Incidence of neonatal sepsis after universal antenatal culture-based screening of group B streptococcus and intrapartum antibiotics: A multicentre retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidences of early and late-onset neonatal sepsis, including group B streptococcus (GBS) and Escherichia coli (E. coli) before and after implementation of universal screening and intrapartum antibiotics prophylaxis (IAP). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Eight public hospitals and 31 Maternal and Child Health Centres (in Hong Kong. POPULATION: 460 552 women attending routine antenatal service from 2009 to 2020. METHODS: Universal culture-based GBS screening has been offered to eligible women since 2012. Total births, GBS screening tests, maternal GBS colonisation and neonatal sepsis with positive blood or cerebrospinal fluid were retrieved from clinical and laboratory database. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maternal GBS colonisation rate, early- and late-onset neonatal sepsis (including GBS and E. coli). RESULTS: Of 318 740 women with universal culture-based screening, 63 767 women (20.0%) screened positive. After implementation of GBS screening and IAP, the incidence of early-onset neonatal sepsis decreased (3.25 versus 2.26 per 1000 live births, p < 0.05), including those caused by GBS (1.03 versus 0.26 per 1000 live births, p < 0.05). Segmented regression showed that change in early-onse GBS sepsis incidence after screening was the only significant variable in the outcome trend. There was no significant evidence of increase in incidence of late-onset neonatal sepsis including those caused by GBS. CONCLUSIONS: Universal culture-based GBS screening and IAP were associated with reduction in early-onset neonatal sepsis including GBS disease. Although an increase in incidence of late-onset neonatal sepsis including those caused by GBS cannot be totally ruled out, we did not identify significant evidence that this occurred.

Sonographic measurement of cervical length and head perineum distance before labor to predict time of delivery.

OBJECTIVES: This was an observational study on cervical length and head perineum distance and the prediction of time of delivery. One-hundred and twenty-five nulliparous women with uncomplicated, term, singleton pregnancy were recruited when they presented to the labor ward with show or infrequent painful uterine contractions (less than three contractions in ten minutes on a 30 min cardiotocogram). Apart from digital vaginal examination to assess cervical length and dilatation, sonographic cervical length and head perineum distance were measured by two-dimensional ultrasound. We compared women who delivered within 72 h of presentation of labor symptoms, with women who did not. After excluding ten women whose labor was induced and delivered within 72 h of presentation, one hundred and fifteen women were included for final data analysis. MAIN FINDINGS: Forty-nine women (42.6%) delivered while sixty-six women (57.4%) remained undelivered at 72 h of presentation of symptoms of labor. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups on age, presence of show, contractions, fetal head station and presentation and mode of delivery. For the group who had delivered within 72 h of presentation of labor symptoms, the mean sonographic cervical length was 1.87 cm ± 0.62 cm, while the head perineum distance was 6.01 cm ± 1.15 cm. For the other group, the mean sonographic cervical length was 2.10 cm ± 0.83 cm; head perineum distance was 6.03 cm ± 1.18 cm. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for both sonographic cervical length (p = .90); and head perineum distance (p = .08). We also compared the cervical length measured by digital vaginal examination versus sonography. The median sonographic measurements were 1.47 cm, 2.11 cm and 2.79 cm at "1 cm," "2 cm" and "3 cm" digital vaginal measurement, respectively. However, there was extensive overlap between digitally and sonographically measured cervical length. Prediction accuracy of cervical length and head perineum distance was poor. The area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were 0.433 for sonographic cervical length and 0.501 for HPD. CONCLUSION: Transperineal sonographical assessment of cervical length and head perineum distance before labor was not useful in predicting the time of delivery. However, it can be explored as an alternative assessment method when digital vaginal examination is not preferred.

Is intrapartum translabial ultrasound examination painless?

OBJECTIVES: To find out whether intrapartum translabial ultrasound examination is painless by comparing pain score of ultrasound-based versus digital vaginal examination of foetal head station. METHODS: In 94 women carrying uncomplicated-term singleton pregnancies, labour progress was assessed by translabial ultrasound, followed immediately by conventional digital vaginal examination. Pain scores (0-10) using visual analogue pain scale were obtained for both examinations. Forty-eight and forty-six sets of data were obtained in first and second stage of labour, respectively. The difference in pain scores between digital vaginal examination and translabial ultrasound was analysed. RESULTS: The median pain score for translabial ultrasound was 0 (range 0-8), while that for vaginal examination was 4.5 (range 0-10), p < 0.05. There was no significant difference in pain scores between first and second stages of labour for translabial ultrasound (p = 0.123) and for vaginal examination (p = 0.680). The pain score for vaginal examination was higher than that of translabial ultrasound in 81.9%, similar in 13.8% and lower in 4.3% of cases. There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores obtained for digital vaginal examination by clinicians with different experience (p = 0.941). CONCLUSIONS: Intrapartum translabial ultrasound is generally better tolerated than digital vaginal examination for assessment of labour progress, making it an acceptable adjunctive assessment tool during labour.

Relationship between intrapartum transperineal ultrasound measurement of angle of progression and head-perineum distance with correlation to conventional clinical parameters of labor progress and time to delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether angle of progression (AOP) and head-perineum distance (HPD) measured by intrapartum transperineal ultrasound (ITU) correlate with clinical fetal head station (station); and whether AOP versus HPD varies during uterine contraction and relaxation. In a subset of primiparous women, whether these ITU parameters correlate with time to normal spontaneous delivery (TD). METHODS: We evaluated prospectively 100 primiparous and multiparous women at term in active labor. Transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound (sagittal and transverse plane) were used to measure fetal head position and ITU parameters, respectively. Digitally palpated station and cervical dilatation were also noted. The results were compared using regression and correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Station was moderately correlated with AOP (r = 0.579) and HPD (r = -0.497). AOP was highly correlated with HPD during uterine contraction (r = -0.703) and relaxation (r = -0.647). In the subgroup of primiparous women, natural log of TD has the highest correlation with HPD and AOP during uterine contraction (r = 0.742), making prediction of TD similar to that of using cervical dilatation. CONCLUSION: ITU parameters were moderately correlated with station. There was constant high correlation between AOP and HPD. Prediction of TD in primiparous women using ITU parameters was similar to that of using cervical dilatation.