Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Radiol ; 71(847): 745-53, 1998 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9771385

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to derive the effective dose to patients from examinations of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract at 11 X-ray units in 10 Dutch hospitals. Entrance dose and entrance dose rate were measured at the surface of a homogeneous PMMA phantom and at the entrance surface of the image intensifier. Dose-area products (DAPs) were assessed during examinations of patients. The patients (334 females and 256 males) ages were 18-95 years (average 52 years). Effective dose was assessed from DAP using Monte Carlo computer calculations for male and female mathematical anthropomorphic phantoms. The DAPs measured during the survey showed substantial variations, i.e. an overall average value of 21 Gy cm2 and a range of average DAP per X-ray unit varying from 7 to 56 Gy cm2. Variations in the number of images (8-28) and the fluoroscopy time (1.7 min-7.0 min) were also large. A DAP to effective dose conversion factor of 0.32 mSv Gy cm-2 was derived for upper GI studies. The dose survey yielded an overall average effective dose of 6.7 mSv. At one location an examination involving as many as 28 projections was performed, whilst maintaining a DAP well below 15 Gy cm2 and an effective dose below 6 mSv. This was achieved using modern equipment (i.e. high frequency generator, digital spot films) with 0.2 mm additional copper filtration and a relatively high tube voltage. For examinations of the upper GI tract, the application of a reference value of 30 Gy cm2 for the DAP will ensure that, in general, the effective dose to individual patients will not exceed 15 mSv.


Assuntos
Sistema Digestório/diagnóstico por imagem , Doses de Radiação , Intensificação de Imagem Radiográfica , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Sulfato de Bário , Meios de Contraste , Duodeno/diagnóstico por imagem , Esôfago/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Fluoroscopia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiometria/métodos , Estômago/diagnóstico por imagem
2.
Gut ; 35(6): 841-3, 1994 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8020816

RESUMO

A patient with nausea and vomiting who subsequently proved to have systemic lupus erythematosus is described. Although gastrointestinal involvement is common in systemic lupus erythematosus it is rare as an initial manifestation. Gastric outlet obstruction was shown on the air contrast examination while the mucosa at endoscopy was normal. The gastric symptoms regressed after treatment with high dose corticosteroids and a repeat air contrast examination of the stomach was normal. This stricturing process may have been caused by a local peritonitis.


Assuntos
Obstrução da Saída Gástrica/etiologia , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/complicações , Adulto , Feminino , Obstrução da Saída Gástrica/diagnóstico por imagem , Obstrução da Saída Gástrica/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Peritonite/complicações , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Radiografia
5.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 134(7): 345-9, 1990 Feb 17.
Artigo em Holandês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2406629

RESUMO

In a prospective, blind study of 385 patients with dyspepsia, the diagnostic value of biphasic radiological examination of stomach and duodenum was compared with endoscopy. The patients were examined for presence of peptic ulcers and gastric carcinomas. No golden standard being available, kappa values were calculated for the comparison. The kappa values were 0.67 and 0.77 for gastric and duodenal ulcers, respectively; for gastric carcinomas the value was 0.91. These values indicate good agreement. The sensitivity and specificity of both methods were high; a lower sensitivity of radiological examination for duodenal ulcers was accounted for by ulcers smaller than 5 mm; for larger ulcers, the sensitivity and specificity of both methods were practically the same. It is concluded that the two methods are of equal value for the diagnosis of peptic ulcers and gastric carcinomas. Endoscopy offers the major advantage that biopsy samples can be taken for histological examination or culturing. The biphasic radiological examination, on the other hand, is cheaper and often better tolerated by the patient.


Assuntos
Gastroscopia , Úlcera Péptica/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Sulfato de Bário , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Tecnologia de Fibra Óptica , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Úlcera Péptica/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Radiografia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico por imagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA