RESUMO
Objective:The assessment of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) antibodies is essential to understand the transmission dynamics of contagious disease. The proportion of the population who developed antibodies against the COVID-19 disease can be estimated through population-based serosurveys. This population based cross sectional serosurvey was designed to assess the seroprevalence of IgG and IgM antibodies of COVID-19 infection. Material and methods:A population based cross sectional serosurvey included 1031 residents of Itanagar Capital Complex region (ICR), Arunachal Pradesh, India, aged above five years. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG and IgM antibody levels were analyzed by chemiluminescence immunoassay based serological tests. Results:The overall seropositivity for SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM was 92.24% and 7.7%, respectively. The seropositivity of IgG and IgM was 97.68% and 2.32%, respectively, in subjects fully vaccinated with two doses, 97.22% and 13.88%, respectively, in those vaccinated with the first dose, and 80% and 11.33%, respectively, in non-vaccinated participants. In contrast to indigenous tribal participants (IgG 90.55% and IgM 8.88%), seroprevalence was high in non-tribal subjects (IgG 94.72% and IgM 6.84%). Age, ethnicity, and area showed a positive correlation, while vaccination status exhibited a negative correlation with IgG levels (Pearson's coefficient -0.535). Conclusions:This first monocentric serosurvey following the high rate of infection with Delta variant in ICR found a high seropositivity for IgG. Further state level serosurveys are needed to assess the infection status, immunological response and associated comorbidities of COVID-19 infection. Periodic vaccination campaigns and early administration of booster doses to the general public might be beneficial in preserving immunity and prevent illness.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Effectively addressing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by the new pathogen requires continuous generation of evidence to inform decision-making. Despite an unprecedented amount of research occurring globally, the need to identify gaps in knowledge and prioritize a research agenda that is linked to public health action is indisputable. The WHO South-East Asia Region (SEAR) is likely to have region-specific research needs. METHODS: We aimed to identify a priority research agenda for guiding the regional and national response to the COVID-19 pandemic in SEAR countries. An online, anonymous research prioritization exercise using recent WHO guidance was conducted among the technical staff of WHO's country and regional offices engaged with the national COVID-19 response during October 2020. They were each asked to contribute up to five priority research ideas across seven thematic areas. These research ideas were reviewed, consolidated and scored by a core group on six parameters: regional specificity, relevance to the COVID-19 response, feasibility within regional research capacity, time to availability for decision-making, likely impact on practice, and promoting equity and gender responsiveness. The total scores for individual suggestions were organized in descending order, and ideas in the upper tertile were considered to be of high priority. RESULTS: A total of 203 priority research ideas were received from 48 respondents, who were primarily research and emergency response focal points in country and regional offices. These were consolidated into 78 research ideas and scored. The final priority research agenda of 27 items covered all thematic areas-health system (n=10), public health interventions (n=6), disease epidemiology (n=5), socioeconomic and equity (n=3), basic sciences (n=1), clinical sciences (n=1) and pandemic preparedness (n=1). CONCLUSIONS: This exercise, a part of WHO's mandate to "shape the research agenda", can help build a research roadmap ensuring efficient use of limited resources. This prioritized research agenda can act as a catalyst for Member States to accelerate research that could impact the COVID-19 response in SEAR.
