Risk of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: Stratified by Severity.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the composite maternal hemorrhagic outcome (CMHO) among individuals with and without hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), stratified by disease severity. Additionally, we investigated the composite neonatal adverse outcome (CNAO) among individuals with HDP who had postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) versus did not have PPH. STUDY DESIGN: Our retrospective cohort study included all singletons who delivered at a Level IV center over two consecutive years. The primary outcome was the rate of CMHO, defined as blood loss ≥1,000 mL, use of uterotonics, mechanical tamponade, surgical techniques for atony, transfusion, venous thromboembolism, intensive care unit admission, hysterectomy, or maternal death. A subgroup analysis was performed to investigate the primary outcome stratified by (1) chronic hypertension, (2) gestational hypertension and preeclampsia without severe features, and (3) preeclampsia with severe features. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to investigate the association of HDP with and without PPH on a CNAO which included APGAR <7 at 5 minutes, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, seizures, neonatal sepsis, meconium aspiration syndrome, ventilation >6 hours, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, or neonatal death. RESULTS: Of 8,357 singletons, 2,827 (34%) had HDP. Preterm delivery <37 weeks, induction of labor, prolonged oxytocin use, and magnesium sulfate usage were more common in those with versus without HDP (p < 0.001). CMHO was higher among individuals with HDP than those without HDP (26 vs. 19%; adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.22). In the subgroup analysis, only individuals with preeclampsia with severe features were associated with higher CMHO (n = 802; aRR 1.52, 95% CI 1.32-1.75). There was a higher likelihood of CNAO in individuals with both HDP and PPH compared to those with HDP without PPH (aRR 1.49, 95% CI 1.06-2.09). CONCLUSION: CMHO was higher among those with HDP. After stratification, only those with preeclampsia with severe features had an increased risk of CMHO. Among individuals with HDP, those who also had a PPH had worse neonatal outcomes than those without hemorrhage. KEY POINTS: · Individuals with HDP had an 11% higher likelihood of CMHO.. · After stratification, increased CMHO was limited to those with preeclampsia with severe features.. · There was a higher likelihood of CNAO in those with both HDP and PPH compared to HDP without PPH..

Equivalence of single and standard doses of antenatal corticosteroids for late preterm neonatal outcomes: insights from a secondary analysis.

BACKGROUND: The recent paradigm shift of treating individuals at risk of late preterm birth with antenatal corticosteroids warrants an assessment of the effect of single dosage. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of neonates born in the late preterm period (34.0-36.6 weeks) after a single dose of antenatal corticosteroids vs placebo. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a secondary analysis of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids trial. All individuals enrolled in the parent trial who received only a single dose of either antenatal corticosteroids or placebo and delivered within 24 hours were included. Primary outcome was a composite of respiratory support at 72 hours, including continuous positive airway pressure or high-flow nasal cannula ≥2 hours, oxygen with an inspired fraction of ≥30% for ≥4 hours, or mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Of the 2831 individuals in the parent trial, 1083 (38.3%) met inclusion criteria; of them, 539 (49.8%) received a single dose of antenatal corticosteroids and 544 (50.2%) a single placebo dose. The placebo and antenatal corticosteroids groups had similar demographic and clinical characteristics. There was no difference in the rate of the primary respiratory outcome (adjusted risk ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.47) or in the rate of respiratory distress syndrome (adjusted risk ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-2.26) between those who received a single antenatal corticosteroids dose and placebo. An exploratory stratification by randomization-to-delivery intervals of 12-hour increments also showed no association with lower primary respiratory outcome rates. CONCLUSION: In individuals with late preterm birth pregnancies who received antenatal corticosteroids and delivered before a second dose, there were no differences in neonatal respiratory morbidities compared with placebo. However, this study is not powered to detect treatment efficacy.

Indicated vs universal third-trimester ultrasound examination in low-risk pregnancies: a pre-post-intervention study.

BACKGROUND: In low-risk pregnancies, a third-trimester ultrasound examination is indicated if fundal height measurement and gestational age discrepancy are observed. Despite potential improvement in the detection of ultrasound abnormality, prior trials to date on universal third-trimester ultrasound examination in low-risk pregnancies, compared with indicated ultrasound examination, have not demonstrated improvement in neonatal or maternal adverse outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to determine if universal third-trimester ultrasound examination in low-risk pregnancies could attenuate composite neonatal adverse outcomes. The secondary objectives were to compare changes in composite maternal adverse outcomes and detection of abnormalities of fetal growth (fetal growth restriction or large for gestational age) or amniotic fluid (oligohydramnios or polyhydramnios). STUDY DESIGN: Our pre-post intervention study at 9 locations included low-risk pregnancies, those without indication for ultrasound examination in the third trimester. Compared with indicated ultrasound in the preimplementation period, in the postimplementation period, all patients were scheduled for ultrasound examination at 36.0-37.6 weeks. In both periods, clinicians intervened on the basis of abnormalities identified. Composite neonatal adverse outcomes included any of: Apgar score ≤5 at 5 minutes, cord pH <7.00, birth trauma (bone fracture or brachial plexus palsy), intubation for >24 hours, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, seizure, sepsis (bacteremia proven with blood culture), meconium aspiration syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage grade III or IV, periventricular leukomalacia, necrotizing enterocolitis, stillbirth after 36 weeks, or neonatal death within 28 days of birth. Composite maternal adverse outcomes included any of the following: chorioamnionitis, wound infection, estimated blood loss >1000 mL, blood transfusion, deep venous thrombus or pulmonary embolism, admission to intensive care unit, or death. Using Bayesian statistics, we calculated a sample size of 600 individuals in each arm to detect >75% probability of any reduction in primary outcome (80% power; 50% hypothesized risk reduction). RESULTS: During the preintervention phase, 747 individuals were identified during the initial ultrasound examination, and among them, 568 (76.0%) met the inclusion criteria at 36.0-37.6 weeks; during the postintervention period, the corresponding numbers were 770 and 661 (85.8%). The rate of identified abnormalities of fetal growth or amniotic fluid increased from between the pre-post intervention period (7.1% vs 22.2%; P<.0001; number needed to diagnose, 7; 95% confidence interval, 5-9). The primary outcome occurred in 15 of 568 (2.6%) individuals in the preintervention and 12 of 661 (1.8%) in the postintervention group (83% probability of risk reduction; posterior relative risk, 0.69 [95% credible interval, 0.34-1.42]). The composite maternal adverse outcomes occurred in 8.6% in the preintervention and 6.5% in the postintervention group (90% probability of risk; posterior relative risk, 0.74 [95% credible interval, 0.49-1.15]). The number needed to treat to reduce composite neonatal adverse outcomes was 121 (95% confidence interval, 40-200). In addition, the number to reduce composite maternal adverse outcomes was 46 (95% confidence interval, 19-74), whereas the number to prevent cesarean delivery was 18 (95% confidence interval, 9-31). CONCLUSION: Among low-risk pregnancies, compared with routine care with indicated ultrasound examination, implementation of a universal third-trimester ultrasound examination at 36.0-37.6 weeks attenuated composite neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes.

Large for Gestational Age and Adverse Outcomes: Stratified By Diabetes Status.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of adverse outcomes among parturients with large for gestational age (LGA; birth weight > 90th) newborns, stratified by diabetes status. Additionally, we described the temporal trends of adverse outcomes among LGA neonates. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the U.S. Vital Statistics dataset between 2014-2020. The inclusion criteria were singleton, non-anomalous LGA live births who labored and delivered at 24-41 weeks with known diabetes status. The co-primary outcomes were composite neonatal adverse outcomes of the following: Apgar score < 5 at 5 minutes, assisted ventilation> 6 hours, seizure, or neonatal or infant mortality, and maternal adverse outcomes of the following: maternal transfusion, ruptured uterus, unplanned hysterectomy, admission to intensive care unit or unplanned procedure. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to estimate adjusted relative risks (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Average annual percent change (AAPC) was calculated to assess changes in rates of LGA and morbidity over time. RESULTS: Of 27 million births in seven years, 1,843,467 (6.8%) met the inclusion criteria. While 1,656,888 (89.9%) did not have diabetes 186,579 (10.1%) were with diabetes. Composite neonatal adverse outcomes (aRR 1.57, 95% CI 1.53-1.62) and composite maternal adverse outcomes (aRR 1.37, 95% CI= 1.36-1.38) were significantly higher among individuals with diabetes, compared to those without diabetes. From 2014 to 2020, the LGA rate was stable among people without diabetes. However, there was a downward trend of LGA in people with diabetes (AAPC= -2.4, 95% CI -3.5, -1.4). CONCLUSION: In pregnancies with LGA newborns, composite neonatal and maternal morbidities were higher in those with diabetes, compared to those without diabetes.

Gestational diabetes mellitus and late preterm birth: outcomes with and without antenatal corticosteroid exposure.

BACKGROUND: Unlike pregestational diabetes mellitus, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends antenatal corticosteroids in those with gestational diabetes mellitus at risk for preterm birth. However, this recommendation is based on limited data, only 10.6% of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids study sample had gestational diabetes mellitus. There is a paucity of data on the risk of neonatal respiratory and other morbidity in this population. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine respiratory outcomes in parturients with gestational diabetes mellitus who received antenatal corticosteroids and delivered during the late preterm period vs those who did not. STUDY DESIGN: This population-based cohort study used the US Vital Statistics dataset between 2016 to 2020. The inclusion criteria were singleton, nonanomalous individuals who delivered between 34.0 to 36.6 weeks with gestational diabetes mellitus and known status of antepartum corticosteroid exposure. The primary outcome, a composite neonatal adverse outcome, included Apgar score <5 at 5 minutes, immediate assisted ventilation, assisted ventilation >6 hours, surfactant use, seizure, or neonatal mortality. The secondary outcome was a composite maternal adverse outcome, including maternal blood transfusion, ruptured uterus, unplanned hysterectomy, and admission to the intensive care unit. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to estimate adjusted relative risks and 95% confidence intervals. Average annual percent change was calculated to assess changes in rates of corticosteroid exposure over the study period. RESULTS: Of 19 million births during the study period, 110,197 (0.6%) met the inclusion criteria, and among them, 23,028 (20.9%) individuals with gestational diabetes mellitus received antenatal corticosteroids. The rate of antenatal steroid exposure remained stable over the 5 years (APC=10.7; 95% confidence interval, -5.4 to 29.4). The composite neonatal adverse outcome was significantly higher among those who received corticosteroids than among those who did not (137.1 vs 216.5 per 1000 live births; adjusted relative risk 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-1.28). Three components of the composite neonatal adverse outcome-immediate assisted ventilation, intubation >6 hours, and surfactant use-were significantly higher with exposure than without. In addition, the composite maternal adverse outcome was significantly higher among those who received corticosteroids (adjusted relative risk, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.52). Three components of the composite maternal adverse outcome-admission to intensive care unit, blood transfusion, and unplanned hysterectomy-were significantly higher among the exposed group. Subgroup analysis, among large for gestational age, by gestational age, and race and ethnicity, confirm the trend of increased likelihood of adverse outcomes with exposure to corticosteroid. CONCLUSION: Individuals with gestational diabetes mellitus and antenatal corticosteroid exposure, who delivered in the late preterm, were at higher risk of neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes than those unexposed to corticosteroid.

The association between maternal insurance status on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

The objective of this study was to examine the association between maternal insurance status and maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes in women who had hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. A population-based retrospective cohort study was undertaken using the US Vital Statistics dataset on Period Linked Birth-Infant Data from 2016-2020. The study population was restricted to non-anomalous births from women whose pregnancies were complicated by hypertensive disorders. Insurance status was categorized as private, Medicaid, self-pay and other. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal adverse outcomes, which included admission to the intensive care unit, unplanned hysterectomy, maternal blood transfusion or uterine rupture. We examined the role of prenatal care in these relationships using a mediation analysis with Kotelchuck's Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between maternal insurance status and adverse outcomes (using adjusted odds ratios [aOR] and 99% confidence interval [CI]). Of the 18,999,865 live births in the five-year study, 1,642,654 (8.6%) met the inclusion criteria. The frequency of the composite maternal adverse outcome was 1.3%. The maternal composite occurred more frequently in women with Medicaid (aOR = 1.11, 99% CI: 1.06, 1.16) or self-pay (aOR = 1.40, 99% CI: 1.25, 1.55) when compared to private insurance. Adjusting for prenatal care slightly attenuated this association, but remained significant. Among women with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, women with Medicaid insurance or self-pay were more likely to experience maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes than women with private insurance.

Ambulation for latency during expectant management of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial (AMBLE).

BACKGROUND: Individuals hospitalized with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes are often advised to limit their activity or adhere to bed rest. Some evidence suggests that greater activity is associated with longer latency and improved outcomes, but no high-quality evidence from a randomized controlled trial exists. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether encouragement to ambulate at least 2000 steps daily affects latency among individuals with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes compared with usual care. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multisite unblinded, 2-arm randomized trial of individuals at 23 0/7 to 35 0/7 weeks of gestation undergoing inpatient expectant management of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes with planned delivery at least 7 days away. Each participant wore a Fitbit Inspire that tracked steps. The intervention arm was encouraged (verbal and Fitbit-based reminders) to reach a goal of 2000 steps per day. The usual-care arm was allowed ad libitum activity with no step goal or reminders. The primary outcome was latency (days) from randomization to delivery. Secondary analyses included composite neonatal and maternal clinical outcomes and maternal mental health survey results. Statistical analyses were conducted with an intent-to-treat approach under a Bayesian framework using neutral priors (a priori assumed 50:50 likelihood of longer latency in either arm). A total of 100 participants were required to have 80% power to demonstrate a 4-day difference in latency with 75% certainty (Bayesian probability). RESULTS: Among 163 eligible individuals, 100 (61%) were randomized, and after loss to follow-up, 95 were analyzed. Gestational age at randomization was 29 3/7 weeks (interquartile range, 26 2/7 to 31 5/7) in the intervention arm and 27 4/7 weeks (interquartile range, 25 4/7 to 29 6/7) in the usual-care arm. Median step counts were 1690 per day in the intervention arm (interquartile range, 1031-2641) and 1338 per day in the usual-care arm (interquartile range, 784-1913). Median days of latency were 9 days in the intervention arm (interquartile range, 4-17) and 6 days in the usual-care arm (interquartile range, 2-14). The primary analysis indicated a 65% posterior probability that the intervention increased latency relative to usual care (posterior relative risk, 1.09; 95% credible interval, 0.70-1.71). The relative risk was 0.55 (95% credible interval, 0.32-0.82) for the composite neonatal adverse outcome, with 99% posterior probability of intervention benefit, and was 0.94 (95% credible interval, 0.72-1.20) for the composite maternal adverse outcome, with 70% posterior probability of intervention benefit. There was a 94% posterior probability of the intervention arm having a greater decrease in maternal stress score from baseline to before delivery compared with the usual-care arm (mean arm difference, 3.24 points [95% credible interval, -7.23 to 0.79]). Adjustment for gestational age at randomization had minimal impact on secondary outcome results. CONCLUSION: Individuals with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes randomized to encouragement to ambulate had a longer latency to delivery and improved neonatal and mental health outcomes, with similar maternal clinical outcomes compared with usual care.

Desirability of outcome ranking for obstetrical trials: illustration and application to the ARRIVE trial.

BACKGROUND: In randomized trials, 1 primary outcome is typically chosen to evaluate the consequences of an intervention, whereas other important outcomes are relegated to secondary outcomes. This issue is amplified for many obstetrical trials in which an intervention may have consequences for both the pregnant person and the child. In contrast, desirability of outcome ranking, a paradigm shift for the design and analysis of clinical trials based on patient-centric evaluation, allows multiple outcomes-including from >1 individual-to be considered concurrently. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe desirability of outcome ranking methodology tailored to obstetrical trials and to apply the methodology to maternal-perinatal paired (dyadic) outcomes in which both individuals may be affected by an intervention but may experience discordant outcomes (eg, an obstetrical intervention may improve perinatal but worsen maternal outcomes). STUDY DESIGN: This secondary analysis applies the desirability of outcome ranking methodology to data from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network ARRIVE trial. The original analysis found no substantial difference in the primary (perinatal composite) outcome, but a decreased risk of the secondary outcome of cesarean delivery with elective induction at 39 weeks. In the present desirability-of-outcome-ranking analysis, dyadic outcomes ranging from spontaneous vaginal delivery without severe neonatal complication (most desirable) to cesarean delivery with perinatal death (least desirable) were classified into 8 categories ranked by overall desirability by experienced investigators. Distributions of the desirability of outcome ranking were compared by estimating the probability of having a more desirable dyadic outcome with elective induction at 39 weeks of gestation than with expectant management. To account for various perspectives on these outcomes, a complementary analysis, called the partial credit strategy, was used to grade outcomes on a 100-point scale and estimate the difference in overall treatment scores between groups using a t test. RESULTS: All 6096 participants from the trial were included. The probability of a better dyadic outcome for a randomly selected patient who was randomized to elective induction was 53% (95% confidence interval, 51-54), implying that elective induction led to a better overall outcome for the dyad when taking multiple outcomes into account concurrently. Furthermore, the desirability-of-outcome-ranking probability of averting cesarean delivery with elective induction was 52% (95% confidence interval, 51-53), which was not at the expense of an operative vaginal delivery or a poorer outcome for the perinate (ie, survival with a severe neonatal complication or perinatal death). Randomization to elective induction was also advantageous in most of the partial credit score scenarios. CONCLUSION: Desirability-of-outcome-ranking methodology is a useful tool for obstetrical trials because it provides a concurrent view of the effect of an intervention on multiple dyadic outcomes, potentially allowing for better translation of data for decision-making and person-centered care.

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Gunshot Wounds in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Case Reports.

A systematic review was performed to compare adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes among pregnant patients with gunshot wounds (GSW) to the abdominopelvic vs other region(s) at > 20 weeks gestation. A search of Medline Ovid, Elsevier Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, and Cochrane Library in July 2022 and reference searches resulted in 1742 studies, which were screened. The 41 included studies reported outcomes for 59 pregnant patients with GSW, of which 31 (52.5%) had an isolated abdominopelvic GSW and 28 (47.5%) had an extremity, thorax, head/neck, back/spine, poly-site, or other/unknown GSW. Stillbirth occurred in 26.7% of abdominopelvic GSW and 26% of non-abdominopelvic GSW. Maternal death occurred in 3.7% of abdominopelvic GSW and 10.7% of non-abdominopelvic GSW. Neonatal death occurred in 9.1% of abdominopelvic GSW and 5.3% of non-abdominopelvic GSW. Further research is needed to standardize the approach for the evaluation and management of patients with GSW in pregnancy.

Validation of Three Models for Prediction of Blood Transfusion during Cesarean Delivery Admission.

OBJECTIVE: Prediction of blood transfusion during delivery admission allows for clinical preparedness and risk mitigation. Although prediction models have been developed and adopted into practice, their external validation is limited. We aimed to evaluate the performance of three blood transfusion prediction models in a U.S. cohort of individuals undergoing cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial of tranexamic acid for prevention of hemorrhage at time of cesarean delivery. Three models were considered: a categorical risk tool (California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative [CMQCC]) and two regression models (Ahmadzia et al and Albright et al). The primary outcome was intrapartum or postpartum red blood cell transfusion. The CMQCC algorithm was applied to the cohort with frequency of risk category (low, medium, high) and associated transfusion rates reported. For the regression models, the area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC) was calculated and a calibration curve plotted to evaluate each model's capacity to predict receipt of transfusion. The regression model outputs were statistically compared. RESULTS: Of 10,785 analyzed individuals, 3.9% received a red blood cell transfusion during delivery admission. The CMQCC risk tool categorized 1,970 (18.3%) individuals as low risk, 5,259 (48.8%) as medium risk, and 3,556 (33.0%) as high risk with corresponding transfusion rates of 2.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-2.9%), 2.2% (95% CI: 1.8-2.6%), and 7.5% (95% CI: 6.6-8.4%), respectively. The AUC for prediction of blood transfusion using the Ahmadzia and Albright models was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.76-0.81) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.77-0.82), respectively (p = 0.38 for difference). Calibration curves demonstrated overall agreement between the predicted probability and observed likelihood of blood transfusion. CONCLUSION: Three models were externally validated for prediction of blood transfusion during cesarean delivery admission in this U.S. COHORT: Overall, performance was moderate; model selection should be based on ease of application until a specific model with superior predictive ability is developed. KEY POINTS: · A total of 3.9% of individuals received a blood transfusion during cesarean delivery admission.. · Three models used in clinical practice are externally valid for blood transfusion prediction.. · Institutional model selection should be based on ease of application until further research identifies the optimal approach..

Misoprostol with balloon vs oxytocin with balloon in high-risk pregnancy induction: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Pregnancies at high risk for maternal, fetal, or placental complications often necessitate induction of labor in the late preterm or early term period for delivery. Limited data exist on the safest method of induction to use in this specific patient population. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the combination of oxytocin plus a Cook balloon vs misoprostol plus a Cook balloon for induction of labor in high-risk pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an open-label, randomized controlled trial at a single institution from July 2020 to May 2022. The study was approved by the institutional review board and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04492072). Individuals with a high-risk pregnancy, at least ≥22 weeks' gestation, with a singleton in cephalic presentation, Bishop score ≤6, and intact membranes were offered enrollment. A high-risk pregnancy was defined as a pregnancy with any of the following complications: hypertensive disease of pregnancy, fetal growth restriction, oligohydramnios, suspected placental abruption requiring delivery, uncontrolled pregestational diabetes, or abnormal biophysical profile or nonstress test requiring delivery. The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean delivery. Secondary maternal outcomes included induction to delivery interval, number of vaginal deliveries within 24 hours, rates of uterine tachysystole, intraamniotic infection, operative vaginal delivery, and postpartum hemorrhage. Secondary fetal outcomes included fetal heart rate abnormalities, stillbirth, Apgar scores <7 at 5 minutes, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, arterial umbilical blood pH <7.1, sepsis, and neonatal death. A subgroup analysis was planned for the primary outcome to assess the different indications for cesarean delivery. An intent-to-treat analysis was performed. RESULTS: During the 22 months of the trial, a total of 150 patients were randomized, and 73 (49%) of those were induced with oxytocin and a Cook balloon and 77 (51%) were induced with misoprostol and a Cook balloon. There was no significant difference in the overall rate of cesarean delivery between the study groups, (21.9% vs 31.1%; relative risk, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-1.21), nor among those for which the cesarean delivery was performed for a specific indication. There were no differences in the secondary maternal and fetal or neonatal adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: In high-risk pregnancies, the rate of cesarean delivery and adverse maternal and fetal outcomes were similar for induction of labor with oxytocin and a Cook balloon and for induction with misoprostol and a Cook balloon.

Spinal Hypotension and Time from Spinal-to-Delivery in Scheduled Cesarean Deliveries: Association with Neonatal Acidosis.

OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to study the effect of sustained hypotension after spinal on neonatal acidosis and adverse outcomes in those undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery (CD) with universal prophylactic vasopressor exposure and to examine differences in spinal-to-delivery time by neonatal acidosis status. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study conducted at a quaternary care center from January 2019 to December 2021 included singleton, term, nonanomalous pregnancies, with scheduled CD under spinal anesthesia. Hypotension was defined as a systolic blood pressure (SYS-BP) < 100 mm Hg (SYS-BP100) or a >20% drop from baseline blood pressure (SYS-BP20). Both the occurrence of hypotension and its magnitude and duration were studied; the latter through the development of a hypotension index. The 90th and 95th percentiles of the hypotension index for SYS-BP20 and SYS-BP100, respectively, were used to define sustained hypotension. The primary outcome was neonatal acidosis (umbilical artery pH ≤ 7.1 or base excess ≤ -12 mmol). Secondary outcomes were composites of neonatal (CNAO) and maternal (CMAO) adverse outcomes. Multivariable Poisson regression models with robust error variance analysis was used to estimate adjusted relative risks (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Our study included 332 individuals who underwent scheduled CD; among them 330 (99.4%) received prophylactic vasopressors. The rate of neonatal acidosis was 4.2%. Sustained hypotension after spinal anesthesia, which occurred in 12.3% of the cohort, was associated with increased risk for neonatal acidosis (aRR 3.96, 95% CI 1.21-12.98), but was not associated with CNAO or CMAO. Time from spinal-to-delivery was not different in those with and without neonatal acidosis. CONCLUSION: Despite universal exposure to prophylactic vasopressors, sustained hypotension after spinal anesthesia was still associated with neonatal acidosis, but no other adverse perinatal outcomes. Our findings may provide additional support for the adoption of prophylactic vasopressors to reduce spinal hypotension and downstream effects on the neonate from intraoperative hemodynamic instability. KEY POINTS: · Despite prophylactic vasopressors during scheduled CD, neonatal acidosis occurred in 4% of subjects.. · Sustained hypotension after spinal anesthesia was associated with neonatal acidosis, but not adverse neonatal outcomes.. · Spinal-to-delivery time was not associated with neonatal acidosis in scheduled CD..

Time to Completion of Two-Step Screening for Gestational Diabetes and Adverse Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to ascertain whether the length of time to complete the gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening was associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton, nonanomalous individuals who were screened for GDM at ≥24 weeks' gestation at an academic hospital system. We compared outcomes among people who were diagnosed with GDM and completed the 3-hour glucose tolerance test (GTT) ≤14 second versus >14 days from the 1-hour glucose challenge test (GCT). The primary outcome was a composite adverse neonatal outcome of the following: large for gestational age, shoulder dystocia, birth injury, respiratory distress, hypoglycemia, or fetal/neonatal death. The secondary outcomes included several individual neonatal and maternal morbidities. Multivariable Poisson's regression models were used to evaluate the association. Adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Among the 313 individuals who completed the two-step screening for GDM and had an 1-hour GCT ≥ 135 mg/dL; of them, 171 (54.6%) completed the 3-hour GTT ≤14 days, 142 (45.4%) completed the 3-hour GTT > 14 days. Overall rate of the primary outcome was 44.1%. After multivariable adjustment, the risk of the primary outcome was similar between people who completed the two-step method in ≤14 versus >14 days (aRR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.81-1.52). There was no significant difference in all secondary adverse outcomes between the two groups. Subgroup analyses, limited to people diagnosed with GDM (N = 89, 23.4%), also found similar results as the full analyses. CONCLUSION: Among individuals who completed the two-step screening for GDM, completion of the 3-hour GTT within ≤14 versus ≥ 14 days was not associated with an increase rate of the adverse outcomes. KEY POINTS: · Among pregnant people in an academic practice, 50% of people with abnormal 1-hour GTT completed GDM two-step screening in 14 days.. · Longer length of time to completion of diagnostic testing for GDM was not associated with an increased rate of adverse outcomes.. · Pregnant people that were diagnosed with GDM and completed the two-step method in >14 days did not have worse perinatal outcomes..

Pregnancy-Associated Stroke and Outcomes Related to Timing and Hypertensive Disorders.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate temporal trends of stroke in the peripartum period and to assess the relationship between stroke and maternal adverse outcomes vis-à-vis timing and hypertension. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study using the National Inpatient Sample to identify hospitalizations with pregnancy-associated stroke in the United States (2016-2019). Temporal trends in pregnancy-associated stroke were examined according to timing of stroke (antepartum vs postpartum) and both prepregnancy and pregnancy hypertensive disorders (yes vs no). Multivariable Poisson regression models with robust error variance were used to examine the association among maternal adverse outcomes, timing of stroke, and hypertensive disorders. RESULTS: Among 15,977,644 pregnancy hospitalizations, 6,100 hospitalizations (38.2/100,000 hospitalizations) were with pregnancy-associated stroke. Of these, 3,635 (59.6%) had antepartum pregnancy-associated stroke and 2,465 (40.4%) had postpartum pregnancy-associated stroke; alternatively, 2,640 (43.3%) had hypertensive disorders, and 3,460 (56.7%) were without hypertensive disorders. From 2016 to 2019, the overall rate of pregnancy-associated stroke (37.5 to 40.8/100,000 pregnancy hospitalizations, P =.028), rate of postpartum pregnancy-associated stroke (14.6 to 17.6/100,000 pregnancy hospitalizations, P =.005), and rate of pregnancy-associated stroke with hypertensive disorders (14.9 to 17.2/100,000 pregnancy hospitalizations, P =.013) increased. Antepartum pregnancy-associated stroke and pregnancy-associated stroke without hypertensive disorders, however, remained stable. Despite higher risk of maternal morbidity in postpartum stroke hospitalizations, including mechanical ventilation and pneumonia, there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between antepartum and postpartum stroke. Similarly, between pregnancy-associated stroke with hypertensive disorders and stroke without hypertensive disorders, an increased risk of mechanical ventilation, seizure, and prolonged hospital stay was seen for stroke with hypertensive disorders without an increase in mortality. CONCLUSION: A nationally representative sample of hospitalizations in the United States indicates an increasing trend in the rate of postpartum stroke. Almost half of hospitalizations with pregnancy-associated stroke have concomitant hypertensive disorders. Risk of adverse outcomes, but not mortality, is elevated in patients with stroke occurring in the postpartum period and stroke associated with hypertensive disorders.

Removal versus retention of cervical cerclage with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate maternal and perinatal outcomes of removal versus retention of cervical cerclage after premature preterm rupture of membranes (pPROM). STUDY DESIGN: Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched electronically on February 2023 utilizing combinations of the relevant medical subject heading (MeSH) terms, keywords, and word variants that were considered suitable for the topic. Either prospective or retrospective trials were considered suitable for the inclusion. The coprimary outcome of this study were pregnancy latency >7 days from pPROM and pregnancy latency >48 h from pPROM. Random effect head to-head meta-analyses were performed to directly compare each outcome, expressing the results as summary odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous outcomes and as mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, plus relative 95% confidence interval (CI). Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Six studies involving a total of 377 women (169 in the "removal" and 208 in the "retention" group) were included. The rate of pregnancy prolongation >48 h was significantly lower in the removal compared to retention group (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.07-0.31; p < 0.0001), as well as the rate of pregnancy prolongation >7 days (OR 0.30 95% CI 0.11-0.83; p = 0.02) and pregnancy latency expressed in days (MD -2.84 days, 95% CI -5.40 to -0.29; p = 0.03). The rate of chorioamnionitis was significantly lower in the removal compared to the retention group (OR 0.57 95% CI 0.34-0.96p = 0.03) as was the rate of Apgar score < 7 at 5 min (OR 0.22 95% CI 0.08-0.56; p = 0.002). There was no difference between removal and retention groups for all the other maternal and perinatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The decision whether to remove or retain cerclage in case of pPROM should balance the prematurity-related risks with that of infectious complications, thus highlighting the need for tailored management based on gestational age at occurrence of pPROM.