Bridging the STRONG Gap: Call to Optimize Heart Failure Treatment After Hospitalization in Women and Men in Taiwan.

The benefits of rapidly up-titrating evidence-based treatments following heart failure (HF) hospitalizations were demonstrated in the STRONG-HF trial and emphasized in contemporary HF guidelines. We aimed to assess up-titration patterns of guideline-directed medical treatments in the Taiwanese HF population. Combining data from the TSOC-HFrEF registry and the TAROT-AHF study cohort, we formed the "Taiwan real-world cohort". We compared these data with subgroups of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% in the STRONG-HF trial. Patients in the Taiwan cohort exhibited similar blood pressure, heart rate and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide levels at discharge compared with those in the STRONG-HF trial. A higher proportion of patients in the STRONG-HF high-intensity care group received up-titrations compared with those in the usual care group and the Taiwan cohort. Composite all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization at 180 days for patients in the high-intensity care group, usual care group, and Taiwan cohort were 17.4%, 23.7%, and 31.9%, respectively, with differences largely contributed by HF hospitalization (10.1%, 17.9%, and 27.6%, respectively), whereas all-cause mortality rates were similar (11.0%, 9.6%, and 9.3%, respectively). Gender did not affect this trend. In conclusion, our data highlights a treatment gap between the STRONG-HF trial and real-world practices in Taiwan, urging prompt optimization of HF therapy.

Sodium Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors Versus Metformin on Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes With Low Cardiovascular Risk: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether initial SGLT2 (sodium-glucose cotransporter 2) inhibitor-based treatment is superior to metformin-based regimens as a primary prevention strategy among low-risk patients with diabetes. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this nationwide cohort study, a total of 38 496 patients with diabetes with low cardiovascular risk were identified (age 62.0±11.6 years, men 50%) from January 1 to December 31, 2016. Patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitors-based and metformin-based regimens were 1:2 matched by propensity score. Study outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure, stroke, and progression to end-stage renal disease. Compared with 1928 patients receiving metformin-based regimens, 964 patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitor-based regimens had similar all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.51-1.12]), cardiovascular death (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.25-1.89]), hospitalization for heart failure (HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.59-1.92]), stroke (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.48-1.27]), and progression to end-stage renal disease (HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.32-2.39]). However, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.23-0.99]; P for interaction=0.008) and progression to end-stage renal disease (HR, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.06-0.82]; P for interaction=0.04) in patients under the age of 65. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to metformin-based regimens, SGLT2 inhibitor-based regimens showed a similar risk of all-cause mortality and adverse cardiorenal events. SGLT2 inhibitors might be considered as first-line therapy in select low-risk patients, for example, younger patients with diabetes.

Taiwan Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Registry 2020: Rationale and Design.

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a significant public health problem worldwide. Death and rehospitalization rates are similar across different HF phenotypes. However, the existing Taiwanese HF registries mainly enrolled inpatients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) before 2019, so their results may not apply to outpatients or patients with HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) phenotypes. Methods: The Taiwan Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Registry 2020 is a prospective, multicenter, observational registry that will enroll patients with HF from 27 hospitals in Taiwan between 2020 and 2022 and will be followed for two years. Patients eligible for enrollment include those admitted due to acute decompensated heart failure or outpatients with a history of hospitalization for heart failure within the past six months. The registry will collect patient demographics, medical history, HF diagnosis, medication use, examination results, and comorbidities. The registry plans to enroll 3,370 patients, with the distribution of HFrEF/HFmrEF/HFpEF as 59%/13%/28%. Follow-up intervals will occur every six months for up to two years to monitor clinical outcomes and major cardiac interventions. The registry will conclude in December 2024. Conclusions: The Taiwan Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Registry 2020 is a comprehensive and meticulous effort to demonstrate the epidemiology, adherence to guidelines, clinical outcomes, and disease progression of Taiwanese patients with HF in contemporary clinical practice.

2024 Guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a multi-organ systemic syndrome that involves cardiac and extra-cardiac pathophysiological abnormalities. Its growing prevalence causes a major public concern worldwide. HFpEF is usually associated with multiple comorbidities, and non-cardiovascular death is common in patients with HFpEF. In Asia, patients with HFpEF has a younger age, higher prevalence of diabetes and chronic kidney disease than Western countries. A 2-step diagnostic algorithm is recommended in this guideline. In the first step, the diagnosis of HFpEF can be made if patients have symptoms and/or signs of heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50%, increased natriuretic peptide, and objective evidence of left atrial or left ventricular abnormalities or raised left ventricular filling pressure. If diagnosis is still uncertain, invasive or noninvasive stress test can be performed in the second step. Comorbidities need to be controlled in HFpEF. Weight reduction for obesity and supervised exercise training are recommended for HFpEF. For pharmacological therapy, diuretic is used to relieve congestion and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, empagliflozin or dapagliflozin, is recommended to improve prognosis of HFpEF. The research on HFpEF is advancing at a rapid pace. It is expected that newer modalities for diagnosis and management of HFpEF could appear in the near future.

Efficacy of Sacubitril-Valsartan on Survival and Cardiac Remodeling in Hypotensive Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether hypotensive patients diagnosed with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) might benefit from angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNis) in real-world practice because patients with baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) of less than 100 mm Hg have been excluded from landmark trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter study conducted between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2021, a total of 7562 symptomatic patients with HFrEF were enrolled and grouped by SBP (hypotension was defined as an SBP of less than 100 mm Hg) and ARNi use as follows: group 1, hypotensive/non-ARNi users (n=484); group 2, hypotensive/ARNi users (n=308); group 3, nonhypotensive/non-ARNi users (n=4560); and group 4, nonhypotensive/ARNi users (n=2210). Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics for survival analysis. RESULTS: Diverse baseline characteristics and lower rates of medication use were found among non-ARNi users compared with ARNi users. Hypotensive/ARNi users had lower ARNi initiation doses than nonhypotensive/ARNi users. We observed significantly lower mortality, composite heart failure hospitalization, and CV death for hypotensive/ARNi and the other 2 nonhypotensive groups (groups 3 and 4) during a median follow-up of 3.43 years (all P<.05), with a similar effect on reverse remodeling for the hypotensive/ARNi group compared with the hypotensive/non-ARNi group. The event-free survival benefits of ARNi vs renin-angiotensin system inhibitors were consistent with the lower boundary of SBP for clinical benefits found until 88 mm Hg (spline curves) after inverse probability of treatment weighting. CONCLUSION: Patients with HFrEF and hypotension may still benefit from ARNi treatment. Patients with hypotensive HFrEF should not be routinely excluded from ARNi use in a real-world setting.

Impact of Type 1 Versus Type 2 Diabetes on Developing Herpes Zoster and Post-herpetic Neuralgia: A Population-based Cohort Study.

Type 2 diabetes is associated with an increased risk of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia. However, the association of type 1 diabetes with herpes zoster or postherpetic neuralgia remains unclear. This retrospective cohort study using Taiwan's Health Insurance Research Database included 199,566 patients with type 1 diabetes and 1,458,331 with type 2 diabetes, identified during the period 2000 to 2012. Patients with type 1 diabetes had a significantly higher risk of developing herpes zoster than those with type 2 diabetes (p < 0.001). Across all age groups, the impact of diabetes on herpes zoster was greater in type 1 than in type 2 diabetes. Patients with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes had a 1.45-fold higher risk of post-herpetic neuralgia than those without diabetes (hazard ratio 1.45, 95% confidence interval 1.28-1.65; hazard ratio 1.45, 95% confidence interval 1.37-1.52, respectively), and there was no difference between the 2 types of diabetes (hazard ratio 1.06; 95% confidence interval 0.93-1.21). The results recommend consideration of herpes zoster vaccination at an earlier age in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Penalized Model-Based Unsupervised Phenomapping Unravels Distinctive HFrEF Phenotypes With Improved Outcomes Discrimination From Sacubitril/Valsartan Treatment Independent of MAGGIC Score.

Background The angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (LCZ696) has emerged as a promising pharmacological intervention against renin-angiotensin system inhibitor in reduced ejection fraction heart failure (HFrEF). Whether the therapeutic benefits may vary among heterogeneous HFrEF subgroups remains unknown. Methods and Results This study comprised a pooled 2-center analysis including 1103 patients with symptomatic HFrEF with LCZ696 use and another 1103 independent HFrEF control cohort (with renin-angiotensin system inhibitor use) matched for age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, and comorbidity conditions. Three main distinct phenogroup clusterings were identified from unsupervised machine learning using 29 clinical variables: phenogroup 1 (youngest, relatively lower diabetes prevalence, highest glomerular filtration rate with largest left ventricular size and left ventricular wall stress); phenogroup 2 (oldest, lean, highest diabetes and vascular diseases prevalence, lowest highest glomerular filtration rate with smallest left ventricular size and mass), and phenogroup 3 (lowest clinical comorbidity with largest left ventricular mass and highest hypertrophy prevalence). During the median 1.74-year follow-up, phenogroup assignment provided improved prognostic discrimination beyond Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure risk score risk score (all net reclassification index P<0.05) with overall good calibrations. While phenogroup 1 showed overall best clinical outcomes, phenogroup 2 demonstrated highest cardiovascular death and worst renal end point, with phenogroup 3 having the highest all-cause death rate and HF hospitalization among groups, respectively. These findings were broadly consistent when compared with the renin-angiotensin system inhibitor control as reference group. Conclusions Phenomapping provided novel insights on unique characteristics and cardiac features among patients with HFrEF with sacubitril/valsartan treatment. These findings further showed potentiality in identifying potential sacubitril/valsartan responders and nonresponders with improved outcome discrimination among patients with HFrEF beyond clinical scoring.

2023 Expert Consensus of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardiac Amyloidosis.

Cardiac amyloidosis is one form of systemic amyloidosis caused by abnormal amyloid fibrils deposited in the extracellular space of the myocardium causing heart failure because of restrictive cardiomyopathy and conduction disturbances. The incidence and prevalence of cardiac amyloidosis are higher than previously noted, particularly among special populations. The most common forms of cardiac amyloidosis are light chain and transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. Even though more than 70% of patients with systemic amyloidosis have cardiac amyloidosis, the diagnosis is often delayed, suggesting significant gaps in the knowledge of cardiac amyloidosis and a lack of multidisciplinary teamwork in our daily practice. The Taiwan Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Committee organized experts to draft the "Expert Consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis." This statement aims to help clinicians and healthcare professionals improve early diagnosis and management of cardiac amyloidosis in Taiwan. The expert panel met virtually to review the data and discuss the consensus statements. Our review provided practical information about diagnostic methods and algorithms, clinical clues and red-flag signs, cardiac amyloidosis per se and its comorbidities treatment modalities, and follow-up plans for asymptomatic transthyretin gene carriers. We especially innovate two acronyms, "HFpEF MUTED CALL" and "HFmrEF MUST COUNT", to help in the early diagnosis and screening of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy as shown in the Central Illustration.

Risk stratification for worsening renal function and renal decline in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction after sacubitril/valsartan treatment.

BACKGROUND: In the real-world setting, data regarding renal decline following sacubitril/valsartan treatment are lacking. This study aimed to develop a scoring system to predict renal outcome in sacubitril/valsartan-treated patients. METHODS: Between 2017 and 2018, a total of 1505 heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) undergoing sacubitril/valsartan treatment were consecutively enrolled from 10 hospitals to serve as the derivation cohort. Another 1620 HFrEF patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan were included as the validation cohort. Worsening renal function (WRF) was defined as a serum creatinine increase of >0.3 mg/dL and/or >25 % at 8 months of sacubitril/valsartan treatment. The derivation cohort was used to identify independent predictive factors for WRF through multivariate analysis, which were then used to develop the risk score system. RESULTS: Among the 3125 HFrEF patients, 689 (22.0 %) patients had WRF at 8 months following sacubitril/valsartan treatment. In the derivation cohort, six prognostic factors (age, functional class, history of peripheral arterial disease, diabetes mellitus, gout or hyperuricemia, and serum albumin level) were independently associated with WRF, and were combined into a risk predicting score. This score showed accurate discrimination in the derivation and validation cohorts (Harrell's concordance indexes 0.74 and 0.71, 95 % confidence intervals 0.71-0.78 and 0.69-0.74, respectively). Patients with a higher risk score experienced a more rapid decline in renal function, poorer clinical outcomes, and a higher rate of discontinuation of sacubitril/valsartan treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study developed a score for WRF after sacubitril/valsartan treatment, which may assist clinicians with risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making.

Iron deficiency in Taiwanese patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency (ID) is a common comorbidity among patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and is associated with poorer outcomes independent of anemia. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic significance of ID in Taiwanese patients with HFrEF. METHODS: We included HFrEF patients from two multicenter cohorts at different periods. The multivariate Cox regression analysis was applied to assess the risk of outcomes associated with ID, accounting for the varying risk of death. RESULTS: Of the 3612 patients with HFrEF registered from 2013 to 2018, 665 patients (18.4%) had available baseline iron profile measurements. Of these, 290 patients (43.6%) were iron deficient; 20.2% had ID+/anemia+, 23.4% ID+/anemia-, 21.5% ID-/anemia+, and 34.9% ID-/anemia-. Regardless of anemia status, patients with coexisting ID had a higher risk than those without ID (all-cause mortality: 14.3 vs 9.5 per 100 patient-years, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-1.85; p = 0.091; cardiovascular mortality: 10.5 per 100 patient-years vs 6.1, adjusted HR 1.54 [95% CI, 1.03-2.30; p = 0.037]; cardiovascular mortality or first unplanned hospitalization for HF: 36.7 vs 19.7 per 100 patient-years, adjusted HR 1.57 [95% CI, 1.22-2.01; p < 0.001]). Among patients eligible for treatment in the IRONMAN trial design (43.9%), parenteral iron therapy was estimated to reduce heart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular deaths by 13.7 per 100 patient-years. CONCLUSION: Iron profiles were tested in less than one-fifth of the Taiwanese HFrEF cohort. ID was present in 43.6% of tested patients and was independently associated with poor prognosis in these patients.

Economic evaluation of new blood pressure target for hypertensive patients in Taiwan according to the 2022 hypertension clinical practice guidelines of the Taiwan society of cardiology: a simulation modeling study.

With the promising cardiovascular benefits in the STEP and SPRINT trials, the 2022 Taiwan's hypertension guidelines redefined the hypertension threshold as 130/80 mmHg and a universal blood-pressure target of <130/80 mmHg. This study's objective was to examine the cost-effectiveness of the intensive blood-pressure target for hypertensive patients using estimated lifetime medical costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) from the Taiwan national payer's perspective. We developed a lifetime Markov model comparing the intensive and conservative blood-pressure targets. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) against the willing-to-pay thresholds at the one-time [US$34,000(NT$1,020,000)] and three-time [US$100,000(NT$3,000,000)] gross domestic product per capita were defined as very cost-effect and only cost-effective. The cost-effectiveness in different age stratifications and cardiovascular risks treated with a more intensive target (120 mmHg) were examined in the subgroup analyses. The new blood-pressure treatment target produced more lifetime medical costs [US$31,589(NT$947,670) versus US$26,788(NT$803,640)] and QALYs (12.54 versus 12.25), and the ICER was US$16,589(NT$497,670), which was 99.1% and 100% probability of a very cost-effective and cost-effective strategy. The ICERs in all age stratifications had more than a 90% probability of being very cost-effective, and ICERs decreased with age. More intensive control in patients with high cardiovascular risks produced a lower ICER [US$14,547(NT$436,410)]. In conclusion, Taiwan's new blood-pressure treatment target can prevent more cardiovascular events with acceptable costs per QALY below the willing-to-pay thresholds. The cost-effectiveness of intensive control is consistent across different ages and more pronounced with the increase in age and cardiovascular risk.

Real-World Experience of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition in Reduced Ejection Fraction Heart Failure Patients With Advanced Kidney Disease.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) in real-world patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and advanced chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 30 mL/min per 1.73 m2), which have been excluded from the landmark trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study examined 3281 patients pooled from two multicenter HFrEF cohorts, and 661 patients with baseline eGFR less than 30 mL/min per 1.73 m2 were further analyzed (the Taiwan Society of Cardiology - Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (TSOC-HFrEF) registry: May 1, 2013 to October 31, 2014, and the Treatment with Angiotensin Receptor neprilysin inhibitor fOr Taiwan Heart Failure patients (TAROT-HF) study: March 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018). Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for confounders. At 1-year follow-up, all-cause mortality, total heart failure hospitalizations, renal function, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were used as the endpoints. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 510 patients (age, 69.8±13.9 years; male, 61.0%; mean LVEF, 29.8±7.3%; mean eGFR, 19.8±9.0 mL/min per 1.73 m2) were included in the final analysis, including 278 patients receiving ARNI treatment (ARNI group) and 232 patients not on ARNI treatment (non-ARNI group). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. At 1 year, eGFR and LVEF measurements were significantly higher in the ARNI group than in the non-ARNI group (25.0±17.1 mL/min per 1.73 m2 vs 21.4±17.5 mL/min per 1.73 m2; P=.04; and 40.1±12.9% vs. 33.1±10.8%, P<.001, respectively). The ARNI group had significantly lower risks of 1-year all-cause mortality (19.4 vs 30.9 per 100-person year; P=.02), and total HF rehospitalizations (70.0 vs 110.4 per 100-person year; P=.01) than non-ARNI users. CONCLUSION: Our results show the effectiveness of ARNIs in HFrEF patients with advanced chronic kidney disease in a real-world setting.

Utility of PREDICT-HF score in high-risk Asian heart failure patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the application of sacubitril/valsartan in clinical practice and the utility of PREDICT-HF score for outcome prediction in Asian heart failure patients with difference risk profiles. Methods: The TAROT-HF study was a multicenter, single-arm, observational study. Totally 1,187 outpatients with HFrEF treated with sacubitril/valsartan were enrolled and categorized by: (1) high-risk group with ≥1 of the following three risk factors: old age (≥80 years), low baseline systolic blood pressure (<100 mmHg), and renal impairment (eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2), and (2) standard-risk group, those who did not have any risk factors. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the PREDICT-HF risk model. Results: A total of 305 (25.7%) patients matched the criteria for the high-risk group. The event rates of cardiovascular death or first unplanned heart failure hospitalization (HFH) among the overall population, high-risk, and standard-risk groups were 13.7, 24.9, and 10.8 events per 100 patient-years, respectively. The C statistics for the PREDICT-HF model in the overall cohort and high-risk group for cardiovascular death or first unplanned HFH at 2 years were 0.73 (95% CI 0.70-0.76) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.65-0.76), respectively. The permanent discontinuation rate among the high-risk patients was significantly higher than that among the standard-risk patients (8.3 vs. 2.5 per 100 patient-years, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Real-world outcomes of the TAROT-HF study demonstrated that the PREDICT-HF model performed well in Asian HFrEF patients. Three easily detected clinical profiles of age, renal function, and systolic BP could help to identify patients at risk before initiating sacubitril/valsartan.

Clinical impacts of sacubitril/valsartan on patients eligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

AIMS: Sacubitril/valsartan (SAC/VAL) has been used in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) could benefit the HFrEF patients with wide QRS durations. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impacts of SAC/VAL on reverse cardiac remodelling in CRT-eligible and CRT-ineligible HFrEF patients with different QRS durations. METHODS AND RESULTS: The TAROT-HF study was a multicentre, observational study enrolling patients who initiated SAC/VAL from 10 hospitals since 2017. Patients with baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% were classified into two groups: (i) Group 1: CRT-eligible group, patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology plus QRS duration ≥130 ms or non-LBBB morphology plus QRS duration ≥150 ms; and (ii) Group 2: CRT-ineligible group. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for confounders, and 1168 patients were analysed. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The improvements in LVEF and left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVi) were more significant in Group 2 than in Group 1 after 1 year SAC/VAL treatment (LVEF: 8.4% ± 11.3% vs. 4.5% ± 8.1%, P < 0.001; change percentages in LVESVi: -14.4% ± 25.9% vs. -9.6% ± 23.1%, P = 0.004). LVEF improving to ≥50% in Groups 1 and 2 constituted 5.2% and 20.2% after 1 year SAC/VAL treatment (P < 0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that wide QRS durations were negatively associated with the reverse cardiac remodelling in these HFrEF patients with SAC/VAL treatment. CONCLUSION: Despite SAC/VAL treatment, wide QRS durations are associated with lower degrees of left ventricular improvement than narrow ones in the HFrEF patients. Optimal intervention timing for the CRT-eligible patients requires further investigation.

Effects of Ivabradine on Patients with Depressed Left Ventricular Function after Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Background: The potential synergistic effect of ivabradine and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure (HF) patients has rarely been studied. We aimed to evaluate the clinical benefits of ivabradine in patients with left ventricular dysfunction following CRT implantation. Methods: Two hundred and thirty-one patients receiving CRT were consecutively enrolled between January 2014 and December 2018 from two HF centers. A total of 123 patients had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40% and resting sinus heart rate (HR) ≥ 75 bpm after six months of CRT implantation. Among these patients, 45 were treated with ivabradine (Group 1), and 78 did not receive ivabradine treatment (Group 2). Results: Baseline characteristics and prescription rates of HF medications other than ivabradine were similar between the two groups. In Group 1, the mean HR decreased from 82.2 ± 11.4 bpm to 76.3 ± 10.5 bpm (p = 0.012), and the mean LVEF increased from 29.9 ± 6.5% to 38.8 ± 12.4% (p < 0.001). Atrial pacing percentage, biventricular pacing percentage, and burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) were not significantly different between the two groups during the study period. The patients' daily physical activity increased significantly in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (Δ daily activity 0.4 ± 0.7 hours/day vs. -0.1 ± 7.2 hours/day, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Ivabradine could effectively reduce HR and improve physical activity. It was safe to use and did not increase AF burden or affect biventricular pacing percentage in CRT recipients.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on heart failure management: Global experience of the OPTIMIZE Heart Failure Care network.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, reductions in heart failure (HF) hospitalizations have been widely reported, and there is an urgent need to understand how HF care has been reorganized in countries with different infection levels, vaccination rates and healthcare services. The OPTIMIZE Heart Failure Care program has a global network of investigators in 42 countries, with first-hand experience of the impact of the pandemic on HF management in different care settings. The national coordinators were surveyed to assess: 1) the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic for continuity of HF care, from both a hospital and patient perspective; 2) the organizational changes enacted to ensure continued HF care; and 3) lessons learned for the future of HF care. Contributions were obtained from 37 national coordinators in 29 countries. We summarize their input, highlighting the issues raised and using the example of three very different settings (Italy, Brazil, and Taiwan) to illustrate the similarities and differences across the OPTIMIZE program.

Duration of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Associated With Electrocardiographic Outcomes Before and After Sacubitril/Valsartan.

AIM: Changes in QRS duration in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) after sacubitril/valsartan therapy is not fully understood. This study aimed to assess the association of duration of HFrEF diagnosis with electrocardiographic and echocardiographic outcomes between before and after sacubitril/valsartan. METHODS: We included HFrEF patients who received naïve sacubitril/valsartan therapy for ≥3 months, between January 2016 and March 2018. All patients were divided into 2 groups based on their duration of HFrEF. Generalized linear models were analyzed the cardiac outcomes after sacubitril/valsartan therapy by HFrEF duration. RESULTS: Among these, 42 patients were HFrEF duration of <1 year and 47 patients were ≥1 year. The mean difference of QRS duration was lesser in the <1-year group than in the ≥1-year group (-2.3 msec vs 6.3 msec; P = .029). However, the mean difference of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was higher in the ≥1-year group (13.8% vs 5.8%; P = .008). After adjusting for patient demographics and clinical characteristics, the ≥1-year group had a significantly prolonged QRS duration (coefficient = 11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-21.7) and an unfavorable LVEF recovery (coefficient = -10.3; 95% CI -14.5 to -6.1) compared with the <1-year group. CONCLUSION: Prolonged QRS durations and unfavorable LVEF recoveries after sacubitril/valsartan therapy were observed in patients with HFrEF duration of ≥1 year. Earlier diagnosis of HFrEF and appropriate medication treatment may be beneficial in the improvement of QRS duration and LVEF recovery.

Contribution of Different Subbands of ECG in Sleep Apnea Detection Evaluated Using Filter Bank Decomposition and a Convolutional Neural Network.

A variety of feature extraction and classification approaches have been proposed using electrocardiogram (ECG) and ECG-derived signals for improving the performance of detecting apnea events and diagnosing patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The purpose of this study is to further evaluate whether the reduction of lower frequency P and T waves can increase the accuracy of the detection of apnea events. This study proposed filter bank decomposition to decompose the ECG signal into 15 subband signals, and a one-dimensional (1D) convolutional neural network (CNN) model independently cooperating with each subband to extract and classify the features of the given subband signal. One-minute ECG signals obtained from the MIT PhysioNet Apnea-ECG database were used to train the CNN models and test the accuracy of detecting apnea events for different subbands. The results show that the use of the newly selected subject-independent datasets can avoid the overestimation of the accuracy of the apnea event detection and can test the difference in the accuracy of different subbands. The frequency band of 31.25-37.5 Hz can achieve 100% per-recording accuracy with 85.8% per-minute accuracy using the newly selected subject-independent datasets and is recommended as a promising subband of ECG signals that can cooperate with the proposed 1D CNN model for the diagnosis of OSA.