Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Physicians Working in the Head and Neck Field.

Background With the COVID-19 pandemic, the clinical practice of physicians who work in the head and neck field in Brazil dropped dramatically. The sustained impact of the pandemic is not known. Methods An anonymous online survey was distributed to Brazilian otolaryngologists, head and neck surgeons, medical and radiation oncologists, asking about their clinical practice in the third to fourth months of the pandemic. Results The survey was completed by 446 specialists. About 40% reported reduction of more than 75% in outpatient care. A reduction of 90% to 100% in airway endoscopies was reported by 50% of the responders, and the same rate of reduction regarding surgeries (pediatric or nasosinusal) was reported by 80% of them. Family income decreased by 50%, and the psychological burden on physicians was considerable. The availability of personal protective equipment and safety precautions were limited, especially in the public sector. Conclusion COVID-19 is still impacting the head and neck field, and safety concerns may hinder the prompt resumption of elective care.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Physicians Working in the Head and Neck Field

Abstract Background With the COVID-19 pandemic, the clinical practice of physicians who work in the head and neck field in Brazil dropped dramatically. The sustained impact of the pandemic is not known. Methods An anonymous online survey was distributed to Brazilian otolaryngologists, head and neck surgeons, medical and radiation oncologists, asking about their clinical practice in the third to fourth months of the pandemic. Results The survey was completed by 446 specialists. About 40 % reported reduction of more than 75 % in outpatient care. A reduction of 90 % to 100 % in airway endoscopies was reported by 50 % of the responders, and the same rate of reduction regarding surgeries (pediatric or nasosinusal) was reported by 80 % of them. Family income decreased by 50 %, and the psychological burden on physicians was considerable. The availability of personal protective equipment and safety precautions were limited, especially in the public sector. Conclusion COVID-19 is still impacting the head and neck field, and safety concerns may hinder the prompt resumption of elective care.

Global frequency and distribution of head and neck cancer in pediatrics, a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Incidence and mortality rates of childhood cancer represent a global public health issue, however, the worldwide prevalence of head and neck cancer in pediatric patients (HNCPP) is still unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the frequency and distribution of HNCPP worldwide. METHODS: A specific search strategy was performed using MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE to include studies based on hospital records, national cancer registries, and pathology files. Studies quality was assessed using the risk of bias checklist of the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal. RESULTS: Nineteen publications (15,970 cases) were included. Global frequency ranged from 0.25 % to 15 %. Male patients older than 10 years of age were most affected by lymphomas, followed by carcinomas and sarcomas. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, thyroid carcinoma, and nasopharyngeal carcinoma were the main histopathological subtypes. Neck/lymph nodes were anatomical hotspots. CONCLUSIONS: This HNCPP global overview may guide secondary prevention strategies and future etiological studies.

Criteria for eligibility to cisplatin in the curative treatment of head and neck cancer: Consensus opinion from a panel of experts.

Squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is an important problem in Brazil, where epidemiological and socioeconomic features often create barriers to the implementation of combined modalities with curative potential. Cisplatin improves the efficacy of radiotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of localized SCCHN and in the definitive therapy of locally advanced disease. However, the addition of high-dose cisplatin to radiotherapy increases treatment toxicity and is not always warranted. A panel of experts convened in Sao Paulo, Brazil, for discussions and recommendations regarding the use of high-dose cisplatin in combination with radiotherapy in SCCHN. In addition to discussing their professional experience, panel members used the current literature to provide evidence-based, practical recommendations regarding sociodemographic or medical criteria that may preclude safe administration of cisplatin. It is hoped that the application of these recommendations in clinical practice may improve therapeutic results in Brazil and other countries with similar health-care environments.

Organ preservation with chemoradiation in advanced laryngeal cancer: The problem of generalizing results from randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The primary goal of treatment in advanced laryngeal cancer is to achieve optimal oncologic outcomes while preserving function and quality of life. Combination of chemotherapy and radiation has been popularized as an alternative to surgery for patients facing total laryngectomy. However, survival analyses from large, population-based databases have not duplicated results reported from randomized trials. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was undertaken to try to better understand the reasons why results differ among randomized trials and population cohort studies. RESULTS: A variety of reasons are discussed, including differences in patient staging, selection bias, complexity bias, inconsistent terminology, patient compliance and treatment expertise. CONCLUSIONS: Personalized treatment considering all factors is critical for optimal outcomes. In general, evidence supports total laryngectomy for patients with T4 cancers. Definitive chemoradiotherapy strategies are acceptable alternatives for T3 cancers, provided that all resources for the administration of the treatment, follow-up and surgical salvage are available.