A mixed methods study of perceptions of bias among neonatal intensive care unit staff.

BACKGROUND: Inequity in neonatology may be potentiated within neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) by the effects of bias. Addressing bias can lead to improved, more equitable care. Understanding perceptions of bias can inform targeted interventions to reduce the impact of bias. We conducted a mixed methods study to characterize the perceptions of bias among NICU staff. METHODS: Surveys were distributed to all staff (N = 245) in a single academic Level IV NICU. Respondents rated the impact of bias on their own and others' behaviors on 5-point Likert scales and answered one open-ended question. Kruskal-Wallis test (KWT) and Levene's test were used for quantitative analysis and thematic analysis was used for qualitative analysis. RESULTS: We received 178 responses. More respondents agreed that bias had a greater impact on others' vs. their own behaviors (KWT p < 0.05). Respondents agreed that behaviors were influenced more by implicit than explicit biases (KWT p < 0.05). Qualitative analysis resulted in nine unique themes. CONCLUSIONS: Staff perceive a high impact of bias across different domains with increased perceived impact of implicit vs. explicit bias. Staff perceive a greater impact of others' biases vs. their own. Mixed methods studies can help identify unique, unit-responsive approaches to reduce bias. IMPACT: Healthcare staff have awareness of bias and its impact on their behaviors with patients, families, and staff. Healthcare staff believe that implicit bias impacts their behaviors more than explicit bias, and that they have less bias than others. Healthcare staff have ideas for strategies and approaches to mitigate the impact of bias. Mixed method studies are effective ways of understanding environment-specific perceptions of bias, and contextual assets and barriers when creating interventions to reduce bias and improve equity. Generating interventions to reduce the impact of bias in healthcare requires a context-specific understanding of perceptions of bias among staff.

Association of Virtual Interviews With Residency Application Geographic Diversity and Match.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess whether the change from in-person to virtual interviews was associated with differences in applicant and match location geography. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of all U.S. applicants to a large pediatric residency. Distances from applicants to our residency program (applicant-to-program) and residency location (applicant-to-match) were compared across demographic subgroups and eras, defined as pre-COVID (2018-2020) and COVID (2021-2022). RESULTS: Applicant-to-program distance (pre-COVID median 737 miles, IQR 265, 1254; COVID median 739 miles; IQR 268, 1284, P = .31) did not change across eras. While overall applicant-to-match distance (pre-COVID median 425 miles, IQR 88, 1142; COVID median 354 miles; IQR 80, 1084, P = .11) did not change, subgroup analysis revealed that applicant-to-match distance for those not participating in a couples match was farther during the pre-COVID era (430 vs 340 miles, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: A transition to virtual interviews was associated with shorter distance between applicants and residency location for those matching alone at a large, urban pediatric residency. While decisions about where to apply appeared unchanged, rank list decisions may have been impacted by virtual interviews for these applicants. Further study to describe geographic considerations in the virtual era are needed to inform advancement of larger workforce goals.

A Community-Based COVID-19 Vaccine Education Initiative.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had a disparate impact on Black and Latinx communities. Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, inaccessibility and distrust of the medical community rooted in historical oppression led to hesitancy about medical interventions. In Boston, COVID-19 vaccination rates of Black and Latinx adolescents lagged behind their white and Asian peers. In response, Boston Medical Center created community vaccine clinic sites across Suffolk County. Pediatric resident physicians subsequently partnered with Boston Medical Center to establish an accompanying education program entitled "Ask-a-Doc" to help improve health literacy and address vaccine hesitancy that focused on Black and Latinx adolescents. In partnership with multidisciplinary stakeholders, including Boston Public School leaders, Ask-a-Doc pediatric resident physicians staffed 46 community vaccine events in 15 zip codes. At these events, 1521 vaccine doses were administered, with most administered to Black and Latinx community members. As of January 1, 2022, 67% of 51 first-year pediatric resident physicians had participated. Ask-A-Doc is an example of a community-based intervention that directly targets health inequities and misinformation and demonstrates that pediatric resident physicians can meaningfully engage in community outreach with sufficient protected time, resources, and institutional support. The resulting connections may lead to greater trust and credibility within systematically oppressed communities.

Effect of a Novel Mindfulness Curriculum on Burnout During Pediatric Internship: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Mindfulness curricula can improve physician burnout, but implementation during residency presents challenges. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether a novel mindfulness curriculum implemented in the first 6 months of internship reduces burnout. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This pragmatic, multicenter, stratified cluster randomized clinical trial of a mindfulness curriculum randomized 340 pediatric interns to the intervention or control arm within program pairs generated based on program size and region. Fifteen US pediatric training programs participated from June 14, 2017, to February 28, 2019. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention included 7 hour-long sessions of a monthly mindfulness curriculum (Mindfulness Intervention for New Interns) and a monthly mindfulness refresher implemented during internship. The active control arm included monthly 1-hour social lunches. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was emotional exhaustion (EE) as measured by the Maslach Burnout Inventory 9-question EE subscale (range, 7-63; higher scores correspond to greater perceived burnout). Secondary outcomes were depersonalization, personal accomplishment, and burnout. The study assessed mindfulness with the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire and empathy with the Interpersonal Reactivity Index subscales of perspective taking and empathetic concern. Surveys were implemented at baseline, month 6, and month 15. RESULTS: Of the 365 interns invited to participate, 340 (93.2%; 255 [75.0%] female; 51 [15.0%] 30 years or older) completed surveys at baseline; 273 (74.8%) also participated at month 6 and 195 (53.4%) at month 15. Participants included 194 (57.1%) in the Mindfulness Intervention for New Interns and 146 (42.9%) in the control arm. Analyses were adjusted for baseline outcome measures. Both arms' EE scores were higher at 6 and 15 months than at baseline, but EE did not significantly differ by arm in multivariable analyses (6 months: 35.4 vs 32.4; adjusted difference, 3.03; 95% CI, -0.14 to 6.21; 15 months: 33.8 vs 32.9; adjusted difference, 1.42; 95% CI, -2.42 to 5.27). None of the 6 secondary outcomes significantly differed by arm at month 6 or month 15. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A novel mindfulness curriculum did not significantly affect EE, burnout, empathy, or mindfulness immediately or 9 months after curriculum implementation. These findings diverge from prior nonrandomized studies of mindfulness interventions, emphasizing the importance of rigorous study design and suggesting that additional study is needed to develop evidence-based methods to reduce trainee burnout. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03148626.

MINdI: Mindfulness Instruction for New Interns.

Introduction: Trainee burnout has reached epidemic proportions and is increasing among physicians compared to non-health care professionals. Burnout is associated with depression and lower empathy, poor patient adherence to medical plans, and early physician retirement. Mindfulness is the quality of being nonjudgmental and present and has been shown to decrease physician burnout. Implementation of mindfulness curricula may decrease trainee burnout. Methods: Using Kern's six-step approach, we developed an easy-to-implement, facilitator-friendly mindfulness curriculum for pediatric interns. Curricular sessions were held monthly during preexisting 1-hour didactics over 6 months, facilitated by individuals without mindfulness experience. Learners were assessed on knowledge, attitudes, and behavior with postintervention surveys during a pilot in 2016. Qualitative data were used for curricular improvement resulting in the published curriculum. Results: Postcurriculum surveys from our pilot revealed that 69% of interns reported a more positive attitude toward mindfulness, while 62% reported having (1) greater knowledge about evidence supporting mindfulness, (2) improved knowledge on how to apply mindfulness techniques, and (3) the belief that techniques they had learned positively impacted their lives. Thirty-three percent endorsed using mindfulness techniques more frequently than they had prior to the start of the mindfulness curriculum. Discussion: Our novel curriculum provided longitudinal mindfulness training that meaningfully impacted trainee knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes. The curricular structure overcame the need for local topic experts and was feasible to implement within the confines of our complex program structure. Ongoing work will determine the impact of our curriculum on objective measures of burnout, empathy, and mindfulness.

Pediatric Quality Improvement (QI) Virtual Practicum: Adapting a QI Simulator.

Introduction: Pediatric residencies are expected to arm trainees with skills in quality improvement (QI) that allow trainees to systematically enhance their own practice. Simulation has been shown to be effective in teaching QI, but there are no published QI simulation tools that target pediatric learners. Methods: We adapted a previously developed QI simulation to include a case relevant for pediatric residents. Participants devised interventions using basic QI principles with iterative feedback from facilitators with knowledge of QI methodology. Changes in resident knowledge, attitudes about the curriculum, and depth of engagement in QI were assessed using pre- and posttests, surveys, and assessment of independent QI activities performed prior to graduation, respectively. Results: Eighty-two residents completed the simulation. Of the 76 residents who completed both the pre- and posttests, which each had a total possible score of 28 points, 68% had improved posttest scores, with an average score increase of 2.6 points (SD = 0.6, p < .001). Improvements were most pronounced for residents that scored in the lowest quartile on the pretest. After the simulation, residents reported greater confidence in and likelihood of completing a QI initiative. There was no difference in the level of involvement in future independent QI activities completed by residents who were simulation participants compared with nonparticipants. Discussion: Adapting a previously published QI simulation for pediatric residents was feasible and effective, and the QI simulation was well-liked by learners. Those with lower baseline QI knowledge may have the most to gain from this simulation.

Encouraging Entrustment: A Qualitative Study of Resident Behaviors That Promote Entrustment.

PURPOSE: To explore resident and attending physician perceptions of resident behaviors and skills that demonstrate trustworthiness and promote entrustment by supervisors. METHOD: Using grounded theory methodology, the authors conducted 3 focus groups with pediatric residents from the Boston Combined Residency Program and 3 focus groups with attending physicians who were either general pediatric hospitalists or other pediatric subspecialists at Boston Children's Hospital and Boston Medical Center in Boston, Massachusetts, from May to December 2018. Data were collected and analyzed iteratively until theoretical saturation was achieved. Three independent reviewers coded each transcript. Codes were grouped into dominant themes to develop a conceptual model. RESULTS: Twelve residents and 18 attending physicians participated in the focus groups. Participants described actions that they felt actively demonstrated residents' trustworthiness within previously described domains of trustworthiness. Four modifiers emerged that affect a resident's progression from trustworthiness to entrustment: (1) self-management, (2) relationships, (3) self-advocacy, and (4) patient-centeredness. Findings were synthesized into a conceptual model depicting how trainees can promote their own entrustment by supervisors. CONCLUSIONS: Trainees must actively demonstrate their trustworthiness to be entrusted. This study proposes that trainees can further gain entrustment through self-management, relationships, self-advocacy, and patient-centeredness. When they understand the actions and behaviors that promote entrustment, trainees may be better able to foster autonomy and progress toward more independent clinical practice. These findings add to existing evidence regarding entrustment and provide a novel, actionable framework for trainees to increase their own entrustment.

Evaluating the Feasibility of Incorporating In-Person Interpreters on Family-Centered Rounds: A QI Initiative.

OBJECTIVES: No best practice has been defined for incorporating in-person interpreters into family-centered rounds (FCRs) for patients with limited English proficiency (LEP). We hypothesized that addressing barriers to scheduling in-person interpreters would make FCR encounters more likely, and thus ensure more equitable care for LEP patients. METHODS: A quality improvement initiative was conducted from October 2014 to March 2016 to arrange in-person interpreters for LEP patients during FCRs on the inpatient pediatric service of a large, urban, tertiary care center in Boston. Main interventions included establishing a protocol for scheduling interpreters for rounds and the implementation of a form to track process adherence. Our primary outcome was the percentage of FCR encounters with LEP patients with an interpreter present. Our balancing measures were patient satisfaction, which was assessed using validated surveys administered weekly by nonphysician team members through convenience sampling of families present on the wards, and rounds duration. RESULTS: There were 614 encounters with LEP patients during the intervention, 367 of which included in-person interpreters. The percentage of encounters with LEP patients involving interpreters increased from 0% to 63%. Form completion, our primary process measure, reached 87% in the most recent phase. English-proficient and LEP patients reported similar satisfaction with their rounding experience amid a modest increase in rounds duration (preintervention, 105 minutes; postintervention, 130 minutes; P = .056). CONCLUSIONS: Using quality improvement as a framework to address key barriers, we successfully implemented a process that increased the participation of in-person interpreters on FCRs on a busy pediatric service.

Social Media: Portrait of an Emerging Tool in Medical Education.

OBJECTIVE: The authors compare the prevalence of challenges and opportunities in commentaries and descriptive accounts versus evaluative studies of social media use in medical education. METHODS: A previously published report of social media use in medical education provided an in-depth discussion of 14 evaluative studies, a small subset of the total number of 99 articles on this topic. This study used the full set of articles identified by that review, including the 58 commentaries and 27 descriptive accounts which had not been previously reported, to provide a glimpse into how emerging tools in medical education are initially perceived. Each commentary, descriptive account, and evaluative study was identified and compared on various characteristics, including discussion themes regarding the challenges and opportunities of social media use in medical education. RESULTS: Themes related to the challenges of social media use in medical education were more prevalent in commentaries and descriptive accounts than in evaluative studies. The potential of social media to affect medical professionalism adversely was the most commonly discussed challenge in the commentaries (53%) and descriptive accounts (63%) in comparison to technical issues related to implementation in the evaluative studies (50%). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the early body of literature on social media use in medical education-like that of previous innovative education tools-comprises primarily commentaries and descriptive accounts that focus more on the challenges of social media than on potential opportunities. These results place social media tools in historical context and lay the groundwork for expanding on this novel approach to medical education.

Social media use in medical education: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: The authors conducted a systematic review of the published literature on social media use in medical education to answer two questions: (1) How have interventions using social media tools affected outcomes of satisfaction, knowledge, attitudes, and skills for physicians and physicians-in-training? and (2) What challenges and opportunities specific to social media have educators encountered in implementing these interventions? METHOD: The authors searched the MEDLINE, CINAHL, ERIC, Embase, PsycINFO, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus databases (from the start of each through September 12, 2011) using keywords related to social media and medical education. Two authors independently reviewed the search results to select peer-reviewed, English-language articles discussing social media use in educational interventions at any level of physician training. They assessed study quality using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. RESULTS: Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria. Interventions using social media tools were associated with improved knowledge (e.g., exam scores), attitudes (e.g., empathy), and skills (e.g., reflective writing). The most commonly reported opportunities related to incorporating social media tools were promoting learner engagement (71% of studies), feedback (57%), and collaboration and professional development (both 36%). The most commonly cited challenges were technical issues (43%), variable learner participation (43%), and privacy/security concerns (29%). Studies were generally of low to moderate quality; there was only one randomized controlled trial. CONCLUSIONS: Social media use in medical education is an emerging field of scholarship that merits further investigation. Educators face challenges in adapting new technologies, but they also have opportunities for innovation.