Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Occup Environ Med ; 63(12): 820-7, 2006 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16912086

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In certain occupations, including farm work, workers are exposed to hazardous substances, some of which are known to be toxic to the nervous system and may adversely affect muscle strength. Measurement of hand-grip strength may be useful for detecting neurotoxic exposure. METHODS: The authors studied 3522 participants of the Honolulu Heart Program and the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study to determine whether occupational exposures to pesticides, solvents, and metals assessed at exam I (1965-68) are associated with hand-grip strength at exam IV (1991-93) and change in hand-grip strength over 25 years. Correlation, analysis of variance and covariance, and linear regression were used to evaluate the associations. RESULTS: At exam IV, participants ranged in age from 71-93 years; mean hand-grip strength was 39.6 kg at exam I and 30.3 kg at exam IV. Over 25 years, the decline in hand-grip strength was an average of 8-9 kg for all exposures. Hand-grip strength was inversely associated with age and glucose but directly associated with cognitive function, BMI, and haemoglobin level. No other exposures were associated with hand-grip strength. CONCLUSION: This study did not provide evidence that occupational exposure to pesticides, solvents, and metals adversely affected hand-grip strength in this population, but confirmed other important associations with hand-grip strength.


Assuntos
Força da Mão , Substâncias Perigosas/toxicidade , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Envelhecimento/fisiologia , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Seguimentos , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Metais/toxicidade , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Praguicidas/toxicidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Solventes/toxicidade
2.
Am J Prev Med ; 21(2): 118-23, 2001 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11457631

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Law enforcement officers play an important role in promoting firearm safety. This study examined their firearm-related attitudes and practices. METHODS: We conducted an anonymous, self-administered survey of law enforcement officers in an agency in the South concerning firearm ownership, storage practices, and opinions. RESULTS: The 207 respondents (response rate=71%) were primarily white (60%) and male (89%). The proportions of respondents with (55%) and without (45%) children were similar. Eighty percent of the officers had firearms in addition to the one they were issued for work. Most stored firearms unlocked (59%) and loaded (68%); almost half (44%) reported storing firearms both unlocked and loaded. Eighty-five percent indicated that they felt an added need to protect themselves and family because of their job. Those who reported having firearms for self-protection were less likely than those who had firearms for recreation to store firearms securely. As compared to those without children, law enforcement officers with children were more likely to store firearms safely, and were especially likely to store firearms locked up (chi(2)=12.72, p<0.0001). Respondents favored background checks, mandatory safety training, and enforcement of storage laws. Three quarters approved of government safety regulations for handguns. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the law enforcement officers' prominent role in firearm safety promotion and support for initiatives that limit unauthorized access, our study found that many do not practice safe storage. Apparently, many officers keep their firearms stored unlocked and loaded for the purpose of protecting themselves and their families. Addressing concerns about personal safety is a necessary step in promoting safe storage to law enforcement officers.


Assuntos
Armas de Fogo , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Polícia , Segurança , Adulto , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
AORN J ; 60(5): 806-12, 1994 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7826050

RESUMO

To estimate the prevalence, risk factors, and clinical spectrum of adverse reactions to natural rubber latex-containing products among a national sample of perioperative nurses, the investigators administered a self-reporting questionnaire to a convenience sample of 2,200 members of the Association of Operating Room Nurses, Inc. Of the 1,738 nurses who responded, 369 (21%) reported latex reactions. Multivariate analysis identified a history of allergies to cosmetic powders, other allergies, chronic illnesses, and regular use of latex gloves as independent risk factors for reactions to latex-containing products. Localized reactions, such as contact dermatitis, were the reactions reported most commonly, although severe systemic reactions also were described.


Assuntos
Luvas Cirúrgicas/normas , Hipersensibilidade/epidemiologia , Látex/efeitos adversos , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Enfermagem de Centro Cirúrgico/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/induzido quimicamente , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA