Validation of a novel patient satisfaction questionnaire for preoperative fasting in cataract surgery: a discrimination analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Preoperative fasting is routinely performed to prevent anaesthesia-related pulmonary aspiration. To capture patients' experiences with preoperative fasting, a 13-item questionnaire was developed and validated using Rasch analysis and shortened to 6 items. This extension study aims to assess this questionnaire's ability to discriminate between participants with a short versus long duration of fasting and early versus late day surgery. DESIGN: Single-centred cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects were recruited via consecutive sampling of cataract patients on surgery day at Kensington Eye Institute in Toronto from February to December 2019. METHODS: A validated preoperative fasting questionnaire was administered. Discriminative ability was assessed by comparing responses in patients scheduled for surgery in the morning (8:00 am-12:00 pm) versus afternoon (12:00 pm-3:30 pm) and fasting for short (≤8 hours) versus long (>8 hours) duration. Diagnostic ability of the 6-item questionnaire relative to the 13-item questionnaire was assessed with receiver operating characteristics curve analysis. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients (mean age 70.8 ± 10.0 years; 57% female) were included. Total scores of patients having surgery in the morning were greater (i.e., less fasting-related burden) than in the afternoon (p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in scores between patients fasting for a short versus long duration (p > 0.05). Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis showed excellent diagnostic ability of the 6-item questionnaire relative to the 13-item version (area under the curve = 0.964). CONCLUSION: The 6-item questionnaire for fasting-related burden has excellent discriminative ability between early versus late surgery patients. The time fasting while awake may be a more relevant predictor of fasting-related burden relative to the total duration of fasting.

Economic appraisal of prosthetic replacement of ocular surface ecosystem in Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To perform an economic appraisal of the Prosthetic Replacement of Ocular Surface Ecosystem (PROSE; BostonSight, Needham Heights, Mass.) lens in patients with a distorted corneal surface or ocular surface disease in Canada. DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study with cost, cost-utility, and benefit-cost analyses. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who received PROSE from the only PROSE clinic in Canada from 2018 to 2020. METHODS: Visual acuity (VA) outcomes of the participants were assessed. Benefits were defined as VA improvements that were converted into utilities and then quality-adjusted life years. Economic values were derived via government statements, clinic financial statements, and published literature. RESULTS: Average best-corrected VA (BCVA) improvement was -0.42 ± 0.41 logMAR (p = 2.68 × 10-13) or Snellen 20/53 for the overall cohort, -0.51 ± 0.48 (p = 5.42 × 10-8) or Snellen 20/65 for distorted corneal surface patients, and -0.31 ± 0.30 (p = 1.30 × 10-7) or Snellen 20/41 for ocular surface disease patients. This corresponded to discounted quality-adjusted life year gains of 0.51, 0.65, and 0.42, respectively, over an estimated 5-year PROSE device lifespan. Average cost to fit a patient with PROSE was USD$5 469.85 (CAD$7 087.28), of which USD$4 971.38 (CAD$6 441.42) was clinic cost and USD$498.47 (CAD$645.87) was patient cost. Cost-utility was USD$10 256.47 (CAD$13 289.31) for the overall cohort, USD$8 439.79 (CAD$10 935.44) for distorted corneal surface patients, and US$13 069.90 (CAD$16 934.67) for ocular surface disease patients. The benefit-cost ratio was 34.4 for all, 43.8 for distorted corneal surface patients, and 28.3 for ocular surface disease patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our economic appraisal demonstrated that PROSE treatment provides a significant, cost-effective benefit to Canadian patients with distorted corneal surfaces and ocular surface diseases. This indicates that PROSE clinics are an efficient investment.

Prosthetic Replacement of the Ocular Surface Ecosystem for Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency: A Case Series.

OBJECTIVES: To assess outcomes of limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) in patients treated with Prosthetic Replacement of the Ocular Surface Ecosystem (PROSE). METHODS: Retrospective case series. Patients with LSCD who received PROSE treatment were included. Data including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and LSCD staging before and after PROSE dispensing were collected to characterize each case. RESULTS: Five eyes of four patients were included. All patients were female, with an age range of 21 to 80 years. Each patient received a PROSE device with diameters ranging from 16 to 18.5 mm. Follow-up ranged from 11 to 29 months. Tolerated wear times ranged from 3.5 to 10 hr daily. Four eyes showed improved BCVA and unchanged LSCD staging as per the global consensus after PROSE treatment. Three of these eyes had stage 3 and one had stage 1C LSCD at diagnosis. The fifth eye had worse BCVA and recurrence of stage 3 LSCD post-living-related conjunctival limbal allograft transplant despite PROSE treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Prosthetic Replacement of the Ocular Surface Ecosystem may be a viable treatment for LSCD, including severe cases, because it can provide symptom relief and improve vision. Its customizability, as demonstrated in this study, is beneficial for troubleshooting issues with fitting. Future studies are needed to further assess PROSE as treatment for LSCD.

Prosthetic Replacement of the Ocular Surface Ecosystem for Terrien Marginal Degeneration: A Case Series.

OBJECTIVES: To assess outcomes of the Prosthetic Replacement of the Ocular Surface Ecosystem (PROSE) treatment in patients with advanced Terrien marginal degeneration (TMD). METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of patients with advanced TMD who were assessed and fit with customized PROSE lenses. Data were collected on PROSE fitting details including visual acuity (VA) before and after PROSE, slit-lamp findings, and corneal tomography scans. RESULTS: Six eyes in four patients were included. All patients attempted at least one other contact lens (CL) modality before PROSE. Some patients had corneal comorbidities such as pseudopterygium and pseudobleb that contributed to intolerance to previous lenses and warranted extra considerations in the fitting process. With PROSE, VA improved in all six eyes. Patients with structural corneal comorbidities achieved improved vision, comfort, and lens tolerance with PROSE. Two eyes had noncorneal ocular comorbidities that limited PROSE efficacy. Another eye discontinued PROSE wear because of limbal stem-cell disease progression necessitating a limbal stem-cell transplant. CONCLUSIONS: PROSE treatment can be an effective option to improve vision and comfort for patients with advanced TMD who are intolerant to first-line therapeutic CL modalities, even in the presence of other corneal comorbidities.

Patient Satisfaction and Visual Function Following Implantation of Trifocal or Extended Range of Vision Intraocular Lenses.

Purpose: To compare the trifocal TFNT00 and extended depth-of-focus (EDF) ZXR00 intraocular lenses (IOLs) with respect to overall satisfaction with near and distance vision, visual acuity, dysphotopsia symptoms, spectacle dependence, and mesopic best corrected contrast sensitivity (MBCCS). Materials and Methods: This non-randomized, retrospective, single-centre, comparative study took place at the Kensington Eye Institute in Toronto, Canada. Subjects implanted with either the TFNT00 IOL (n = 11) or ZXR00 IOL (n = 13) were assessed up to 4 years post operatively. Overall satisfaction with distance and near vision, corrected distance visual acuity, uncorrected visual acuity at distance, intermediate (60 cm) and near (40 cm) (UNVA), dysphotopsia symptoms, spectacle dependence and monocular MBCCS were evaluated. Results: Forty-eight eyes of 24 subjects (mean age 68 years, 54% female) were assessed. There was no difference in overall satisfaction; both groups had a median score of 10/10 for overall distance vision, and 7/10 and 8/10 for near vision for EDF and trifocal, respectively. MBCCS at the higher spatial frequencies was significantly better with the ZXR00 IOL. Potentially clinically relevant but not statistically significant differences were found; the trifocal group (vs the EDF group) had better binocular UNVA (20/24 vs 20/32) and less spectacle dependence at least some of the time (54% vs 85%). Conclusion: The ZXR00 may be preferred for those who want optimal contrast sensitivity in dim lighting. Consistent with previous studies, the TFNT00 trifocal IOL may be a better choice for those who want to optimize UNVA. More studies in North America are required to further investigate spectacle dependence.

Diagnoses and Outcomes of Prosthetic Replacement of the Ocular Surface Ecosystem Treatment-A Canadian Experience.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate underlying diagnoses and outcomes of patients undergoing Prosthetic Replacement of the Ocular Surface Ecosystem (PROSE) treatment at the first Canadian PROSE center. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients referred for PROSE treatment and fitted with PROSE devices from 2018 to 2020. Data were collected on diagnoses, presenting symptoms, previous lens modalities attempted, best-corrected visual acuities (BCVAs) pre-PROSE and post-PROSE, daily wear time, and failure rates. Best-corrected visual acuities pre-PROSE and post-PROSE were compared to evaluate visual improvement. RESULTS: In total, 78 patients (126 eyes) were analyzed. The most common diagnoses were keratoconus (n=39 eyes) and postcorneal graft (n=15) in the distorted cornea group, and limbal stem cell deficiency (n=17) and graft versus host disease (n=15) in the ocular surface disease (OSD) group. Most frequent symptoms included blur, photophobia, and pain. Most common lens modalities attempted pre-PROSE were conventional scleral lenses and glasses. The overall mean BCVA improvement was 0.40 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) (4-lines Snellen) (P<0.0001). Best-corrected visual acuities improvement in the distorted cornea group (0.52 logMAR, 5-lines) was significantly greater than in the OSD group (0.29 logMAR, 3-lines) (P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem treatment can provide significant visual improvement for patients with distorted corneal surfaces and OSDs who failed other lens modalities.

Development and Validation of a Questionnaire Assessing Patient Distress from Preoperative Fasting in Cataract Surgery.

Purpose: To develop and psychometrically validate a questionnaire to measure patient distress with preoperative fasting related to cataract surgery.Methods: In this single-centered cross-sectional study, consecutive sampling of cataract patients was undertaken immediately preoperatively from February to December 2019. A questionnaire evaluating patient distress with fasting was designed and administered. Questionnaire development occurred in an iterative process and was conducted with consultation from expert investigators and patients. Validation and psychometric evaluation of the questionnaire were performed with Rasch analysis.Results: A preliminary version of the questionnaire was developed by 10 study investigators. Across five iterations of development, the questionnaire was administered to 186 cataract patients. Psychometric evaluation of the 13-item questionnaire demonstrated ordered thresholds, acceptable item calibration and fit, adequate internal consistency, ability to discriminate between three levels of distress from preoperative fasting and no notable differential item functioning. However, issues with mistargeting, clustering of items on the person-item map and multidimensionality remained. Given these concerns, 13 separate re-analyses were conducted via removal of certain items. A 6-item subset was determined to be well targeted, unidimensional, did not display item clustering and was able to discriminate between patients with high and low distress from preoperative fasting.Conclusion: A 6-item questionnaire is a valid, psychometrically robust and reliable measure for the assessment of patient distress with preoperative fasting in cataract surgery. Items include hunger, thirst, hoarseness, weakness, anxiety and nausea. Future studies should seek to validate this questionnaire across a variety of sociodemographic contexts, languages and specialties.

Effects of Reduced Acuity and Stereo Acuity on Saccades and Reaching Movements in Adults With Amblyopia and Strabismus.

Purpose: Our previous work has shown that amblyopia disrupts the planning and execution of visually-guided saccadic and reaching movements. We investigated the association between the clinical features of amblyopia and aspects of visuomotor behavior that are disrupted by amblyopia. Methods: A total of 55 adults with amblyopia (22 anisometropic, 18 strabismic, 15 mixed mechanism), 14 adults with strabismus without amblyopia, and 22 visually-normal control participants completed a visuomotor task while their eye and hand movements were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the association between three clinical predictors of amblyopia (amblyopic eye [AE] acuity, stereo sensitivity, and eye deviation) and seven kinematic outcomes, including saccadic and reach latency, interocular saccadic and reach latency difference, saccadic and reach precision, and PA/We ratio (an index of reach control strategy efficacy using online feedback correction). Results: Amblyopic eye acuity explained 28% of the variance in saccadic latency, and 48% of the variance in mean saccadic latency difference between the amblyopic and fellow eyes (i.e., interocular latency difference). In contrast, for reach latency, AE acuity explained only 10% of the variance. Amblyopic eye acuity was associated with reduced endpoint saccadic (23% of variance) and reach (22% of variance) precision in the amblyopic group. In the strabismus without amblyopia group, stereo sensitivity and eye deviation did not explain any significant variance in saccadic and reach latency or precision. Stereo sensitivity was the best clinical predictor of deficits in reach control strategy, explaining 23% of total variance of PA/We ratio in the amblyopic group and 12% of variance in the strabismus without amblyopia group when viewing with the amblyopic/nondominant eye. Conclusions: Deficits in eye and limb movement initiation (latency) and target localization (precision) were associated with amblyopic acuity deficit, whereas changes in the sensorimotor reach strategy were associated with deficits in stereopsis. Importantly, more than 50% of variance was not explained by the measured clinical features. Our findings suggest that other factors, including higher order visual processing and attention, may have an important role in explaining the kinematic deficits observed in amblyopia.

Test-retest reliability of hemifield, central-field, and full-field chromatic pupillometry for assessing the function of melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the test-retest reliability of current methods of inducing the melanopsin-driven postillumination pupil response (PIPR) under hemifield, central-field, and full-field stimulation conditions. METHODS: Pupil response was recorded with an eye tracker in 10 visually normal participants. Light stimuli were presented using a Ganzfeld screen with a custom-built device that allows specific regions of the retina to be stimulated. Blue light stimulation at 400 cd/m(2) intensity was presented for 400 ms to the lower and upper halves of the central 30° fields (hemifields), central 30° field (central-field), and full-field to induce PIPR. Red light full-field stimulation also was presented with the same intensity and duration as a control condition. Test-retest reliability of the PIPR measures was assessed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of six repetitions for lower and upper hemifield stimulation, and three repetitions for central-field and full-field stimulation. RESULTS: Hemifield, central-field, and full-field blue light stimulation induced increasingly greater PIPR in ascending order, while full-field red light stimulation induced no PIPR. Mean lower and upper hemifield PIPR was highly symmetric. Mean ICC of blue light PIPR was 0.87 for lower hemifield, 0.88 for upper hemifield, 0.95 for central-field, and 0.94 for full-field stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: We validated a new and repeatable method to measure PIPR induced by hemifield, central-field, and full-field light stimulation. Good PIPR measurement reliability was obtained under all conditions. This practical and reliable protocol will facilitate the clinical application of PIPR testing in different disease populations.

Effects of strabismic amblyopia and strabismus without amblyopia on visuomotor behavior: III. Temporal eye-hand coordination during reaching.

PURPOSE: To examine the effects of strabismic amblyopia and strabismus only, without amblyopia, on the temporal patterns of eye-hand coordination during both the planning and execution stages of visually-guided reaching. METHODS: Forty-six adults (16 with strabismic amblyopia, 14 with strabismus only, and 16 visually normal) executed reach-to-touch movements toward targets presented randomly 5° or 10° to the left or right of central fixation. Viewing conditions were binocular, monocular viewing with the amblyopic eye, and monocular viewing with the fellow eye (dominant and nondominant viewing for participants without amblyopia). Temporal coordination between eye and hand movements was examined during reach planning (interval between the initiation of saccade and reaching, i.e., saccade-to-reach planning interval) and reach execution (interval between the initiation of saccade and reach peak velocity [PV], i.e., saccade-to-reach PV interval). The frequency and dynamics of secondary reach-related saccades were also examined. RESULTS: The temporal patterns of eye-hand coordination prior to reach initiation were comparable among participants with strabismic amblyopia, strabismus only, and visually normal adults. However, the reach acceleration phase of participants with strabismic amblyopia and those with strabismus only were longer following target fixation (saccade-to-reach PV interval) than that of visually normal participants (P < 0.05). This effect was evident under all viewing conditions. The saccade-to-reach planning interval and the saccade-to-reach PV interval were not significantly different among participants with amblyopia with different levels of acuity and stereo acuity loss. Participants with strabismic amblyopia and strabismus only initiated secondary reach-related saccades significantly more frequently than visually normal participants. The amplitude and peak velocity of these saccades were significantly greater during amblyopic eye viewing in participants with amblyopia who also had negative stereopsis. CONCLUSIONS: Adults with strabismic amblyopia and strabismus only showed an altered pattern of temporal eye-hand coordination during the reach acceleration phase, which might affect their ability to modify reach trajectory using early online control. Secondary reach-related saccades may provide a compensatory mechanism with which to facilitate the late online control process in order to ensure relatively good reaching performance during binocular and fellow eye viewing.

Audiovisual perception in adults with amblyopia: a study using the McGurk effect.

PURPOSE: The effects on multisensory integration have rarely been examined in amblyopia. The McGurk effect is a well-established audiovisual illusion that is manifested when an auditory phoneme is presented concurrently with an incongruent visual phoneme. Visually healthy viewers will hear a phoneme that does not match the actual auditory stimulus, having been perceptually influenced by the visual phoneme. This study examines audiovisual integration in adults with amblyopia. METHODS: Twenty-two subjects with amblyopia and 25 visually healthy controls participated. Participants viewed videos of combinations of visual and auditory phonemes, and were asked to report what they heard. Some videos had congruent video and audio (control), whereas others had incongruent video and audio (McGurk). The McGurk effect is strongest when the visual phoneme dominates over the audio phoneme, resulting in low auditory accuracy on the task. RESULTS: Adults with amblyopia demonstrated a weaker McGurk effect than visually healthy controls (P = 0.01). The difference was greatest when viewing monocularly with the amblyopic eye, and it was also evident when viewing binocularly or monocularly with the fellow eye. No correlations were found between the strength of the McGurk effect and either visual acuity or stereoacuity in subjects with amblyopia. Subjects with amblyopia and controls showed a similar response pattern to different speakers and syllables, and subjects with amblyopia consistently demonstrated a weaker effect than controls. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal visual experience early in life can have negative consequences for audiovisual integration that persists into adulthood in people with amblyopia.

Short-term saccadic adaptation in patients with anisometropic amblyopia.

PURPOSE: Amblyopia is a developmental disorder characterized by impairment of spatiotemporal visual processing that also affects oculomotor and manual motor function. We investigated the effects of amblyopia on short-term visuomotor adaptation using a saccadic adaptation paradigm. METHODS: A total of 8 patients with anisometropic amblyopia and 11 visually-normal controls participated. Saccadic adaptation was induced using a double-step paradigm that displaced a saccadic visual target (at ±19°) back toward central fixation by 4.2° during the ongoing saccade. Three test blocks, preadaptation, adaptation, and postadaptation, were performed sequentially while participants viewed binocularly and monocularly with the amblyopic and fellow eyes (nondominant and dominant eyes in controls) in three separate sessions. The spatial and temporal characteristics of saccadic adaptation were measured. RESULTS: Patients exhibited diminished saccadic gain adaptation. The percentage change in saccadic gain was lower in patients during amblyopic eye and binocular viewing compared to controls. Saccadic latencies were longer, and saccadic gains and latencies were more variable in patients during amblyopic eye viewing. The time constants of adaptation were comparable between controls and patients under all viewing conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term adaptation of saccadic gain was weaker and more variable in patients during amblyopic eye and binocular viewing. Our findings suggest that visual error information necessary for adaptation is imprecise in amblyopia, leading to reduced modulation of saccadic gain, and support the proposal that the error signal driving saccadic adaptation is visual.

Error correcting mechanisms during antisaccades: contribution of online control during primary saccades and offline control via secondary saccades.

Errors in eye movements can be corrected during the ongoing saccade through in-flight modifications (i.e., online control), or by programming a secondary eye movement (i.e., offline control). In a reflexive saccade task, the oculomotor system can use extraretinal information (i.e., efference copy) online to correct errors in the primary saccade, and offline retinal information to generate a secondary corrective saccade. The purpose of this study was to examine the error correction mechanisms in the antisaccade task. The roles of extraretinal and retinal feedback in maintaining eye movement accuracy were investigated by presenting visual feedback at the spatial goal of the antisaccade. We found that online control for antisaccade is not affected by the presence of visual feedback; that is whether visual feedback is present or not, the duration of the deceleration interval was extended and significantly correlated with reduced antisaccade endpoint error. We postulate that the extended duration of deceleration is a feature of online control during volitional saccades to improve their endpoint accuracy. We found that secondary saccades were generated more frequently in the antisaccade task compared to the reflexive saccade task. Furthermore, we found evidence for a greater contribution from extraretinal sources of feedback in programming the secondary "corrective" saccades in the antisaccade task. Nonetheless, secondary saccades were more corrective for the remaining antisaccade amplitude error in the presence of visual feedback of the target. Taken together, our results reveal a distinctive online error control strategy through an extension of the deceleration interval in the antisaccade task. Target feedback does not improve online control, rather it improves the accuracy of secondary saccades in the antisaccade task.

Effects of strabismic amblyopia and strabismus without amblyopia on visuomotor behavior, I: saccadic eye movements.

PURPOSE: It has previously been shown that anisometropic amblyopia affects the programming and execution of saccades. The aim of the current study was to investigate the impact of strabismic amblyopia on saccade performance. METHODS: Fourteen adults with strabismic amblyopia, 13 adults with strabismus without amblyopia, and 14 visually normal adults performed saccades and reach-to-touch movements to targets presented at ± 5° and ± 10° eccentricity during binocular and monocular viewing. Latency, amplitude, and peak velocity of primary and secondary saccades were measured. RESULTS: In contrast to visually normal participants who had shorter primary saccade latency during binocular viewing, no binocular advantage was found in patients with strabismus with or without amblyopia. Patients with amblyopia had longer saccade latency during amblyopic eye viewing (P < 0.0001); however, there were no significant differences in saccade amplitude precision among the three groups across viewing conditions. Further analysis showed that only patients with severe amblyopia and no stereopsis (n = 4) exhibited longer latency (which was more pronounced for more central targets; P < 0.0001), and they also had reduced amplitude precision during amblyopic eye viewing. In contrast, patients with mild amblyopia (n = 5) and no stereopsis had normal latency and reduced precision during amblyopic eye viewing (P < 0.001), whereas those with gross stereopsis (n = 5) had normal latency and precision. There were no differences in peak velocity among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Distinct patterns of saccade performance according to different levels of visual acuity and stereoscopic losses in strabismic amblyopia were found. These findings were in contrast to those in anisometropic amblyopia in which the altered saccade performance was independent of the extent of visual acuity or stereoscopic deficits. These results were most likely due to different long-term sensory suppression mechanisms in strabismic versus anisometropic amblyopia.

Effects of induced monocular blur versus anisometropic amblyopia on saccades, reaching, and eye-hand coordination.

PURPOSE: We previously showed that anisometropic amblyopia affects the programming and execution of saccades and reaching movements. In our current study, we investigated whether these amblyopia-related changes simply are due to a reduction in visual acuity alone by inducing artificial blur in one eye in visually-normal participants. METHODS: Twelve visually-normal participants performed saccades and reach-to-touch movements to targets presented on a computer screen during binocular and monocular viewing. A contact lens was used to blur the vision of one eye to a mean acuity level of 20/50. Saccades and reaching kinematics were compared before blur, immediately after blur, and 5 hours after blur was induced. The 5 hours after blur kinematic data from visually-normal participants also were compared to those from 12 patients with anisometropic amblyopia who had comparable acuity in the amblyopic eye. RESULTS: Primary saccades (latency, amplitude, peak velocity), reaching movements (reaction time, movement time, peak acceleration, duration of the acceleration phase), and eye-hand coordination (saccade-to-reach planning interval, saccade-to-reach peak velocity interval) were not affected by induced monocular blur in visually-normal participants, either immediately or 5 hours after blur. Compared to visually-normal participants after 5 hours of blur, patients with anisometropic amblyopia had significantly longer and more variable saccade latency during amblyopic eye viewing, lower peak acceleration, and a longer acceleration phase during reaching, and a different temporal pattern of eye-hand coordination. CONCLUSIONS: Artificially-induced monocular blur in visually-normal participants did not affect saccades, reaching movements, and eye-hand coordination during a simple reach-to-touch task even after a period of blur exposure. In contrast, patients with anisometropic amblyopia demonstrated significantly different kinematics while performing the same task. These results indicate that loss of visual acuity alone cannot explain the kinematic changes seen in patients with mild anisometropic amblyopia.

The effect of sensory uncertainty due to amblyopia (lazy eye) on the planning and execution of visually-guided 3D reaching movements.

BACKGROUND: Impairment of spatiotemporal visual processing in amblyopia has been studied extensively, but its effects on visuomotor tasks have rarely been examined. Here, we investigate how visual deficits in amblyopia affect motor planning and online control of visually-guided, unconstrained reaching movements. METHODS: Thirteen patients with mild amblyopia, 13 with severe amblyopia and 13 visually-normal participants were recruited. Participants reached and touched a visual target during binocular and monocular viewing. Motor planning was assessed by examining spatial variability of the trajectory at 50-100 ms after movement onset. Online control was assessed by examining the endpoint variability and by calculating the coefficient of determination (R(2)) which correlates the spatial position of the limb during the movement to endpoint position. RESULTS: Patients with amblyopia had reduced precision of the motor plan in all viewing conditions as evidenced by increased variability of the reach early in the trajectory. Endpoint precision was comparable between patients with mild amblyopia and control participants. Patients with severe amblyopia had reduced endpoint precision along azimuth and elevation during amblyopic eye viewing only, and along the depth axis in all viewing conditions. In addition, they had significantly higher R(2) values at 70% of movement time along the elevation and depth axes during amblyopic eye viewing. CONCLUSION: Sensory uncertainty due to amblyopia leads to reduced precision of the motor plan. The ability to implement online corrections depends on the severity of the visual deficit, viewing condition, and the axis of the reaching movement. Patients with mild amblyopia used online control effectively to compensate for the reduced precision of the motor plan. In contrast, patients with severe amblyopia were not able to use online control as effectively to amend the limb trajectory especially along the depth axis, which could be due to their abnormal stereopsis.

Ability of an upright-supine test to differentiate skew deviation from other vertical strabismus causes.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of a new upright-supine test to differentiate skew deviation from trochlear nerve palsy and other causes of vertical strabismus in a large number of patients. METHODS: The study consisted of 125 consecutive patients who sought treatment from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2010, for vertical strabismus of various causes: skew deviation (25 patients), trochlear nerve palsy (58 patients), restrictive causes (14 patients), and other causes (eg, myasthenia gravis and childhood strabismus) (28 patients). Twenty healthy participants served as controls. The deviation was measured by the prism and alternate cover test using a near target at ⅓ m in both the upright and supine positions. A vertical strabismus that decreased by 50% or more from the upright to supine position constituted a positive test result. RESULTS: The upright-supine test result was positive in 20 of 25 patients with skew deviation (sensitivity, 80%) but negative in all patients with trochlear nerve palsy, restrictive, or other causes (specificity, 100%). CONCLUSIONS: The upright-supine test is highly specific for differentiating skew deviation from other causes of vertical strabismus. This test could be added as a fourth step after the 3-step test, and if the result is positive, neuroimaging should be considered if indicated clinically.

Effects of anisometropic amblyopia on visuomotor behavior, III: Temporal eye-hand coordination during reaching.

PURPOSE: To examine the effects of anisometropic amblyopia on the temporal pattern of eye-hand coordination during visually-guided reaching. METHODS: Eighteen patients with anisometropic amblyopia and 18 control subjects were recruited. Participants executed reach-to-touch movements toward visual targets under three viewing conditions: binocular, monocular amblyopic eye, and monocular fellow eye viewing. Temporal coordination between eye and hand movements was examined during reach planning (interval between the initiation of saccade and reaching) and reach execution (interval between the initiation of saccade and reach peak velocity). The frequency and dynamics of secondary saccades were also examined. RESULTS: Patients with severe amblyopia spent a longer time planning the reaching response after fixating the target in comparison with control subjects and patients with mild amblyopia (P = 0.029). In comparison with control subjects, all patients extended the acceleration phase of the reach after target fixation (P = 0.018). Secondary (reach-related) saccades were initiated during the acceleration phase of the reach and patients executed these saccades with greater frequency than control subjects (P < 0.0001). The amplitude and peak velocity of reach-related saccades were higher when patients viewed with the amblyopic eye in comparison with the other viewing conditions (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to show that patients with anisometropic amblyopia modified the temporal dynamics of eye-hand coordination during visually-guided reaching. They extended the planning and execution intervals after target fixation and increased the frequency of secondary, reach-related saccades. These may represent visuomotor strategies to compensate for the spatiotemporal visual deficits to achieve good reaching accuracy and precision.