Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 100(6): 762-5, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26405104

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Prevalence estimates and treatment decisions for trachoma are based entirely on ocular clinical examination. The aim of the current study is to demonstrate that ophthalmic assistants can be trained and certified to provide trachoma grading within a single day. METHODS: Conjunctival photographs from an area with endemic trachoma were randomised into two sets of 60 cases. Photographs were graded for trachomatous inflammation-follicular (TF) and trachomatous inflammation-intense (TI) by three experienced graders. Inter-rater reliability of eight ophthalmic assistants and three experienced graders were compared before and after training. RESULTS: The mean κ agreement between the ophthalmic assistants and the consensus grades of the experienced graders for TF was 0.38 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.58) before training, and increased to 0.60 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.78) after training (p=0.07). The mean κ agreement for TI was 0.16 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.30) before training, and increased to 0.39 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.58) after training (p=0.02). CONCLUSION: A single day of training improves agreement between prospective and experienced trachoma graders, and provides the basis for certification of workers who are able to accurately grade trachoma and generate reliable prevalence estimates.


Assuntos
Certificação , Túnica Conjuntiva/patologia , Fotografação/classificação , Exame Físico/classificação , Tracoma/classificação , Tracoma/diagnóstico , Tomada de Decisões , Humanos , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA