A Descriptive Study of enteral tube feeding among adults in an acute care tertiary hospital-patient selection, characteristics and complications.

BACKGROUND: It is vital to develop a better understanding of the use of different modalities for enteral feeding and its associated complications, given differences in funding support, community resources and infrastructure available to support home enteral feeding in an acute care tertiary hospital. AIM: To provide a description of the clinical characteristics of patients on long-term enteral feeding and incidence of associated complications. METHODS: A retrospective case records review study design was adopted. Medical records of patients discharged from a tertiary hospital with long-term nasogastric tube (NGT) or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding for the first time during the period of January 2010 to June 2017 were reviewed. Data collected include patient's demographics, reason for enteral feeding, morbidity and nutritional status upon initiation of NGT and PEG feeding, readmission episodes and documented complications (associated with enteral feeding) within one-year post discharge. RESULTS: Records of 120 NGT and 118 PEG patients were analysed. Significant age and gender differences were found with older patients being more likely to be placed on NGT [NGT (Mean 79.1, SD 11.3) vs. PEG (Mean 67.1, SD 12.6)] and higher number of females in the NGT group as compared to the PEG group (NGT 59.2% vs. PEG 31.4%). Majority of patients were fed by caregivers in the NGT (99.2%) as compared to the PEG (51.7%) group. Patients with cancer were more likely to be on PEG feeding (NGT 5%, PEG 70.3%), whereas patients with stroke-related diagnoses were more likely to be on NGT feeding (NGT 48% vs. PEG 8.5%). The total Charlson Comorbidity score was also significantly different between the NGT (mean = 5.7; SD = 1.5) and PEG (mean = 4.5; SD = 2.0) groups. A higher number of patients with PEG feeding had no complications (47.5%) as compared to the NGT group (8.3%). Patients who received NGT feeding were more likely experience tube blockage [OR 0.03, 95% CI (0.001-0.72), p = 0.03], secondary displacement of tube [OR 0.04, 95% CI (0.002-0.72), p = 0.03] and accidental tube removal [OR 0.03, 95% CI (0.004-0.21), p < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: Overall, patients who received NGT feeding experienced more complications than those who had PEG feeding. The choice for NGT or PEG feeding may be influenced by patient related factors as well as the presence of caregivers, which need to be considered in the improvement of enteral nutrition services in the local context.

The "pet effect" in cancer patients: Risks and benefits of human-pet interaction.

"Can I keep my dog while receiving chemotherapy?" "Can my cat sleep on my bed while I'm on treatment?" "What precautions should I take with my pets in order to avoid infections?"" I read that my dog could give me breast cancer, is that true?" "Do you have assistance therapy dogs at your chemotherapy day unit?" These are not uncommon questions from cancer patients in oncology/haematology consultation rooms. The answers to these questions however, are widely unknown among physicians. Pet ownership is thought to provide patients with both emotional and physical health benefits. However, owning pets may also pose health risks to immunocompromised patients through zoonotic transmission of disease. Some studies have also suggested that the ownership of domestic pets may increase the risk of developing some cancers. But what is the evidence behind these claims? This paper presents the results of a literature review of a variety of scientific literature about pet ownership as a potential risk factor for suffering cancer, zoonotic diseases and the immunocompromised, and animal-assisted-therapy in cancer patients.

Patients and home carers' experience and perceptions of different modalities of enteral feeding.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore patients and carers' experience and perceptions of different modalities of long-term enteral feeding. BACKGROUND: With an ageing population in Singapore, there is a concomitant increase in number of patients with dysphagia and hence increase in prevalence of enteral feeding. It is essential to understand experiences of patients and home carers with long-term home enteral feeding and perceptions of different modalities to better provide support. DESIGN: A qualitative descriptive approach fulfilling the COREQ checklist criteria (See File S1). Nine patients who were receiving long-term enteral feeding and nine carers were recruited over the period of August to December 2017. One-to-one interviews were conducted and audio-recorded. An inductive content analysis approach, with open coding, creation of categories and abstraction of data, was adopted. RESULTS: Three themes were generated: (a) factors influencing choice of mode of enteral feeding; respondents narrated factors such as need to "conceal" illness, need to be independent and previous bad experience with alternative modality (b) identified informational, emotional and physical needs. Respondents reported the need for support in terms of information on the different modalities, and training on how to self-care or provide care and (c) individual perception and attitude towards life with enteral feeding. Most respondents portrayed a positive outlook to life, despite that they could no longer participate in communal eating. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Understanding patients and carers' experience and perceptions will inform the development of strategies to empower future patients and carers in choice of modality for enteral feeding. Patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) found it easier to integrate enteral tube feeding into daily lives. Carers played a pivotal role in choice of modality, as well as in care of patients on enteral feeding.

Health care professionals' perceptions and experience of initiating different modalities for home enteral feeding.

BACKGROUND: With an aging population, there is a concomitant increase in number of patients with dysphagia; and hence increase in prevalence of enteral feeding. Health care professionals play a critical role in informing decisions of patients and caregivers on their choice of modality for long-term home enteral feeding. AIMS: To explore the perceptions of health care professionals on different modalities for enteral feeding and their experiences in initiating long-term enteral feeding among adult patients. METHODS: A qualitative explorative descriptive study design with purposive sampling approach was adopted. A total of four speech therapists, fifteen nurses and seven doctors who were ever involved in initiating long term home enteral tube feeding were recruited over a data collection period of August to December 2017. One to one interviews were conducted and audio-recorded. An inductive content analysis approach, with open coding, creation of categories and abstraction of data was adopted. RESULTS: Four main themes were generated: (1) Naso-gastric Tube Feeding (NGT) is health care professionals' first choice of modality; (2) Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Feeding (PEG) is regarded as an alternative approach; (3) Perceived better outcomes with PEG; and (4) Identified barriers to promotion of PEG. CONCLUSION: NGT remained as the modality of choice although health care professionals perceived that patients will have better outcomes with the use of PEG.

Caring for patients on home enteral nutrition: Reported complications by home carers and perspectives of community nurses.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore the experiences of community nurses and home carers, in caring for patients on home enteral nutrition. BACKGROUND: The number of patients on home enteral nutrition is on the increase due to advancement in technology and shift in focus of providing care from acute to community care settings. METHODS: A mixed-method approach was adopted. (i) A face-to-face survey design was used to elicit experience of carers of patients on home enteral nutrition. (ii) Focus group interviews were conducted with community nurses. RESULTS: Ninety-nine carers (n = 99) were recruited. Patient's mean age that they cared for was aged 77.7 years (SD = 11.2), and they had been on enteral feeding for a mean of 29 months (SD = 23.0). Most were bed-bound (90%) and required full assistance with their feeding (99%). Most were not on follow-up with dietitians (91%) and dentists (96%). The three most common reported gastrointestinal complications were constipation (31%), abdominal distension (28%) and vomiting (22%). Twenty community nurses (n = 20) were recruited for the focus group interviews. Four main themes emerged from the analysis: (i) challenge of accessing allied health services in the community; (ii) shorter length of stay in the acute care setting led to challenges in carers' learning and adaptation; (iii) transition gaps between hospital and home care services; and (iv) managing expectations of family. CONCLUSION: To facilitate a better transition of care for patients, adequate training for carers, standardising clinical practice in managing patients with home enteral nutrition and improving communication between home care services and the acute care hospitals are needed. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study highlighted the challenges faced by community home care nurses and carers. Results of this study would help to inform future policies and practice changes that would improve the quality of care received by patients on home enteral nutrition.