[Lynch syndrome: when pathologist and clinician have the opportunity to reduce the risk of developing cancer]. / Le syndrome de lynch: pathologiste et praticien peuvent ensemble éduire le risque de cancer.

Lynch syndrome is an autosomal dominant disease associated with an important risk of cancer, mainly endometrial and colorectal-cancer. This risk can be efficiently lessen by an appropriate screening as far as the mutations carriers are identified. As current clinicopathological recommendations lack sensitivity, a systematic pre-screening of every patient with a colorectal or endometrial cancer can be proposed. Oncogenetic units of the HUG in Geneva and ICHV in Valais have set up a population-based study to evaluate the efficacy of such a strategy. Whatever the approach, the pathologist is directly implicated as Lynch syndrome harbors specific histological aspects that can help to its identification, but also as pre-screening tests are directly realized on tumor-tissue.

Impact of a positive family history on diagnosis, management, and survival of breast cancer: different effects across socio-economic groups.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to investigate whether increased awareness of breast cancer, due to a positive family history (FH), reduces diagnostic, therapeutic, and survival differences between women of low versus high socio-economic status (SES). METHODS: All breast cancer patients registered between 1990 and 2005 at the population-based Geneva Cancer Registry were included. With multivariate logistic and Cox regression analysis, we estimated the impact of SES and FH on method of detection, treatment, and mortality from breast cancer. RESULTS: SES discrepancies in method of detection and suboptimal treatment, as seen among women without a FH, disappeared in the presence of a positive FH. SES differences in stage and survival remained regardless of the presence of a positive FH. Overall, positive FH was associated with better survival. This effect was the strongest in women of high SES (age-adjusted Hazard Ratio [HR(ageadj)] 0.54 [0.3-1.0]) but less pronounced in women of middle (0.77 [0.6-1.0]), and absent in women of low SES (0.80 [0.5-1.2]). CONCLUSION: A positive FH of breast cancer may reduce SES differences in access to screening and optimal treatment. However, even with better access to early detection and optimal treatment, women of low SES have higher risks of death from their disease than those of high SES.

Hormonal therapy for oestrogen receptor-negative breast cancer is associated with higher disease-specific mortality.

BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen has a remarkable impact on the outcome of oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. Without proven benefits, tamoxifen is occasionally prescribed for women with ER-negative disease. This population-based study aims to estimate the impact of tamoxifen on the outcome of ER-negative disease. METHODS: We identified all women (n = 528) diagnosed with ER-negative invasive breast cancer between 1995 and 2005. With Cox regression analysis, we calculated breast cancer mortality risks of patients treated with tamoxifen compared with those treated without tamoxifen. We adjusted these risks for the individual probabilities (propensity scores) of having received tamoxifen. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (13%) with ER-negative disease were treated with tamoxifen. Five-year disease-specific survival for women treated with versus without tamoxifen were 62% [95% confidence interval (CI) 48% to 76%] and 79% (95% CI 75% to 83%), respectively (P(Log-rank) < 0.001). For ER-negative patients, risk of death from breast cancer was significantly increased in those treated with tamoxifen compared with patients treated without tamoxifen (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.9, P = 0.031). CONCLUSION: Our results show that patients with ER-negative breast cancer treated with tamoxifen have an increased risk of death from their disease. Tamoxifen use should be avoided for these patients.

[Epigenetics and cancer]. / Epigénétique et cancer.

Since the early 80's, cancer research has been dominated by scientific breakthroughs demonstrating the genetic origin of cancer. Thousands of genetic alterations have been identified, affecting more than one hundred cell regulating genes. In the past ten years, our understanding of carcinogenesis has evolved: cancer is both a genetic and an epigenetic disease. Epigenetic modifications play a fundamental biological role in the initiation and progression of cancer by altering the expression of cell cycle regulation genes. Unlike genetic mutations, epigenetic modifications are potentially reversible. Thus, epigenetic inhibitors are currently evaluated as anticancer drugs. Moreover, DNA methylation study holds promise as biological marker for classification, diagnostic and prognostic purposes in clinical practice.

[Breast cancer screening different from that used for the general population: who is concerned and with which approach?]. / Un dépistage du cancer du sein différent de celui de la population générate: pour quelles femmes et avec quelles mesures?

One of the major risk factors for developing breast cancer is a positive family history for this disease. A detailed family history is critical for breast cancer risk evaluation and for evaluation of the probability of a genetic predisposition to breast cancer in the family (the hereditary breast/ovarian cancer syndrome). Various models have been developed to evaluate these risks. The diagnosis of a low, moderate or high breast cancer risk is associated with adapted breast cancer screening procedures. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended only for women identified as high risk. Genetic testing of the main breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, is now available in a clinical setting.

[Colorectal cancer: a risk-adapted screening and the role of the physician in the prevention of this cancer]. / Cancer colorectal: dépistage adapté au risque et rôle du médecin traitant dans la prévention de ce cancer.

The benefit of colorectal cancer screening in the average-risk population, as well as in the presence of high risk genetic predispositions, has been validated by a significant reduction of the mortality associated with the disease. Several screening options are recognized and compliance with these measures remains a public health problem. The physician plays a key role in the promotion of the colorectal cancer screening. Collecting a precise family history is crucial for the identification of individuals at high risk. Validated clinical criteria are helpful for the identification of individuals with a genetic predisposition to colorectal cancer. Molecular screening for the main colorectal cancer predisposing genes should now be integrated in the clinical management of these patients and their families.

Impact of familial risk factors on management and survival of early-onset breast cancer: a population-based study.

This population-based study evaluates the impact of a strong family history of breast cancer on management and survival of women with early-onset disease. We identified all breast cancer patients

Cyclin E expression in breast cancer: predicting germline BRCA1 mutations, prognosis and response to treatment.

BACKGROUND: Elevated levels of the cell cycle protein cyclin E, and low levels of its inhibitor, p27(Kip1), have been associated with a poor prognosis following breast cancer. Some studies have found that germline mutations in the breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA1, are also associated with an inferior survival rate. The relationship between cyclin E/p27(Kip1) levels, BRCA1 status and outcome has not been studied in detail. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed a historical cohort of 288 Ashkenazi Jewish women who were diagnosed with breast cancer between 1980 and 1995 and were previously tested for BRCA1/2 mutations. Protein levels of cyclin E and p27(Kip1) were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was the main outcome measured. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 8 years. Thirty tumors carried germline BRCA1 mutations. These tumors were more likely to have high cyclin E protein levels [odds ratio (OR) 9.5; P <0.001] and low p27(Kip1) protein levels (OR 2.8; P=0.03) than tumors from patients without BRCA1/2 mutations. High cyclin E expression level was the strongest predictor of BRCA1 germline mutations (multivariate OR 4.7; P=0.004). On univariate analysis, high cyclin E protein levels [relative risk (RR) 2.6; P <0.001] and low p27(Kip1) protein levels (RR 2.3; P=0.006) were significant prognostic factors for a poorer BCSS. In Cox multivariate models, high cyclin E levels remained an independent indicator of poor outcome only in the subgroup of patients who did not receive chemotherapy (P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In this ethnically restricted cohort, a high level of cyclin E is a characteristic of BRCA1-related breast cancer, and is a marker of poor prognosis following breast cancer, particularly in the absence of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Set-up of a population-based familial breast cancer registry in Geneva, Switzerland: validation of first results.

BACKGROUND: This article evaluates the accuracy of family history of breast and ovarian cancer among first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients, retrospectively collected during the setting up of a population-based family breast cancer registry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Family histories of cancer for all women with breast cancer recorded at the Geneva Cancer Registry from 1990 to 1999 were retrospectively extracted from medical files. The accuracy of these family histories was validated among Swiss women born in Geneva: all 119 with a family history of breast (n = 110) or ovarian (n = 9) cancer and a representative sample of 100 women with no family history of breast or ovarian cancer. We identified the first-degree relatives of these women with information from the Cantonal Population Office. All first-degree relatives, resident in Geneva from 1970 to 1999, were linked to the cancer registry database for breast and ovarian cancer occurrence. Sensitivity, specificity and level of overall agreement (kappa) were calculated. RESULTS: Among 310 first-degree relatives identified, 61 had breast cancer and six had ovarian cancer recorded at the Geneva Cancer Registry. The sensitivity, specificity and kappa of the reported family histories of breast cancer were 98%, 97% and 0.97, respectively. For ovarian cancer, the sensitivity, specificity and kappa were 67%, 99%, and 0.66, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that retrospectively obtained family histories are very accurate for breast cancer. For ovarian cancer, family histories are less precise and may need additional verification.

Glomeruloid microvascular proliferation is associated with p53 expression, germline BRCA1 mutations and an adverse outcome following breast cancer.

Glomeruloid microvascular proliferation (GMP) in breast cancer independently adversely affected survival (relative risk 1.9, 95% CI: 1.2-3.0), particularly among women who received adjuvant chemotherapy (10-year survival 27 vs 69%, P=0.0003), and was significantly associated with p53 overexpression and BRCA1 germline mutations. The presence of GMP may influence treatment decisions.

Molecular and clinical characteristics in 32 families affected with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Germ-line mutations in the 5' half of the Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC) gene are found in about 80% of the patients affected with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). The vast majority of these are nonsense or frameshift mutations which result in the loss of the carboxyl terminus of the APC protein. Using an in vivo assay in yeast, we have identified pathogenic germ-line mutations in 26 of 32 (81%) unrelated Swiss families affected with FAP. Nine mutations were novel and eight families were shown to harbor two recurrent mutations. Correlations were attempted between the location of APC germ-line mutations and clinical manifestations of the disease.

Increased risk for nonmedullary thyroid cancer in the first degree relatives of prevalent cases of nonmedullary thyroid cancer: a hospital-based study.

The genetic basis for nonmedullary forms of thyroid cancer (NMTC) is less well established than that of medullary thyroid cancer. However, epidemiological and family studies suggest that a proportion of NMTC may be due to inherited predisposition. To estimate the familial risk of thyroid cancer, we conducted a hospital-based case-control study at the Princess Margaret Hospital in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and at 2 university hospitals in Montréal, Québec, Canada. We obtained pedigrees from 339 unselected patients diagnosed with NMTC and from 319 unaffected ethnically matched controls. Family histories of cancer were obtained from the cases and controls for 3292 first degree relatives of cases and controls. Seventeen cases (5.0%) and 2 controls (0.6%) reported at least one first degree relative with thyroid cancer. In relatives of patients with thyroid cancer, the incidence of any type of cancer (including NMTC) was 38% higher than in relatives of controls (incidence rate ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.7). The relative risk for thyroid cancer was 10-fold higher in relatives of cancer patients than in controls (incidence rate ratio, 10.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.2-47.6). Our findings suggest that hereditary or other familial factors are important in a small proportion of NMTC. Molecular studies are needed to determine the genetic basis of cancer susceptibility in these families.

Prevalence of founder BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in unselected French Canadian women with breast cancer.

The frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women with breast cancer varies according to the age at diagnosis, family history of cancer, and ethnicity/country of origin. We set out to estimate the frequency of seven previously described founder mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in all eligible French Canadian women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer at one Montreal hospital over a 20-month period. One hundred and ninety-two patients were eligible and 127 (66.2%) provided blood for genetic testing. We identified 4 women who carried a founder mutation (3.1%, 95% confidence interval 0.9-7.9%) in this population. Interestingly, all the mutations were in BRCA2. The mean age at diagnosis for mutation carriers was 51.2 years (range 49.1-53.5). Two of these 4 cases were lobular invasive carcinomas and 2 were ductal carcinomas, histological grade 1 or 2. Despite a small tumor size (< or =20 mm), axillary nodal involvement was present in 3 women. Estrogen receptors were strongly expressed in all cases. Two of the 4 cases reported a strong family history of breast cancer, but a family history of site-specific breast cancer was a relatively poor indicator of the presence of BRCA2 mutations. The absence of BRCA1 mutations may be a result of chance, but may also reflect different geographical origins of the most common BRCA1 mutations within the French Canadian population.

Functional evaluation of plasmin formation in primary breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Plasmin generation is controlled by the plasminogen activators (PA)/plasmin system, which comprises proteases (urokinase-type PA [uPA] and tissue-type PA [tPA]) and antiproteases (PA inhibitors, PAI-1 and PAI-2). The tumoral content of uPA and PAI-1 has been shown to carry prognostic value in breast cancer; however, because most assays used so far have relied on immunometric determinations, we have explored the enzymatic activities governing plasmin formation in breast cancer specimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We applied semiquantitative histochemical zymography to 201 primary breast cancer tissue sections. Enzymatic activities were correlated with histopathologic parameters and clinical outcome. The median follow-up was 91 months. RESULTS: A wide range of PA-mediated catalytic activities was detected. The overall survival was significantly worse for patients with tumors showing tPA in the lowest quartile of activity (P =.003). The 5-year overall survival of patients with tPA activity in the lowest quartile was 58% compared with 81% for patients with tPA value in the other three quartiles. Tumor size, axillary lymph node metastasis, histologic grade, lymphovascular infiltration, TP53 mutation, and tPA activity were all major risk factors in univariate analysis. tPA activity was an independent prognostic factor in a multivariate Cox regression model, both in the whole population (relative risk = 0.5, 95% confidence interval, 0.3 to 0.9; P =.02) and in the node-negative subgroup (relative risk = 0.2, 95% confidence interval, 0.08 to 0.6; P =.004). CONCLUSION: By using a zymographic assay performed directly on primary tumor tissue sections, we demonstrate that reduced tPA-mediated plasmin production is an independent adverse prognostic factor in breast cancer.

TP53 mutations in breast cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 germ-line mutations: distinctive spectrum and structural distribution.

Several groups have studied the molecular pathology of inherited breast cancer. By combining several such studies, we show in this study that somatic TP53 abnormalities are more common in breast cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 germ-line mutations than in sporadic breast cancers (odds ratio, 2.8; P = 0.0003). Then, we compared the spectrum of TP53 mutations for breast cancers in the IARC TP53 mutation database with the 82 mutations reported in BRCA1/2-associated breast cancers. The spectrum differed significantly both in distribution (P < 1 x 10(-6)) and in base changes (P = 0.025). Mutations at A:T bp were more common in BRCA1/2-associated tumors and strand bias suggesting DNA repair abnormalities was found. Changes were common at TP53 codons that are not mutation hotspots. Structural modeling showed that most of these p53 non-hotspot amino acids characterized in breast tumors isolated from patients with deficient BRCA1/2 function are distributed in a region of the protein on the opposite side of the p53 DNA-binding surface. Our results suggest that BRCA1/2 mutations influence the type and distribution of TP53 mutations seen in breast cancer.

The role of genetic factors in the etiology of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: an update.

Pancreatic cancer is a disease with a very poor prognosis and its etiology is still largely elusive. The only consistent environmental risk factor is cigarette smoking. A previous history of pancreatitis or diabetes mellitus is also considered to be a risk factor. Epidemiological studies have confirmed that relatives of those with pancreatic cancer have an increased risk of this malignancy, and it has been evaluated that 3-5% of all pancreatic cancer cases are caused by genetic predisposition to the disease. Usually this occurs in the setting of a known inherited cancer syndrome caused by mutations in genes such as BRCA1/2 and CDKN2A. Whether or not a true site-specific pancreatic adenocarcinoma syndrome exists is not known. The real challenge for the management of high risk patients is to develop new screening methods than can identify pre-neoplastic or early neoplastic lesions in a timely manner.