Features of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with metabolic syndrome with or without comparable blood pressure: a meta-analysis.

The prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS) has been on the rise over the past few decades, and this is associated with an increased incidence of target organ damage such as left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the features of LVH in MS patients with or without high blood pressure (BP). PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Science Citation Index, and China Biology Medicine Disc, WanFang data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure database, and VIP were searched. Cross-sectional studies which directly compared LVH in hypertensive patients with MS and those with hypertension alone were identified. The following parameters were analyzed: systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), left ventricular mass (LVM), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), left ventricular mass/height(2.7) (LVM/h(2.7)), interventricular septum thickness (IVSt), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDd), left ventricular posterior wall (LVPW), ratio of early to late diastolic peak flow velocity (E/A), and relative wall thickness (RWT). Data were extracted and analyzed by Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.0 software. 14 studies involving 5,994 patients were included. In four studies, MS patients with comparable level of BP had higher SBP (mmHg) [Mean Difference (MD) = 2.28, 95 % confidence intervals (CI): -0.58 to 5.13], DBP (mmHg) (MD = 1.32, 95 % CI: -0.23 to 2.87), LVM (g) (MD = 42.10, 95 % CI: 6.92-77.28), LVMI (g/m(2)) (MD = 8.93, 95 % CI: 5.29-12.57), LVM/h(2.7) (g/m(2.7)) (MD = 5.40, 95 % CI: 2.51-8.29), IVSt (mm) (MD = 0.49, 95 % CI: 0.28-0.71), LVEDd (mm) (MD = 1.04, 95 % CI: -1.10 to 3.18), LVPW (mm) (MD = 0.75, 95 % CI: 0.13-1.37), RWT (MD = 0.06, 95 % CI: -0.00 to 0.12), and lower E/A (MD = -0.08, 95 % CI: -0.18 to 0.02) when compared to the patients with hypertension alone. In other ten studies, the hypertensive patients with MS exhibited higher levels of SBP (mmHg) (MD = 4.67, 95 % CI: 2.72-6.62), DBP (mmHg) (MD = 2.03,95 % CI: 1.40-2.65), LVM (g) (MD = 24.79, 95 % CI: 20.21-29.36), LVMI(g/m(2)) (MD = 9.22, 95 % CI: 2.81-15.64), LVM/h(2.7) (g/m(2.7)) (MD = 5.97, 95 % CI: 4.14-7.80), IVSt (mm) (MD = 0.63, 95 % CI: 0.58-0.69), LVEDd (mm) (MD = 1.11, 95 % CI: 0.42-1.80), LVPW (mm) (MD = 0.63, 95 % CI: 0.31-0.94), RWT (MD = 0.02, 95 % CI: 0.01-0.03), as compared to patients with hypertension alone (P < 0.05). In addition, the MS patients combining with hypertension showed a lower E/A (MD = -0.07, 95 % CI: -0.10 to -0.04) when compared to those with hypertension alone. This study suggests that MS plays an important role in the development of LVH. MS seems to amplify hypertension-related cardiac changes. Furthermore, MS combining with higher level of BP will aggravate LVH and damage the diastolic function of left ventricle.

Mycobacterium vaccae as adjuvant therapy to anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy in never-treated tuberculosis patients: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of heat-killed M. vaccae added to chemotherapy of never-treated tuberculosis (TB) patients. METHODS: The databases of Medline, Embase, Biosis, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCI, CBM, VIP and CNKI were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and Controlled clinical trials (CCT) comparing M. vaccae with or without a placebo-control injection as adjuvant therapy in the chemotherapy of never-treated TB patients were included. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and quality assessment. Data were analyzed using RevMan 5.0 software by The Cochrane Collaboration. RESULTS: Fifty four studies were included. At the end of the follow-up period, Pooled RR (Risk Ratio) and its 95% CI of sputum smear conversion rate were 1.07 (1.04, 1.10) in TB patients without complications, 1.17 (0.92, 1.49) in TB patients with diabetes mellitus, 1.02 (0.94, 1.10) in TB patients with hepatitis B, and 1.46 (0.21, 10.06) in TB patients with pneumosilicosis. In elderly TB patients the RR was 1.22 (1.13, 1.32). Analysis of each time point during the follow-up period showed that M. vaccae could help to improve the removal of acid-fast bacilli from the sputum, and promote improvement of radiological focal lesions and cavity closure. Compared with the control group, the differences in levels of immunological indicators of Th1 such as IL-2 and TNF-α were not statistical significant (P = 0.65 and 0.31 respectively), and neither was that of IL-6 produced by Th2 (P = 0.52). An effect of M. vaccae of prevention of liver damage was found in TB patients with hepatitis B (RR 0.20 and 95% CI (0.12, 0.33). No systemic adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Added to chemotherapy, M. vaccae is helpful in the treatment of never-treated TB patients in terms of improving both sputum conversion and X-ray appearances.

Mycobacterium vaccae vaccine to prevent tuberculosis in high risk people: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Mycobacterium vaccae (MV) in prevention of tuberculosis (TB) among high risk people. METHODS: Database of MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, SCI, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CBM, CNKI and VIP were searched till July 2009. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or non-randomized controlled clinical trials (CCTs) investigating MV as interventions in people at high risk of TB were identified for critical appraisal. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and quality assessment. Effectiveness of MV was summarized in different group of risk people through RevMan 5.0 by The Cochrane Collaboration. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included. Risk difference (RD) of protection index (PI), its 95% confidence interval (95%CI) and the P value were as following: MV vs. Isoniazid (INH): 0.02 (-0.01, 0.05) (P=0.12); MV vs. (INH plus RFT): 0.00 (-0.00, 0.00) (P=1.00); MV vs. Blank: 0.04 (0.00, 0.08) (P=0.03) for soldiers with PPD strong positive; 0.00 (-0.00, 0.00) (P=0.05) for students with PPD strong positive; 0.20 (0.05, 0.36) (P=0.01) for aged people of clinical cured pulmonary TB, and 0.08 (0.01, 0.14) (P=0.03) for type 2 diabetes mellitus. In HIV-infected people, The Risk Ratio (RR) of MV vs. CV (control vaccine) of positive stimulation index (SI) (> or = 3) in lymphocyte proliferation assays (LPA) to Mycobacterium vaccae sonicate (MVS) was 2.39 with 95% CI (1.56, 3.66), P<0.0001. Immunization had no adverse effects on CD4 cell count or HIV viral load. The most frequent adverse effects of MV were induration and sore arm. CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence shows that MV is effective in preventing TB in PPD strong positive/type 2 diabetes mellitus/aged people of clinical cured pulmonary TB, and is safe, well-tolerated and effective in inducing biologically relevant immune response against TB in HIV-infected patients. High-quality trials aimed at different groups of high risk people are encouraged.