Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for super obese patients: what approach?

BACKGROUND: Super obese (SO) patients with a Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 50 kg/m(2) still represent a real anesthesiological and surgical challenge. While the best procedure to perform in this population remains unclear, robotic technology has been proposed to accomplish Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The study aim is to report our experience of robotic RYGB for SO patients and to compare it with open and laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: From July 1997 to March 2014, all consecutive RYGB cases for SO patients were collected in a dedicated database and reviewed retrospectively. Two hundred and fourteen SO patients were operated on: 65 by a robotic approach (30.4%), 54 by a laparoscopic approach (25.2%), and 95 using an open approach (44.4%). Peri- and post-operative data were compared between the three approaches. RESULTS: There were more male patients in the robotic group, but with a slightly lower BMI. The operative time was longer for the robotic (+27 min) and laparoscopic (+21 min) groups in comparison with the open group (P < 0.05). Overall, there were less reoperations (P < 0.05) and a shorter hospital stay (P < 0.05) in the robotic group in comparison with other groups. Of note there was also a trend in favor of robotics with less conversions (P = 0.08) and less postoperative complications (P ≥ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic RYGB can be performed safely in super obese patients with results that compare favorably with laparoscopic and open surgery. However, the robotic approach has a longer operative time. The exact role of robotics for super obese population needs to be clarified in larger and randomized trials before drawing definitive conclusions. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Laparoscopic versus robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: lessons and long-term follow-up learned from a large prospective monocentric study.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has become the procedure of choice for the treatment of morbid obesity. Recently, several reports have shown the potential advantages of the robotic approach, notably by reducing complications. The aim of this study is to report our long-term experience with robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and to compare outcomes with the laparoscopic approach. METHODS: From January 2003 to September 2013, 777 consecutive minimally invasive RYGB have been performed in our institution: 389 laparoscopically (50.1 %) and 388 robotically (49.9 %). During the study period, all the data regarding these consecutive RYGB has been prospectively collected in a dedicated database. RESULTS: While longer in duration compared to laparoscopy (+30 min; p=0.0001), the robotic approach had a lower conversion rate (0.8 vs. 4.9 %; p=0.0007), and less complications (11.6 % vs. 16.7 %; p=0.05), in particular, less gastrointestinal leaks (0.3 vs. 3.6 %; p=0.0009). There were also less early reoperations (1 vs. 3.3 %; p=0.05) and a shorter hospital stay in the robotic group (6.2 vs. 10.4 days; p=0.0001). There were no statistical differences between the early and the current robotic experience, except in operative time and hospital stay, which were shorter for the last 100 cases. Finally, the BMI loss was significantly higher in the laparoscopic group starting at the first post-operative year. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic RYGB is not only safe and feasible, but also a valid option in comparison to laparoscopy. At the cost of a longer operative time, we observed better short-term outcomes with the robotic approach.

Robotic revisional bariatric surgery: a comparative study with laparoscopic and open surgery.

BACKGROUND: Revisional bariatric procedures (RBP) can be technically challenging. While robotics might provide help for complex procedures, the study aim was to report our experience with robotic RBP. METHODS: From March 2000 to June 2013, 60 consecutive RBP (11 robotic, 21 laparoscopic, 28 open) have been prospectively entered into a dedicated database and reviewed retrospectively. Outcomes have been compared between the three approaches. RESULTS: The robotic group had fewer complications (0 vs. 14.3% for laparoscopy, vs. 10.7% for open; P > 0.05), but took longer than the other approaches (352 vs. 270 vs. 250 minutes respectively; P < 0.05). There were fewer conversions in the robotic group (0 vs. 14.3% for laparoscopy; P > 0.05), and a significantly shorter hospital stay (6 vs. 8 vs. 9 days, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic RBP is feasible and safe, but at the price of a longer operative time. The exact role of robotics remains yet to be defined for this indication in larger studies.

Robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for super obese patients: a comparative study.

Superobese patients (SO) (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 50 kg/m(2)) represent a real surgical challenge and the best management remains debatable. While the safety of a laparoscopic approach has been questioned for this population, robotics has been introduced in the armamentarium of the bariatric surgeon, yet its role remains poorly assessed, especially for a very high BMI. The study aim is thus to report our experience with robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for SO. From July 2006 to May 2012, 288 consecutive robot-assisted RYGB procedures have been performed at a single institution. All data were collected prospectively in a dedicated database. Among those patients, 41 were SO (14.2 %). All the peri- and postoperative parameters were compared to the morbidly obese (MO) group (BMI < 50). Data have been reviewed retrospectively. The SO group presented a higher ASA score and more male patients. The operative time was similar between both groups, yet there were more conversions in the SO group (two versus one for MO; p = 0.05). The morbidity and mortality rates were similar between both groups. The length of stay was longer for the SO population (7 vs. 6 days; p = 0.03). The percent BMI loss was similar at 1 year (34 vs. 34 %; p = 1), but the percent excess BMI loss was higher for the MO group (83 vs. 65 % for the SO group; p = 0.0007). Robot-assisted RYGB can be performed safely for SO, with complication rates and functional results at 1 year comparable to MO, yet this approach for SO has been associated with a slightly increased conversion rate and length of stay.

Value of performing routine postoperative liquid contrast swallow studies following robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

QUESTIONS UNDER STUDY/PRINCIPLES: In most centers, Upper Gastrointestinal series (UGI) following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) is performed to rule out GJ anastomotic leak. According to the introduction of robotic technology associated with a hypothetical decrease of anastomotic complications, we aim to assess the validity and cost effectiveness of early routine UGI following robot-assisted RYGB. METHODS: Between July 2006 and December 2010, 167 robot-assisted RYGB were performed at a single institution. All data were collected prospectively in a computerised database and reviewed retrospectively. Patients underwent a gastrografin UGI at postoperative day 2 to exclude anastomotic leak or stenosis. RESULTS: None of the 167 patients who underwent an early UGI experienced leak radiologically and clinically. The only radiological abnormalities were two GJ edema (1.2%) and one jejunojenunostomy stenosis (0.6%), all treated conservatively with success. The total cost for the 167 UGI was CHF 93,520 (= USD 96,886). CONCLUSIONS: In most centres, the risk of anastomotic leak has been the rationale for obtaining an UGI following RYGB. However, provided low leak rates as for our experience with robotic RYGB, the authors show this exam to be expensive and of limited value. A decisional algorithm for on demand UGI has been developed according to patient's characteristics and is now under validation.

Reducing cost of surgery by avoiding complications: the model of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery is a complex technology offering technical advantages over conventional methods. Still, clinical outcomes and financial issues have been subjects of debate. Several studies have demonstrated higher costs for robotic surgery when compared to laparoscopy or open surgery. However, other studies showed fewer costly anastomotic complications after robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) when compared to laparoscopy. METHODS: We collected data for our gastric bypass patients who underwent open, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery from June 1997 to July 2010. Demographic data, BMI, complications, mortality, intensive care unit stay, hospitalization, and operating room (OR) costs were analyzed and a cost projection completed. Sensitivity analyses were performed for varied leak rates during laparoscopy, number of robotic cases per month, number of additional staplers during robotic surgery, and varied OR times for robotic cases. RESULTS: Nine-hundred ninety patients underwent gastric bypass surgery at the University Hospital Geneva from June 1997 to July 2010. There were 524 open, 323 laparoscopic, and 143 robotic cases. Significantly fewer anastomotic complications occurred after open and robotic RYGBP when compared to laparoscopy. OR material costs were slightly less for robotic surgery (USD 5,427) than for laparoscopy (USD 5,494), but more than for the open procedure (USD 2,251). Overall, robotic gastric bypass (USD 19,363) was cheaper when compared to laparoscopy (USD 21,697) and open surgery (USD 23,000). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic RYGBP can be cost effective due to balancing greater robotic overhead costs with the savings associated with avoiding stapler use and costly anastomotic complications.

Learning curve for robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is rapidly evolving as an important surgical approach in the bariatric field. However, the specific learning curve associated with this new approach remains poorly investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the learning curve for robot-assisted RYGBP. METHODS: A series of 64 consecutive robot-assisted RYGBP procedures were performed between December 2008 and December 2010 by a single surgeon already experienced in advanced laparoscopic procedures but not in bariatric surgery. All data were collected prospectively in a database and reviewed retrospectively. The learning curve was evaluated using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method. RESULTS: Women comprised 76.6% and men 23.4% of this series. These patients had a mean age of 43 years and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 44.5 kg/m(2). The mean operative time (OT) was 238.1 min (range, 150-400 min). A total of six complications occurred (9.4%). The CUSUM learning curve consisted of two distinct phases: phase 1 (the initial 14 cases; mean OT, 288.9 min) and phase 2 (the subsequent cases; mean OT, 223.6 min), which represented the mastery phase, with a decrease in OT (P = 0.0001). The two groups were similar in terms of gender, age, and BMI. The two phases did not differ in terms of complications or hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: This series confirms previous study findings concerning the feasibility and the safety of robotic RYGBP even after a limited experience with laparoscopic RYGBP. The data reported in this article suggest that the learning phase for robot-assisted RYGBP can be achieved with 14 cases.

Independent evolution of heart autonomic function and insulin sensitivity during weight loss.

In order to investigate the improvement of insulin resistance and cardiac autonomic function along massive weight loss, 12 obese women were evaluated before, and 3 and 12 months after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The 12-month values were compared to those of BMI-matched controls. Insulin sensitivity was assessed by euglycemic clamp and the cardiac autonomic function by the analysis of the Heart Rate Variability (HRV). After surgery, glucose uptake progressively increased from 4.3 +/- 0.5 mg/kg lean body mass (LBM)/min preoperative (pre-op) to 4.9 +/- 0.5 and 7.0 +/- 0.5, 3- and 12-month postoperative (post-op) (P = 0.04 and P = 0.006 vs. pre-op), whereas the cardiac autonomic function showed a biphasic pattern. HRV values increased 3 months post-op, and decreased at 12 months, thus indicating an early sympathetic withdrawal followed by a later reactivation (e.g., the standard deviation of the normal-to-normal intervals was 116 +/- 7 ms in pre-op, 161 +/- 10 at 3 months, P = 0.008 vs. pre-op, and 146 +/- 15 at 12 months, P = 0.03 vs. pre-op and P = 0.02 vs. 3 m). Insulin sensitivity was significantly related to body weight (P = 0.02), whereas the cardiac indexes were significantly linked to the profile of energy intake (e.g., HRV triangular index vs. energy intake P = 0.003). No significant relationship linked insulin sensitivity to the cardiac autonomic indexes. Insulin sensitivity and cardiac parameters of the 12-month post-op patients were similar to their matched controls. During massive weight loss, the cardiac autonomic deregulation and insulin resistance improved concomitantly but independently from each other. Our results suggest that the extent of the improvement is associated with the final body weight.

Long-term results of surgical treatment of Vater's ampulla neoplasms.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Vater's ampulla neoplasms account for 30% of resected bilio-pancreatic confluent tumors. Study aim was to review long-term results of surgical treatment for ampullary neoplasms. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective review from 1993 to 2002 identified 55 patients admitted for Vater's ampulla neoplasm in our institution. Follow-up was complete for all cases with a median follow-up of 24 (range 2-180) months. RESULTS: Among the ampullary neoplasms, 10 were adenomas (median age 71) and 45 adenocarcinomas (median age 69). Of the adenomas 60% were treated surgically with excellent long-term results. The resectability rate of ampullary carcinomas was 84%. 34 patients had pancreaticoduodenectomy and 4 ampullectomy. Importantly, the rate of false-negative preoperative biopsies was 45%. Seven patients were treated by stenting or derivation due to poor condition. Actuarial five-year survival rate after pancreatoduodenectomy was 68% (median follow-up 24 months), compared to 0% for other approaches (p < 0.01). After pancreatoduodenectomy, the lymph node status influenced survival, while disease-free survival at 5 years was 85% for NO and 27% for N1 (p < 0.001). Among the pancreatoduodenectomies, 55% consisted of pylorus-preserving procedure which did not influence prognosis compared to absence of pylorus preservation. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatoduodenectomy remains the gold standard for Vater's ampulla neoplasms resection due to the low sensitivity of diagnostic biopsies for carcinoma detection. Vater's ampulla neoplasms resection by pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with good long-term results; however survival after curative resection is influenced by lymph node status.

Surgical management of abdominal and retroperitoneal Castleman's disease.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal and retroperitoneal Castleman's disease could present either as a localized disease or as a systemic disease. Castleman's disease is a lymphoid hyperplasia related to human Herpes virus type 8, which could have an aggressive behavior, similar to that of malignant lymphoid neoplasm mainly with the systemic type, or a benign one in its localized form. METHODS: The authors report two cases of localized Castleman's disease in the retroperitoneal space and review the current and recent progress in the knowledge of this atypical disease. CASES PRESENTATION: The two patients were young healthy women presenting with a hyper vascular peri-renal mass suggestive of malignant tumor. Both have been resected in-toto. One of them had an extensive resection with nephrectomy, while the second had a kidney preserving surgery. Pathological examination revealed localized Castleman's disease and surgical margins were free of disease. Postoperative course was uneventful, and after more than 5-years of follow-up no recurrences have been observed. CONCLUSION: Localized Castleman's disease should be considered when facing a solid hypervascular abdominal or retroperitoneal mass. A better knowledge of this disorder and its characteristic would help surgeon to avoid unnecessarily extensive resection for this benign disorder when dealing with abdominal or retroperitoneal tumors. Surgical resection is curative for the localized form, when complete, while splenectomy could be indicated for the systemic form.