Policy design and implementation: a quantitative evaluation and empirical study of China's rural sports policy based on the PMC index model.

The formulation and implementation of a rural sports policy is an important means of promoting rural sports, improving the physical wellbeing of farmers, and enhancing the cohesion of rural communities. However, introducing such a policy faces problems in the process of specific policy practices, such as poor effective implementation, a lagging implementation effect, and goal cognitive bias. How to look at the current rural sports policy implementation blockage problem and the governance of the blockage, in order to improve the level of rural sports public service, is the focus of this paper's research. On this basis, this paper selects 56 policy texts, issued from 2002 to 2023, that are highly relevant to rural sports and have high timeliness and authority from the sports policies issued in China. Also, ROST CM6 software is used to count high-frequency words; this study then draws keyword social network mapping for the visual analysis of policy preferences and selects 20 rural sports policy texts as typical samples. Finally, a policy modeling research consistency (PMC) index model is used to evaluate the texts comprehensively and quantitatively. The results show that the overall design of China's rural sports policies is relatively reasonable. However, the consistency and effectiveness of their implementation need to be improved. Twenty representative policy texts have an average PMC index score of 5.96, with a concave index of 3.04 (which is good overall), with the highest mean value for rural sports policies at the national level. This is followed by the second highest value at the municipal and county levels, and the smallest at the provincial level. Therefore, in the future formulation and implementation of rural sports policies, a multi-dimensional rural sports policy system should be constructed. This would help to strengthen the consistency and effectiveness of the implementation of the policy system and promote the high-quality development of rural sports.

Trends in the Utilization of Surgical Modalities for the Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Comprehensive 10-Year Analysis Using the National Inpatient Sample.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Epilepsy is considered one of the most prevalent and severe chronic neurological disorders worldwide. Our study aims to analyze the national trends in different treatment modalities for individuals with drug-resistant epilepsy and investigate the outcomes associated with these procedural trends in the United States. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2010 to 2020, patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who underwent laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT), open surgical resection, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), or responsive neurostimulation (RNS) were identified. Trend analysis was performed using piecewise joinpoint regression. Propensity score matching was used to compare outcomes between 10 years prepandemic before 2020 and the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: This study analyzed a total of 33 969 patients with a diagnosis of drug-resistant epilepsy, with 3343 patients receiving surgical resection (78%), VNS (8.21%), RNS (8%), and LITT (6%). Between 2010 and 2020, there was an increase in the use of invasive electroencephalography monitoring for seizure zone localization (P = .003). There was an increase in the use of LITT and RNS (P < .001), while the use of surgical resection and VNS decreased over time (P < .001). Most of these patients (89%) were treated during the pre-COVID pandemic era (2010-2019), while a minority (11%) underwent treatment during the COVID pandemic (2020). After propensity score matching, the rate of pulmonary complications, postprocedural hematoma formation, and mortality were slightly higher during the pandemic compared with the prepandemic period (P = .045, P = .033, and P = .026, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study indicates a relative decrease in the use of surgical resections, as a treatment for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. By contrast, newer, minimally invasive surgical approaches including LITT and RNS showed gradual increases in usage.

Managing Antiseizure Medications in Pregnancy: Is Earlier and More Frequent Monitoring Better?

Background and Objective: Medication management in pregnant women with epilepsy (PWWE) poses challenges, and understanding the effects of metabolic changes on antiseizure medications (ASMs) is important in planning care for PWWE. The possible teratogenic effects and risks of poorly controlled seizures have to be weighed. There are data in the literature on clinical management of ASMs including the effects of drug levels on seizures and factors that predict seizure frequency, but timing and frequency of monitoring and dose adjustment paradigms have not been well studied. Methods: This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Johns Hopkins University. We retrospectively identified adult PWWE evaluated during pregnancy at the Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center epilepsy clinic, between January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2021. We reviewed charts for information regarding demographics, medical and epilepsy history, medications, serum drug levels, and dosing paradigms. We assessed risk factors for breakthrough seizures with a focus on frequency and timing of laboratory testing. We calculated the dose-normalized concentration (DNC) for analysis with levetiracetam and lamotrigine, assessing changes in DNC over time by half trimesters, and analyzed DNC and effects on seizures in pregnancy. We also compared preemptive vs clinically based lamotrigine dose adjustments in managing epilepsy in pregnancy. Results: A total of 45 pregnancies in 39 patients were included in this study, 8 generalized, 28 focal epilepsy, and 3 unclassified. 31 PWWE (36 pregnancies) were on lamotrigine and/or levetiracetam, and 14 of these pregnancies experienced breakthrough seizures, 77% in the first trimester. Seizures led to the diagnosis of pregnancy in 5 patients. The DNC for levetiracetam decreased significantly compared with prepregnancy levels by the second half of the first trimester and demonstrated variable but frequently significant or near significant reduction throughout pregnancy. DNC for lamotrigine decreased significantly in the first half of the first trimester and remained significant throughout pregnancy. Age of mother at conception, week of first ASM serum level and number of levels obtained during pregnancy, and epilepsy type were not associated with breakthrough/increase in seizures. The history of drug resistance (p = 0.038) was associated with a higher odds of seizures. In those on lamotrigine, preemptive dose adjustments demonstrated similar results regarding seizure control when compared with clinical-based or laboratory-based dose management (p = 0.531). Discussion: This study demonstrates that frequency and timing of ASM level monitoring may not affect overall seizure outcomes during pregnancy in those on lamotrigine or levetiracetam. Furthermore, one can consider preemptive dose adjustments or a laboratory-based/clinical-based approach in managing lamotrigine as both seem safe and feasible. However, in those with drug-resistant epilepsy before pregnancy, earlier and closer monitoring is warranted given the risk of seizures early during pregnancy. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

Balamuthia mandrillaris Encephalitis Presenting as a Symptomatic Focal Hypodensity in an Immunocompromised Patient.

We present the case of a 61-year-old woman with a history of orthotopic heart transplant who was hospitalized with new-onset headache. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain revealed T2 hyperintense signal involving the left occipital lobe with leptomeningeal enhancement and mild vasogenic edema. Initial neurologic examination was normal; however, after 7 days she developed imbalance, visual disturbances, night sweats, bradyphrenia, alexia without agraphia, and right hemianopsia. Brain MRI showed enlargement of the left occipital mass and worsening edema. Stereotactic needle biopsy showed nondiagnostic necrosis. The patient continued to deteriorate despite dexamethasone. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) suggested infection, and cytomegalovirus CSF polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was positive. The patient received vancomycin, imipenem, and ganciclovir. After obtaining a positive serum beta-D-glucan (Fungitell), amphotericin was added. Despite best medical efforts, the patient died. Postmortem broad-range PCR sequencing of the brain tissue was positive for rare amoeba Balamuthia mandrillaris.

Intraoperative electrocorticography during laser-interstitial thermal therapy predicts seizure outcome in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRLiTT) for treating temporal lobe epilepsy has recently gained popularity. We aimed to investigate the predictive value of pre-and post-MRLiTT epileptiform discharges (EDs) on intraoperative electrocorticography (iECoG) in seizure outcomes for patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE). METHODS: We conducted a pilot, prospective single-center cohort study on seven consecutive patients with mTLE that underwent MRLiTT. Pre- and post-MRLiTT iECoG was performed using a 1x8 contact depth electrode along the same trajectory used for the laser catheter. RESULTS: The responders had a robust reduction in ED frequency compared to pre-MRLiTT iECoG (86% vs 13%, p < 0.01). Clinical characteristics, including risk factors for epilepsy, duration of epilepsy, presence of mesial temporal lobe sclerosis, prior intracranial monitoring, the absolute frequency of pre- or post-MRLiTT EDs, and ablation volume were not significantly associated with responder status. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first demonstration that intraoperative reduction in EDs during mesial temporal lobe MRLiTT may potentially predict seizure outcomes and may serve as an intraoperative biomarker for satisfactory ablation. However, larger prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings and evaluate the utility of iECoG during MRLiTT. SIGNIFICANCE: iECoG during mesial temporal lobe MRLiTT may help assess seizure outcomes.

Association of intracranial abnormalities with the development of epilepsy and drug-resistant epilepsy in patients with Parry-Romberg syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy represents an essential component of Parry Romberg syndrome (PRS). This study aimed to identify clinical factors that influence the development of epilepsy and drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in PRS. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of eighty patients with PRS. Data including the age of onset for PRS, history of seizures, use and timing of immunotherapy, antiseizure medication use, and EEG and brain imaging findings were reviewed. For comparison with the patients with epilepsy (PRSe+) group, we selected 18 age and sex-matched controls from the patient without epilepsy (PRSe-) cohort using propensity score matching. RESULTS: Eighteen (22.5%) had epilepsy: 12 were female, and the median age was 14.5 years (range = 6-48 years). Eleven patients developed DRE. The median latency between the onset of cutaneous manifestations and diagnosis and timing and use of immunotherapy was similar between the PRSe + and PRSe- groups. Intracranial abnormalities were commonly seen in the PRSe + group (16 vs. 2, p < 0.01). White matter disease and ipsilateral atrophy were common among the PRSe + group. Timing and use of immunotherapy, epileptiform discharges, and brain imaging abnormalities did not differ between those with DRE and without. CONCLUSIONS: The presence and degree of severity of ipsilateral brain abnormalities are risk factors for the development of epilepsy in PRS but not factors in predicting drug resistance. The timing of immunotherapy did not influence the development of PRSe + or DRE. Prospective studies are needed to identify biomarkers for epilepsy and assess the role of immunotherapy on seizure outcomes in PRSe + .

Brain responsive neurostimulation device safety and effectiveness in patients with drug-resistant autoimmune-associated epilepsy.

PURPOSE: This study examines the safety and effectiveness of brain-responsive neurostimulation (RNS System) therapy in patients with refractory autoimmune-associated epilepsy (AAE). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 85 medical records of patients who were treated with the RNS System at the three Mayo Clinic sites to identify patients with AAE. We collected clinical data including demographics, epilepsy history, prior evaluations and treatment, RNS implantation and lead information, long term ambulatory electrocorticography (ECoG) data, and patient-reported seizure details. Inclusion criteria included: (1) confirmed neural antibodies, or absent/negative autoimmune panel with Antibody Prevalence in Epilepsy (APE2) score ≥ 4 and (2) at least 6 months of follow up after RNS implantation. The primary outcomes measured were patient-reported seizure frequencies at last follow-up as compared to baseline, ECoG long-episode frequencies, and adverse events following RNS implantation. RESULTS: Of the 85 patients reviewed, nine (11 %) met the inclusion criteria. Three patients had GAD65 antibodies (mean serum titer = 816 ug/dl), one had Rasmussen's encephalitis (biopsy proven), and five had absent/negative neuronal antibody panel but APE scores were ≥ 4. Six out of nine patients (67 %) reported improvement in clinical seizure frequency, all reported improvements in seizure duration and intensity. Four of 9 patients (44 %) showed trends of decreasing frequency of prolonged periods of epileptiform activity over time. One patient (11 %) developed a superficial wound infection at the implant site. CONCLUSION: The findings from our study suggest that adjunctive treatment with the RNS System may be a safe option for patients with refractory AAE.

Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Cancer Presenting to the Emergency Department and Their Use of Emergency Medical Service Transport.

Objectives: Although life-threatening emergencies for cancer patients are relatively rare, cancer patients often seek care in the emergency department. The use of emergency medical service (EMS) by these patients is not well studied. The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of cancer patients who present to the emergency department (ED) for care and compare characteristics of patients transported by EMS vs. those transported by private vehicle. Methods: Our retrospective cohort study was conducted in an EMS system with 21,070 annual transports and an academic ED with 129,263 annual visits. Our study consisted of patients with a new diagnosis of cancer between January 1 and July 1, 2015 who subsequently presented to the ED between January 1, 2015 and July 1, 2017. Study variables included patient demographics, mode of ED arrival, cancer type and treatment, patient clinical characteristics, and disposition. To describe differences in patient characteristics of EMS vs. private vehicle transport, we report variable frequencies and stratified them by mode of transport. Results: Of the 2,727 patients with a new diagnosis of cancer, 1,303 (47.8%) presented to the ED with a total of 3,590 visits in 30 months. EMS transported 22% of cancer patients to the ED vs. 78% transported by private vehicle. Thus, cancer patients would make up approximately 1.5% (781/52,675) of all EMS transports during the study period. For those transported by EMS, the most common chief complaints were respiratory distress (16.0%), pain (15.4%), and neurological symptoms (12.6%). Patients with cancer of the lung/respiratory tract (21.5%), upper GI (12.4%), and central nervous system (CNS) (11.0%) were most frequently transported by EMS. Older age, presence of CNS cancer, presentation with neurological or cardiovascular complaints, and higher acuity were significantly associated with EMS transport to ED, while gender and pain severity were not. Patients transported by EMS were more likely to be hospitalized and for greater than 2 days (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Cancer patients frequently seek emergency care after initial diagnosis, most commonly present for symptom relief, and are often admitted. Patients transported by EMS are more likely to be admitted and for longer periods of time.