Anticoagulation therapy in non-valvular atrial fibrillation after intracerebral hemorrhage: A propensity score-matched study.

BACKGROUND: The effect of antithrombotic therapy on patients with atrial fibrillation who sustained previous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains uncertain. Data regarding antithrombotic therapy use in these patients are limited. This study aims to compare the clinical and overall outcomes of antithrombotic therapy and usual care in patients with atrial fibrillation who sustained ICH. METHODS: We assembled consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation sustaining an ICH from our institution. Multivariable regression analysis and propensity-matched analysis were applied to assess associations of different antithrombotic therapies and outcomes. The primary outcome was mortality within the longest follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests of the time-to-event data were used to assess differences in survival. RESULTS: In total, 296 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation who survived an ICH were included in this study. Our analysis demonstrated that antithrombotic therapy was associated with reduced mortality up to a 4-year duration of follow-up (OR, 0.49, 95 % CI 0.30-0.81). Similar results were obtained from the propensity-matched analysis (OR, 0.58, 95 % CI 0.34-0.98). Subgroup analysis showed that compared with usual care, direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) with or without antiplatelet was associated with a lower risk of long-term mortality (OR, 0.34, 95 % CI 0.17-0.69). In addition, our analysis observed a significant interaction between cardiac insufficiency and treatment effect (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with atrial fibrillation who have a history of ICH, administration of antithrombotic therapy, especially DOAC, was associated with lower mortality. Future randomized trials are warranted to test the positive net clinical benefit of DOAC therapy.

Hematocrit drift and outcomes in surgical patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of conclusive evidence regarding the impact of downward drift in hematocrit levels among patients who have undergone surgical clipping for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). This study endeavors to explore the potential association between hematocrit drift and mortality in this specific patient population. METHODS: A cohort study was conducted, encompassing adult patients diagnosed with aSAH at a university hospital. The primary endpoint was follow-up mortality. Propensity score matching was employed to align patients based on their baseline characteristics. Discrimination capacity across various models was assessed and compared using net reclassification improvement (NRI). RESULTS: Among the 671 patients with aSAH in the study period, 118 patients (17.6%) experienced an in-hospital hematocrit drift of more than 25%. Following adjustment with multivariate regression analysis, patients with elevated hematocrit drift demonstrated significantly increased odds of mortality (aOR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.14 to 3.97; P = 0.019). Matching analysis yielded similar results (aOR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.05 to 4.10; P = 0.036). The inclusion of hematocrit drift significantly improved the NRI (P < 0.0001) for mortality prediction. When in-hospital hematocrit drift was served as a continuous variable, each 10% increase in hematocrit drift corresponded to an adjusted odds ratio of 1.31 (95% CI 1.08-1.61; P = 0.008) for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the findings from this comprehensive cohort study indicate that a downward hematocrit drift exceeding 25% independently predicts mortality in surgical patients with aSAH. These findings underscore the significance of monitoring hematocrit and managing anemia in this patient population.

Association between antithrombotic therapy and mortality in patients hospitalized for COVID­19.

BACKGROUND: The prothrombotic state is a common abnormality in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, there is controversy over the use of anticoagulants, especially oral anticoagulants (OAC) due to limited studies. We sought to evaluate the association between antithrombotic therapy on mortality and clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 through propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed to include adult patients with COVID-19 in a university hospital. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and acute kidney injury (AKI) during hospitalization. PSM was used as a powerful tool for matching patients' baseline characteristics. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated from the models. RESULTS: Of 4,881 COVID-19 patients during the study period, 690 (14.1%) patients received antithrombotic therapy and 4,191 (85.9%) patients were under no antithrombotic therapy. After adjustment with multivariate regression analysis, patients receiving OAC, compared with those who did not receive any antithrombotic therapy, had significantly lower odds for in-hospital mortality (aOR: 0.46. 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.87; P= 0.017). PSM analysis observed similar results (aOR: 0.35. 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.61; P< 0.001). Moreover, in critically ill patients who received mechanical ventilation, antithrombotic treatment (aOR: 0.54. 95% CI: 0.32 to 0.89; P= 0.022) was associated with reduced risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The application OACs was associated with reduced hospital mortality and mechanical ventilation requirement in COVID-19 patients. Besides, antithrombotic treatment was associated with a reduction in in-hospital mortality among critically ill COVID-19 patients who required mechanical ventilation.