International exchange on the clinical practice and research of rheumatic skin diseases: A report of the 5th International Conference of Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus.

The 5th International Conference of Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus was held in Tokyo, Japan on May 9 and 10, 2023. The latest topics on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis, and scleroderma (systemic sclerosis, morphea) were presented by experts in each field and new developments discussed. In these rheumatic skin diseases, many clinical trials of novel therapies targeting cytokines, signaling molecules, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, B cells, and other molecules are currently underway, and standardization of outcome assessment was discussed. In addition, the selection of the therapeutic agents available for the diversity of each case is becoming more important, together with the ongoing pathophysiological analysis of the diseases. The achievements of this conference will further promote the development of clinical practice and research in rheumatic skin diseases through international exchange among researchers. We hope that by reporting a summary of the conference in this manuscript, we can share its contents with readers.

Recent findings about antimalarials in cutaneous lupus erythematosus: What dermatologists should know.

Antimalarials (AMs), particularly hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine (CQ), are the cornerstone of the treatment for both systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). HCQ and CQ are recommended as first-line oral agents in all CLE guidelines. Initially thought to have potential therapeutic effects against COVID-19, HCQ has drawn significant attention in recent years, highlighting concerns over its potential toxicity among patients and physicians. This review aims to consolidate current evidence on the efficacy of AMs in CLE. Our focus will be on optimizing therapeutic strategies, such as switching from HCQ to CQ, adding quinacrine to either HCQ or CQ, or adjusting HCQ dose based on blood concentration. Additionally, we will explore the potential for HCQ dose reduction or discontinuation in cases of CLE or SLE remission. Our review will focus on the existing evidence regarding adverse events linked to AM usage, with a specific emphasis on severe events and those of particular interest to dermatologists. Last, we will discuss the optimal HCQ dose and the balance between preventing CLE or SLE flares and minimizing toxicity.

Clinical trial outcomes for SLE: what we have and what we need.

The paradigm of drug approval in SLE currently relies on successful large phase III randomised controlled trials and a set of primary, secondary and additional end points. Taken together, these outcomes offer a nuanced understanding of the efficacy and safety of the investigational agent. In this review, we thoroughly examine the main outcomes used in SLE trials and highlight unmet requirements as well as potential venues for future trial design in SLE. Disease activity indices can be broadly categorised into global-specific and organ-specific indices, in particular for skin, joints and kidneys, but there is no universal consensus about their use in clinical trials. Because each of these instruments has its own intrinsic strengths and weaknesses, the assessment of treatment response has progressed from relying solely on one individual disease activity index to using composite responder definitions. Those are typically measured from the trial baseline to the end point assessment date and may be combined with the need to taper and maintain glucocorticoids (GCs) within prespecified ranges. Remission and low disease activity are two critical states in the perspective of 'Treat-to-Target' trials, but are not fully recognised by regulators. While significant progress has been made in clinical trial outcomes for SLE, there is a clear need for continued innovation. Addressing these challenges will require collaboration between researchers, clinicians, patients as well as with regulatory agencies to refine existing outcome measures, incorporate meaningful and ethnically diverse patient perspectives, foster relevant digital opportunities and explore new therapeutic avenues, including early use of investigational agents. By doing so, we can advance our ability to manage SLE effectively and safely and improve the lives of those living with this complex and impactful autoimmune disease.

Comparison of patients with isolated cutaneous lupus erythematosus versus systemic lupus erythematosus with cutaneous lupus erythematosus as the sole clinical feature: A monocentric study of 149 patients.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) may present as an isolated entity or be classified as Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by the presence of laboratory abnormalities, including cytopenia, low complement levels, and/or autoantibodies (CLE with laboratory SLE). OBJECTIVE: To compare isolated CLE and CLE with laboratory SLE and to validate an existing 3-item score with age < 25 years (1 point), phototypes V to VI (1 point), antinuclear antibodies ≥ 1:320 (5 points) to predict the risk of progression from CLE to severe SLE (sSLE). METHODS: Monocentric cohort study including consecutive patients with CLE. CLE with laboratory SLE was defined by 2019 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for SLE score of ≥10 points at baseline with CLE as the sole clinical feature. RESULTS: Of the 149 patients with CLE, 20 had CLE with laboratory SLE. The median follow-up duration was 11.3 years (IQR: 5.1-20.5). Ten patients (7%) had sSLE developed. In survival analysis, the risk of progression to sSLE was higher among CLE with laboratory SLE (hazard ratio = 6.69; 95% CI: 1.93-23.14, P < .001) compared to isolated CLE. In both groups, none of the patients with a risk score ≤ 2 had sSLE developed. LIMITATIONS: Monocentric study with a limited number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: CLE with laboratory patients with SLE have a higher risk of progression to sSLE than isolated CLE.

Identification of new risk factors for hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine retinopathy in systemic lupus erythematosus patients.

BACKGROUND: Long-term hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) or chloroquine (CQ) intake causes retinal toxicity in 0.3-8 % of patients with rheumatic diseases. Numerous risk factors have been described, eg, daily dose by weight, treatment duration, chronic kidney disease, concurrent tamoxifen therapy and pre-existing retinal or macular disease. However, those factors cannot explain the entire risk of developing antimalarial retinopathy. OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to identify new risk factors associated with HCQ or CQ retinopathy (QRNP) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. METHODS: This case-control (1:2) study compared SLE patients with QRNP (cases) to those without (controls). Controls were matched for sex and known QRNP risk factors: HCQ and/or CQ treatment duration (±1 year) and age (±5 year) at SLE diagnosis. RESULTS: Forty-eight cases were compared to 96 SLE controls. Multivariable logistic-regression analysis retained the following as independent determinants significantly associated with QRNP: concomitant selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or serotonin- and norepinephrine-reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) intake (OR [95 % confidence interval] 6.6 [1.2 to 40.9]; p < 0.01); antiphospholipid syndrome (OR=8.9 [2.2 to 41.4] p < 0.01); blood hydroxychloroquine/desethylchloroquine concentration ([HCQ]/[DCQ]) ratio <7.2 (OR 8.4 [2.7 to 30.8]; p < 0.01) or skin phototype ≥4 (OR 5.5 [1.4 to 26.5]; p = 0.02), but not daily HCQ dose, blood [HCQ] or body mass index. CONCLUSION: The results of this case-control study identified blood [HCQ]/[DCQ] ratio, concurrent SSRI/SNRI therapy, skin phototype ≥4 and antiphospholipid syndrome as new risk factors for QRNP.

Type 1 interferons: A target for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs).

The improved understanding of the molecular basis of innate immunity have led to the identification of type I interferons (IFNs), particularly IFN-α, as central mediators in the pathogenesis of several Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis, inflammatory myositis and Sjögren's syndrome. Here, we review the main data regarding the opportunity to target type I IFNs for the treatment of IMIDs. Type I IFNs and their downstream pathways can be targeted pharmacologically in several manners. One approach is to use monoclonal antibodies against IFNs or the IFN-receptors (IFNARs, such as with anifrolumab). The downstream signaling pathways of type I IFNs also contain several targets of interest in IMIDs, such as JAK1 and Tyk2. Of these, anifrolumab is licensed and JAK1/Tyk2 inhibitors are in phase III trials in SLE. Targeting IFN-Is for the treatment of SLE is already a reality and in the near future may prove useful in other IMIDs. IFN assays will find a role in routine clinical practice for the care of IMIDs as further validation work is completed and a greater range of targeted therapies becomes available.

Assessing delayed penicillin hypersensitivity using the PENFAST+ score.

Introduction: Approximately 10% of individuals report a suspected allergy to penicillin, but according to allergy work-ups, only 10%-15% of them are truly allergic. A clinical decision score, the PEN-FAST, was developed and validated to identify adults with low-risk penicillin allergy. Objectives: The objective of this study was to improve the performance of the PEN-FAST score, particularly for those with delayed hypersensitivity (HS), by improving the negative predictive value. Methods: STEP 1: Retrospective evaluation of the PEN-FAST score in patients with proven immediate and delayed penicillin allergy. STEP 2: Identification of additional criteria among Step 1 patients misclassified by PEN-FAST score. Development of the PEN-FAST+ score using multivariable logistic regression in a prospective cohort of patients with a suspicion of HS to penicillin. STEP 3: Comparison of diagnostic performances of PEN-FAST and PEN-FAST+ scores. Results: The PEN-FAST score showed limitations in predicting the relapse of immediate skin HS or delayed maculopapular exanthema, with 28.6% and 38.4% of patients misclassified, respectively. We identified two potential additional criteria: skin rash lasting more than 7 days and immediate reaction occurring in less than 1 h (generalized or localized on palmoplantar area or scalp itching/heat feeling). A total of 32/252 (12.7%) patients were confirmed to be allergic to penicillin. With PEN-FAST, 37% of patients (n = 10) with delayed allergic penicillin HS were misclassified. With PEN-FAST+, 3 patients with delayed HS confirmed by a ST (11.1%) were misclassified. The AUC was significantly higher for PEN-FAST+ than PEN-FAST (85% vs. 72%, p = 0.03).

Prevalence, characteristics, and knowledge related to photosensitivity in patients with lupus erythematosus: the international PHOTOLUP study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence, characteristics and knowledge about photosensitivity and the use of photoprotective measures in an international cohort of cutaneous and systemic lupus erythematosus patients. METHODS: We conducted an international, cross-sectional study based on a 46-question web-based survey including patients with medically confirmed LE conducted between November 2021 and April 2022. RESULTS: 600 patients with lupus erythematosus (94% female, median age: 41 years [IQR: 33-51]) from 50 countries were included. A history of photosensitivity was reported by 389/600 (64.8%) patients. Photosensitivity was associated with the presence of other cutaneous involvement (OR = 3.8; 95%CI 2.5-5.7; p < 0.001) and differed according to the area of habits and level of education (p < 0.001, for all). Photosensitivity was characterized by a wide range of clinical manifestations (both cutaneous and systemic symptoms in 56.1% and systemic symptoms only in 29.8% of patients). Fatigue was the most frequently reported systemic manifestation (82.3%). Overall, 559/600 (93%) patients were aware of the detrimental role of UV exposure in lupus erythematosus, but 160/480 (33.3%) were unaware of the importance of photoprotective measures, including 90/310 (29%) among those with photosensitivity. CONCLUSION: A high rate of self-reported photosensitivity characterize lupus erythematosus patients. Photosensitivity frequently includes subjective features, which makes it difficult to evaluate in clinical practice. As fatigue is frequent in LE, further study is needed to clarify its causal link with UV exposure. About one-third of lupus erythematosus patients are unaware of the importance of photoprotective measures. This should be improved through more frequent and targeted awareness interventions.

Elastic fiber alterations and calcifications in calcific uremic arteriolopathy.

Calcific uremic arteriolopathy (CUA) is a severely morbid disease, affecting mostly dialyzed end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, associated with calcium deposits in the skin. Calcifications have been identified in ESRD patients without CUA, indicating that their presence is not specific to the disease. The objective of this retrospective multicenter study was to compare elastic fiber structure and skin calcifications in ESRD patients with CUA to those without CUA using innovative structural techniques. Fourteen ESRD patients with CUA were compared to 12 ESRD patients without CUA. Analyses of elastic fiber structure and skin calcifications using multiphoton microscopy followed by machine-learning analysis and field-emission scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive X-ray were performed. Elastic fibers specifically appeared fragmented in CUA. Quantitative analyses of multiphoton images showed that they were significantly straighter in ESRD patients with CUA than without CUA. Interstitial and vascular calcifications were observed in both groups of ESRD patients, but vascular calcifications specifically appeared massive and circumferential in CUA. Unlike interstitial calcifications, massive circumferential vascular calcifications and elastic fibers straightening appeared specific to CUA. The origins of such specific elastic fiber's alteration are still to be explored and may involve relationships with ischemic vascular or inflammatory processes.

New and future therapies: Changes in the therapeutic armamentarium for SLE.

Following better understanding of molecular pathways involved in the pathogenesis of Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), pharmaceutical companies have been investigating new targeted drugs for SLE. The purpose of this scoping review is to provide an updated view of the most promising targeted therapies currently in clinical development or recently approved for SLE treatment as well as of the most promising potential future therapeutic strategies in SLE. In the past several years, two new drugs have been developed for lupus treatment along with an extended indication for belimumab. Anifrolumab, the anti-interferon medication, to treat non-renal lupus; voclosporin, a calcineurin inhibitor, for the treatment of lupus nephritis; and belimumab for lupus nephritis. More than 90 investigational drugs are currently in clinical development for SLE treatment, with various targets including inflammatory cytokines and their receptors, intracellular signaling, B cells or plasma cells, co-stimulation molecules, complement fractions, T cells, plasmacytoid dendritic cells as well as various other immunological targets of interest. Researchers are also actively engaged in the development of new therapeutic strategies, including the use of monoclonal antibodies in combination with bispecific monoclonal antibodies, nanobodies and nanoparticles, therapeutic vaccines, utilizing siRNA interference techniques, autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation and Chimeric Antigens Receptor (CAR)-T cells. The therapeutic management and prognosis of SLE have profoundly evolved with changes in the therapeutic armamentarium. With the broad pipeline of targeted treatments in clinical development and new treatment strategies in the future, current challenges are transitioning from the availability of new drugs to the selection of the most appropriate strategy at the patient level.

[Dysimmune manifestations associated with myelodysplastic neoplasms and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemias]. / Manifestations dysimmunitaires associées aux syndromes myélodysplasiques et leucémies myélomonocytaires chroniques.

Systemic inflammatory or autoimmune diseases (SIAD) are observed in up to a quarter of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), with a broad clinical spectrum including asymptomatic biological abnormalities, isolated inflammatory clinical manifestations (recurrent fever, arthralgia, neutrophilic dermatoses…) or identified systemic diseases (giant cell arteritis, recurrent polychondritis…). Recent advances in molecular biology have shed new light on the pathophysiological mechanisms that link inflammatory manifestations and myeloid hemopathies, particularly in VEXAS syndrome following the identification of somatic mutations in the UBA1 gene, or in neutrophilic dermatoses with the concept of myelodysplasia cutis. Although the presence of SIAD does not seem to affect overall survival or the risk of transformation into acute myeloid leukemia, their treatment remains a challenge given the frequent high level of corticosteroid dependence as well as the poor efficacy and tolerance (cytopenias, infections) of conventional immunosuppressive agents. Recent prospective data supports the interest of a therapeutic strategy using demethylating agents and notably azacitidine to target the pathological clone.

Rheumatoid vasculitis in 2023: Changes and challenges since the biologics era.

BACKGROUND: Significant changes in the epidemiology and natural history of rheumatoid vasculitis (RV) have occurred with the introduction of biological therapies such as TNF inhibitors (TNFi) and rituximab. PURPOSE: This scoping review aims to address the key current challenges and propose updated criteria for RV. This will aid future descriptive observational studies and prospective therapeutic trials. METHODOLOGY: The MEDLINE database was searched for eligible articles from inception through December 2022. Articles were selected based on language and publication date after 1998, corresponding to the approval of the first TNFi in rheumatic diseases. RESULTS: Sixty articles were included in the review. The mean incidence of RV has decreased since the approval of biologic therapies in RA, from 9.1 (95% CI: 6.8-12.0) per million between 1988 and 2000 to 3.9 (95% CI: 2.3-6.2) between 2001 and 2010, probably due to significant improvement in RA severity and a decrease in smoking habits. Factors associated with an increased risk of RV include smoking at RA diagnosis, longer disease duration, severe RA, immunopositivity, and male gender (regardless of age). Homozygosity for the HLA-DRB104 shared epitope is linked to RV, while the presence of HLA-C3 is a significant predictor of vasculitis in patients without HLA-DRB104. Cutaneous (65-88%), neurologic (35-63%), and cardiac (33%) manifestations are common in RV, often associated with constitutional symptoms (70%). Histologic findings range from small vessel vasculitis to medium-sized necrotizing arteritis, but definite evidence of vasculitis is not required in the 1984 Scott and Bacon diagnostic criteria. Existing data on RV treatment are retrospective, and no formal published guidelines are currently available. CONCLUSION: The understanding of RV pathogenesis has improved since its initial diagnostic criteria, with a wider range of clinical manifestations identified. However, a validated and updated criteria that incorporates these advances is currently lacking, impeding the development of descriptive observational studies and prospective therapeutic trials. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Sexually Transmitted Trichophyton mentagrophytes Genotype VII Infection among Men Who Have Sex with Men.

Transmission of dermatophytes, especially Trichophyton mentagrophytes genotype VII, during sexual intercourse has been recently reported. We report 13 such cases in France. All patients were male; 12 were men who have sex with men. Our findings suggest sexual transmission of this pathogen within a specific population, men who have sex with men.

Anti-SAE autoantibody in dermatomyositis: original comparative study and review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: Among specific autoantibodies in DM, the anti-small ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme (SAE) antibody is rare. We aim to describe the clinical characteristics, cancer prevalence, and muscle pathology of anti-SAE-positive DM. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of DM and sera positive for the anti-SAE antibody were recruited from 19 centres in this retrospective observational study. The available muscular biopsies were reviewed. We conducted a comparison with anti-SAE-negative DM and a review of the literature. RESULTS: Of the patients in the study (n = 49), 84% were women. Skin involvement was typical in 96% of patients, with 10% having calcinosis, 18% ulceration and 12% necrosis; 35% presented with a widespread skin rash. Muscular disease affected 84% of patients, with mild weakness [Medical Research Council (MRC) scale 4 (3, 5)], although 39% of patients had dysphagia. Muscular biopsies showed typical DM lesions. Interstitial lung disease was found in 21% of patients, mainly with organizing pneumonia pattern, and 26% of patients showed dyspnoea. Cancer-associated myositis was diagnosed in 16% of patients and was responsible for the majority of deaths, its prevalence being five times that of the general population. IVIG therapy was administered to 51% of the patients during the course of the disease. Comparison with anti-SAE-negative DM (n = 85) showed less and milder muscle weakness (P = 0.02 and P = 0.006, respectively), lower creatinine kinase levels (P < 0.0001) and less dyspnoea (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Anti-SAE positive DM is a rare subgroup associated with typical skin features but a potentially diffuse rash, a mild myopathy. Interstitial lung disease defines an organizing pneumonia pattern. Cancer associated DM prevalence is five times that of the general population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04637672.

Identifying high-risk profile in primary antiphospholipid syndrome through cluster analysis: French multicentric cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease characterised by thrombosis (arterial, venous or small vessel) or obstetrical events and persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), according to the Sydney classification criteria. Many studies have performed cluster analyses among patients with primary APS and associated autoimmune disease, but none has focused solely on primary APS. We aimed to perform a cluster analysis among patients with primary APS and asymptomatic aPL carriers without any autoimmune disease, to assess prognostic value. METHODS: In this multicentre French cohort study, we included all patients with persistent APS antibodies (Sydney criteria) measured between January 2012 and January 2019. We excluded all patients with systemic lupus erythematosus or other systemic autoimmune diseases. We performed hierarchical cluster analysis on the factor analysis of mixed data coordinates results with baseline patient characteristics to generate clusters. RESULTS: We identified four clusters: cluster 1, comprising 'asymptomatic aPL carriers', with low risk of events during follow-up; cluster 2, the 'male thrombotic phenotype', with older patients and more venous thromboembolic events; cluster 3, the 'female obstetrical phenotype', with obstetrical and thrombotic events; and cluster 4, 'high-risk APS', which included younger patients with more frequent triple positivity, antinuclear antibodies, non-criteria manifestations and arterial events. Regarding survival analyses, asymptomatic aPL carriers relapsed less frequently than the others, but no other differences in terms of relapse rates or deaths were found between clusters. CONCLUSIONS: We identified four clusters among patients with primary APS, one of which was 'high-risk APS'. Clustering-based treatment strategies should be explored in future prospective studies.