Stratifying outcome based on the Oswestry Disability Index for operative treatment of adult spinal deformity on patients 60 years of age or older: a multicenter, multi-continental study on Prospective Evaluation of Elderly Deformity Surgery (PEEDS).

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Patients with adult spinal deformity suffer from disease related disability as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for which surgery can result in significant improvements. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to show the change in overall and individual components of the ODI in patients aged 60 years or older following multi-level spinal deformity surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, multi-continental, observational longitudinal cohort study PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients ≥60 years undergoing primary spinal fusion surgery of ≥5 levels for coronal, sagittal or combined deformity. OUTCOME MEASURES: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) METHODS: : Patients completed the ODI pre-operatively for baseline, then at 10 weeks, 12 months and 24 months post-operatively. ODI scores were grouped into deciles, and change was calculated with numerical score and improvement or worsening was further categorized from baseline as substantial (≥20%), marginal (≥10-<20%) or no change (within 10%). RESULTS: Two-hundred nineteen patients met inclusion criteria for the study. The median number of spinal levels fused was 9 [Q1=5.0, Q3=12.0]. Two-year mean (95% CI) ODI improvement was 19.3% (16.7%; 21.9%; p<.001) for all age groups, with mean scores improved from a baseline of 46.3% (44.1%; 48.4%) to 41.1% (38.5%; 43.6%) at 10 weeks (p<.001), 28.1% (25.6%; 30.6%) at 12 months (p<.001), and 27.0% (24.4%; 29.5%) at 24 months (p<.001). At 2 years, 45.5% of patients showed 20% or greater improvement in ODI, 23.7% improved between 10% and 20%, 26.3% reported no change (defined as±10% from baseline), 4.5% of patients reported a worsening between 10% to 20%, and none reported worsening greater than 20%. 59.0% of patients were severely disabled (ODI >40%) pre-operatively, which decreased to 20.2% at 2 years. Significant improvement was observed across all 10 ODI items at 12 and 24 months. The largest improvements were seen in pain, walking, standing, sex life, social life and traveling. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective, multicenter, multi-continental study of patients 60 years or older undergoing multi-level spinal deformity surgery, almost 70% of patients reported significant improvements in ODI without taking into account surgical indications, techniques or complications. Clear data is presented demonstrating the particular change from baseline for each decile of pre-operative ODI score, for each sub-score, and for each age group.

Concomitant atlantoaxial and atlanto-occipital rotatory dislocation in children: Radiological features, diagnostic pitfalls, and long-term outcome.

While the pathological manifestation of atlantoaxial rotatory dislocation has been well described in the medical literature, the combined dislocation of the atlantoaxial and atlanto-occipital joints, or OAARD - short for occipital-atlantoaxial rotatory dislocation - is a condition which has been poorly elucidated and probably underdiagnosed. We believe that the pathogenesis of combined atlantoaxial and atlanto-occipital dislocation is most likely a result of untreated atlantoaxial rotatory dislocation leading to chronic secondary compensation measures occurring at the occiput-C1 joints. Unique clinical and radiological features lead to difficulty in diagnosis, and conventional treatment algorithms may not apply. This paper describes a combination of clinical and radiological features which can help clinicians correctly diagnose and treat OAARD.

Current status of the magnetically controlled growing rod in treatment of early-onset scoliosis: What we know after a decade of experience.

The magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) has had approximately 10 years of clinical experience worldwide. Clinical effectiveness to control early-onset scoliosis is consistent even at final surgery. MCGRs have significantly lower relative percentage of infection or wound complications as compared to traditional growing rods. Most common complications include foundation failure and failure of distraction. Contouring of the rod especially at the proximal segment while accommodating for the straight actuator remains a difficult task and its failure may lead to proximal junctional kyphosis. Unique complications of MCGR include clunking, temporary diminishing distraction gains, and metallosis. Temporary reductions in distraction gains are observed as the MCGR lengthens but return to normal baseline distraction gains after rod exchange. Lack of standardization for rod configuration, distraction strategies and decisions of whether to keep the rods in situ, remove without fusion surgery or to perform spinal fusion at skeletal maturity will require further study.

Reliability of Rod Lengthening, Thoracic, and Spino-Pelvic Measurements on Biplanar Stereoradiography in Patients Treated With Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: To assess the inter- and intraobserver reliability of thoracic, spino-pelvic, and rod lengthening measurements made on biplanar spinal stereoradiography (EOS imaging) in children treated with magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: MCGR treatment aims to gain spine length while gradually correcting the spinal deformity. Monitoring thoracic and spino-pelvic parameters is crucial for successful management. EOS imaging is widely used for diagnosis and monitoring of children with Early Onset Scoliosis. However, there is a paucity of literature on the reliability of thoracic and spino-pelvic parameters on EOS imaging in children treated with MCGR. METHODS: Three independent reviewers independently read a random assortment of 20 whole spine posteroanterior and lateral radiographs from patients treated with MCGR. The measurements were repeated 4 weeks after the initial read. The following radiological parameters were measured: Cobb angle of the main and compensatory curves, coronal balance, coronal T1-S1 and T1-T12 length, chest width and depth at T6, pelvic inlet width, MCGR distracted lengths, global kyphosis, proximal and distal junctional angle, lordosis, sagittal balance, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt and sacral slope. Statistical analysis was performed with paired t test and Cronbach alpha for inter- and intraobserver reliability. RESULTS: All measurements had good or excellent intra- and interobserver reliability (α>0.8; P < 0.05), except measurements of the proximal junctional angle which showed only poor intra- and interobserver reliability for patients with an upper instrumented vertebra cranial to T4. CONCLUSION: EOS imaging is reliable for diagnosis and monitoring of children with Early Onset Scoliosis treated with MCGR. EOS imaging is particularly excellent for assessment of MCGR lengthening. Diagnosis and interpretation of early proximal junctional kyphosis within the cervicothoracic junction should be made with caution. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

A correlation study between in-brace correction, compliance to spinal orthosis and health-related quality of life of patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that in-brace correction is the best guideline for prediction of the results of brace treatment for patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). However, bracing may be a stressful experience for patients and bracing non-compliance could be psychologically related. The purpose of this study was to assess the correlation between brace compliance, in-brace correction and QoL of patients with AIS. METHODS: Fifty-five patients with a diagnosis of AIS were recruited. All were female and aged 10 years or above when a brace was prescribed, none had undergone prior treatment, and all had a Risser sign of 0-2 and a Cobb angle of 25-40°. The patients were examined in three consecutive visits with 4 to 6 months between each visit. The Chinese translated Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS), the Chinese translated Brace Questionnaires (BrQ) and the Chinese translated SRS-22 Questionnaires were used in the study. The in-brace Cobb angle, vertebral rotation and trunk listing were also measured. Patients' compliance, in-brace correction and patients' QoL were assessed. To identify the relationship among these three areas, logistic regression model and generalized linear model were used. RESULT: For the compliance measure, a significant difference (p = 0.008) was detected on TAPS mean score difference between Visit 1 and Visit 2 in the least compliant group (0-8 hours) and the most compliant group (17-23 hours). In addition, a significant difference (p = 0.000) was detected on BrQ mean score difference between Visit 2 and Visit 3 in the least compliant group (0-8 hours) and the most compliant group (17-23 hours). For the orthosis effectiveness measure, no significant difference was detected between the three groups of bracing hours (0-8 hours, 9-16 hours, 17-23 hours) on in-brace correction (below 40% and 40% or above). For the QoL measure, no significant difference was detected between the two different in-brace correction groups (below 40% and 40% or above) on QoL as reflected by the TAPS, BrQ and SRS-22r mean scores. CONCLUSION: The results showed a positive relationship between patients' brace wear compliance and patients' QoL. Poor compliance would cause a lower QoL.

Treatment of stiff thoracic scoliosis by thoracoscopic anterior release combined with posterior instrumentation and fusion.

BACKGROUND: Thoracoscopic anterior release has been shown that it can effectively improve spinal flexibility in animal and human cadaveric studies, and has been advocated for use in patients with scoliosis. This prospective case series aims to investigate the improvement of the spinal flexibility and the effectiveness in deformity correction by anterior thoracoscopic release and posterior spinal fusion. METHODS: Eleven patients with stiff idiopathic thoracic scoliosis underwent anterior thoracoscopic release followed by posterior instrumentation. The average number of discs excised was five. Spinal flexibility was assessed by the fulcrum bending technique. Cobb angle before and after the anterior release was compared. RESULTS: The patients were followed for an average of 5.6 years (range 2.2 to 8.1 years). Fulcrum bending flexibility was increased from 39% before the thoracoscopic anterior spinal release to 54% after the release. The average Cobb angle before anterior release was 74 degrees on the standing radiograph and 45 degrees with the fulcrum-bending radiograph. This reduced to 34 degrees on the fulcrum-bending radiograph after the release, and highly corresponded to the 31 degrees measured at the post-operative standing radiograph. CONCLUSION: It was demonstrated in patients with stiff idiopathic thoracic scoliosis that thoracoscopic anterior spinal release can effectively improve the spinal flexibility and increase the correction of the spinal deformity.