RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Colon cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors of the digestive system. Liver metastasis after colon cancer surgery is the primary cause of death in patients with colon cancer. AIM: To construct a novel nomogram model including various factors to predict liver metastasis after colon cancer surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 242 patients with colon cancer who were admitted and underwent radical resection for colon cancer in Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital from December 2019 to December 2022. Patients were divided into liver metastasis and non-liver metastasis groups. Sex, age, and other general and clinicopathological data (preoperative blood routine and biochemical test indexes) were compared. The risk factors for liver metastasis were analyzed using single-factor and multifactorial logistic regression. A predictive model was then constructed and evaluated for efficacy. RESULTS: Systemic inflammatory index (SII), C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR), red blood cell distribution width (RDW), alanine aminotransferase, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level, and lymphatic metastasis were different between groups (P < 0.05). SII, CAR, and RDW were risk factors for liver metastasis after colon cancer surgery (P < 0.05). The area under the curve was 0.93 for the column-line diagram prediction model constructed based on these risk factors to distinguish whether liver metastasis occurred postoperatively. The actual curve of the column-line diagram predicting the risk of postoperative liver metastasis was close to the ideal curve, with good agreement. The prediction model curves in the decision curve analysis showed higher net benefits for a larger threshold range than those in extreme cases, indicating that the model is safer. CONCLUSION: Liver metastases after colorectal cancer surgery could be well predicted by a nomogram based on the SII, CAR, and RDW.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common type of tumor with limited treatment options. Sintilimab and anlotinib hydrochloride are two extensively studied anticancer drugs. AIM: To probe the clinical value of combining sintilimab with anlotinib hydrochloride in MSS CRC treatment. METHODS: During the period spanning from April 2019 to April 2022, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital accommodated a cohort of 92 patients diagnosed with MSS CRC who were classified into two distinct groups in our study, the observation group and the control group. The control group was administered anlotinib hydrochloride as their designated therapy, whereas the observation group received the additional treatment of sintilimab in conjunction with the therapy assigned to the control group. The administration of treatment occurred in cycles consisting of a duration of 3 wk, and the evaluation of effectiveness took place subsequent to the completion of two consecutive cycles of treatment within both groups. A comparative analysis between the two groups was conducted to assess the short-term efficacy and ascertain the incidence of adverse events transpiring throughout the duration of the treatment period. Changes in the levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199), CA125, and T cell subsets (CD4+, CD8+, CD4+/CD8+) as well as the assessment of the quality of life using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 were compared between the two groups prior to and subsequent to therapy. Finally, a 1-year follow-up was conducted for both groups of patients, and the survival status was recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: The short-term effectiveness displayed by the observation group surpassed that exhibited by the control group, with a statistically significant discrepancy (76.09% vs 50.00%), reaching a significance level denoted as P < 0.05. Following the administration of treatment, the observation group manifested a considerable reduction in numerous serum indicators, which were found to be lower than the corresponding pretreatment levels within the same group as well as the post-treatment levels observed in the control group (P < 0.05). Post-treatment, the T lymphocyte subset levels within the observation group demonstrated a remarkable amelioration, surpassing the corresponding pre-treatment levels observed within the same group as well as the post-treatment levels observed in the control group (P < 0.05). Subsequent to the therapeutic intervention, the observation group showcased a notable amelioration in the scores associated with multiple dimensions of life quality. These scores outperformed the pretreatment scores within the same group as well as the post-treatment scores observed in the control group (P < 0.05). The safety levels of drug use in the two group were comparable (19.57% vs 13.04%), and no distinct difference was observed upon comparison (P > 0.05). After the completion of treatment, both groups of patients underwent a 1-year follow-up outside the hospital. Throughout this period, 1 patient within the observation group and 2 patients within the control group became untraceable and were lost to follow-up. During the follow-up period of the observation group, 12 patients died, resulting in a survival rate of 73.33% (33/45), while in the control group, 21 patients died, resulting in a survival rate of 52.27% (23/44). The implementation of Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a conspicuous contrast in survival rates exhibited by the two groups (log-rank = 4.710, P = 0.030). CONCLUSION: The combination of sintilimab and anlotinib hydrochloride demonstrated favorable efficacy in the treatment of MSS CRC patients, leading to improvements in patient immunity and prognosis. Additionally, it exerted inhibitory effects on the expression of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA199, and CA125.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world, which is seriously threatening the lives of patients. Due to the rapid development of the disease, patients were in the middle and advanced stages at the time of diagnosis and missed the best time for treatment. With the development of minimally invasive medicine, interventional therapy for advanced HCC has achieved promising results. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) are currently recognized as effective treatments. This study aimed to investigate the clinical value and safety of TACE alone and combined with TACE in the treatment of progression in patients with advanced HCC and to find a breakthrough for the early diagnosis and treatment of patients with advanced HCC. AIM: To investigate the efficacy and safety of hepatic TACE and TARE in advanced descending hepatectomy. METHODS: In this study, 218 patients with advanced HCC who were treated in the Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital from May 2016 to May 2021 were collected. Of the patients, 119 served as the control group and received hepatic TACE, 99 served as the observation group and were treated with hepatic TACE combined with TARE. The patients in two groups were compared in terms of lesion inactivation, tumor nodule size, lipiodol deposition, serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level in different periods, postoperative complications, 1-year survival rate, and clinical symptoms such as liver pain, fatigue, and abdominal distension, and adverse reactions such as nausea and vomiting. RESULTS: The observation group and the control group had good efficacy in treatment efficiency, reduction of tumor nodules, reduction of postoperative AFP value, reduction of postoperative complications, and relief of clinical symptoms. In addition, compared with the control group, the treatment efficiency, reduction of tumor nodules, reduction of AFP value, reduction of postoperative complications, and relief of clinical symptoms in the observation group were better than those in the TACE group alone. Patients in the TACE + TARE group had a higher 1-year survival rate after surgery, lipiodol deposition was significantly increased and the extent of tumor necrosis was expanded. The overall incidence of adverse reactions in the TACE + TARE group was lower than that in the TACE group, and the difference had statistical significance (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with TACE alone, TACE combined with TARE is more effective in the treatment of patients with advanced HCC. It also improves postoperative survival rate, reduces adverse effects, and has a better safety profile.
