A core domain set for pyoderma gangrenosum trial outcomes: an international eDelphi and consensus study from the UPGRADE initiative.

BACKGROUND: Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare ulcerative skin condition with no current standardized outcomes or outcome measures. With a rich investigational therapeutic pipeline, standardization of outcomes and improvement of data quality and interpretability will promote the appropriate and consistent evaluation of potential new therapies. Core outcome sets (COS) are agreed, standardized sets of outcomes that represent the minimum that should be measured and reported in all clinical trials of a specific condition. OBJECTIVES: To identify and reach a consensus on which domains (what to be measured) should be included in the Understanding Pyoderma Gangrenosum: Review and Analysis of Disease Effects (UPGRADE) core domain set for clinical trials in PG. METHODS: Collaborative discussions between patients and PG experts, and a systematic review of the literature identified items and prospective domains. A three-round international eDelphi exercise was performed to prioritize the domains and refine the provisional items (consensus: ≥ 70% of participants rating a domain as 'extremely important' and < 15% of participants voting 'not important'), followed by an international meeting to reach consensus on the core domain set (consensus: < 30% disagreement). Item-generation discussions and consensus meetings were hosted via online videoconferences. The eDelphi exercise and consensus voting were performed using Qualtrics survey software. Participants were adults with PG, healthcare professionals, researchers and industry representatives. RESULTS: Collaborative discussions and systematic reviews yielded 115 items, which were distilled into 15 prospective domains. The eDelphi exercise removed the three lowest-priority domains ('laboratory tests', 'treatment costs' and 'disease impact on family') and ranked 'pain', 'quality of life' and 'physical symptoms' as the highest-priority prospective domains. Consensus was reached on the domains of 'pain', 'quality of life' and 'clinical signs'. The domain of 'disease course/disease progression' narrowly failed to reach consensus for inclusion in the core set (32% of participants voted 'no'). Refinement of this domain definition will be required and presented for consideration at future consensus meetings. CONCLUSIONS: The UPGRADE core domain set for clinical trials in PG has been agreed by international multistakeholder consensus. Future work will develop and/or select outcome measurement instruments for these domains to establish a COS.

Minimum data set for treatment effectiveness in pyoderma gangrenosum (MIDSTEP): an international protocol of an e-Delphi study to develop a clinical physician-driven treatment effectiveness registry on behalf of the UPGRADE initiative.

Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare inflammatory condition with an immense disease burden that remains understudied. With limited approved treatments and low-quality clinical evidence, PG continues to have poor patient outcomes. Unfortunately, improvement in PG treatments and patient care is based on additional research endeavors that can only be developed from existing high-quality data. The following protocol outlines the development of the Minimum Data Set for Treatment Effectiveness in Pyoderma gangrenosum (MIDSTEP), a core set of domains and domain items for the Pyoderma Gangrenosum Treatment Effectiveness (PyGaTE) international registry. The outcomes and benefits are focused on providing real-world data for physicians to improve their clinical decisions on PG treatment and inform clinical trial design, promoting clinical research among the international scientific community. MIDSTEP is a multi-phase project. The first phase will produce a domain item list from a literature review to take into the second phase which would finalize the core data set by an e-Delphi exercise. There will be a single stakeholder group participating together in the e-Delphi consisting of PG experts (healthcare providers, researchers, methodologists, industry representatives, and regulators), ulcerative PG patients, and PG patient advocates. The methodology outlined in the protocol is a systematic method based on several guidelines through COMET and established dermatologic registries and outcome sets with systematic methodologies of their own. The third phase will identify the instruments for the items, the 'when to measure' the items, and the platform for the registry. The last phase is the implementation and continued maintenance of the international registry PyGaTE. By solidifying a consensus on standardized outcomes and collecting information on PG treatment effectiveness in a centralized database, existing treatments can be compared more systematically and analyzed with increased evidence. MIDSTEP and the PyGaTE international registry will have the ambitious goal to generate and disseminate real-world data that can be used by all stakeholders to improve health outcomes for PG patients. Future potential for the outcome of this project includes the development of a gold-standard PG treatment.

Rituximab versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Patients with Pemphigus Vulgaris.

BACKGROUND: Rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil are used to treat pemphigus vulgaris, but they have not been adequately compared in clinical trials. METHODS: In a randomized, controlled trial, we assigned patients with moderate-to-severe pemphigus vulgaris in a 1:1 ratio to receive intravenous rituximab (1000 mg on days 1, 15, 168, and 182) or oral mycophenolate mofetil (2 g per day), in addition to an oral glucocorticoid administered on the same tapering schedule in the two groups. The primary end point was sustained complete remission at week 52, defined as the healing of lesions with no new active lesions, as reflected by a Pemphigus Disease Area Index (PDAI) activity score of 0 (on a scale of 0 to 250, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity), for at least 16 weeks without the use of glucocorticoids. Secondary end points were the cumulative dose of glucocorticoids, the number of disease flares, and the change from baseline in the score on the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI; scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment). RESULTS: Of the 135 patients who underwent randomization, 67 were assigned to receive rituximab and 68 to receive mycophenolate mofetil. The primary outcome was assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population: 62 patients in the rituximab group and 63 in the mycophenolate mofetil group. The median PDAI activity scores at baseline were 22.7 in the rituximab group and 18.3 in the mycophenolate mofetil group. At week 52, sustained complete remission was observed in 25 patients (40%) in the rituximab group and in 6 (10%) in the mycophenolate mofetil group (difference, 31 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15 to 45; P<0.001). The mean cumulative glucocorticoid dose during the 52-week treatment period was 3545 mg in the rituximab group and 5140 mg in the mycophenolate mofetil group (difference, -1595 mg; 95% CI, -2838 to -353; P<0.001). There were 6 disease flares in the rituximab group and 44 in the mycophenolate mofetil group (adjusted rate ratio, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.29; P<0.001). The mean change in DLQI score was -8.87 points and -6.00 points, respectively (difference, -2.87 points; 95% CI, -4.58 to -1.17; P = 0.001). Serious adverse events occurred in 15 of 67 patients (22%) in the rituximab group and in 10 of 68 (15%) in the mycophenolate mofetil group. CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab was superior to mycophenolate mofetil in producing sustained complete remission at 52 weeks in patients with pemphigus vulgaris. Rituximab resulted in a greater reduction in glucocorticoid use than mycophenolate mofetil, but more patients in the rituximab group had serious adverse events. Further trials are needed to determine the comparative efficacy and safety of rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil beyond 52 weeks of treatment. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; PEMPHIX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02383589.).

Assessing health-related quality of life for advanced basal cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma nevus syndrome: development of the first disease-specific patient-reported outcome questionnaires.

IMPORTANCE Little is known about patients' experiences of advanced basal cell carcinoma (aBCC) and basal cell carcinoma nevus syndrome (BCCNS), a rare genetic disorder that greatly increases the number of BCCs. OBJECTIVE To develop a questionnaire to measure patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in these populations. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Concept elicitation interviews were conducted with patients with aBCC and BCCNS from 5 US clinical sites and the BCCNS Life Support Network and 4 physicians. The PRO questionnaires were drafted based on results from a literature review and findings from these interviews. Questionnaires were finalized after cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted with patients. Concept elicitation interviews were conducted with 30 patients (14 with aBCC, 16 with BCCNS) and 4 physicians (2 dermatologists, 1 Mohs surgeon, and 1 oncologist) in the United States. A subset of 10 of these patients (5 with aBCC, 5 with BCCNS) took part in cognitive debriefing interviews. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Development of 2 questionnaires to allow clinicians to assess the emotional, social, and physical impacts of the disease on patients with aBCC and BCCNS. RESULTS Most concept elicitation interview patients were male (63%) and white (93%); their mean age was 57 years. There were impacts on emotional, social, and physical functioning in both conditions. Patients were unable to do many activities and avoided other activities. Seventy-nine percent of patients with aBCC and all patients with BCCNS reported scarring. Physician interviews revealed similar findings. During cognitive debriefing interviews, the questionnaires were found to be relevant, clear, and comprehensive. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Advanced BCC and BCCNS affect patients in unique and substantial ways. These PRO questionnaires were developed with patient and clinician input and measure the key areas that have an impact on patients with these conditions.

Expanded access study of patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma treated with the Hedgehog pathway inhibitor, vismodegib.

BACKGROUND: Vismodegib, a first-in-class Hedgehog pathway inhibitor, was US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for advanced basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) based on a single, nonrandomized, phase-II trial. Consequently, additional clinical data are critical to confirm the efficacy and safety of vismodegib. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess efficacy and safety of vismodegib, while providing early drug access to patients with advanced BCC and limited treatment options. METHODS: This was an open-label, multicenter study in patients with advanced BCC inappropriate for radiotherapy or surgery. Patients received 150 mg vismodegib daily until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Tumor response was assessed via Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0. RESULTS: A total of 119 patients with advanced BCC took vismodegib for a median of 5.5 months. Objective responses occurred in 46.4% of locally advanced BCC and 30.8% of patients with metastatic BCC. Response was negatively associated with prior systemic therapy in patients with locally advanced BCC (P = .002). Mean follow-up for safety was 6.5 months, with muscle spasms (70.6%), dysgeusia (70.6%), alopecia (58.0%), and diarrhea (25.2%) as the most common adverse events. LIMITATIONS: Abbreviated follow-up time because of study termination upon FDA approval was a limitation. CONCLUSION: This study provides important clinical data supporting the efficacy and safety of vismodegib. Larger studies are underway to assess predictors of response and long-term outcomes.

How patients experience and manage dryness and irritation from acne treatment.

BACKGROUND: Products that may cause irritation are widely used to treat acne. Irritation has the potential to reduce treatment adherence. How patients manage irritation and dryness is not well characterized. OBJECTIVES: To study self-reported irritation, its impact and coping mechanisms in patients who had been treated for acne with a clindamycin-5% benzoyl peroxide (BPO) product. METHODS: An Internet-based survey of 200 subjects, aged 15-40 years who had used a clindamycin-5% BPO fixed combination product in the last six months on at least 50 percent of their face, at least five days per week. RESULTS: The majority of subjects (57%) had moderate acne, 28 percent had severe acne. Bothersome side effects of the clindamycin-5% BPO combination included dry skin (55%), flaky/peeling skin (45%), irritated skin (44%), itchy skin (39%) and redness (37%). As a result, subjects used the product only as a spot treatment (33%), only when breakouts seemed worse (28%), or less often than recommended (32%); stopped using from time to time (32%); switched to a different prescription medication and/or an over-the-counter acne product (28%); or stopped using altogether (10%). 41 percent of subjects reported using moisturizers to counteract dryness and redness. LIMITATIONS: We queried patients concerning use of combination clindamycin/BPO products and not other products. DISCUSSION: Irritation to clindamycin-5% BPO is a common problem that reduces patients' use of the medication. Strategies to improve treatment include communication with patients on possible side effects, providing written instruction on how to manage irritation and dryness and consideration of alternative topical treatments and treatment regimens.

Impact of a fixed combination of clindamycin phosphate 1.2%-benzoyl peroxide 2.5% aqueous gel on health-related quality of life in moderate to severe acne vulgaris.

The acne-specific quality of life (Acne-QoL) questionnaire was developed to measure the impact of facial acne across 4 domains (acne symptoms, role-emotional, self-perception, role-social) of health-related quality of life (HRQL). This analysis assessed the impact of clindamycin phosphate 1.2%-benzoyl peroxide 2.5% (clindamycin-BPO 2.5%) gel on HRQL in a combined study population (N = 2813) of participants with moderate to severe acne vulgaris. Although the results presented within do not include factors of study and study-by-treatment interaction, analyses were performed to confirm that the results were consistent across the 2 identical, double-blind, randomized studies and within each treatment group across studies to justify pooling the data from both studies. The Acne-QoL questionnaire was administered at baseline and at the end of treatment (week 12). Treatment with clindamycin-BPO 2.5% gel significantly improved participant-reported HRQL across all 4 domains compared with individual active ingredients and vehicle (P < .001). The percentage improvement in mean Acne-QoL domain scores with clindamycin-BPO 2.5% gel ranged from 37% to 59%. Because the negative impact of facial acne on HRQL is one of the primary motivators for patients to seek treatment, this analysis underscores the importance of physicians incorporating assessments of HRQL into their clinical decision making.

Pimecrolimus cream 1% in the treatment of intertriginous psoriasis: a double-blind, randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Inverse psoriasis can be difficult to treat because of the high sensitivity of intertriginous areas to cutaneous side effects, such as irritation and striae. Pimecrolimus, a well-tolerated, nonatrophogenic, skin-selective inflammatory cytokine inhibitor, has been shown to be effective in the treatment of psoriasis when applied topically under occlusion. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% versus vehicle twice a day in the treatment of inverse psoriasis. Methods This was a double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled study in 57 patients with moderate to severe inverse psoriasis. Patients were evaluated using Investigator's Global Assessment of overall severity, Target Area Score, and Patient Self-Assessment. RESULTS: A significant between-group difference was observed early on, with 54% of the pimecrolimus group versus 21% of the vehicle group having an Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear) at week 2 ( P = .0169). By week 8, 71% of the pimecrolimus group had an Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1. Change from baseline in Target Area Score was -2.4 (pimecrolimus group) compared with -0.7 (vehicle) at day 3 ( P < .0001). By week 8, 82% of patients using pimecrolimus scored their disease as well or completely controlled versus 41% of the vehicle group ( P = .0007). Adverse events were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Pimecrolimus cream 1% is an effective treatment for inverse psoriasis with a rapid onset of action, and is safe and well-tolerated.

Photodynamic therapy with aminolevulinic acid topical solution and visible blue light in the treatment of multiple actinic keratoses of the face and scalp: investigator-blinded, phase 3, multicenter trials.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) using 20% wt/vol aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride (hereinafter "ALA") and visible blue light for the treatment of multiple actinic keratoses of the face and scalp. DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled, uneven parallel-group study. INTERVENTIONS: Patients (N = 243) were randomized to receive vehicle or ALA followed within 14 to 18 hours by PDT. Follow-up visits occurred 24 hours and 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks following PDT. Target lesions remaining at week 8 were re-treated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Clinical response based on lesion clearing by week 8. RESULTS: Most patients in both groups had 4 to 7 lesions. Complete response rates for patients with 75% or more of the treated lesions clearing at weeks 8 and 12 were 77% (128/166) and 89% (133/149), respectively, for the drug group and 18% (10/55) and 13% (7/52), respectively, for the vehicle group (P<.001, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel general association test). The 95% confidence interval for the difference in response rates at week 8 was 46.9% to 71.0% and at week 12, 65.3% to 86.3%. The week 12 response rate includes 30% of patients who received a second treatment. Most patients experienced erythema and edema at the treated sites, which resolved or improved within 1 to 4 weeks after therapy, and stinging or burning during light treatment, which decreased or resolved by 24 hours after light treatment. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate that topical ALA PDT is an effective and safe treatment for multiple actinic keratoses of the face and scalp.