Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Appl Microbiol ; 131(2): 988-995, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33421237

RESUMO

AIM: To investigate the impact of expression mode: electric breast pump or hand expression, and timing of sample collection: pre- and post-milk ejection on human milk (HM) bacterial DNA profiles. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three HM samples from the same breast were collected from 30 breastfeeding mothers: a pre-milk ejection pump-expressed sample (pre-pump), a post-milk ejection pump-expressed sample (post-pump) and a post-milk ejection hand-expressed sample (post-hand). Full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to assess milk bacterial DNA profiles. Bacterial profiles did not differ significantly based on mode of expression nor timing of sample collection. No significant differences were detected in the relative abundance of any OTUs based on expression condition (pre-pump/ post-pump and post-pump/post-hand) with univariate linear mixed-effects regression analyses (all P-values > 0·01; α = 0·01). Similarly, no difference in richness was observed between sample types (number of observed OTUs: post-pump/post-hand P = 0·13; pre-pump/post-pump P = 0. 45). CONCLUSION: Bacterial DNA profiles of HM did not differ according to either expression method or timing of sample collection. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Hand or pump expression can be utilized to collect samples for microbiome studies. This has implications for the design of future HM microbiome studies.


Assuntos
Extração de Leite , DNA Bacteriano , Leite Humano , Aleitamento Materno , DNA Bacteriano/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Lactação , Ejeção Láctea , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética
2.
J Appl Microbiol ; 130(1): 142-156, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32654260

RESUMO

AIMS: To evaluate four DNA extraction methods to elucidate the most effective method for bacterial DNA recovery from human milk (HM). METHODS AND RESULTS: Human milk DNA was extracted using the following methods: (i) Qiagen MagAttract Microbial DNA Isolation Kit (kit QM), (ii) Norgen Milk Bacterial DNA Isolation Kit (kit NM), (iii) Qiagen MagAttract Microbiome DNA/RNA Isolation Kit (kit MM) and (iv) TRIzol LS Reagent (method LS). The full-length 16S rRNA gene was sequenced. Kits MM and method LS were unable to extract detectable levels of DNA in 9/11 samples. Detectable levels of DNA were recovered from all samples using kits NM (mean = 0·68 ng µl-1 ) and QM (mean = 0·55 ng µl-1 ). For kits NM and QM, the greatest number of reads were associated with Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus vestibularis, Propionibacterium acnes, Veillonella dispar and Rothia mucilaginosa. Contamination profiles varied substantially between kits, with one bacterial species detected in negative extraction controls generated with kit QM and six with kit NM. CONCLUSIONS: Kit QM is the most suitable of the kits tested for the extraction of bacterial DNA from human milk. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Choice of extraction method impacts the efficiency of bacterial DNA extraction from human milk and the resultant bacterial community profiles generated from these samples.


Assuntos
DNA Bacteriano/isolamento & purificação , Leite Humano/microbiologia , Análise de Sequência de DNA/métodos , Bactérias/classificação , Bactérias/genética , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , DNA Bacteriano/genética , Humanos , Microbiota/genética , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico
4.
J Food Prot ; 42(6): 512-518, 1979 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30812259

RESUMO

The stress metabolites rishitin and lubimin accumulate at relatively low concentrations (5-20 ppm) in potato tuber slices subjected to various cell-disruptive treatments including heavy metal salts, sulfhydryl reagents, metabolic inhibitors, detergents, ultraviolet light and lysosomal enzymes. Cold-stored (4 C) tubers are more disposed to terpene accumulation than freshly harvested, 25-C stored and conditioned potatoes. Various inhibitors of DNA transcription and mRNA translation block terpene induction by non-specific elicitors when applied at sufficiently high concentration. However. various protein synthesis inhibitors were shown to be potent elicitors of terpene accumulation when applied at lower concentration. Actinomycin D (25 µg/ml) treatment of discs for 30 min elicits higher levels of rishitin than results from Phytophthora infestans interaction with potato (> 100 ppm). A mechanism for terpene induction based on derepression of "stress metabolite DNA" is proposed to explain the experimental data.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...