Treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in ESRD: a 2-year, single-center crossover study.

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is a common complication of chronic kidney disease. The management of SHPT commonly involves vitamin D, either calcitriol or newer analogs (paricalcitol or doxercalciferol), along with dietary phosphorus restriction and phosphate binding agents. Published reports have suggested that treatment with paricalcitol in hemodialyzed (HD) patients offers a morbidity or mortality advantage in comparison with treatment with calcitriol. We have recently reported that switching from calcitriol to paricalcitol resulted in a lower serum calcium and calcium-phosphorus product (Ca x P product), as well as lower parathyroid hormone (PTH) and alkaline phosphatase during 6 months of serial treatment. We converted all HD patients in our large urban dialysis center from calcitriol to paricalcitol using a 1:3 conversion ratio, on the basis of published data. Comparisons of individual patient mean biochemical values, as well as episodes of hypercalcemia and elevated Ca x P product, were made after adjusting for equivalent doses. In addition, we recorded the number of missed doses during two years of therapy. No patient in this study had received a calcimimetic before or during the study period. Fifty-nine patients were treated with calcitriol for at least 12 months and then completed 12 months of paricalcitol. Conversion from calcitriol to paricalcitol resulted in lower serum calcium (P=0.0003), lower serum phosphorus (P=0.027), lower Ca x P product (P=0.003), reduced PTH (P=0.001) and reduced serum alkaline phosphatase (P=0.0005). Most dramatically, there was a highly significant difference in the number of missed doses (P<0.0001) during the treatments. This 2-year single-center study, comparing long-term calcitriol with paricalcitol treatment in the same HD patients, extends our previous findings, offers new information regarding single episodes of potentially adverse biochemical effects related to vitamin D therapy, and provides several clues that may explain the outcome advantages suggested by previously published retrospective analyses of large dialysis provider-pooled databases.

Serum fructosamine versus glycosylated hemoglobin as an index of glycemic control, hospitalization, and infection in diabetic hemodialysis patients.

Diabetes is the most common cause of end-stage renal disease and an important risk factor for morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. Glycemic control, utilizing serial measurement of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), is generally recommended to limit end-organ damage, including cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We, along with others, have previously suggested that HbA1c may not be a reliable measure of glycemic control in dialysis patients, and have therefore explored the use of serum fructosamine (SF) as an alternative marker. The objective of this study was to compare HbA1c levels with SF in monitoring glycemic control and associated morbidity (infection and hospitalization) in diabetic patients in a large urban hemodialysis (HD) center. We enrolled 100 diabetic HD patients and followed them up prospectively for 3 years. Data on demographics, as well as biochemical and clinical data, including hospitalizations and infections, were recorded. The mean age was 63 years. In all 54% were women and the majority were African Americans (72%). As expected, HbA1c and albumin-corrected fructosamine (AlbF) levels were highly correlated and both were significantly associated with serum glucose. AlbF, however, was more highly correlated with mean glucose values when less than 150 mg/dl and was a more useful predictor of morbidity. By univariate logistic regression and by Poisson regression analysis, AlbF, but not HbA1c, was a significant predictor of hospitalization. Additionally, in patients dialyzed by arteriovenous (AV) access (that is, excluding those dialyzed via vascular catheters), AlbF, but not HbA1c, was a significant predictor of infection. In conclusion, AlbF is as reliable a marker as HbA1c for glycemic control in diabetic patients on HD, and may be advantageous for patients with serum glucose in a desirable therapeutic range (<150 mg/dl). In addition, AlbF, but not HbA1c, is associated with morbidity (hospitalizations and infections) in diabetic patients on HD.

The safety and efficacy of an accelerated iron sucrose dosing regimen in patients with chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Provision of adequate iron to support erythropoiesis in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is time consuming and may present adherence problems for patients in the outpatient setting. We studied an accelerated regimen of high-dose intravenous iron sucrose therapy in a cohort of iron-deficient, anemic CKD patients. METHODS: Intravenous iron sucrose 500 mg was infused over three hours on two consecutive days in 107 CKD patients (glomerular filtration rate, 32.3 +/- 19.6 mL/min/1.73m2, baseline hemoglobin 10.2 +/- 1.7 g/dL). Iron indices (transferrin saturation, ferritin) were measured at baseline and at two and seven days after completion of the iron regimen. Blood pressures were monitored immediately prior to, and hourly throughout the iron sucrose infusions. RESULTS: Transferrin saturation and serum ferritin increased from 18.5 +/- 8.5% and 177 +/- 123.8 ng/mL at baseline to 40.2 +/- 22.3% and 811 +/- 294.1 ng/mL in 102 evaluated patients (P < 0.015). In 55 patients with additional measurements at 7 days post-dosing, the transferrin saturation and ferritin had fallen to 26.3 +/- 10.6% and 691 +/- 261.8 ng/mL (P < 0.015 compared to two days' post-dose). Blood pressure rose slightly, but not significantly, throughout the infusions, and altering the infusion rate was not necessary. Two patients had seven adverse events that were considered related to iron sucrose. CONCLUSION: An accelerated regimen of high-dose intravenous iron sucrose therapy in CKD patients is safe and effective in restoring iron stores, and may potentially save time and improve patient adherence.