the human middle meningeal artery. Concentration response curves to sumatriptan in human coronary arteries were constructed in the absence or presence of the 5-hydroxytryptamine1B (5-HT1B) receptor antagonist SB224289 and the 5-HT1D receptor antagonist BRL15572. The effect of sumatriptan on increased cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels induced by forskolin in proximal and distal coronary artery segments was investigated using a biochemical assay. Western blotting was used to analyse the 5-HT1B receptor density in the human arteries. RESULTS: Contractions in the proximal human coronary artery were significantly smaller than those in the human meningeal artery, as we showed previously. In contrast, contractions to sumatriptan in distal and small human coronary arteries were not different from those in the human meningeal artery. The 5-HT1B receptor antagonist SB224289, but not the 5-HT1D receptor antagonist BRL15572, inhibited the contraction induced by sumatriptan in the coronary arteries. Moreover, in distal, but not in proximal, coronary arteries, sumatriptan inhibited the increase in cAMP levels induced by forskolin. Contrary to our expectations, the 5-HT1B receptor expression was more pronounced in the proximal human coronary artery than in the distal and small human coronary artery. CONCLUSIONS: Based on functional experiments in distal and small human coronary arteries, contractions to sumatriptan are not as cranioselective as previously assumed. However, the vast clinical experience with sumatriptan and other triptans has proven that these drugs are cardiovascularly safe when contraindications are taken into account.

Discovery techniques for calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists for potential antimigraine therapies.

INTRODUCTION: Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) exerts a key function in migraine pathophysiology through the trigeminovascular system. Influencing this system via CGRP receptor antagonists seems to be an important new option in treating migraine attacks. To characterize new compounds, models are used to study the vascular effects as well as their effects on the central nervous system. AREAS COVERED: The authors review the clinical trials and many different in vitro and in vivo experimental models that have been used to investigate the effects and side effects in animals, healthy subjects and patients. These experimental models are essential, not only in characterizing new CGRP receptor antagonists, but also in gaining more insight into the pathophysiological mechanisms behind migraines. EXPERT OPINION: Although triptans were a major breakthrough in migraine treatment, they are not effective for every patient and contraindicated in patients with cardiovascular disease. There is still a demand for other acute antimigraine acting drugs with CGRP receptor antagonists being the most promising candidates. CGRP plays a role in protection against ischemia, but CGRP receptor antagonists do not seem to affect this protection to a harmfull extent, when used incidentally as acute antimigraine treatment. In order for drug specificity to be increased, the site of action needs to be identified; this consequently may lead to a decrease in dosing with fewer side effects.

Inotropic effects of prokinetic agents with 5-HT(4) receptor agonist actions on human isolated myocardial trabeculae.

AIMS: Besides acting as gastrointestinal prokinetic agents, 5-hydroxytryptamine(4) (5-HT(4)) receptor agonists can induce positive inotropism in human isolated atrium, but not in ventricles. We pharmacologically evaluated the gastroprokinetic 5-HT(4) receptor agonists tegaserod, prucalopride, R199715, cisapride, the cisapride metabolite norcisapride, and the 5-HT(3) receptor agonist MKC773 on human isolated myocardial trabeculae, and compared their effects with those induced by 5-HT and 5-methoxytryptamine (5-MeOT). MAIN METHODS: Atrial and ventricular trabeculae were paced and changes in contractile force were studied in the absence or presence of the 5-HT(4) receptor antagonist GR113808. Partial agonism was assessed using 5-HT(4) receptor agonists as antagonists against 5-HT. To test the contribution of L-type calcium channels, the inotropic responses to 5-HT and 5-MeOT were studied in the absence or presence of verapamil. KEY FINDINGS: Like 5-HT and 5-MeOT, cisapride and tegaserod, but not prucalopride, R19971 and MKC-733, induced concentration-dependent positive inotropic responses on atrial trabeculae, which were abolished by GR113808. The L-type calcium channel blocker verapamil attenuated inotropic responses to 5-HT and 5-MeOT. None of the agonists affected the contraction of left ventricular trabeculae. Concentration response curves to 5-HT were shifted to the right in the presence of prucalopride, cisapride, tegaserod and R199715, but not MKC-773. SIGNIFICANCE: We conclude that (i) inotropic responses to 5-HT and 5-MeOT seem to depend on L-type calcium channels, (ii) tegaserod and cisapride behave as partial 5-HT(4) receptor agonists, while prucalopride, norcisapride and MKC-733 cause no significant effects on human atrial trabeculae, (iii) R199715 seems to behave as a 5-HT(4) receptor antagonist.

Pharmacological characterization of VIP and PACAP receptors in the human meningeal and coronary artery.

OBJECTIVE: We pharmacologically characterized pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptides (PACAPs), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and the VPAC(1), VPAC(2) and PAC(1) receptors in human meningeal (for their role in migraine) and coronary (for potential side effects) arteries. METHODS: Concentration response curves to PACAP38, PACAP27, VIP and the VPAC(1) receptor agonist ([Lys15,Arg16,Leu27]-VIP[1-7]-GRF[8-27]) were constructed in the absence or presence of the PAC(1) receptor antagonist PACAP6-38 or the VPAC(1) receptor antagonist, PG97269. mRNA expression was measured using qPCR. RESULTS: PACAP38 was less potent than VIP in both arteries. Both peptides had lower potency and efficacy in meningeal than in coronary arteries, while mRNA expression of VPAC(1) receptor was more pronounced in meningeal arteries. PACAP6-38 reduced the E(max) of PACAP27, while PG97269 right-shifted the VIP-induced relaxation curve only in the coronary arteries. CONCLUSION: The direct vasodilatory effect of VIP and PACAP might be less relevant than the central effect of this compound in migraine pathogenesis.

Potential mechanisms of prospective antimigraine drugs: a focus on vascular (side) effects.

Currently available drugs for the acute treatment of migraine, i.e. ergot alkaloids and triptans, are cranial vasoconstrictors. Although cranial vasoconstriction is likely to mediate-at least a part of-their therapeutic effects, this property also causes vascular side-effects. Indeed, the ergot alkaloids and the triptans have been reported to induce myocardial ischemia and stroke, albeit in extremely rare cases, and are contraindicated in patients with known cardiovascular risk factors. In view of these limitations, novel antimigraine drugs devoid of vascular (side) effects are being explored. Currently, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists, which do not have direct vasoconstrictor effects, are under clinical development. Other classes of drugs, such as 5-HT(1F) receptor agonists, glutamate receptor antagonists, nitric oxide synthase inhibitors, VPAC/PAC receptor antagonists and gap junction modulators, have also been proposed as potential targets for acute antimigraine drugs. Although these prospective drugs do not directly induce vasoconstriction, they may well induce indirect vascular effects by inhibiting or otherwise modulating the responses to endogenous vasoactive substances. These indirect vascular effects might contribute to the therapeutic efficacy of the previously mentioned compounds, but may alternatively also lead to vascular side-effects. As described in the current review, some of the prospective antimigraine drugs with a proposed non-vascular mechanism of action may still have direct or indirect vascular effects.

Effect of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist telcagepant in human cranial arteries.

INTRODUCTION: Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a neuronal messenger in intracranial sensory nerves and is considered to play a significant role in migraine pathophysiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated the effect of the CGRP receptor antagonist, telcagepant, on CGRP-induced cranial vasodilatation in human isolated cerebral and middle meningeal arteries. We also studied the expression of the CGRP receptor components in cranial arteries with immunocytochemistry. Concentration response curves to αCGRP were performed in human isolated cerebral and middle meningeal arteries in the absence or presence of telcagepant. Arterial slices were stained for RAMP1, CLR and actin in a double immunofluorescence staining. RESULTS: In both arteries, we found that: (i) telcagepant was devoid of any contractile or relaxant effects per se; (ii) pretreatment with telcagepant antagonised the αCGRP-induced relaxation in a competitive manner; and (iii) immunohistochemistry revealed expression and co-localisation of CLR and RAMP1 in the smooth muscle cells in the media layer of both arteries. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide morphological and functional data on the presence of CGRP receptors in cerebral and meningeal arteries, which illustrates a possible site of action of telcagepant in the treatment of migraine.

Functional characterization of contractions to tegaserod in human isolated proximal and distal coronary arteries.

Tegaserod, a 5-HT(4) receptor agonist, has been used to treat idiopathic constipation and constipation-predominant irritable bowel disease. It has recently been suggested that tegaserod has an affinity for 5-HT(1B) receptors, which mediate vasoconstriction. As some patients have experienced cardiac ischemia during treatment with tegaserod, we assessed contractions to tegaserod in healthy and diseased human isolated coronary arteries and compared the results with those obtained using sumatriptan, an established 5-HT(1B) receptor agonist. Proximal and distal human coronary arteries were divided into sets of healthy and diseased tissues based on functional endothelial responses. Concentration-response curves to tegaserod and sumatriptan were constructed to assess their contractile potential. Tegaserod's antagonist properties at 5-HT(1B) receptors were studied by constructing concentration-response curves to sumatriptan in the absence or presence of tegaserod (1 microM). Sumatriptan induced concentration-dependent contractions, which were greater in distal than in proximal coronary artery segments. In the proximal segments, tegaserod induced contractions only at concentrations of 10 microM or higher, while in distal segments contractions were generally absent. Tegaserod did not antagonize sumatriptan-induced contractions. There was no difference between the results obtained in healthy and diseased coronary arteries. In conclusion, tegaserod induced contractions in human proximal coronary arteries at concentrations 1000 times higher than C(max) (6 mg bid). Hence, tegaserod does not exhibit a relevant vasoconstrictor potential in the human coronary artery. Further, tegaserod did not behave as an antagonist at 5-HT(1B) receptors. Additional studies may be warranted to investigate the use of 5-HT(4) agonists in patients with cardiovascular risk factors.

Current and prospective pharmacological targets in relation to antimigraine action.

Migraine is a recurrent incapacitating neurovascular disorder characterized by unilateral and throbbing headaches associated with photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, and vomiting. Current specific drugs used in the acute treatment of migraine interact with vascular receptors, a fact that has raised concerns about their cardiovascular safety. In the past, alpha-adrenoceptor agonists (ergotamine, dihydroergotamine, isometheptene) were used. The last two decades have witnessed the advent of 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonists (sumatriptan and second-generation triptans), which have a well-established efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine. Moreover, current prophylactic treatments of migraine include 5-HT(2) receptor antagonists, Ca(2+) channel blockers, and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists. Despite the progress in migraine research and in view of its complex etiology, this disease still remains underdiagnosed, and available therapies are underused. In this review, we have discussed pharmacological targets in migraine, with special emphasis on compounds acting on 5-HT (5-HT(1-7)), adrenergic (alpha(1), alpha(2,) and beta), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP(1) and CGRP(2)), adenosine (A(1), A(2), and A(3)), glutamate (NMDA, AMPA, kainate, and metabotropic), dopamine, endothelin, and female hormone (estrogen and progesterone) receptors. In addition, we have considered some other targets, including gamma-aminobutyric acid, angiotensin, bradykinin, histamine, and ionotropic receptors, in relation to antimigraine therapy. Finally, the cardiovascular safety of current and prospective antimigraine therapies is touched upon.

Neurovascular pharmacology of migraine.

Migraine is a paroxysmal neurovascular disorder, which affects a significant proportion of the population. Since dilation of cranial blood vessels is likely to be responsible for the headache experienced in migraine, many experimental models for the study of migraine have focussed on this feature. The current review discusses a model that is based on the constriction of carotid arteriovenous anastomoses in anaesthetized pigs, which has during the last decades proven of great value in identifying potential antimigraine drugs acting via a vascular mechanism. Further, the use of human isolated blood vessels in migraine research is discussed. Thirdly, we describe an integrated neurovascular model, where dural vasodilatation in response to trigeminal perivascular nerve stimulation can be studied. Such a model not only allows an in-depth characterization of directly vascularly acting drugs, but also of drugs that are supposed to act via inhibition of vasodilator responses to endogenous neuropeptides, or of drugs that inhibit the release of these neuropeptides. We discuss the use of this model in a study on the influence of female sex hormones on migraine. Finally, the implementation of this model in mice is considered. Such a murine model allows the use of genetically modified animals, which will lead to a better understanding of the ion channel mutations that are found in migraine patients.