How does severe mental illness impact on cancer outcomes in individuals with severe mental illness and cancer? A scoping review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Individuals living with severe mental illness (SMI) have a reduced life expectancy of approximately 15-20 years compared to the general population1,2. Individuals with SMI and comorbid cancer have increased cancer related mortality rates compared to the non SMI population. This scoping review examines the current evidence in relation to the impact on cancer outcomes where individuals have a pre-existing SMI. METHODS: Scopus, PsychINFO, PubMed, PsycArticles and the Cochrane Library were searched for peer reviewed research articles, published in English language between 2001 and 2021. Initial title and abstract screening, followed by full text screening sourced articles reporting on the impact of SMI and cancer on: stage at diagnosis, survival, treatment access or quality of life. Articles were quality appraised, and data were extracted and summarised. RESULTS: The search yielded 1226 articles, 27 met the inclusion criteria. The search yielded no articles that met the inclusion criteria that were from the perspective of the service user or that were focused on the impact of SMI and cancer quality of life. Three themes were developed following analysis: Cancer related mortality, stage at diagnosis, and access to stage appropriate treatment. DISCUSSION: The collective study of populations with comorbid SMI and cancer is complex and challenging without a large-scale cohort study. The studies yielded through this scoping review were heterogenous and often study multiple diagnoses of SMI and cancer. Collectively these indicate that cancer related mortality is increased in the population of individuals with pre-existing SMI and the SMI population are more likely to have an increased likelihood of metastatic disease at diagnosis and less likely to receive stage appropriate treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with pre-existing SMI and cancer have increased cancer specific mortality. Comorbid SMI and cancer is complex, and individuals with SMI and cancer are less likely to receive optimal treatments, experience increased interruptions and delays to treatment.

A rapid review and expert identification of the Allied Health Professions' interventions as a contribution to public health outcomes.

Background and aim: In preparation for the Public Health England Impact Assessment of the 2014 AHP Public Health Strategy a follow up rapid literature review was commissioned. The aim was to identify primary studies in which Allied Health Professionals (AHP) contribute to public health outcomes, based on UK research evidence. This review was used to inform further UK policy and implementation for AHPs in the UK via Public Health England. Methods: A rapid mixed methods review was conducted, limiting the selection of studies to those published after December 2014 and recognising the same 12 Allied Health Professions that were used in the previous review. The rapid review included all age groups and patient populations but limited the searches to studies that reflected UK AHP practices and research outcomes. The literature search included title, abstract and full-text screening with data extraction of selected papers. A nominal group method invited expert AHPs to review and select the interventions for potential impact at population level. Results: 11 selected articles were grouped into two areas of interventions; health intervention/public health and secondary prevention/health improvement, based on the Public Health England Strategic Framework. AHP interventions were effective for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Osteoarthritis and specifically used to manage musculoskeletal conditions (e.g. frozen shoulder). AHPs leading vocational rehabilitation and falls management were also effective. These areas were additional to those previously identified and represented some additional specialist activity undertaken to affect health outcomes. Conclusions: This study also contributed to the UK AHP Public Health Strategic Framework 2019-2024 by appraising the UK evidence and impact of some AHP practices. Further improvement is required; for AHPs to measure the impact of their interventions which would demonstrate evidence of outcomes at population level.

Allied health professions public health research priorities: A modified e-delphi study in the United Kingdom.

Objectives: This study identifies the United Kingdom (UK) Allied Health Professions (AHP) public health research priorities through a modified e-Delphi study conducted with an expert panel. Study design: A modified e-Delphi study was utilised in this study. Methods: This study used a modified e-Delphi approach to reach a consensus on research priorities. Expert panel members were invited to participate and complete three rounds of the e-Delphi. Ethical approval was obtained through the Public Health England Research and Evidence Governance Group. Results: A total of 38 participants completed three rounds of the e-Delphi study between September and November 2020. Consensus was reached on nine AHP public health research priorities. Conclusion: Several areas of AHP public health research were identified as priority, however, a number of priorities refer to the impact of AHP public health activities as opposed to empirical research. The identified priorities will be used to progress the AHP public health research agenda through a UK wide AHP public health strategy implementation group and through support and engagement from the AHP professional bodies and arm's length bodies.

Therapeutic radiographers' delivery of health behaviour change advice to those living with and beyond cancer: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: Therapeutic radiographers (TRs) are well placed to deliver health behaviour change advice to those living with and beyond cancer (LWBC). However, there is limited research on the opinions of TRs around delivering such advice to those LWBC. This study aimed to explore TRs' practices and facilitators in delivering advice on physical activity, healthy eating, alcohol intake, smoking and weight management. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen UK-based TRs took part in a telephone interview using a semi-structured interview guide. Data was analysed using the framework analysis method. RESULTS: Emergent themes highlighted that TRs are mainly aware of the benefits of healthy behaviours in managing radiotherapy treatment related side effects, with advice provision lowest for healthy eating and physical activity. Participants identified themselves as well placed to deliver advice on improving behaviours to those LWBC, however reported a lack of knowledge as a limiting factor to doing so. The TRs reported training and knowledge as key facilitators to the delivery of advice, with a preference for online training. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for education resources, clear referral pathways and in particular training for TRs on delivering physical activity and healthy eating advice to those LWBC.

Healthcare students' perceptions about their role, confidence and competence to deliver brief public health interventions and advice.

BACKGROUND: Public health improvement has long been an important focus for the United Kingdom Department of Health. The Allied Health Professions (AHP) Federation has 84,000 members, such a large number of AHP professionals should play a role in public health initiatives, but it is not clear if they or the AHP students who will be the future healthcare workforce feel themselves equipped to do so. Our aim was to understand the perceptions of AHP students about their role in delivering public health advice. METHODS: AHP students were recruited in one teaching university from different departments. Participants were final year AHP students who had completed all clinical placements related to their course. All students were emailed an invitation to participate, and those interested were asked to contact the researchers to participate in one of several focus groups. Data were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using framework analysis by two independent researchers. RESULTS: Nineteen students were recruited and participated in four focus groups. The main themes produced by the data analysis were: understanding of public health issues, perceptions of their role in this, challenges and opportunities to develop a public health role, and preparation for a public health role. CONCLUSIONS: AHP students felt that they had a role in public health advice-giving, but barriers to providing this advice included their own lack of confidence and knowledge, time, and the environment of the clinical placement. They considered that there should be more teaching on public health issues, and that these should feature in both the curriculum and on clinical placement.