Olanzapine for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Purpose: This study was designed to investigate the prophylactic effect of oral olanzapine in postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Methods: ASA I-II, aged 18-75 years, planned to undergo gynecologic laparoscopic surgery with general anesthesia in adult female patients. Using the randomized numbers table, the patients were placed in two groups. Oral olanzapine 5 mg or placebo was given 1 h before anesthesia. All patients received standard antiemetic prophylaxis with dexamethasone and granisetron. The primary outcome was nausea and/or vomiting in the 24 h after the postoperative. Results: A total of 250 patients were randomized, and 241 were analyzed. The primary outcome occurred in 10 of 120 patients (8.3%) in the olanzapine group and 23 of 121 patients (19.2%) in the placebo group (p = 0.014). According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, the probabilities of nausea and/or vomiting in the 24 h after the postoperative in the olanzapine group were lower than in the placebo group (log-rank p = 0.014). In a multivariate Cox analysis, the variables of use of olanzapine [hazard ratio (HR): 0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.16-0.79; p = 0.012] and use of vasoactive drugs (HR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.07-5.75; p = 0.034) were independently associated with nausea and/or vomiting in the 24 h after the postoperative. Conclusion: Our data suggest that olanzapine relative to placebo decreased the risk of nausea and/or vomiting in the 24 h after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Trial registration: The trial was registered prior to patient enrollment at The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=166900, link to registry page, Principal investigator: Nanjin Chen, Date of registration: 25 April 2022).

Preventing nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic gynecological surgery: the benefits of using olanzapine Why was this study done? Despite the use of antiemetics, postoperative nausea and vomiting remain prevalent. Furthermore, patients who undergo gynecological laparoscopic surgery are at an increased risk. Therefore, this study investigated whether oral Olanzapine could reduce the incidence of nausea and vomiting after gynaecological Laparoscopy? What did the researchers do? The research team examined patients who underwent gynecological laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia. They observed the occurrence of nausea and vomiting within 24 hours after surgery in patients who either received or did not receive Olanzapine treatment. The goal was to assess the effectiveness of Olanzapine in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting. What did the researchers find? The addition of Olanzapine, when combined with granisetron and dexamethasone, resulted in a decreased risk of nausea and/or vomiting within the 24 hours following gynecologic laparoscopic surgery, as compared to the placebo. Administering oral Olanzapine at a dosage of 5 mg reduced the incidence of nausea and vomiting after gynecological laparoscopy from 19.2% to 8.3%. What do the findings mean? This study has identified a safe and effective medication for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Implementing Olanzapine as a preventive measure can significantly reduce the incidence of nausea and vomiting following surgery, thereby enhancing the overall medical experience for patients.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Flare-Up Manifestation as Intramedullary and Posterior Pharynx Hemorrhage.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a common clinical condition, and one of its more common complications is bleeding. Intramedullary and posterior pharynx hemorrhage in SLE is rare and disastrous. We present a patient with a predominantly neurological clinical presentation, which on examination was thought to be the result of active SLE complicated by intramedullary and pharynx hemorrhage. Intravenous glucocorticoids were administered for the acute SLE flare-up. The patient's neurological deficits improved gradually. She could walk independently when she was discharged. Early magnetic resonance imaging detection and early glucocorticoid treatment can halt the progression of neuropsychiatric SLE.

Estimation of the median effective dose and the 95% effective dose of alfentanil required to inhibit the bronchoscopy reaction during painless bronchoscopy with i-gel supraglottic airway device: an Up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Trial.

Background: In practice, the optimal dose of alfentanil that should be used when painless bronchoscopy is performed is unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effective dose of alfentanil in suppressing bronchoscopy responses to painless bronchoscopy with an i-gel supraglottic airway device. Methods: Patients aged 18-70 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II, who planned to undergo painless bronchoscopy were recruited for this study. Alfentanil was administered intravenously 2 minutes before propofol administration. The response to bronchoscopy was measured, including oxygen saturation (SPO2) and changes in respiratory rhythm. The median effective dose of alfentanil (ED50) required to alleviate responses to the bronchoscopy was calculated using Dixon's up-and-down method in the female and male groups. Probit analysis was used to generate a dose-response curve in each group. Results: A total of 48 patients were recruited for the study including 25 females and 23 males. The ED50 of alfentanil for suppressing responses to painless bronchoscopy in females and males was 13.68±4.75 and 17.96±3.45 µg/kg, respectively. The difference was not statistically significant between the two groups (P=0.078). Probit analysis showed the ED50 of alfentanil in female bronchoscopy was 12.4 µg/kg [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.5 to 17 µg/kg]. In men, the ED50 of alfentanil was 16.4 µg/kg (95% CI: 12.1 to 20.1 µg/kg). According to the probit analysis, the 95% effective dose (ED95) of alfentanil was 22.4 µg/kg (95% CI: 17.5 to 67.3 µg/kg) in female bronchoscopy. In men, the ED95 of alfentanil was 23.3 µg/kg (95% CI: 19.8 to 46.2 µg/kg). Conclusions: Our data suggest that there were no obvious differences between men and women in the effective dose of alfentanil in painless bronchoscopy.

Time interval between alfentanil and rocuronium administration necessary to prevent rocuronium-induced withdrawal movement.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the time interval between alfentanil and rocuronium administration, at a 50% probability of preventing pain-induced withdrawal movement from rocuronium injection (TimeAR50). METHODS: A total of 64 patients scheduled for general anesthesia were enrolled in this study (33 men and 31 women). Anesthesia was induced with target-controlled infusion of propofol, at an effect-site target concentration of 3 µg/mL. Then, alfentanil 15 µg/kg was injected for 30 s. After 60 s, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was administered to the first patient. The Dixon's up-and-down method was used to determine the time interval for each subsequent patient (interval of 5 s). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded at three time points: T0, pre-induction; T1, before rocuronium injection; and T2, 1 min after rocuronium injection. RESULTS: The TimeAR50 ± standard deviation (SD) was 5.6 ± 3.7 s and 21.9 ± 5.6 s in the male and female patients, respectively. Based on the probit regression, the TimeAR50 was 4.7 s (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-7.6 s) and 20.3 s (95% CI, 7.7-26.1 s) in the male and female patients, respectively. The TimeAR95 was 10.6 s (95% CI, 7.7-25.3 s) and 35.0 s (95% CI, 28.1-95.5 s) in the male and female patients, respectively, with significantly higher values in females than in males (P < 0.001). Compared with the T0, MAP and HR decreased significantly at T1 and T2 in both groups. CONCLUSION: The TimeAR50 required for preventing rocuronium-induced withdrawal movement were 4.7 s and 20.3 s in male and female patients, respectively. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry on April 7, 2021 (URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn . Registry number: ChiCTR2100045137 ) .

Efficacy analysis of Arbidol treatment in patients with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether Arbidol has a good antiviral effect on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in one of the treatment centers for COVID-19 patients in China from January 2020 to March 2020. The antiviral drug Arbidol (ARB) was administrated to some of the patients at 0.2 g tid po for 7 to 10 days. According to whether patients were given ARB, they were divided into 2 groups: the ARB group and the Non-ARB group. The primary outcome was the 14-day COVID-19 negativity rate. RESULTS: Of 146 patients, 140 were included. A total of 79 (56.4%) patients received ARB during hospitalization. In the overall cohort, the time of COVID-19 negativity in the ARB group compared with the Non-ARB group was 12.9 days versus 12.7 days (P=0.175; >0.05). The rates of 14-day COVID-19 negativity were 60.8% and 65.6% in the ARB and non-ARB groups, respectively (P=0.559; >0.05). Using an adjusted model, there were no obvious differences in the time of COVID-19 negativity and the rates of 14-day COVID-19 negativity (P>0.05). According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, the probabilities of 14-day COVID-19 negativity were similar in the 2 groups (log-rank P=0.130; >0.05). In a multivariate Cox analysis, the variables of age [hazard ratio (HR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83 to 0.99; P=0.039] and glucose (HR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.82 to 0.98; P=0.021) were independently associated with 14-day COVID-19 negativity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that there was no apparent favorable clinical response with ARB both in clinical symptoms and the 14-day COVID-19 negativity rate.

Attentional biases among body-dissatisfied young women: an ERP study with rapid serial visual presentation.

In the current study, rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) task combined with event related potentials (ERP) was used to investigate attention biases toward body-related words in a nonclinical sample of body dissatisfied females. Consistent with the hypotheses, the amplitudes of N100, N170 and P3 are sensitive to different body-related words in the RSVP paradigm only among body weight dissatisfied women (WD group), while control group did not show this difference. The early anterior N100 and bi-lateral parietal and occipital N170 amplitudes elicited by fatness-related words were larger than those elicited by thinness-related and neutral words among WD group, a finding which is consistent with the presence of a 'negativity bias'. Also, WD group women showed significantly different amplitudes in response to three categories of stimuli with thin words eliciting the largest P3 amplitudes, followed by fat words and the least neutral words. The current findings indicated that attention biases toward body weight related words were evident during both sensory and cognitive stages of information processing. Findings are also consistent with hypotheses of cognitive-behavioral accounts of body weight dissatisfaction which propose, in part, that individual differences on cognitive tasks reveal underlying psychopathology; attentional biases reflect disordered body schema, not disordered eating, and can therefore be seen in non-clinical samples.