Comprehensive evaluation of using computerised provider order-entry system for hospital discharge orders.

BACKGROUND: Computerised prescriptions for Hospital Discharge Orders (HDO) are used world-wide to secure medication processes. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate physicians' adoption of computerised provider order-entry (CPOE) for HDO and the prescribing error rate of HDO in an acute medical care unit. SETTING: A prospective study was conducted in an internal medicine department over a six-month period. The use rate of CPOE for HDO edition, prescription lines concordance between CPOE-edited HDO, exit prescriptions transcribed in the discharge summary (DS), and prescribing error rate in CPOE-edited HDO were all evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 407 patients with HDO were included in the study. HDO were edited via CPOE system for 350 patients (86%), among which 124 (35%) were identically transcribed, 217 (62%) had discrepancies, and nine (3%) were not transcribed in the discharge summary (DS). Prescription errors were analysed using the total of 2,854 drugs prescribed on HDO. Although hospital pharmacists had signalled discrepancies and provided recommendations to the prescribers via alerting pharmaceutical interventions in CPOE 67 prescription errors (error rate of 2.3%) were found. Errors included 53 cases of refractory period disrespected, four cases of drug interactions, three cases of drug redundancies, and two cases of excessive dosage. CONCLUSION: This study highlights that most HDO were edited via the CPOE system. Together with pharmacist's interventions, the CPOE system contributed to reducing the prescription error rate in HDO. However, discrepancies in the recording process to DS were frequent, calling for reinforcement of error prevention strategies upon the integration of a CPOE system in the hospital's Electronic Health Records. Providing regular training for physicians is also a requirement.

Concerning one case of rupture of a flow regulator: How patient safety procedures contribute to the correct use of medical devices.

Flow regulators are widely used in hospitals to assist with intravenous (IV) infusion of medication. The rupture of a flow regulator at the base of the clamp was observed during parenteral nutrition. This rupture resulted in fluid leakage and an inlet of air, responsible for an air embolism in a fragile patient who had undergone a bilateral lung transplant. The patient's clinical condition required him to be transferred to a continuous monitoring unit. A serious Adverse Event in Healthcare (AEH) was reported, as well as a medical device vigilance report. A Feedback Committee (FC) was set up and it recommended an audit within the health care departments to study the conditions for use of flow regulators and to propose corrective actions. Despite the technical data sheet of the device not recommending the administration of lipid emulsions and glucose solutions above 10%, the manufacturer's expert report concluded that the mechanical failure could not be linked to the type of solution. However, the audit did reveal a lack of knowledge of certain rules for using this device. The analysis of this AEH is part of the establishment's patient safety procedure. The AEH highlighted a deviation in care concerning the conditions for use of flow regulators, thus resulting in misuse. The collaboration between the various actors involved in the analysis of this AEH led to the implementation of improvement actions on the root causes, related to the lack of information and of training for professionals on correct use of the medical device.