Comparison of neuromuscular fatigability amplitude and etiologies between fatigued and non-fatigued cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is the most reported side effect of cancer and its treatments. Mechanisms of CRF are multidimensional, including neuromuscular alterations leading to decreased muscle strength and endurance (i.e., fatigability). Recently, exercise fatigability and CRF have been related, while fatigability mechanisms remain unclear. Traditionally, fatigability is assessed from maximal voluntary contractions (MVC) decrease, but some authors hypothesized that the rate of force development (RFD) determined during a rapid contraction could also be an interesting indicator of functional alterations. However, to our knowledge, no study investigated RFD in cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to determine whether RFD, fatigability amplitude, and etiology are different between fatigued and non-fatigued cancer patients. METHODS: Eighteen participants with cancer, divided in fatigued or non-fatigued groups according their CRF level, completed a 5-min all-out exercise in ankle plantar flexor muscles composed of 62 isometric MVC of 4 s with 1 s rest, to assess fatigability amplitude as the force-time relationship asymptote (FA). Before and after exercise, fatigability etiologies (i.e., voluntary activation (VA) and evoked forces by electrical stimulation (Db100)) were assessed as well as RFD in 50 and 100 ms (RFD50 and RFD100, respectively) during rapid contractions. RESULTS: FA is significantly lower in fatigued group. Significant differences were found between pre- and post-exercise VA, Db100, RFD50, and RFD100 for both groups, with no statistical difference between groups. CONCLUSION: During treatments, fatigability is higher in fatigued patients; however, the mechanisms of fatigability and RFD alterations are similar in both groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04391543, May 2020.

Acute effects of small changes in antero-posterior shoe-cleat position on physiological and biomechanical variables in road cycling.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of changes in cycling shoe-cleat position on pedalling biomechanics, physiological variables, and performance in road cycling. Twelve competitive road cyclists performed three pedalling trials with the cleat positioned at the first metatarsal head, 15-mm anterior and 15-mm posterior. Each trial included three sets of 5 min performed at 35%, 50%, and 65% of maximal aerobic power (MAP) followed by a 10-s sprint. Results showed no significant changes in physiological variables, pedalling kinetics, muscular activity of six lower limb muscles, sprint performance and perceived exertion. However, significant differences were found regarding joint kinematics: hip, knee, and ankle angles during both extension and flexion were reduced in the anterior cleat position. Therefore, this study suggests that cleat position does not affect sprint performance, physiological variables, pedalling kinetics, muscle activity, and perceived exertion regardless of the cycling intensity. However, joint kinematics, and particularly knee extension angle which could be related to the risk of overuse injuries, was affected by the shoe-cleat position.

Building a biopsychosocial model of cancer-related fatigue: the BIOCARE FActory cohort study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is the most common side effect of cancer and cancer treatment. CRF prevalence is up to 50% in breast cancer patients and can continue several years after cancer remission. This persistent subjective sense of exhaustion is multifactorial. Numerous parameters have been evidenced to be related to CRF across biological, physical, psychological, social and/or behavioral dimensions. Although CRF has been studied for many years, the majority of previous studies focused on only one dimension, i.e., physical function. Moreover, few studies investigated CRF longitudinally with repeated measures. These are the two main obstacles that limit the understanding of CRF mechanisms. The purpose of this study is to create a biopsychosocial model of CRF with simultaneous and longitudinal anthropometric, clinical, biological, physical, psychological and sociological parameters. METHODS: BIOCARE FActory is a multicentric prospective study that will consist of an 18-month follow-up of 200 women diagnosed with breast cancer. Four visits will be scheduled at diagnosis, after treatments, and 12 and 18 months after diagnosis. The same procedure will be followed for each visit. Each session will be composed of anthropometric data collection, a semi-structured interview, cognitive tests, postural control tests, neuromuscular fatigability tests and a cardiorespiratory fitness test. Clinical and biological data will be collected during medical follow-ups. Participants will also complete questionnaires to assess psychological aspects and quality of life and wear an actigraphy device. Using a structural equation modeling analysis (SEM), collected data will build a biopsychosocial model of CRF, including the physiological, biological, psychological, behavioral and social dimensions of CRF. DISCUSSION: This study aims to highlight the dynamics of CRF and its correlates from diagnosis to post treatment. SEM analysis could examine some relations between potential mechanisms and CRF. Thus, the biopsychosocial model will contribute to a better understanding of CRF and its underlying mechanisms from diagnosis to the aftermaths of cancer and its treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04391543 ), May 2020.