The role of Gender in Operative Autonomy in orthopaedic Surgical Trainees (GOAST).

Aims: Global literature suggests that female surgical trainees have lower rates of independent operating (operative autonomy) than their male counterparts. The objective of this study was to identify any association between gender and lead/independent operating in speciality orthopaedic trainees within the UK national training programme. Methods: This was a retrospective case-control study using electronic surgical logbook data from 2009 to 2021 for 274 UK orthopaedic trainees. Total operative numbers and level of supervision were compared between male and female trainees, with correction for less than full-time training (LTFT), prior experience, and time out during training (OOP). The primary outcome was the percentage of cases undertaken as lead surgeon (supervised and unsupervised) by UK orthopaedic trainees by gender. Results: All participants gave permission for their data to be used. In total, 274 UK orthopaedic trainees submitted data (65% men (n = 177) and 33% women (n = 91)), with a total of 285,915 surgical procedures logged over 1,364 trainee-years. Males were lead surgeon (under supervision) on 3% more cases than females (61% (115,948/189,378) to 58% (50,285/86,375), respectively; p < 0.001), and independent operator (unsupervised) on 1% more cases. A similar trend of higher operative numbers in male trainees was seen for senior (ST6 to 8) trainees (+5% and +1%; p < 0.001), those with no time OOP (+6% and +8%; p < 0.001), and those with orthopaedic experience prior to orthopaedic specialty training (+7% and +3% for lead surgeon and independent operator, respectively; p < 0.001). The gender difference was less marked for those on LTFT training, those who took time OOP, and those with no prior orthopaedic experience. Conclusion: This study showed that males perform 3% more cases as the lead surgeon than females during UK orthopaedic training (p < 0.001). This may be due to differences in how cases are recorded, but must engender further research to ensure that all surgeons are treated equitably during their training.

Reimagining sexual and reproductive healthcare for LGBTQ communities.

Qualitative interviews were conducted with nine individuals identifying as LGBTQ to identify recommendations for improving sexual and reproductive healthcare at a local clinic on the California Central Coast. Interviewees were recruited at local Pride events. Grounded theory methodology revealed several themes related to participants' desires for a LGBTQ-affirmative sexual and reproductive healthcare setting. Themes identified included: Beyond Enacted Inclusivity (avoiding a performative demonstration of LGBTQ-affirming care); Anti-Institutional Care (a political and visual challenge to what the healthcare setting should look like), a One-Stop-Shop (encompassing several types of care under one roof); Constrained Visibility (where LGBTQ identities are reflected but not exposed); and Community and Social Wellness (to be in community with other LGBTQ-serving organisations and one another in mutual support and celebration). Research implications and clinical recommendations are described at the local and system levels.

Preferred terminology of people with serious mental illness.

People with serious mental illnesses (SMIs) have argued for name changes for their conditions given problems with oversimplification, stigma, and social exclusion. There is a need to better understand the terminology preferences of people with SMI. The present two-part qualitative study analyzed data regarding participant preferences and evaluations of different labels for SMIs using qualitative data analysis methodologies of grounded theory and content analysis. The range of names identified by people with SMI in the present qualitative interviews and the positive and negative evaluations of the different labels are presented. Results were integrated across Study 1 and Study 2 to identify the following preferred and nonpreferred terms for these mental health problems; mental illness, diagnosis, disorder, psychiatric disability, person in recovery, person with lived experience, mental health challenges/issues, chemical imbalance, symptom names, and self-constructed labels. These results suggest the need to identify and reflect the terminology preferences of each individual with mental health problems when seeking psychological services and recognize the varying benefits of different terms depending on time and context. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Metastatic bone disease: new quality performance indicator development.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with metastatic bone disease (MBD) should receive the same standard of care regardless of which centre they are treated in. The aim was to develop and test a set of quality performance indicators (QPIs) to evaluate care for patients with MBD referred to orthopaedics. METHODS: QPIs were adapted from the literature and ranked on feasibility and necessity during a modified RAND/Delphi consensus process. They were then validated and field tested in a retrospective cohort of 108 patients using indicator-specific targets set during consensus. RESULTS: 2568 articles including six guidelines were reviewed. 43 quality objectives were extracted and 40 proceeded to expert consensus. After two rounds, 18 QPIs for MBD care were generated, with the following generating the highest consensus: 'Patients with high fracture risk should receive urgent assessment' (combined mean 6.7/7, 95% CI 6.5 to 6.8) and 'preoperative workup should include full blood tests including group and save' (combined mean 6.7/7, 95% CI 6.5 to 6.9). In the pilot test, targets were met for 5/18 QPIs (mean 52%, standard deviation 22%). The median deviation from projected target was -14% (interquartile range -11% to -31%, range -74% to 11%). The highest scoring QPI was 'adults with fractures should have surgery within 7 days' (target 80%:actual 92%). CONCLUSIONS: The published evidence and guidelines were adapted into a set of validated QPIs for MBD care which can be used to evaluate variation in care between centres. These QPIs should be correlated with outcome scores to determine whether they can act as predictors of outcome after surgery.

Hip fracture care during the 2020 COVID-19 first-wave: a review of the outcomes of hip fracture patients at a Scottish Major Trauma Centre.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: This study reviewed whether the response to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic affected the care for hip fracture patients at a major trauma centre in Scotland during the first-wave lock-down period. METHODS: All patients referred to Orthopaedics with a hip fracture in a major trauma centre in Scotland were captured between 14 th March and 28 th May (11 weeks) in 2020 and 2019. Patients were identified using electronic patient records. The primary outcomes are time to theatre, length of admission and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes are COVID-19 prevalence, duration of surgery, proportion of patients to theatre within 36 hours and COVID-19 positive 30-day mortality from time of surgery. 225 patients were included: 108 from 2019 and 117 from 2020. THE MAIN FINDINGS: 30-day mortality was 3.7% (n=4) in 2019 and 8.5% (n=10) in 2020 (p=0.142). There was no statistical difference with time to theatre (p=0.150) nor duration of theatre (p=0.450). Duration of admission was reduced from 12 days to 6.5 days (p=<0.005). 4 patients tested positive for COVID-19 during admission, one 5 days after discharge, all underwent surgical management. 30-day mortality for COVID-19 positive patients during admission was 40%. COVID-19 prevalence of patients that were tested (n=89) was 5.62%. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown the care of hip fracture patients has been maintained during the COVID-19 pandemic. There is no statistically significant change in mortality, time to theatre, and duration of surgery, however, the patient's admission duration was significantly less than the 2019 cohort.

Clinical outcomes and ultrasonographic viability of GraftJacket® augmented rotator cuff repair: a prospective follow-up study with mean follow-up of forty-one months.

BACKGROUND: The management of large rotator cuff tears in patients without evidence of glenohumeral arthritis is challenging and controversial. We wished to investigate the viability of Graft Jacket® augmentation and assess the clinical and radiological outcomes in a prospective study with a select cohort of patients. METHODS: All procedures were performed by a single shoulder surgeon over a three-year period. Inclusion criteria were patients with large cuff tears (size 3-5 cm) not amenable to end-to-end repair. Patients with radiographic evidence of glenohumeral arthritis or cuff tear arthropathy were excluded. Open rotator cuff repair followed by bridging with GraftJacket® Regenerative Tissue Matrix was performed. Outcome was assessed with Constant scores (CS), QuickDash (QD) and Oxford Shoulder scores (OSS) at minimum twenty-two months and ultrasound assessment at nine months post-operatively. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were identified who fit inclusion criteria (one bilateral). No patients were lost to follow up. At final follow-up thirteen shoulders had achieved function range of movement. Mean CS was 83 (range 70-100), mean Quick DASH was 5.4 (range 0-18.2), and mean OSS was 46 (range 41-48). Shoulder ultrasound revealed an intact Graft Jacket® in these patients.One patient had lower functional movement and worse CS (34), QD (34.1) and OSS (25) and ultrasound assessment identified a re-rupture. DISCUSSION: This study indicates that augmentation of large rotator cuff repairs with a GraftJacket® scaffold is a viable option and has good functional results and sustained viability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

Glycemic and insulinemic responses to protein supplements.

OBJECTIVE: The effects of common servings of commercially marketed nutritional protein supplements on blood glucose and insulin responses were studied in 12 healthy men after ingestion of feedings that had varying carbohydrate and protein compositions. DESIGN: Fasting subjects consumed a 50-gram glucose drink, a white bagel, peanuts, a protein bar, or a protein drink in a counterbalanced fashion. SETTING: Subjects rested in a supine position and were not disturbed while blood samples were drawn at rest and at 10-minute intervals during the ensuing 2 hours. RESULTS: The area under the curve for glucose was greater in the glucose drink group vs all treatment groups except the white bagel group ( P <.05). At 20 to 40 minutes, plasma glucose was elevated in the glucose drink group vs the peanuts group, the protein bar group, and the protein drink group ( P <.05). The glycemic response was greater in the glucose drink group vs the white bagel group at 30 minutes (8.1+/-0.5 vs 6.5+/-0.3 mmol/L, respectively) ( P <.05). The area under the curve for insulin was lower in the peanuts group vs all treatment groups ( P <.05). Insulin concentrations peaked at 40 minutes in the glucose drink group (285.5+/-18.3 pmol) and was similar in all but the peanuts group (130.5+/-14.3 pmol) ( P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: A common serving of a commercially available protein supplement resulted in a marked insulin response with no glycemic response because of the lack of carbohydrate content. Inasmuch as many such supplements similar in composition are marketed on the bases of their nutritional energy benefits, these data underscore the need to educate consumers regarding appropriate fuel for exercise and nutritional supplement composition.