RESUMO
Detection of fracture healing (FH), which depends on assessment methods, is a crucial factor affecting treatment. The study aimed to examine orthopedic surgeons in terms of practical methods of fracture healing (FHA) assessment (physical, imaging, measurement, and laboratory) and to check whether surgeons participating in clinical and laboratory experiments or only clinical practitioners prefer different FHA methods. An International Survey on Fracture Healing Assessment Methods was developed and distributed through the Web-based survey portal. Ninety-three orthopedic surgeons, on average age 41.46 years, from 24 countries participated in the study. Thirty-one respondents (33.3%) reported dealing with fractures both in the clinic and in experimental studies, six (6.5%) reported dealing with fractures only in laboratory research work, and fifty-six (60.2%) indicated that they dealt with fractures only clinically. The survey's internal consistency was significantly high (Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranged from 0.84 to 0.96). The majority of respondents (80.83%) use specific clinical criteria to define a fracture union. The FHA was mainly based on the physical examination and plain radiograms. Laboratory findings, patient-oriented outcomes scores, and quantitative methods are rarely used. Orthopaedic surgeons dealing with fractures both in the clinic and in laboratory fracture research studies are more likely to use more quantitative FHA methods. Future research is needed to improve the international standard of the FHA methods for use in research, clinical trials, and clinical practice. Using a quantitative, reliable, and standardized approach, including online support, can be valuable for increasing compliance in the orthopedic surgeon population, effectively improving the adherence of fracture healing assessment in clinical conditions, and improving early detection of fracture healing disorders, improving fracture efficiency treatment.