RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, observational study to describe the incidence of orthostatic hypotension (OH) and orthostatic hypertension (OHtn) and its association with symptoms at standing and outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: 321 active standing tests were performed in 87 inpatients during admission, and 316 tests were performed in 208 outpatients during follow-up. Blood pressure (BP) was measured by an automatic device 4 times in the supine position and at 1, 3 and 5 minutes of standing. Patients were queried about symptoms of orthostatic intolerance. The incidence of OH and OHtn was similar in both groups at baseline (classical OH 11%-22%, OHtn 3%-8%, depending on definition and timing). Reproducibility of BP changes with standing was low. Up to 50% of cases with abnormal responses were asymptomatic. Symptoms were variable and occurred mainly during the first minute of standing and had a U-shaped association with BP changes. OH in outpatients with HF was associated with a higher risks of death or readmission due to HF. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HF have variable hemodynamic responses and symptoms during repeated active standing tests. OH might identify outpatients with HF who are at risk of long-term negative outcomes.
Assuntos
Pressão Sanguínea , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Hipotensão Ortostática , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Humanos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hipotensão Ortostática/fisiopatologia , Hipotensão Ortostática/epidemiologia , Hipotensão Ortostática/diagnóstico , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Posição Ortostática , Hospitalização , Estudos de Coortes , Pacientes Internados , Determinação da Pressão Arterial/métodos , Seguimentos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hospitalization is an opportunity to optimize heart failure (HF) therapy. As optimal treatment for hospitalized HF patients in sinus rhythm with heart rate≥70bpm is unclear, we investigated the impact of combined beta-blocker (BB) and ivabradine versus BBs alone on short and longer term mortality and rehospitalization. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 370 hospitalized HF patients with heart rate≥70bpm (150 BB+ivabradine, 220 BB alone) in the Optimize Heart Failure Care Program in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Russia, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan, from October 2015 to April 2016. RESULTS: At 1month, 3months, 6months and 12months, there were fewer deaths, HF hospitalizations and overall hospitalizations in patients on BB+ivabradine vs BBs alone. At 12months, all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization was significantly lower with BB+ivabradine than BBs (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.64, P<0.0001). Significantly greater improvement was seen in quality of life (QOL) from admission to 12months with BB+ivabradine vs BBs alone (P=0.0001). With BB+ivabradine, significantly more patients achieved ≥50% target doses of BBs at 12months than on admission (82.0% vs 66.6%, P=0.0001), but the effect was non-significant with BBs alone. CONCLUSIONS: Heart rate lowering therapy with BB+ivabradine started in hospitalized HF patients (heart rate≥70bpm) is associated with reduced overall mortality and re-hospitalization over the subsequent 12months. A prospective randomized trial is needed to confirm the advantages of this strategy.