L-selectin shedding in sepsis limits leukocyte mediated microvascular injury at remote sites.

BACKGROUND: Increased soluble L-selectin levels have been shown to attenuate local inflammation-mediated microvascular leakage, and failure to generate high levels has been associated with increased risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome in septic patients. We hypothesized that failure to shed L-selectin in systemic inflammation would result in increased local inflammation-induced leukocyte adherence and microvascular leakage. METHODS: Using intraperitoneal lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or control bicarbonate buffered saline (BBS) and intrascrotal TNFalpha or BBS, mice were randomized to systemic inflammation (LPSip + BBSis), local inflammation (BBSip + TNFis), both (LPSip + TNFis), or control (BBSip+BBSis). Furthermore, mice received intraperitoneal L-selectin Sheddase inhibitor (Ro31-9790) or control vector. With intravital microscopy on cremaster muscle, we measured leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions and microvascular leakage (permeability index). Surface L-selectin was measured by flow cytometry (MCF). RESULTS: Without Ro31-9790, systemic inflammation attenuated increases induced by local inflammation in leukocyte adherence and vascular leakage. Ro31-9790 significantly increased adherence and leakage in systemic and systemic + local inflammation. L-selectin was shed progressively by increasing degrees of inflammation. Ro31-9790 limited this shedding of L-selectin. CONCLUSION: In systemic inflammation, L-selectin shedding is required to limit local inflammation-mediated leukocyte adherence and microvascular leakage. Failure to shed L-selectin may increase leukocyte-mediated end-organ injury in septic patients.

Safe implementation of laparoscopic gastrectomy in a community-based general surgery practice.

BACKGROUND: This study reviewed a 3-year experience with the implementation of laparoscopic gastrectomy at a community hospital. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified all patients that underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy between January 2004 and March 2007. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, length of stay, operative time, and short-term outcomes (postoperative complications and death) were examined. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were identified; 25 (51%) were male. Median age was 68 years (range 31-90 years). Thirty-five (71%) and seven (14%) patients presented with adenocarcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), respectively. Median operative time was 169 min (range 23-387 min). Conversion to open laparotomy was necessary in six cases (12%). Median length of stay was 5 days (range 0-48 days). There were four (8.2%) postoperative deaths, and eight major complications, which included: myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, duodenal stump leak, bleeding, dehiscence, anastomotic leak, and obstruction. Of patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy with curative intent, 36/38 (95%) underwent R0 resection. Median number of lymph nodes that were pathologically evaluated was 11 (range 1-27). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to report on the implementation of laparoscopic gastrectomy in a community hospital setting. Laparoscopic gastrectomy can be performed safely in a community hospital setting with operative times and length of stay that are comparable to open cases. Our short-term outcomes are comparable with existing studies from academic/university centers.